DEF 14A of Aptiv PLC, Mar 10, 2025

DEF 14A of Aptiv PLC

Filed Mar 10, 2025 · FY20240000950170-25-036263

Open on EDGAR
  1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

    ELECTION OF DIRECTORS THAT the following directors be elected as directors of the Company: 1) Kevin P. Clark 2) Nancy E. Cooper 3) Joseph L. Hooley 4) Vasumati P. Jakkal 5) Merit E. Janow 6) Sean O. Mahoney 7) Paul M. Meister 8) Robert K. Ortberg 9) Colin J. Parris 10) Ana G. Pinczuk

  2. REORGANIZATION

    | 2024 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE | | 46 | | 2024 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS | | 48 | | 2024 OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END | | 50 | | 2024 OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED TABLE | | 51 | | 2024 NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION | Plan Benefits | 52 | | | Investment Options | 52 | | | Deferral Election Process | 52 | | | Distributions | 52 | | | Vesting | 52 | | | 2024 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table | 53 | | POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL | Employment Arrangements | 54 | | | Annual Incentive Plan | 54 | | | Long-Term Incentive Plan | 54 | | | Change in Control Plan | 55 | | | Severance Plan | 55 | | | Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control Table | 57 | | CEO PAY RATIO | | 59 | | 2024 PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE TABLE | Analysis of the Information Presented in the Pay Versus Performance Table | 61 | | | Most Important Measures in Linking Compensation with Performance in Fiscal Year 2024 | 63 | | REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE | | 64 | | INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM’S FEES | | 65 | | APPOINTMENT OF AND PAYMENT TO AUDITORS (Resolution 11) | | 66 | | ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (Resolution 12) | | 67 | | OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS | | 68 | | SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT | | 69 | | RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS | | 70 |

  3. (RESOLUTIONS 1 TO 10)

    (RESOLUTIONS 1 TO 10) All of our current directors are nominated for one-year terms to serve until the 2026 annual meeting, or until such director’s earlier resignation, retirement or other termination of service. The Board believes that the combination of the various qualifications, skills, and breadth and depth of experiences of the director nominees contributes to an effective and well-functioning Board. The Board and the Nominating and Governance Committee believe that, individually and as a whole, the directors possess the necessary qualifications to provide effective oversight of the business and quality advice and counsel to the Company’s management. Included in each director nominee’s biography below is an assessment of each of their specific qualifications, attributes, skills and experience. Committee memberships listed below are as of the date of this Proxy Statement. In connection with the Scheme completed on December 17, 2024, the then-serving directors of the Predecessor became the directors of Aptiv PLC with the same term of office as they had with the Predecessor. References below to tenure on the Board for each our directors includes their service on the board of the Predecessor. Mr. Mahoney was a member of the Board prior to the Company’s initial public offering in 2011, and information included in this Proxy Statement as to his tenure on our Board reflects that service. The Board has been informed that each nominee is willing to continue to serve as a director. If a director does not receive a majority of the vote for his or her election, then that director will not be elected to the Board, and the Board may fill the vacancy with a different person, or the Board may reduce the number of directors to eliminate the vacancy.

  4. (RESOLUTIONS 1 TO 10)

    | | KEVIN P. CLARK | Age: 62 Kevin P. Clark has been a director since March 2015, when he became Aptiv’s President and Chief Executive Officer. In April 2022, he was named Chair and Chief Executive Officer. In 2014, Mr. Clark was appointed Chief Operating Officer responsible for Aptiv’s business segments, as well as the global supply chain function. He joined Aptiv in 2010 as Chief Financial Officer, responsible for all financial activities, including strategic planning, corporate development, financial planning and analysis, treasury, accounting, and tax. Before joining Aptiv, he was a founding partner of Liberty Lane Partners, LLC, a private investment company with investment holdings in healthcare, technology and distribution-related industries from 2007 to 2010. He served as Chief Financial Officer of Fisher Scientific International Inc., a manufacturer, distributor and service provider to the global healthcare market, from the company’s initial public offering in 2001 through the completion of its merger with Thermo Electron Corporation in 2006 forming Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.. He also held a number of senior management positions while at Fisher Scientific. He began his career in the financial organization of Chrysler Corporation. Mr. Clark has both a bachelor’s degree in financial administration and a master’s degree in finance from Michigan State University. QUALIFICATIONS: Mr. Clark is a proven leader with notable success in creating and implementing Aptiv’s business and technology strategies. As our Chair and CEO, and former COO and CFO, he provides the Board with significant strategic, financial and industry expertise. | | | CHAIR & CEO DIRECTOR SINCE: MARCH 2015 NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR APTIV COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIPS: None | | | | | Current Public Company Directorships: | Previous Public Company Directorships in Last Five Years: | | | • United Parcel Services, Inc. | • None |

  5. (RESOLUTIONS 1 TO 10)

    | | Nancy E. Cooper | Age: 71 Nancy E. Cooper has been a director since February 2018. Ms. Cooper is the former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of CA Technologies, an IT management software provider, a position she held from 2006 until she retired in 2011. Before joining CA, she served as the Chief Financial Officer of IMS Health, Inc. from 2001 to 2006 and as Chief Financial Officer for Reciprocal, Inc. from 2000 to 2001. She began her career at IBM Corporation in 1976, where she held positions of increasing responsibility over a 22-year period, focusing on technology strategy and financial management. Ms. Cooper has bachelor’s degrees in both economics and political science from Bucknell University and a master’s of business administration from the Harvard Graduate School of Business. QUALIFICATIONS: Ms. Cooper brings to the Board significant experience leading a global public company finance organization, and contributes leadership, financial, risk management, technology and strategy expertise. | | | DIRECTOR SINCE: FEBRUARY 2018 INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR APTIV COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIPS: Audit Committee (Chair) and Nominating and Governance Committee | | | | | Current Public Company Directorships: | Previous Public Company Directorships in Last Five Years: | | | • Brunswick Corporation | • The Mosaic Company (2011 – 2021) |

