DEF 14A of Rex American Resources Corp, Apr 25, 2025

DEF 14A of Rex American Resources Corp

Filed Apr 25, 2025 · FY20240000930413-25-001442

Open on EDGAR
  1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS (Item 1)

    ELECTION OF DIRECTORS (Item 1) Nine directors are to be elected at the Annual Meeting to hold office until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until their successors are elected and qualified. Unless otherwise directed, it is the intention of the persons named in the accompanying proxy to vote each proxy for the election of the nominees listed below. All nominees are presently directors of REX and all nominees have given their consent to being named as a candidate. If at the time of the Annual Meeting any nominee is unable or declines to serve, the proxy holders will vote for the election of such substitute nominee as the Board of Directors may recommend. We have no reason to believe that any substitute nominee will be required. Directors are elected by a majority of votes cast unless the election is contested, in which case directors are elected by a plurality vote. A majority of votes cast means that the number of shares voted “for” a nominee must exceed the number of votes cast “against” that nominee. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect. If a non-incumbent nominee receives a greater number of votes cast “against” than cast “for”, that non-incumbent nominee is not elected to the Board. Any incumbent director nominee who receives a greater number of votes cast “against” than votes “for” shall continue to serve as a “holdover director” under Delaware law, but shall tender his or her resignation as a director. Within 90 days, the Board will decide, after taking into account the recommendation of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee and excluding the nominee in question, whether to accept the resignation. The Board will promptly disclose its decision on a Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Set forth below is certain information with respect to the nominees for director, including the experience, qualifications and skills we believe these individuals bring to the Board and qualify them to serve as directors. The following matrix summarizes the diversity of business skills and financial and reporting expertise of our directors.

  2. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS (Item 1)

    | | Stuart A. Rose | Zafar A. Rizvi | Edward M. Kress | David S. Harris | Charles A. Elcan | Mervyn L. Alphonso | Lee I. Fisher | Anne C. MacMillan | Cheryl L. Bustos | | Qualifications/Experience | | | | | | | | | | | Executive leadership experience | ✓ | ✓ | | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | | Financial/accounting literacy | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | | Legal expertise | | | ✓ | | | | ✓ | ✓ | | | Entrepreneurial experience | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | | | | ✓ | | Policy experience | | | | | | | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | | Independence | | | | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |

  3. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS (Item 1)

    STUART A. ROSE, 70, was appointed our Executive Chairman of the Board and Head of Corporate Development in 2015. Mr. Rose had served as our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer since our incorporation in 1984 as a holding company. Mr. Rose ceased to be our Chief Executive Officer in 2015. Prior to 1984, Mr. Rose was Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Rex Radio and Television, Inc., which he founded in 1980. Mr. Rose’s past leadership and current position provides the Board with essential insight into the Company’s strategic activities. ZAFAR A. RIZVI, 75, was appointed our Chief Executive Officer and a director in 2015. Mr. Rizvi has been our President and Chief Operating Officer since 2010, was Vice President from 2006 to 2010, and has been President of Farmers Energy Incorporated, our alternative energy investment subsidiary, since 2006. From 1991 to 2006, Mr. Rizvi was Vice President—Loss Prevention. Mr. Rizvi’s knowledge of the Company’s alternative energy investments and diverse management operation expertise provides the Board with operational perspective and promotes efficiencies in communications between management and the Board. EDWARD M. KRESS, 75, has been our Secretary since 1984 and a director since 1985. Mr. Kress has been a partner of the law firm of Dinsmore & Shohl LLP (formerly Chernesky, Heyman & Kress P.L.L.), our legal counsel, since 1988. Mr. Kress has practiced law in Dayton, Ohio since 1974. Mr. Kress, a lawyer and our legal counsel, provides the Board with critical legal advice and perspective. DAVID S. HARRIS, 65, has been a director since 2004 and Lead Director since 2015. Mr. Harris has served as President of Grant Capital, Inc., a private investment company, since 2002. Previously, he was a director of Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc., a restaurant franchisee, where he served in various roles from 2012 to 2024, including Chairman of the Audit and Compensation Committees and Chairman of the Board from 2020 to 2024. Mr. Harris served as chief operating officer of Seven Oaks Acquisition Corp., a special purpose acquisition company, from 2020 to 2021. Mr. Harris’ experience in corporate finance and capital markets and previous experience as a director of public companies is valuable to the Board in developing strategy and evaluating senior management. CHARLES A. ELCAN, 61, has been a director since 2003. Mr. Elcan has served as a partner of Frisco Partners since 2017. Mr. Elcan was previously a founder of, and President until 2017 of, China Healthcare Corporation, organized in 2008 to build and operate hospitals in China. Mr. Elcan was Executive Vice President—Medical Office Properties of Health Care Property Investors, Inc. (HCP), a real estate investment trust specializing in health care related real estate, from 2003 to 2008, and served as the Chief Executive Officer and President of MedCap Properties, LLC, a real estate company located in Nashville, Tennessee that owned, operated and developed real estate in the healthcare field, from 1998 to 2003. (HCP acquired MedCap Properties in 2003.) From 1992 to 1997, Mr. Elcan was a founder and investor in Behavioral Healthcare Corporation (now Ardent Health Services LLC), a healthcare company that owns and operates acute care hospitals. Mr. Elcan, a founder of health care real estate companies, brings to the Board entrepreneurial experience. MERVYN L. ALPHONSO, 84, has been a director since 2007. Mr. Alphonso retired as Vice President for Administration and Chief Financial Officer of Central State University in 2007. Mr. Alphonso has over 30 years of experience in the banking industry. He was President, Dayton District, KeyBank National Association from 1994 to 2000 and held various management positions with KeyBank of New York, N.A., and Crocker National Bank and Bankers Trust Company. Mr. Alphonso served as a Peace Corps volunteer from 2001 to 2003. Mr. Alphonso’s experience in the banking industry and as a chief financial officer provides the Board with financial management expertise. LEE I. FISHER, 73, has been a director since 2011 and previously served as a director from 1996 to 2006. Mr. Fisher has been appointed President of Baldwin Wallace University, effective July 1, 2025. Mr. Fisher was appointed Dean of Cleveland State University College of Law and Joseph C. Hostetler—Baker Hostetler Chair in Law in 2017 and will continue to serve as Dean until June 30, 2025. Prior to his appointment as Dean, he was President and Chief Executive Officer of CEOs for Cities, a non-profit national organization of urban leaders focused on revitalizing American cities. Mr. Fisher was also a Senior Fellow with the Levin College of Urban Affairs at Cleveland State University and an Urban Scholar with the College of Urban Planning and Public Affairs at the University of Illinois-Chicago. Mr. Fisher served as Lieutenant Governor of Ohio from 2007 to 2011, including as Director of the Ohio Department of Development and Chair of the Ohio Third Frontier Commission. He served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Center for Families and Children, a private non-profit human services organization, from 1999 to 2006. Mr. Fisher practiced law with the law firm of Hahn Loeser & Parks LLP from 1978 to 1990 and was a partner in the firm from 1995 to 1999. He served as Ohio Attorney General from 1991 to 1995, Ohio State Senator from 1983 to 1990 and Ohio State Representative from 1981 to 1983. Mr. Fisher was formerly a director of OfficeMax Incorporated. Mr. Fisher brings to the Board experience and understanding of law, government, higher education, public affairs, economic development, and regulatory and public policy. ANNE C. MACMILLAN, 46, has been a director since 2019. Ms. MacMillan has been a partner with Invariant GR since 2016, where she manages Invariant’s food, agriculture and trade practice, leveraging nearly 20 years of substantive policy experience from serving in the House of Representatives, the United States Department of Agriculture, and in corporate America. Ms. MacMillan served as the Director of Government Affairs for the Wonderful Company, a multi-billion dollar farming and consumer packaged goods company, from 2014-2016. Prior to that, Ms. MacMillan was at the United States Department of Agriculture, serving as Senior Advisor from 2010-2012, and as Deputy Chief of Staff from 2012-2014 where she developed and implemented the Agency’s regulatory agenda and managed key policy staff. Ms. MacMillan started her career on Capitol Hill with the late Bob Matsui (D-CA) and spent several years as the Legislative Director to Rep. Dennis Cardoza (D-CA), managing his Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee work in addition to assisting with his leadership of the Blue Dog Coalition. Ms. MacMillan then served as a senior policy advisor for Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) for the last two years of the Speaker’s first speakership. In this capacity, Ms. MacMillan managed all issues pertaining to agriculture and rural America, amongst other key priorities. Ms. MacMillan is a graduate of the University of California, San Diego and received her Juris Doctorate from The George Washington University Law School. Ms. MacMillan’s experience serving the agricultural industry, in both the public and private sector, brings a different perspective and insight to the Board.