  6. (RESOLUTIONS 1 TO 10)

    | | Joseph L. (Jay) Hooley | Age: 67 Joseph L. (Jay) Hooley has been a director since January 2020. Mr. Hooley is the former Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of State Street Corporation, one of the world’s leading providers of financial services to institutional investors, including investment servicing, investment management and investment research and trading. He served as State Street’s Chairman from 2011 to 2019, its Chief Executive Officer from 2010 to 2018, and its President and Chief Operating Officer from 2008 to 2014. From 2002 to 2008, he served as Executive Vice President and head of State Street’s Investor Services Division, and, in 2006, he was appointed Vice Chairman and Global Head of State Street’s Investment Servicing and Investment Research and Trading. Mr. Hooley has a bachelor’s degree from Boston College. QUALIFICATIONS: Mr. Hooley’s long tenure as a public company executive leading and transforming a global financial services organization, including his extensive experience with institutional investors through his role as Chairman and CEO of State Street, provides the Board with significant expertise in management, strategic planning and corporate governance, as well as a global business perspective, and his unique background helps the Board better understand investors’ points of view and ensures those perspectives are incorporated into Board discussions with management on important strategic topics. | | | DIRECTOR SINCE: JANUARY 2020 INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR APTIV COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIPS: Compensation and Human Resources Committee (Chair) and Audit Committee | | | | | Current Public Company Directorships: | Previous Public Company Directorships in Last Five Years: | | | • Exxon Mobil Corporation (Lead Independent Director) | • State Street Corporation (2009 – 2019) |

  7. (RESOLUTIONS 1 TO 10)

    | | Vasumati P. (Vasu) Jakkal | Age: 49 Vasumati P. (Vasu) Jakkal has been a director since April 2024. Ms. Jakkal is the Corporate Vice President of Security, Compliance, Identity & Privacy at Microsoft Corporation, a position she has held since 2020. Prior to joining Microsoft, from 2017 to 2020, she served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer at FireEye-Mandiant (acquired by Google), which provided hardware, software and services that investigate cybersecurity attacks and analyze IT security risks. From 2014 to 2017, Ms. Jakkal was Vice President, Corporate Marketing & Strategy at Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. (now Broadcom Inc.), a networking provider of software and hardware solutions spanning the cloud to the edge. Prior to that, she was with LSI Corporation (now Broadcom Inc.), a designer, developer, manufacturer and global supplier of semiconductor and infrastructure software products, where she served as the Chief of Staff and Technical Advisor to the CEO and COO. She began her career at Intel Corporation, where she held positions of increasing responsibility spanning engineering to general management from 1999 until 2012. Ms. Jakkal has a bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from the College of Engineering, Pune (India) and a master’s degree in electrical engineering from the University of Minnesota. QUALIFICATIONS: Ms. Jakkal has over 20 years of technology experience across cybersecurity, cloud, IOT, AI and mobility, which provides the Board with critical expertise as Aptiv accelerates its innovation in and commercialization of new technologies across industries. | | | DIRECTOR SINCE: APRIL 2024 INDEPENDENT APTIV COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIPS: Innovation and Technology Committee | | | | | Current Public Company Directorships: | Previous Public Company Directorships in Last Five Years: | | | • None | • None |

  8. (RESOLUTIONS 1 TO 10)

    | | Merit E. Janow | Age: 66 Merit E. Janow has been a director since April 2021. Professor Janow is the Dean Emerita of the Faculty and currently Professor of Practice in the School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA) at Columbia University, a position she has held since 1993. Previously, she was the Dean of the faculty of SIPA from 2013 to 2021. She regularly teaches graduate courses in international economic policy and law, at both SIPA and Columbia Law School. She has published numerous articles and several books. Professor Janow has had three periods of government service, serving as one of seven members of the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization from 2003 to 2007, as the Executive Director of the International Competition Policy Advisory Committee of the U.S. Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division from 1997 to 2000, and as Deputy Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for Japan and China from 1990 to 1993. She served on the Board of Directors and as Chair of the Nasdaq Stock Markets LLC of the Nasdaq OMX Group from 2005 to 2016. Professor Janow has a bachelor’s degree in Asian Studies from the University of Michigan and a juris doctorate degree from Columbia Law School. QUALIFICATIONS: Professor Janow’s extensive knowledge and experience in international trade, economics, policy and regulatory matters provide valuable insight to the Company given the global nature of our business, and she particularly contributes meaningful perspective on the Asia Pacific region, as a result of her background and experience. | | | DIRECTOR SINCE: APRIL 2021 INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR APTIV COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIPS: Compensation and Human Resources Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee | | | | | Current Public Company Directorships: | Previous Public Company Directorships in Last Five Years: | | | • Mastercard Inc. (Non-Executive Board Chair) | • Trimble Inc. (2008 – 2021) |

  9. (RESOLUTIONS 1 TO 10)

    | | Sean O. Mahoney | Age: 62 Sean O. Mahoney has been a director since November 2009. Mr. Mahoney is a private investor with over three decades of experience in investment banking and finance. He spent 17 years in investment banking at Goldman, Sachs & Co. from 1987 to 2004, where he was a partner and head of the Financial Sponsors Group, followed by four years at Deutsche Bank Securities, where he served as Vice Chairman, Global Banking from 2004 to 2008. During his banking career, he acted as an advisor to companies across a broad range of industries and product areas. Mr. Mahoney has a bachelor’s degree from the University of Chicago and a master’s degree from Oxford University, where he was a Rhodes Scholar. QUALIFICATIONS: Through his many years of experience in investment banking and finance, Mr. Mahoney provides the Board with expertise in value-creation and business strategy, capital markets, financing, and mergers and acquisitions. | | | DIRECTOR SINCE: NOVEMBER 2009 INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR APTIV COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIPS: Finance Committee (Chair) and Nominating and Governance Committee | | | | | Current Public Company Directorships: | Previous Public Company Directorships in Last Five Years: | | | • Pepco Group N.V. | • Howmet Aerospace Inc. (formerly Arconic Inc. and Alcoa Inc.) (2016 – 2020) • iHeartMedia, Inc. (2019 – 2021) |