  4. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS (Item 1)

    CHERYL L. BUSTOS, 63, has been a director since February 2023. Since December, 2023, she has been a partner of, and since January, 2023, she has been head of Illinois operations and Co-Chair of, Mercury Public Affairs, a public affairs consulting firm based in Washington, D.C. Ms. Bustos served in the United States House of Representatives, representing Illinois’ 17th Congressional District, from January, 2013 until January, 2023. While in the House of Representatives, Ms. Bustos served on the Agriculture Committee for 10 years and chaired its General Farm Commodities and Risk Management Subcommittee during a portion of that time. She also served on the House Appropriations Committee. Prior to serving in Congress, Ms. Bustos was Vice President of Corporate Communications for UnityPoint Health, a nonprofit integrated healthcare system, from 2008 to 2011; Senior Director of Corporate Communications for Trinity Regional Health System from 2001 to 2007; and a journalist with the Quad-City Times from 1985 to 2001. Ms. Bustos holds a bachelors degree in Government and Politics from the University of Maryland and a Masters in Public Affairs Reporting from the University of Illinois at Springfield. Ms. Bustos also is a board member of Ullico Inc., a privately held insurance and financial services holding company, and its subsidiary, Ullico Investment Advisors Inc., a registered investment advisor. Ms. Bustos provides the Board with extensive legislative experience at the local and national level, expertise in agricultural policy and familiarity with the agricultural community.

  5. Board of Directors

    Board of Directors Our Board of Directors currently consists of nine directors. The Board has determined that five of the nine, David S. Harris, Charles A. Elcan, Mervyn L. Alphonso, Lee I. Fisher and Anne C. MacMillan, are independent within the meaning of Section 303A.02 of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) Listed Company Manual. To be considered independent, the Board must determine that the director has no material relationship with the Company, either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company, including commercial, industrial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, charitable and family relationships, among others. Our Board has established the following guidelines, consistent with Section 303A.02 of the NYSE listing standards, to assist it in determining independence of directors.

  6. Board of Directors

    | • | A director who is an employee, or whose immediate family member (as defined in such guidelines) is an executive officer, of the Company is not independent until three years after the end of such employment relationship. | | • | A director who receives, or whose immediate family member receives, more than $120,000 during any 12-month period in direct compensation from the Company, other than director or committee fees and pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior service (not contingent in any way on continued service), is not independent until three years after he or she does not receive more than $120,000 of such compensation during any 12-month period. (Compensation received by an immediate family member for service as a non-executive employee need not be considered in determining independence under this test.) | | • | A director who is employed, or whose immediate family member is employed, as an executive officer of another company where any of the Company’s present executives at the same time serve on that company’s compensation committee is not independent until three years after the end of such service or the employment relationship. | | • | A director who is an employee, or whose immediate family member is an executive officer, of a company that makes payments to, or receives payments from, the Company for property or services |

  7. Board of Directors

    | in an amount which, in any single fiscal year, exceeds the greater of $1 million, or 2% of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues, is not independent until three years after falling below such threshold. |

  8. Board of Directors

    Messrs. Harris, Alphonso, Elcan and Fisher and Ms. MacMillan currently have no relationships with the Company other than being a director. In August, 2024, the Company entered into a consulting services agreement with Highstake 35 LLC doing business as Mercury Public Affairs under which the Company paid the firm $15,000 per month to provide certain consulting services to the Company for the period commencing August 1, 2024 through December 31, 2024. The Company subsequently extended the agreement through June 30, 2025. Ms. Bustos is a partner and officer of Mercury Public Affairs. At the time the consulting services agreement was approved, the Board also concluded that Ms. Bustos would no longer be independent after the agreement went into effect, and she resigned at that time as a member of the Audit and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committees. Our Board of Directors held six meetings during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2025. Directors are invited and encouraged to attend our Annual Meeting of Shareholders and all of our serving directors attended last year’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders. During our fiscal year ended January 31, 2025, each of our directors also attended 100% of the Board meetings and the meetings of each Committee on which such director served other than one director, who attended more than 80% of the meetings of the Board and each Committee on which such director served. Our Board of Directors also acted once during fiscal 2024 by unanimous written consent. The non-management directors have the opportunity to meet in executive sessions without management present following Audit Committee and Board meetings. The presiding director for each executive session is the independent Lead Director.

  9. Elements of Executive Compensation

    Elements of Executive Compensation The elements of our executive compensation program are discussed below. Base Salary. Base salaries of our executive officers reflect individual job responsibilities, with consideration for past contributions and length of service. Base salary levels generally are set at levels below that of salaries paid to executive officers of other public companies in the ethanol industry in recognition of their annual incentive opportunities. For comparative purposes, we review base salaries paid by companies in our industry peer group. We do not engage in benchmarking in setting or adjusting base salaries. The base salaries of our CEO, Mr. Rizvi, our CFO, Mr. Bruggeman, and our Executive Chairman, Mr. Rose, were increased in May, 2022 (effective for the full fiscal year) to $275,000, $300,000 and $225,000, respectively, based on a market assessment prepared by Pearl Meyer. These base salaries remained the same in fiscal 2024. Annual Incentive Program. Our annual incentive program is designed to reward executive officers for corporate performance and to incentivize those individuals to contribute to corporate profitability. Annual incentives are based on corporate performance and profitability measures. There are no individual performance goals or objectives. For fiscal 2024, the annual incentive opportunities for our executive officers were based upon and determined as a specific percentage of our Adjusted Net Income (as defined below). The specific percentage of Adjusted Net Income for each executive officer was determined on a scaled basis considering each officer’s overall responsibilities and contributions to corporate performance and operations, subject to individual maximum limits for the year. The individual specified percentages and maximum annual limits for each named executive officer, which were unchanged in fiscal 2024 from fiscal 2023 and fiscal 2022, were:

  10. Elements of Executive Compensation

    | Named Executive Officer | Fiscal 2024 Annual Incentive Payout | | Mr. Rizvi | $3,962,152 | | Mr. Bruggeman | $1,981,076 | | Mr. Rose | $2,201,196 |

  11. Elements of Executive Compensation

    Long-Term Incentive Program. The Company did not grant long-term incentive awards to the named executive officers for 2024. Based on the market assessment prepared by Pearl Meyer, effective as of May 24, 2022, the Compensation Committee approved a grant to Messrs. Rizvi and Bruggeman of performance-based long-term incentive awards under the Company’s 2015 Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) in the form of restricted stock units (“RSUs”), with vesting and payment based on total shareholder return of the Company (the “2022 TSR Awards”). The target number of RSU’s subject to the 2022 TSR Awards granted to Messrs. Rizvi and Bruggeman (after adjustment for the three-for-one common stock split effective August 5, 2022) were 45,000 units and 22,500 units, respectively. The number of RSU’s subject to each 2022 TSR Award that could vest at the end of the three year performance period, which commenced January 1, 2022, ranged from 0% to 200% of the specified target number of RSUs subject to the award, based on the Company’s total shareholder return (“TSR”) in comparison to the TSR of the companies that comprised the Russell 2000 Index during the performance period (with the ending stock prices based on a 60-day average through February 13, 2025), provided that the recipient of the award remained a full-time employee of the Company during the entire performance period. If the Company’s TSR was negative during the performance period, the maximum number of RSU’s that could vest was 100%, even for performance above the 60th percentile of the index group. The following table provides the TSR percentile rankings and corresponding payout levels:

  12. Elements of Executive Compensation

    | Company TSR Percentile Rank within the Russell 2000 Index: | Percentage Payout of Target 2022 TSR Award | Actual Result | Payout Percentage | | At or Below 40th percentile | 0% | | | | Above 40th percentile | 50% | | | | Above 50th percentile | 100% | 74th percentile | 148% | | Above 75th percentile | 150% | | | | 90th percentile or higher | 200% | | |

  13. Employment, Termination and Change in Control Arrangements

    Employment, Termination and Change in Control Arrangements We maintain employment agreements for each of our named executive officers which cover base salary, annual incentive award opportunities, and potential payments upon termination or change in control. These agreements provide that, upon a termination without cause, or for good reason within 12 months following a change in control, the executive would be entitled to his salary for the remainder of the employment period, and a cash payment equal to 200% of the total incentive bonus paid for the prior fiscal year, but not less than $1,000,000 and not more than $6,000,000 for Mr. Rizvi and not more than $3,000,000 for each of Messrs. Bruggeman and Rose. The Compensation Committee determined these payment amounts based upon competitive practices at the time the employment agreements were approved. The purpose of providing these severance benefits is to compensate executives in the event of a termination of employment not reflective of individual performance and to assure that executives focus on a smooth transition of management and operation of the Company in the event of a change in control. The employment agreements for our named executive officers, which most recently were amended effective as of February 1, 2022, based on the market assessment prepared by Pearl Meyer, provide as follows:

  14. Employment, Termination and Change in Control Arrangements

    | • | Mr. Rizvi’s employment agreement provides for an annual base salary of $275,000 and an annual incentive bonus based on 4.5% of the Company’s Adjusted Net Income, subject to an annual cap of $5,000,000. In addition, the minimum amount of the incentive bonus Mr. Rizvi will be entitled to receive in the event his employment is terminated by the Company without cause or, following a change in control, for good reason (which will be calculated without regard to the normal annual cap and paid in cash), is $1,000,000, with the amount of such bonus capped at $6,000,000. | | • | Mr. Bruggeman’s employment agreement provides for an annual base salary of $300,000, and an annual incentive bonus based on 2.25% of the Company’s Adjusted Net Income, subject to an annual cap of $2,500,000. In addition, the minimum amount of the incentive bonus Mr. Bruggeman will be entitled to receive in the event his employment is terminated by the Company without cause or, following a change in control, for good reason (which will be calculated without regard to the normal annual cap and paid in cash), is $1,000,000, with the amount of such bonus capped at $3,000,000. | | • | Mr. Rose’s employment agreement provides for an annual base salary of $225,000 and an annual incentive bonus based on 2.5% of the Company’s Adjusted Net Income, subject to an annual cap of $2,500,000. In addition, the minimum amount of the incentive bonus Mr. Rose will be entitled to receive in the event his employment is terminated by the Company without cause or, following a change in control, for good reason (which will be calculated without regard to the normal annual cap and paid in cash), is $1,000,000, with the amount of such bonus capped at $3,000,000. |

  15. Peer Group

    Peer Group When the Compensation Committee adjusted the base salaries and annual incentive opportunities for our executive officers in fiscal 2022 (which remained unchanged in fiscal 2024), the Compensation Committee consulted with management and selected a peer group consisting of 15 companies. The Company’s revenue was at the 55th percentile of the peer group. The peer group consisted of the following companies:

  16. Peer Group

    | Aemetis, Inc. | Green Plains Inc. | | Alto Ingredients, Inc. | Intrepid Potash, Inc. | | American Vanguard Corporation | Laredo Petroleum, Inc. | | Archrock, Inc. | LSB Industries, Inc. | | Berry Corporation | Renewable Energy Group, Inc. | | Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. | U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. | | Clean Energy Fuels Corp. | W&T Offshore, Inc. | | FutureFuel Corp. | |

  17. Summary Compensation Table

    Summary Compensation Table The following table sets forth the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and our other most highly compensated executive officers.

  18. Summary Compensation Table

    | Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary | Stock Awards(1) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation(2) | All Other Compensation(3) | Total | | Zafar A. Rizvi, | 2024 | $275,000 | $990,538 | $2,971,614 | $200 | $4,237,352 | | Chief Executive Officer | 2023 | $275,000 | $2,617,799 | $3,170,248 | $200 | $6,063,247 | | and President | 2022 | $275,000 | $2,292,721 | $1,408,412 | $200 | $3,976,333 | | Douglas L. Bruggeman, | 2024 | $300,000 | $495,269 | $1,485,807 | $200 | $2,281,276 | | Vice President-Finance, | 2023 | $300,000 | $1,308,900 | $1,585,124 | $200 | $3,194,224 | | Chief Financial Officer | 2022 | $300,000 | $1,146,360 | $704,206 | $200 | $2,150,766 | | and Treasurer | | | | | | | | Stuart A. Rose, | 2024 | $225,000 | $550,299 | $1,650,897 | — | $2,426,196 | | Executive Chairman of | 2023 | $225,000 | $587,083 | $1,761,249 | — | $2,573,332 | | the Board | 2022 | $225,000 | $260,817 | $782,451 | — | $1,268,268 |

  19. Summary Compensation Table

    | (1) This column reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of (i) restricted stock that was earned by the named executive officers under the annual incentive program (which is payable one-quarter in restricted stock and the remainder in cash), (ii) restricted stock granted as an additional long-term incentive to Messrs. Rizvi and Bruggeman in 2023, and (iii) for 2022 only, performance-based long-term incentive awards granted in 2022 with vesting and payment based on the Company’s total shareholder return (“TSR”) over the three year performance period compared to the TSR of the companies comprising the Russell 2000 Index (the “2022 TSR Awards”) to Messrs. Rizvi and Bruggeman, in each case computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (“Topic 718”). The grant date fair value of the 2022 TSR Awards was based on the probable outcome of the applicable performance conditions as of the date of grant. The grant date fair value of the 2022 TSR Awards for 2022, assuming that the maximum level of performance would be achieved, was as follows: for Mr. Rizvi $2,614,500, and for Mr. Bruggeman $1,307,250. For a discussion of the assumptions that we used to value the restricted stock awards and the 2022 TSR Awards for financial accounting purposes, please refer to “Note 10—Employee Benefits” in the notes to our consolidated financial statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2025. The 2022 TSR Awards were earned at 148% of the target award (based on TSR results through December 31, 2024, with the number of shares determined on February 13, 2025, using a 60-day average price), resulting in a payout of 66,600 fully vested shares for Mr. Rizvi and 33,300 fully vested shares for Mr. Bruggeman on February 25, 2025. | | (2) Amounts in this column reflect three-quarters of the award earned for the applicable year under our annual incentive program, which amounts were paid in cash. The remainder of the earned award is paid in the form of restricted stock, which is included in the “Stock Awards” column for the year in which it is earned. | | (3) Amounts in this column reflect a matching contribution under the 401(k) plan on behalf of each named executive officer other than Mr. Rose. |

  20. Grants of Plan-Based Awards

    Grants of Plan-Based Awards The following table sets forth information concerning grants of awards to each named executive officer in fiscal 2024 under our annual incentive programs.