  10. (RESOLUTIONS 1 TO 10)

    | | Paul M. Meister | Age: 72 Paul M. Meister has been a director since July 2019 and our Lead Independent Director since April 2022. Mr. Meister is a partner in Novalis LifeSciences, a Life Science focused venture firm and is also co-founder and Chief Executive Officer of Liberty Lane Partners, LLC, a private investment company with investment holdings in healthcare, technology and distribution-related industries. From 2014 to 2018, he was President of MacAndrews & Forbes Incorporated, a private company that owns or controls a diverse set of businesses. During 2018, he also served, on an interim basis, as Executive Vice Chairman of Revlon, Inc. a leading beauty products company. He served from 2010 to 2014 as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of inVentiv Health (now Syneos Health), a leading provider of commercial, consulting and clinical research services to the pharmaceutical and biotech industries. He was Chairman of Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc, a scientific instruments equipment and supplies company, from November 2006 to April 2007. He was previously an Executive Officer of Fisher Scientific International Inc., a predecessor of Thermo Fisher Scientific from 1991 to 2006. Mr. Meister has a bachelor’s degree from the University of Michigan and a master’s of business administration degree from Northwestern University. QUALIFICATIONS: Mr. Meister’s extensive public company experience, as both an executive and a board member, provides the Board with significant expertise in management, strategy, finance and capital markets, operations, and mergers and acquisitions. | | | LEAD INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR DIRECTOR SINCE: JULY 2019 APTIV COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIPS: Compensation and Human Resources Committee, Finance Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee (Chair) | | | | | Current Public Company Directorships: | Previous Public Company Directorships in Last Five Years: | | | • Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Non-Executive Chair) • Oaktree Acquisition Corp.III Life Sciences • Quanterix Corporation | • Oaktree Acquisition Corp.I (2019 – 2021) • Oaktree Acquisition Corp.II (2020 – 2022) • Scientific Games Corporation (2012 – 2020) |

  11. (RESOLUTIONS 1 TO 10)

    | | Robert K. (kelly) Ortberg | Age: 64 Robert K. (Kelly) Ortberg has been a director since September 2018. Mr. Ortberg has been the President and Chief Executive Officer of The Boeing Company since August 2024. Previously, Mr. Ortberg was the Chief Executive Officer of Collins Aerospace, a United Technologies company, a position he held from 2018 to 2020. Following his retirement from Collins Aerospace, he served as a Special Advisor to the office of the Chief Executive Officer for RTX Corporation (formerly Raytheon Technologies Corporation), an aerospace and defense company that provides advanced systems and services for commercial, military and government customers worldwide until 2021. He previously served at Rockwell Collins, Inc. as its Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer from 2015 to 2018; President and CEO from 2013 to 2015; President from 2012 to 2013; Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, Government Systems from 2010 to 2012; and Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer of Commercial Systems from 2006 to 2010. Before taking on those roles, he held other executive positions at Rockwell Collins, which he joined in 1987. Mr. Ortberg has a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Iowa. QUALIFICATIONS: Mr. Ortberg brings to the Board a track record of operational and technology leadership, global management, accelerating company growth and creating shareholder value, coupled with a strong background in transformation and innovation and more than 30 years of experience in aerospace and defense. | | | DIRECTOR SINCE: SEPTEMBER 2018 INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR APTIV COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIPS: Audit Committee and Innovation and Technology Committee | | | | | Current Public Company Directorships: | Previous Public Company Directorships in Last Five Years: | | | • The Boeing Company | • RTX Corporation (formerly Raytheon Technologies Corporation) (2020 – 2024) |

  12. (RESOLUTIONS 1 TO 10)

    | | Colin J. Parris | Age: 63 Colin J. Parris has been a director since December 2017. Dr. Parris is the former Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer at GE Digital, a position he held from May 2020 until April 2024. He joined General Electric in 2014 as the Vice President, GE Software Research. Before joining GE, he spent two decades at IBM in a variety of executive roles, serving most recently as Vice President, Systems Research in the IBM T.J. Watson Research Division from 2013 to 2014 and General Manager for IBM’s Power Systems business from 2010 to 2013. Dr. Parris has a bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from Howard University, a master’s degrees in electrical engineering and computer science from the University of California, Berkeley, and a master’s degree in management from Stanford University. He also has a Ph.D in electrical engineering from the University of California, Berkeley. QUALIFICATIONS: Dr. Parris has an extensive technology background with significant experience in software and leading digital transformations. His deep technology background and current focus on data software and artificial intelligence provide valuable knowledge and relevant insight to the Board. | | | DIRECTOR SINCE: DECEMBER 2017 INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR APTIV COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIPS: Audit Committee and Innovation Technology Committee (Chair) | | | | | Current Public Company Directorships: | Previous Public Company Directorships in Last Five Years: | | | • Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated | • None | | | • Corebridge Financial, Inc. | |

  13. (RESOLUTIONS 1 TO 10)

    | | Ana G. Pinczuk | Age: 61 Ana G. Pinczuk has been a director since November 2016. Ms. Pinczuk was the Chief Operating Officer for Dexterity, Inc., a company that has created AI-enabled robots for logistics and warehouse automation from December 2022 to May 2024. From 2019 to 2022, Ms. Pinczuk served as the Chief Development Officer for Anaplan, Inc., which provides a cloud-based connected planning platform that helps connect organizations and people to make better and faster decisions. She joined Anaplan in 2019 as Chief Transformation Officer. Before that she held the following positions from 2015 to 2018: President of Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s Pointnext technology services organization; Executive Vice President and Chief Product Officer of Veritas Technologies LLC, a data management provider specializing in information protection, availability and insight solutions; and Senior Vice President and General Manager of Backup and Recovery for Symantec Corporation. From 2000 to 2015, Ms. Pinczuk served in various executive positions at Cisco Systems, Inc., including Senior Vice President, Sales from 2014 to 2015, Senior Vice President, Services Transformation and Chief Operating Officer from 2013 to 2014, and Vice President, Global Technical Services from 2009 to 2013. Before joining Cisco, she spent 15 years with AT&T, Inc., in positions of increasing responsibility. Ms. Pinczuk has both a bachelor’s degree and a master’s degree in mechanical engineering from Cornell University, an executive master’s degree in technology management from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and a master’s degree in software management from Carnegie Mellon University. Ms. Pinczuk is pursuing a Master of Science in Cybersecurity, Risk and Strategy at New York University. QUALIFICATIONS: Ms. Pinczuk’s broad technology and commercial experience spans AI/ML, IP networking, mobility, software/SaaS, data storage and security, making her a strong contributor to the Board as Aptiv accelerates its innovation in and commercialization of new technologies. | | | DIRECTOR SINCE: NOVEMBER 2016 INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR APTIV COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIPS: Finance Committee and Innovation Technology Committee | | | | | Current Public Company Directorships: | Previous Public Company Directorships in Last Five Years: | | | • SentinelOne, Inc. • SmartRent Inc. | • Five9, Inc. (2021 – 2023) • KLA-Tencor Corporation (2018 – 2019) |