  21. Grants of Plan-Based Awards

    | Name | Grant Date | Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) | | | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards | | | All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units(2) | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards(3) | | | | Threshold | Target | Maximum | Threshold | Target | Maximum | | | | Mr. Rizvi | N/A | $0 | $4,226,998 | $5,000,000 | — | — | — | — | — | | | 6/16/2025 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $990,538 | | Mr. Bruggeman | N/A | $0 | $2,113,499 | $2,500,000 | — | — | — | — | — | | | 6/16/2025 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $495,269 | | Mr. Rose | N/A | $0 | $2,348,332 | $2,500,000 | — | — | — | — | — | | | 6/16/2025 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $550,299 |

  22. Grants of Plan-Based Awards

    | (1) The information included in the “Threshold”, “Target” and “Maximum” columns reflects the range of potential payouts under the 2024 annual incentive program. Mr. Rizvi’s annual incentive award opportunity for fiscal 2024, which is specified in his employment agreement, was earned at 4.5% of Adjusted Net Income (as previously defined), subject to a maximum $5,000,000 incentive payout for the year. Mr. Bruggeman’s annual incentive award opportunity for fiscal 2024, which is specified in his employment agreement, was earned at 2.25% of Adjusted Net Income, subject to a maximum $2,500,000 incentive payout for the year. Mr. Rose’s annual incentive award opportunity for fiscal 2024, which is specified in his employment agreement, was earned at 2.5% of Adjusted Net Income, subject to a maximum $2,500,000 incentive payout for the year. 25% of each executive’s annual incentive award will be paid in an award of restricted stock based on the closing price of our common stock on June 16, 2025, vesting in one-third installments on the first three anniversaries of the grant. The 75% balance of each executive’s annual incentive award was paid in cash and is reported in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column in the Summary Compensation Table. The target amounts of the annual incentive opportunity are not determinable at the time of grant. Pursuant to applicable SEC rules, we have provided a representative “target” amount based on the previous fiscal year’s performance. | | (2) The number of shares of restricted stock to be granted to the named executive officers under the annual incentive program for fiscal 2024 (one-quarter of the amount of the incentive award earned for fiscal 2024) will not be determined until the restricted stock is issued in June, 2025. The restricted stock vests in three equal annual installments. | | (3) This column reflects the aggregate grant date fair value, as determined in accordance with Topic 718, of the restricted stock earned with respect to the fiscal 2024 annual incentive award. See footnote 1 to the Summary Compensation Table of this proxy statement for the assumptions used to calculate these values. |

  23. Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 2024 Year-End

    Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 2024 Year-End The following table sets forth information concerning restricted stock and the 2022 TSR Awards that have not vested for each named executive officer outstanding as of the end of fiscal 2024.

  24. Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 2024 Year-End

    | Name | Stock Awards | | | | | | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested(1) | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested(2) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested(3) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested(2) | | Mr. Rizvi | 69,905 | $2,916,437 | 66,600 | $2,778,552 | | Mr. Bruggeman | 35,408 | $1,477,222 | 33,300 | $1,389,276 | | Mr. Rose | 23,671 | $987,554 | — | — |

  25. Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 2024 Year-End

    | (1) The following table shows the vesting schedules for the unvested time-based restricted stock awards outstanding as of January 31, 2025: |

  26. Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 2024 Year-End

    | Name | June 16, 2025 | June 15, 2026 | June 15, 2027 | | Mr. Rizvi | 34,958 | 27,229 | 7,718 | | Mr. Bruggeman | 17,934 | 13,615 | 3,859 | | Mr. Rose | 12,589 | 6,794 | 4,288 |

  27. Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 2024 Year-End

    | (2) Based on the closing price of our common stock on January 31, 2025, which is the last day of our fiscal year. | | (3) Reflects the actual number of shares earned under each 2022 TSR Award as determined in February 2025, based on a payout of 148% of target (66,600 shares for Mr. Rizvi and 33,300 shares for Mr. Bruggeman). The number of RSU’s was determined following the end of the three year performance period, which commenced January 1, 2022 and ended December 31, 2024 (with the ending stock prices based on a 60-day average through February 13, 2025) and could have ranged from 0% to 200% of the specified target number of RSU’s subject to the award, based on the Company’s total shareholder returns (“TSR”) in comparison to the TSR of the companies that comprise the Russell 2000 Index during the performance period, provided that the recipient of the award remained a full-time employee of the Company during the entire performance period. Since the ending stock price was based on a 60-day average through February 13, 2025, the awards were not vested as of January 31, 2025, and are therefore included in this table as outstanding at year-end. |

  28. Stock Vested

    Stock Vested The following table sets forth information for each named executive officer with respect to the vesting of restricted stock awards in fiscal 2024.

  29. Stock Vested

    | Name | Stock Awards | | | | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting | Value Realized on Vesting(1) | | Mr. Rizvi | 27,696 | $1,264,045 | | Mr. Bruggeman | 14,302 | $652,743 | | Mr. Rose | 8,636 | $394,147 |

  30. Stock Vested

    | (1) The value realized on vesting equals the number of shares acquired multiplied by the closing market price of our common stock on the vesting date. As noted above, the 2022 TSR Awards were not vested as of January 31, 2025 and are therefore not reflected in this table. |

  31. Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

    Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control The employment agreements with our named executive officers provide for the following compensation payable upon termination of employment:

  32. Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

    | • | In the event of termination without cause, or in the event the executive terminates employment for good reason within 12 months following a change in control, the executive is entitled to (i) the balance of his salary for the remainder of the employment period, (ii) a cash bonus equal to 200% of the total incentive bonus paid for the prior fiscal year, but not less than $1,000,000 and no more than $6,000,000 for Mr. Rizvi and no more than $3,000,000 for the other named executive officers, and (iii) the right to exercise any awards under any incentive plan whether exercisable or unexercisable, vested or unvested. |

  33. Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

    | o | “Good reason” includes a reduction in the executive’s salary or bonus opportunity, significant diminution in the executive’s position, authority or duties, work relocation outside the Dayton, Ohio metropolitan area, and our breach of the employment agreement. | | o | “Change in control” includes any person acquiring 25% or more of the outstanding common stock of the Company, incumbent directors or their Board approved successors ceasing to |

  34. Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

    | constitute a majority of our board of directors, or a merger or other reorganization resulting in less than 50% of the outstanding voting shares of the surviving or resulting company being owned by our shareholders determined immediately prior to the event. |

  35. Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

    | • | In the event of termination due to death, total disability or voluntary termination, the executive or his estate is entitled to (i) his salary computed pro rata to the date of termination, (ii) bonus payment computed pro rata based on the date of termination and (iii) the right to exercise any awards under any incentive plan whether exercisable or unexercisable or vested or unvested, assuming in the case of voluntary termination the executive has 20 years of service and attained age 55. | | • | In the event of termination by us for cause, the executive is entitled to his salary and bonus payment computed pro rata to and based upon the date of termination. |

  36. Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

    The 2022 TSR Awards granted to Mr. Rizvi and Mr. Bruggeman provided that, in the event that, during the three year performance period (but prior to any change in control), the employment of Mr. Rizvi or Mr. Bruggeman was terminated by the Company without cause or by him for good reason, the performance goals on which the achievement of the RSU’s subject to the awards were based would be deemed satisfied at the greater of the 100% level of performance or the Company’s actual TSR performance as of the date of the occurrence of such event relative to the index group, and would be paid within 30 days after the occurrence of such event. If, during such period, Mr. Rizvi or Mr. Bruggeman died or became totally disabled, the performance goals on which the achievement of the RSU’s subject to the awards were based would be deemed satisfied at the 100% level of performance and would be paid within 30 days after the occurrence of such event. In the event of a change in control (as defined in the 2015 Incentive Plan) of the Company during the performance period for the 2022 TSR Awards, the performance goals on which the achievement of the RSU’s subject to the award were based would be deemed satisfied at the greater of the 150% level of performance or the Company’s actual TSR performance as of the date of the change in control relative to the index group. If the 2022 TSR Award was assumed or substituted by the acquirer or a specified related party in connection with the change in control, the award would vest and become payable if the executive remained employed through the end of the three-year performance period (or his earlier death or disability or the termination of his employment by the Company without cause or by him for good reason). If the 2022 TSR Award was not so assumed or substituted in connection with the change of control, the award would become fully vested as of the date of the change in control and would be paid within 30 days thereafter. Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason. If the employment of our named executive officers were terminated without cause, or terminated for good reason following a change in control, as provided in their respective employment agreements, our named executive officers would have been entitled to the following lump sum amounts as of January 31, 2025:

  37. Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

    | Name | Salary(1) | Incentive Award(2) | Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Stock(3) | Accelerated Vesting of 2022 TSR Awards(4) | Total | | Mr. Rizvi | — | $6,000,000 | $2,916,437 | $2,778,552 | $11,694,989 | | Mr. Bruggeman | — | $3,000,000 | $1,477,222 | $1,389,276 | $5,866,498 | | Mr. Rose | — | $3,000,000 | $987,554 | — | $3,987,554 |

  38. Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

    | (1) January 31, 2025 is the last day of an employment period under each named executive officer’s employment agreement. | | (2) 200% of the annual incentive award for fiscal 2023, calculated without regard to the annual incentive bonus cap, but subject to caps of $6,000,000 for Mr. Rizvi and $3,000,000 for Messrs. Bruggeman and Rose. | | (3) Dollar value of unvested restricted stock. | | (4) The 2022 TSR Awards are reported at actual number of shares earned, based on performance during the three year performance period ended December 31, 2024, as determined in February, 2025. |

  39. Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

    Termination on Death, Total Disability or Voluntary Termination. If the employment of our named executive officers were terminated due to death, total disability or voluntary termination, as provided in their respective employment agreements, our named executive officers or their estates would be entitled to the following lump sum amounts as of January 31, 2025 (except as otherwise noted in the footnote below):

  40. Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

    | Name | Salary | Incentive Award | Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Stock | Accelerated Vesting of 2022 TSR Awards(1) | Total | | Mr. Rizvi | — | $3,962,152 | $2,916,437 | $2,778,552 | $9,657,141 | | Mr. Bruggeman | — | $1,981,076 | $1,477,222 | $1,389,276 | $4,847,574 | | Mr. Rose | — | $2,201,196 | $987,554 | — | $3,188,750 |

  41. Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

    | (1) In the event of a voluntary termination of employment (other than termination for good reason), the vesting of the 2022 TSR Awards would not accelerate, so in that event the totals for Messrs. Rizvi and Bruggeman would be $6,878,589 and $3,458,298, respectively. |

  42. Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

    In their employment agreements, our named executive officers are subject to non-competition provisions for a period of one year following termination of employment for any reason, as well as confidentiality provisions. All unvested shares of restricted stock automatically vest upon death, total disability, termination of employment without cause, voluntary termination of employment after 20 years of service and attaining age 55, termination of employment for good reason within 12 months following a change in control, and any other event specified in an applicable employment agreement. In the event of a change in control, unvested restricted stock will be subject to the definitive agreement governing the change in control.

  43. Director Compensation for Fiscal 2024

    Director Compensation for Fiscal 2024 The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation of our non-employee directors for fiscal 2024.