  14. (RESOLUTIONS 1 TO 10)

    | | THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE 10 DIRECTOR NOMINEES NAMED ABOVE. IF YOU COMPLETE THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD, UNLESS YOU DIRECT OTHERWISE ON THAT CARD, THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THAT PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF ALL 10 NOMINEES. |

  15. (RESOLUTIONS 1 TO 10)

    | | Board Practices |

  16. (RESOLUTIONS 1 TO 10)

    | BOARD AND GOVERNANCE INFORMATION The Company is committed to good corporate governance, which we believe is important to the success of our business and to advancing shareholder interests. Highlights include: |

  17. Board Independence and Accountability

    Board Independence and Accountability

  18. Board Independence and Accountability

    | Board Independence | | 9 of 10 director nominees are independent. Our Chair and Chief Executive Officer is the only non-independent director. | | Board Leadership | | Current Board leadership structure is comprised of our Chair and a strong Lead Independent Director, who provides independent Board leadership, based on robust and clearly delineated responsibilities. | | Board Engagement | | Attendance: • All directors attended more than 75% of Board and their respective Committee meetings in 2024. • All director nominees are expected to attend the Annual Meeting. Independent directors meet in executive session at every regular Board and Board Committee meeting. | | Board Composition and Diversity | | Directors have a diversity of experience that spans a broad range of industries. Directors have a broad array of attributes and skills directly relevant to the Company. 5 of our 10 director nominees are female and/or racially/ethnically diverse. No director should stand for election if the director has reached age 75, unless the Board determines that such director’s continued service is in the Company’s interest. | | Board Committees | | Fully independent Audit, Compensation and Human Resources, Finance, Innovation and Technology and Nominating and Governance Committees. Each Committee has a written charter that is reviewed annually and is available on our website. | | Board Accountability | | Annual elections of all directors. Majority voting standards for election of directors. Annual Say-on-Pay vote. Annual shareholder ratification of the Audit Committee’s selection of our independent auditor. Code of Conduct applies to all directors and employees. | | Responsiveness to Shareholders and Shareholder Engagement | | Following each Annual Meeting, the appropriate Committees of the Board consider the vote outcomes of the management and shareholder proposals and, depending on those vote outcomes, may recommend proposed courses of action. Directors are committed to meaningful engagement, communication and transparency with shareholders and welcome their input and suggestions, to better understand shareholders’ perspectives about Aptiv. Board members meet with top shareholders for conversations focused on a variety of topics, including strategic initiatives and sustainability, human capital matters and governance matters, when appropriate. |

  19. Board Independence and Accountability

    | Stock Ownership | | Non-employee directors are subject to robust stock ownership guidelines of $600,000 in Aptiv shares, representing 5X the annual maximum cash retainer. No hedging/no pledging. |

  20. DIVERSITY, SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE OF OUR DIRECTOR NOMINEES

    DIVERSITY, SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE OF OUR DIRECTOR NOMINEES The table below summarizes some of the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills of our director nominees. This high-level summary is not intended to be an exhaustive list of each of our director nominee’s skills or contributions to the Board; we look to directors to be knowledgeable in these areas as it relates to Aptiv. We have identified below the areas in which each director has specific expertise or prominence that he or she brings to the Board. Further information on each director nominee, including some of each of their specific experience, qualifications, attributes or skills is set forth in the biographies in “Election of Directors” above.

  21. COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

    | | Director Compensation |

  22. BOARD COMPENSATION

    BOARD COMPENSATION Our directors (other than Mr. Clark, who does not receive additional compensation for his Board service) received the following annual compensation for service in 2024, which is paid in cash and time-based restricted stock units (“RSUs”). For 2024, each non-employee director was entitled to receive annual compensation in the amount of $300,000. In addition, the Lead Independent Director was entitled to receive additional annual compensation of $50,000. Also, Chairs of our Board Committees received the following additional annual compensation:

  23. BOARD COMPENSATION

    Each director may elect, on an annual basis, to receive 60%, 80% or 100% of his or her compensation in RSUs, with the remainder paid in cash. An annual grant of RSUs is made on the day of the Annual Meeting, which vests on the day before the next annual meeting. Cash compensation is paid quarterly. Any director who joins the Board, other than in connection with the Annual Meeting, will receive prorated cash compensation and a prorated grant of RSUs, based on the date the director joins the Board. These RSUs vest on the day before the next annual meeting. The table below shows cash and equity compensation paid to each member of the Board in 2024:

  24. 2024 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

    2024 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

  25. 2024 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

    | Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) | Stock Awards ($)(1) | Total ($) | | Richard L. Clemmer | 30,000 | — | 30,000 | | Nancy E. Cooper | 132,000 | 198,064 | 330,064 | | Joseph L. Hooley | — | 325,038 | 325,038 | | Vasumati P. Jakkal | 45,000 | 240,047 | 285,047 | | Merit E. Janow | 120,000 | 180,071 | 300,071 | | Sean O. Mahoney | 128,000 | 192,066 | 320,066 | | Paul M. Meister | — | 370,066 | 370,066 | | Robert K. Ortberg | 120,000 | 180,071 | 300,071 | | Colin J. Parris | 128,000 | 192,066 | 320,066 | | Ana G. Pinczuk | — | 300,023 | 300,023 |

  26. 2024 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

    Reflects the grant date fair value of the equity awards granted to directors on April 25, 2024, which was the date of grant for all directors. The values set forth in the table were determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For assumptions used in determining the fair value of the awards, see Note 21. Share-Based Compensation to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024. As of December 31, 2024, all outstanding Aptiv RSU awards held by our directors were unvested; they vest in full on April 22, 2025. The year-end RSU balances for our directors are: DIRECTOR COMPENSATION 25

  27. 2024 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

    | Name | Unvested RSUs 12/31/2024 (#) | | Nancy E. Cooper | 2,774 | | Joseph L. Hooley | 4,552 | | Vasumati P. Jakkal | 3,362 | | Merit E. Janow | 2,522 | | Sean O. Mahoney | 2,690 | | Paul M. Meister | 5,183 | | Robert K. Ortberg | 2,522 | | Colin J. Parris | 2,690 | | Ana G. Pinczuk | 4,202 |

  28. CEO REALIZED PAY AND OUR PERFORMANCE

    CEO REALIZED PAY AND OUR PERFORMANCE The compensation programs for our named executive officers are heavily weighted toward performance-based opportunities that are at-risk and subject to our performance. Incentive plan metrics are intended to drive results that create value for our shareholders. The chart below illustrates the relationship between Mr. Clark’s target performance-based long-term incentive award opportunity granted in 2022 and the amount he realized based on our performance against the metrics established for the three-year performance period ended December 31, 2024. While our financial performance over the three-year performance period was slightly below target, our stock price performance over the same period, both relative to companies in the Russell 3000 Auto Parts Index and on an absolute basis, had a significant negative impact on how much value Mr. Clark realized from the target opportunity granted to him. This table supplements, but is not a substitute for, the information contained in the “2024 Summary Compensation Table” and the “2024 Pay Versus Performance Table”. • The chart above depicts the Target value of performance-based RSUs granted in 2022. The Realized value represents the value of the 2022 performance-based RSUs that vested on December 31, 2024. • Target value reflects 54,125 target performance-based RSUs multiplied by grant date closing share price of $129.44. Realized value of the performance-based RSUs represents a share price of $60.48 as of December 31, 2024, with a performance factor of 63%, as described in the “2022-2024 Performance-Based RSUs” discussion below.

  29. COMPENSATION GOVERNANCE AND ALIGNMENT WITH SHAREHOLDERS

    | | Pay for Performance | More Information On Page | | | 91% of 2024 total target annual compensation for the CEO is at risk and 78% is granted in equity; on average, 86% of 2024 total target annual compensation for the other NEOs is at risk and 68% is granted in equity. | 34 | | | We use a structured goal-setting process for performance incentives, with multiple levels of review including the Compensation Committee, its consultant and senior management. | 35 | | | NEOs’ annual incentives are typically based on achievement of multi-faceted financial and strategic annual performance goals. | 37 | | | 60% of the NEOs’ annual long-term incentive compensation consists of performance-based RSUs, which deliver value based on achievement of multi-year financial and relative TSR goals. | 38 | | | We review and analyze our pay-for-performance alignment on an annual basis, both in absolute terms and relative to our peer group. | — |

  30. COMPENSATION GOVERNANCE AND ALIGNMENT WITH SHAREHOLDERS

    | | Compensation Governance | More Information On Page | | | We actively engage with our shareholders to discuss governance and executive compensation matters. | 31 | | | We maintain reasonable severance practices in line with market practices, including double-trigger change in control provisions. | 41 | | | We maintain stock ownership guidelines for our NEOs. | 42 | | | We maintain insider trading, comprehensive clawback, anti-hedging and anti-pledging policies. | 43 | | | We offer no excise tax gross-ups to our NEOs. | 43 | | | Our Compensation Committee utilizes an independent compensation consultant. | 43 | | | We annually review our compensation programs to ensure they do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Aptiv. | 44 |

  31. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY AND STRATEGY

    EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY AND STRATEGY General Philosophy in Establishing and Making Pay Decisions. Our executive compensation programs reflect our pay-for-performance philosophy and encourage executives to make sound decisions that drive short- and long-term shareholder value creation. The Compensation Committee utilizes a combination of fixed and variable pay elements in order to achieve the following objectives: • Emphasize a pay-for-performance culture by linking incentive compensation to defined short- and long-term performance goals; • Attract, retain and motivate key executives by providing competitive total compensation opportunities; and • Align executive and investor interests by establishing market- and investor-relevant metrics that drive shareholder value creation. Given the on-going transformation of our Company, we seek talent across a broad range of industries, including technology. Our goal for target total direct compensation (base salary, annual and long-term incentives) for our officers, including the NEOs, is to provide market competitive compensation that allows us to attract and retain the best global talent. Compensation for individual roles is based on a review of market data and multiple factors, including each executive’s role and responsibilities, the individual’s performance over time, the experience and critical skills the individual may bring to the role with Aptiv, and talent market dynamics. 2024 Say-on-Pay. At our 2024 Annual Meeting, we received support from approximately 90% of votes cast for our named executive officers’ compensation. Management and the Compensation Committee closely reviewed our shareholders’ 2024 Say-on-Pay vote and believe it indicates support for the Company’s executive compensation program and pay-for-performance philosophy. Based on this support, as well as with the feedback we have heard through our shareholder engagement efforts, the Compensation Committee has maintained the overall pay-for-performance philosophy, compensation objectives and governing principles it has used in recent years when making decisions or adopting policies regarding executive compensation. 2024 Shareholder Engagement. Aptiv is committed to regular, proactive engagement, communication, and transparency with shareholders, which enables the Company to better understand shareholders’ perspectives about Aptiv and the market generally. As part of this commitment, in November 2024, our CEO engaged with a majority of our top 25 shareholders, primarily to discuss our CFO transition from Mr. Massaro to Mr. Laroyia. As part of our formal outreach program, we then extended the opportunity to our top 25 shareholders representing approximately 57% of our then-outstanding shares, to meet with our Chief Legal Officer, Chief People Officer and Investor Relations in December 2024. Members of our Board also met with shareholders. In these shareholder meetings, topics discussed included Aptiv’s path to carbon neutrality, supply chain management, talent development and retention, and diversity and inclusion. The Board and management appreciated the constructive and positive input received from shareholders on all topics, which has continued to give us valuable insight into our shareholders’ priorities. We have and will continue to incorporate shareholder feedback into our practices. In addition to the formal outreach discussed above, members of management continued to have regular and extensive interaction with our investors throughout the year to discuss our businesses, technologies, end markets, financial results, operational execution and our sustainability efforts at numerous conferences and roadshows, in addition to Company-hosted events and quarterly conference calls; in particular, in 2024, the Company hosted 296 one-on-one investor meetings, 12 investor conferences and 18 marketing/non-deal roadshow events. We have also shared financial and sustainability information relevant to our shareholders through our Sustainability Report, our Investor Relations website, our Annual Report and this Proxy Statement. 2024 Peer Group Analysis. We use a group of peer companies to compare NEO compensation to market. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves the composition of our peer group on an annual basis, with input from its independent compensation consultant and management. Aptiv’s 2024 peer group (referenced for purposes of 2024 compensation decisions) consisted of the following companies, whose aggregate profile was comparable to Aptiv in terms of size, industry, global reach, operating characteristics and competition for executive talent. In July 2024, the Compensation Committee added four companies to Aptiv's peer group (as designated below):