  44. Director Compensation for Fiscal 2024

    | Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash | Stock Awards(1) | Total | | Edward M. Kress | — | $50,000 | $50,000 | | Charles A. Elcan | $75,000 | $50,000 | $125,000 | | David S. Harris | $95,000 | $75,000 | $170,000 | | Mervyn L. Alphonso | $85,000 | $50,000 | $135,000 | | Lee I. Fisher | $75,000 | $50,000 | $125,000 | | Anne C. MacMillan | $85,000 | $50,000 | $135,000 | | Cheryl L. Bustos | $73,750 | $50,000 | $123,750 |

  45. Director Compensation for Fiscal 2024

    | (1) The aggregate number of outstanding restricted stock awards granted to non-employee directors of REX that have not vested at January 31, 2025 is 2,636 shares for each of Messrs. Kress, Elcan, Alphonso, Fisher and Ms. MacMillan, 2,056 shares for Ms. Bustos, and 3,954 shares for Mr. Harris. |

  46. Director Compensation Arrangements

    Director Compensation Arrangements Directors who are not officers or employees of REX are paid an annual retainer of $70,000 per year, plus reasonable travel expenses, and a $5,000 per year retainer if the director serves on one or more Board committees. The Chair of the Audit Committee receives an additional $20,000 per year retainer, and the Chairs of the Compensation and Nomination and Governance Committees each also receives an additional $10,000 per year retainer. Non-employee directors receive an annual $50,000 grant of restricted stock under the 2015 Incentive Plan, based on the closing price of REX common stock on the date of grant, vesting in one-third installments on the first three anniversaries of the grant. The Lead Director also receives an additional $25,000 annual grant of restricted stock with a vesting period of three years.

  47. Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Pay Ratio

    Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Pay Ratio We are committed to internal pay equity to incentivize all our employees and to maximize shareholder value. In furtherance of that goal, and consistent with the requirements of Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, the Compensation Committee reviewed a comparison of our CEO’s annual total compensation in fiscal year 2024 to that of all other Company employees for the same period. For fiscal 2024, the annual total compensation of our CEO was $4,237,352 and the average of the annual total compensation of the two employees identified at the median of our Company (excluding the CEO), who we refer to collectively as our median employee, was $70,294. Therefore, the ratio of annual total compensation of our CEO to the median of the annual compensation for fiscal 2024 was 60.3 to 1. For purposes of identifying our median employee and for purposes of calculating annual total compensation of our median employee, the calculation of annual total compensation of all employees (including full and part-time employees) was determined in the same manner as the “Total Compensation” shown for our CEO in the “Summary Compensation Table” on page 13 of this Proxy Statement. Pay elements that were included in the annual total compensation of our median employee were salary/hourly wage, bonus and 401K matching contributions. We identified our median employee as of December 31 2023, based on all employees of REX and its consolidated subsidiaries as of that date. In identifying our median employee, we: (i) calculated the annual total compensation described above for each of our employees and annualized the base salary/wages of all employees who were hired in 2023 but did not work for the entire year, (ii) ranked the annual total compensation of all employees except for the CEO from lowest to highest, and (iii) since we had an even number of employees when not including the CEO, determined the average of the annual total compensation of the two employees ranked at the median. For fiscal 2024, we concluded that, to our reasonable belief, there were no changes in our employee population or compensation arrangements during the fiscal year that would significantly impact our pay ratio disclosure if we continued to use our same median employee we identified as of December 31, 2023 for purposes of the pay ratio calculation, as permitted by applicable SEC rules. This pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules based on our payroll and employment records and the methodology described above.

  48. Pay Versus Performance Table

    Pay Versus Performance Table

  49. Pay Versus Performance Table

    | Year | Summary Compensation Table Total for CEO | Compensation Actually Paid to CEO(1) | Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-CEO NEOs | Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-CEO NEOs(2) | Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based On: | | Net Income(4) | Company- Selected Measure (Adjusted Net Income)(5) | | | | | | | Total Shareholder Return(3) | Peer Group Total Shareholder Return(3) | | | | 2024 | $4,237,352 | $4,043,787 | $2,353,736 | $2,321,302 | $166.04 | $80.87 | $58,167,000 | $88,047,834 | | 2023 | $6,063,247 | $6,980,272 | $2,883,778 | $3,038,370 | $164.75 | $170.69 | $60,935,000 | $93,933,283 | | 2022 | $3,976,333 | $4,550,392 | $1,709,517 | $2,022,908 | $130.26 | $289.18 | $27,697,000 | $41,730,719 | | 2021 | $2,225,200 | $1,741,294 | $1,524,027 | $1,200,406 | $127.98 | $275.99 | $52,364,000 | $74,510,182 | | 2020 | $359,217 | $397,256 | $297,844 | $321,269 | $101.53 | $221.71 | $3,001,000 | $4,467,222 |

  50. Pay Versus Performance Table

    | (1) Compensation actually paid (“CAP”) was calculated by beginning with the total amount reported in the Summary Compensation Table (the “SCT”) for the applicable year, (i) subtracting the grant date fair value of stock awards reported in the Stock Awards column of the SCT, and (ii) adding the change in fair value of stock awards for the applicable year. Fair value amounts were computed in a manner consistent with the fair value methodology used to account for share-based payments in our financial statements under generally accepted accounting principles. The fair value amounts were calculated using our stock price on the last day of each fiscal year or the date of vesting, as applicable, and using the probable achievement level of the performance goals as of the end of the year. The following is a reconciliation of the SCT total and the CAP for the CEO for each of the applicable years. Mr. Rizvi is included as the CEO for each year. Note that the CEO’s 2022 TSR Award was valued for the purpose of the Summary Compensation Table in the manner described in footnote 1 to the Summary Compensation Table. |

  51. Pay Versus Performance Table

    | CEO | | | | | | Year | SCT Total | Subtract Grant Date Value of Stock Awards Granted Each Year as Disclosed in the SCT | Add Change in Fair Value of Stock Awards | CAP | | 2024 | $4,237,352 | $(990,538) | $796,973 | $4,043,787 | | 2023 | $6,063,247 | $(2,617,799) | $3,534,824 | $6,980,272 | | 2022 | $3,976,333 | $(2,292,721) | $2,866,780 | $4,550,392 | | 2021 | $2,225,200 | $(666,667) | $182,761 | $1,741,294 | | 2020 | $359,217 | $(44,673) | $82,712 | $397,256 |