  32. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY AND STRATEGY

    * Companies added to the peer group in July 2024 In addition to the peer group, the Compensation Committee periodically uses supplemental market references from the technology sector for select roles to help prioritize building the leadership and technology skills within Aptiv that are fundamental to our ability to achieve our long-term strategy. For example, the Compensation Committee used the 2023 Radford Global Compensation survey to benchmark executive leadership of size appropriate software industry companies when establishing a competitive compensation package to hire Mr. Khan. While target pay positioning versus market varies among our NEOs, executive pay packages that are at a premium to market reflect the competitive landscape in the sectors from which we seek industry leaders with the requisite experience to drive our business. Furthermore, the Compensation Committee believes that our highly performance-based incentive programs create strong alignment between compensation and shareholder value and result in appropriate pay outcomes on a realized basis.

  33. 2024 COMPENSATION PROGRAM OVERVIEW

    | Element | Key Features | Relationship to Strategic Objectives | | | | | | Annual Base Salary | • Commensurate with job responsibilities, individual performance, capabilities, market competitiveness and talent market dynamics • Reviewed on an annual basis | • Attract and retain key executives by providing market-competitive fixed compensation | | Annual Incentive Plan Awards | • Compensation Committee approves an incentive design for the annual performance period to include financial, operational and strategic metrics with goals and objectives • Target award opportunity based upon job responsibilities, market competitiveness and talent market dynamics • Payouts can range from 0% to 200% of target and are determined by achievement of pre-established financial goals and strategic objectives | • Pay-for-performance and encourages accountability by rewarding achievement of corporate objectives • Align executive and shareholder interests • Motivate the pursuit of specific business goals that drive long-term value creation • Drive our current and future platforms and Aptiv’s sustainability commitments through strategic goals • Attract, retain and motivate key executives with market-competitive incentive compensation opportunities | | Long-Term Incentive Plan Awards | • Target award granted commensurate with job responsibilities, individual performance, market competitiveness and talent market dynamics • Performance-based RSU awards (60% of LTI) are earned based upon achievement of Company performance goals, including multi-year financial and relative TSR targets • Time-based RSU awards (40% of LTI) vest over time, generally three years | • Pay-for-performance and encourages accountability by rewarding achievement of corporate objectives • Align executive and shareholder interests • Attract, retain and motivate key executives with market-competitive incentive compensation opportunities • Utilize multi-year vesting period and multiple metrics aligned to long-term shareholder value creation, including stock price performance, providing a multi-dimensional assessment of performance | | | | | | Retirement Programs | • Qualified defined contribution plan available to all U.S. salaried employees, including NEOs • Non-qualified defined contribution plan available to eligible U.S. employees, including NEOs, that allows for contributions that exceed statutory limits under our qualified defined contribution plan | • Attract and retain key executives with market-competitive wealth accumulation opportunities |

  34. 2024 COMPENSATION PROGRAM OVERVIEW

    | | 2024 TARGET ANNUAL TOTAL DIRECT COMPENSATION MIX FOR CEO AND OTHER NEOs* Base salary and annual and long-term incentive award opportunities (all as more fully described below) are the elements of our NEOs’ total direct compensation. A majority of each NEO’s total direct compensation opportunity is comprised of performance-based (“at-risk”) pay, in line with the Company’s compensation philosophy. | |

  35. 2024 COMPENSATION PROGRAM OVERVIEW

    | 2024 NEO Target Total Direct Compensation Opportunities The following table depicts 2024 annual target total direct compensation opportunities for the NEOs. This table reflects base salary, plus annual and long-term incentive plan target award values, and therefore uses different valuation methodologies from those required for purposes of the “2024 Summary Compensation Table” under applicable SEC rules. Further, this table does not include information regarding changes in non-qualified deferred compensation earnings, information regarding all other compensation or certain additional footnote disclosure, each as required to be presented in the “2024 Summary Compensation Table” under the rules of the SEC. As such, this table should not be viewed as a substitute for the “2024 Summary Compensation Table”. | | | | | | Name | Annual Base Salary ($) | Annual Incentive Target Award ($)(1) | Long-Term Incentive Plan Target Annual Award ($) | Target Total Direct Compensation ($)(2) | | Kevin P. Clark Chair and Chief Executive Officer | 1,462,272 | 2,193,408 | 13,500,000 | 17,155,680 | | Varun Laroyia Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | 850,000 | 850,000 | 4,050,000 | 5,750,000 | | Joseph R. Massaro Vice Chairman, Engineered Components Group and Former Chief Financial Officer | 1,275,000 | 1,721,250 | 6,250,000 | 9,246,250 | | Javed A. Khan President, Software and Advanced Safety and User Experience | 900,000 | 1,215,000 | 4,100,000 | 6,215,000 | | Joseph T. Liotine Executive Vice President, Electrical Distribution Systems | 900,000 | 1,125,000 | 4,300,000 | 6,325,000 | | Obed D. Louissaint Executive Vice President and Chief People Officer | 750,000 | 750,000 | 3,400,000 | 4,900,000 | | (1) Messrs. Laroyia and Liotine were each eligible for a prorated 2024 annual incentive award based on their respective hire dates; however, the amount shown above for each executive is the full-year annual incentive target. Mr. Khan was eligible for his full 2024 annual incentive award. (2) This table does not reflect the value of new hire awards for Messrs. Laroyia, Khan and Liotine, which are discussed below. | | | | |

  36. 2024 ANNUAL COMPENSATION DETERMINATION

    2024 ANNUAL COMPENSATION DETERMINATION Individual base salaries and annual incentive targets for the NEOs are established based on the scope of each NEO’s responsibilities, individual performance, capabilities, market pay data and talent market dynamics. 2024 Base Salaries. Base salary is intended to be commensurate with each NEO’s responsibilities, individual performance and capabilities. Our practice is to make periodic adjustments to base salary, although we review compensation competitiveness annually. During 2024, the Compensation Committee did not make any base salary adjustments for Messrs. Clark, Massaro and Louissaint. Each of Messrs. Laroyia, Khan and Liotine joined Aptiv in 2024 and their compensation remained as detailed under the "Recent New Hire Information" section. 2024 Annual Incentive Plan Awards. Our Annual Incentive Plan is designed to motivate our NEOs to drive earnings, cash flow, profitable growth and our strategic priorities, all of which are key indicators of success for the Company. During 2024, the Compensation Committee approved an increase to Mr. Massaro’s annual incentive award opportunity from 125% to 135% as a percentage of base salary as a result of the Compensation Committee's annual market assessment. The Compensation Committee, working with management and its independent compensation consultant, sets the performance metrics and objectives based on Aptiv’s annual business objectives. For 2024, the Compensation Committee approved the following performance metrics for the Annual Incentive Plan:

  37. 2024 ANNUAL COMPENSATION DETERMINATION

    (1) OI represents net income before interest expense, other income (expense), net, income tax (expense) benefit, equity income (loss), net of tax, amortization, restructuring and other special items. See Appendix A for further details. (2) CFBF represents cash provided by (used in) operating activities plus cash provided by (used in) investing activities, adjusted for the purchase price of business acquisitions and other transactions, the cost of significant technology investments and net proceeds from the divestiture of discontinued operations and other significant businesses. See Appendix A for further details. SOCF is defined, on a segment basis, as earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), plus or minus changes in accounts receivable, inventory and accounts payable, less capital expenditures net of proceeds from asset dispositions, plus restructuring expense, less cash expenditures for restructuring. Design Changes from 2023 Annual Incentive Plan. For 2024, the Compensation Committee approved the following design changes to the Annual Incentive Plan (from the 2023 program): • Replaced Adjusted Net Income with Adjusted Operating Income as a performance metric to better align to how Aptiv's business unit performance is measured and to enhance line-of-sight for the participants; • Reduced the overall weighting of Growth over Market performance to reflect Aptiv's expansion of revenue sources outside of the automotive industry; and • Restored an annual performance measurement period versus two 6-month performance periods (which was a temporary feature used in 2023 to address short-term macroeconomic and supply chain headwinds). Financial Performance Objectives (75% Weighting). For 2024, the Compensation Committee approved the three financial performance metrics described in the table above, including OI, CFBF / SOCF and GOM, which were collectively weighted 75% of the Annual Incentive Plan. Performance Goal Setting. The OI, CFBF / SOCF and GOM goals and the award payout levels related to the achievement of those goals are measured on a performance scale set by the Compensation Committee. Performance below the minimum threshold for a metric would result in no payout for that metric, and performance above the maximum level for a metric would be capped at a maximum total payout of 200% of target with respect to that metric. The Compensation Committee consistently sets performance targets that are rigorous and aligned with Aptiv’s goal planning process and commitments to operational excellence. Our Annual Incentive Plan target goals, approved by the Compensation Committee, are generally established to reflect our focus on growth over prior year actual outcomes and above market growth in the performance period. Aptiv’s targeted levels of performance continue to reflect rigorous hurdles taking into account the challenging macroeconomic outlook and consistent with our goal of delivering exceptional operational performance. In addition, for our business segment leaders, the Compensation Committee approves segment-specific financial performance targets to further enhance pay and performance alignment for the respective segment leaders. For 2024, each NEO's award was designed to payout as follows: For Messrs. Clark, Laroyia, Massaro and Louissaint, enterprise-wide ("Total Aptiv") performance metrics were weighted 100% of the overall financial weighting, reflecting their broad enterprise-level responsibilities. • For Mr. Khan, Total Aptiv performance metrics and Advanced Safety and User Experience ("AS&UX") performance metrics were each weighted 50% of the overall financial weighting. • For Mr. Liotine, Total Aptiv performance metrics and performance metrics for our Signal and Power Systems ("S&PS") segment were each weighted 50% of the overall financial weighting. The 2024 financial performance goals and results by metric were:

  38. 2024 ANNUAL COMPENSATION DETERMINATION

    | Performance Metric* | Total Aptiv / Segment | Threshold 25% Payout | Target 100% Payout | Maximum 200% Payout | Payout | | Adjusted Operating Income (OI) | Total Aptiv | | Actual: $2,128M | | 114% | | | | | | | | | | | $1,319M | $1,978M | $2,528M | | | | AS&UX | | | Actual: $810M | 165% | | | | | | | | | | | $448M | $672M | $859M | | | | S&PS | Actual: $1,908M | | | 91% | | | | | | | | | | | $1,326M | $1,989M | $2,541M | | | Cash Flow Before Financing (CFBF) | Total Aptiv | | | Actual: $1,647M | 200% | | | | | | | | | | | $765M | $1,148M | $1,466M | | | Simplified Operating Cash Flow (SOCF) | AS&UX | | | Actual: $659M | 200% | | | | | | | | | | | $333M | $499M | $638M | | | | S&PS | | | Actual: $1,895M | 172% | | | | | | | | | | | $1,036M | $1,554M | $1,986M | | | Growth Over Market (GOM) | Total Aptiv | Actual: 0.6% | | | 0% | | | | | | | | | | | 3.6% | 5.4% | 7.8% | | | | | Actual: 4.3% | | | 0% | | | AS&UX | | | | | | | | 6.0% | 9.0% | 13.0% | | | | S&PS | Actual: (0.6%) | | | 0% | | | | | | | | | | | 2.4% | 3.6% | 5.2% | | | Financial Payout (% of Target) | Total Aptiv | | | | 126% | | | AS&UX | | | | 136% | | | S&PS | | | | 115% |