  52. Pay Versus Performance Table

    | CEO: Change in Fair Value of Stock Awards | | | | | | | | Year | Year-End Fair Value of Stock Awards Granted in Covered Fiscal Year that Remained Unvested at the end of the Covered Fiscal Year | Year-over-Year Increase or Decrease in Fair Value for Stock Awards Granted in Prior Years that Remained Unvested at the end of the Covered Fiscal Year | Increase or Decrease in Fair Value of Stock Awards Granted in Prior Years that Vested in the Covered Fiscal Year | Adjustments for Stock Awards that Failed to Meet Performance Conditions | Value of Dividends or other Earnings Paid on Stock Awards not Otherwise Reflected in Fair Value | Total Change in Fair Value of Stock Awards Included in CAP | | 2024 | $965,985 | $(286,720) | $117,708 | — | — | $796,973 | | 2023 | $2,422,681 | $1,092,874 | $19,269 | — | — | $3,534,824 | | 2022 | $2,884,479 | $(19,154) | $1,455 | — | — | $2,866,780 | | 2021 | $43,968 | $96,935 | $41,858 | — | — | $182,761 | | 2020 | $122,247 | $(45,256) | $5,721 | — | — | $82,712 |

  53. Pay Versus Performance Table

    | (2) CAP for the other named executive officers was calculated in the same manner as described above for the CEO, except the amounts were averaged for each year. Following is a reconciliation of the average SCT total and the average CAP for the named executive officers, other than the CEO, for each of the applicable years. The non-CEO named executive officers included in the average for each year were Messrs. Bruggeman and Rose. |

  54. Pay Versus Performance Table

    | Other Named Executive Officers | | | | | | Year | Average SCT Total | Subtract Grant Date Value of Stock Awards Granted Each Year as Disclosed in the SCT | Add Average Change in Fair Value of Stock Awards | Average CAP | | 2024 | $2,353,736 | $(522,784) | $490,350 | $2,321,302 | | 2023 | $2,883,778 | $(947,992) | $1,102,584 | $3,038,370 | | 2022 | $1,709,517 | $(703,589) | $1,016,980 | $2,022,908 | | 2021 | $1,524,027 | $(436,276) | $112,655 | $1,200,406 | | 2020 | $297,844 | $(27,548) | $50,973 | $321,269 |

  55. Pay Versus Performance Table

    | Other Named Executive Officers: Average Change in Fair Value of Stock Awards | | | | | | | | Year | Year-End Fair Value of Stock Awards Granted in Covered Fiscal Year that Remained Unvested at the end of the Covered Fiscal Year | Year-over-Year Increase or Decrease in Fair Value for Stock Awards Granted in Prior Years that Remained Unvested at the end of the Covered Fiscal Year | Increase or Decrease in Fair Value of Stock Awards Granted in Prior Years that Vested in the Covered Fiscal Year | Adjustments for Stock Awards that Failed to Meet Performance Conditions | Value of Dividends or other Earnings Paid on Stock Awards not Otherwise Reflected in Fair Value | Total Change in Fair Value of Stock Awards Included in CAP | | 2024 | $509,818 | $(68,211) | $48,743 | — | — | $490,350 | | 2023 | $761,266 | $328,859 | $12,459 | — | — | $1,102,584 | | 2022 | $1,027,894 | $(11,812) | $898 | — | — | $1,016,980 | | 2021 | $27,094 | $59,403 | $26,158 | — | — | $112,655 | | 2020 | $75,352 | $(27,907) | $3,528 | — | — | $50,973 |

  56. Pay Versus Performance Table

    | (3) The Company’s total shareholder return (“Company TSR”) represents the cumulative investment return of an initial fixed $100 investment in our common stock during the period commencing on January 31, 2020 and ending on the last day of the covered fiscal year, assuming reinvestment of all dividends. The Company TSR reflected in the table above may not be indicative of future performance. Peer group total shareholder return (“Peer Group TSR”) represents the cumulative investment return of an initial fixed $100 investment in a peer group comprised of Alto Ingredients, Inc. and Green Plains, Inc. (with the returns weighted according to respective market capitalization at the beginning of each period for which the return is indicated) during the period commencing on January 31, 2020 and ending on the last day of the covered fiscal year, assuming reinvestment of all dividends. |

  57. Pay Versus Performance Table

    | (4) Reflects net income, as reported in our Form 10-K for the applicable year. | | (5) The following is a list of the most important financial performance measures used by the Compensation Committee to link CAP to Company performance for the most recently completed fiscal year. |

  58. Pay Versus Performance Table

    | • | Adjusted Net Income | | • | Net Income | | • | Total Shareholder Return |

  59. Pay Versus Performance Table

    Of the goals listed above, we consider Adjusted Net Income to be the most important financial performance measure (that is not otherwise required to be disclosed in the table) used to link CAP to Company performance and therefore include it as the Company-Selected Measure in the table above. For the definition of Adjusted Net Income, please see page 9 of this proxy statement. Required Supplemental Graphs Showing Relationship Between: CAP, Company TSR and Peer Group TSR The graphs below illustrates the relationship between the CAP to our CEO and the other named executive officers, Company TSR and Peer Group TSR during the period covered by the Pay versus Performance Table. CAP and Net Income The graph below illustrates the relationship between the CAP to our CEO and the other named executive officers and the Company’s net income during the period covered by the Pay versus Performance Table. CAP and Adjusted Net Income The graph below illustrates the relationship between the CAP to our CEO and the other named executive officers and the Company’s Adjusted Net Income during the period covered by the Pay versus Performance Table.