  39. 2024 ANNUAL COMPENSATION DETERMINATION

    *For purposes of the OI calculated results under the Annual Incentive Plan, the results shown in Appendix A were adjusted to remove the impact of M&A activity. For purposes of the CFBF / SOCF calculated results under the Annual Incentive Plan, the results shown were adjusted to remove the impact of M&A. See Appendix A for further details. Strategic Results Metric (25% Weighting). For 2024, the Compensation Committee approved that achievement on our strategic initiatives would constitute a 25% weighted metric ("Strategic Results Metric") to reinforce the importance of making significant progress on our strategic goals in the overall execution of our business strategy. The strategic goals under the Strategic Results Metric fall under the following three pillars - Business Foundation, Current Platforms and Future Platforms - and align with our broader strategic framework, including our sustainability program, and are intended to align focus across the organization on specific goals that drive long-term value creation. Aptiv’s strategic goals are reviewed with the same rigor and processes as the quantitative goal-setting described above, because these strategic goals are important to our ability to drive shareholder value creation. Based on its holistic evaluation of our performance against our strategic goals, the Compensation Committee approved that a payout factor of 75% of target reflected the progress made in 2024 in relation to our Strategic Results Metric, as set forth in more detail below. The following table reflects qualitative results achieved and support the payout factor. While meaningful progress was made, our payout factor reflects that we did not meet all our expectations.

  40. 2024 ANNUAL COMPENSATION DETERMINATION

    2024 Annual Incentive Plan Payouts. The 2024 Annual Incentive Plan payouts for our NEOs were based 75% on financial performance and 25% on strategic goals. Based on the results described above, the Compensation Committee approved the following 2024 Annual Incentive Plan payouts for the NEOs:

  41. 2024 ANNUAL COMPENSATION DETERMINATION

    | Name | Target Award ($)(1) | Financial Payout Factor 75% Weighting (%) | Strategic Results Metric Payout Factor 25% Weighting (%) | Total Incentive Award Payout Factor (%) | Payout ($) | | Kevin P. Clark | 2,193,408 | 126 | 75 | 113 | 2,478,551 | | Varun Laroyia | 135,068 | 126 | 75 | 113 | 152,627 | | Joseph R. Massaro | 1,721,250 | 126 | 75 | 113 | 1,945,013 | | Javed A. Khan | 1,215,000 | 136 | 75 | 121 | 1,470,150 | | Joseph T. Liotine | 761,301 | 115 | 75 | 105 | 799,366 | | Obed D. Louissaint | 750,000 | 126 | 75 | 113 | 847,500 |

  42. 2024 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION

    2024 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION Performance Metrics. Aptiv’s Long-Term Incentive Plan is designed to reward performance on long-term strategic metrics and to attract, retain and motivate participants. Aptiv’s Long-Term Incentive Plan is primarily performance-based, with 60% of the NEOs’ annual award consisting of performance-based RSUs, which deliver value if financial and relative TSR goals are met. The targets reflect Aptiv’s pay-for-performance culture, which help align executive and investor interests. The remaining 40% of NEOs' annual award are time-based RSUs, the value of which is determined by Aptiv’s share price performance. The performance-based RSUs are settled after the results of a three-year performance period are determined. The time-based RSUs generally vest ratably over three years, beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date. The 2024 performance-based RSU grant vests at the end of 2026 and will be settled in early 2027 after the outcomes of the performance period are determined and approved. Under the design of the performance-based RSU awards, each NEO could receive from 0% to 200% of his target performance-based RSU award, as determined by Aptiv’s performance against certain Company-wide performance metrics. The metrics and weights used in the 2024 awards are shown below. These metrics reflect the balance sheet, income statement and market performance, together providing a comprehensive and robust performance assessment.

  43. 2024 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION

    | Metric | Weighting (%) | | Average Return on Net Assets (RONA)(1) | 33.3 | | Cumulative Net Income (NI)(2) | 33.3 | | Relative Total Shareholder Return (TSR)(3) | 33.3 |

  44. 2024 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION

    (1) Average RONA is tax-affected operating income divided by average net working capital plus average net property, plant and equipment for each calendar year, as adjusted for incentive plan calculation purposes. (2) Cumulative NI represents net income attributable to Aptiv before restructuring and other special items, including the tax impact thereon. (3) Relative TSR is measured by comparing the average closing price per share of the Company’s ordinary shares for all available trading days in December 2026 to the average closing price per share of the Company’s ordinary shares for all available trading days in December 2023, including the reinvestment of dividends, relative to the companies in the Russell 3000 Auto Parts Index. 2024 Grants. The Compensation Committee established the following 2024 target long-term incentive award values for our NEOs (consisting of performance-based RSUs and time-based RSUs, as described above). In so doing, the Compensation Committee considered market compensation data and each NEO’s scope of responsibilities, individual performance and retention considerations.

  45. 2024 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION

    | Name | Performance-Based RSUs ($ at Target) | Time-Based RSUs ($) | Total Long-Term Incentive Plan Target Annual Award ($) | | Kevin P. Clark | 8,100,000 | 5,400,000 | 13,500,000 | | Varun Laroyia | 2,430,000 | 1,620,000 | 4,050,000 | | Joseph R. Massaro | 3,750,000 | 2,500,000 | 6,250,000 | | Javed A. Khan | 2,460,000 | 1,640,000 | 4,100,000 | | Joseph T. Liotine | 2,580,000 | 1,720,000 | 4,300,000 | | Obed D. Louissaint | 2,040,000 | 1,360,000 | 3,400,000 |

  46. 2024 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION

    In addition to their respective annual long-term incentive awards set forth in the table above, Messrs. Laroyia, Khan and Liotine were awarded new hire equity awards, granted shortly after their respective hire dates in 2024. These awards were granted to Messrs. Laroyia, Khan and Liotine in consideration of the forfeited value of cash and equity compensation from their prior employers, and to build an equity ownership stake to align with our shareholders. For specific details on the new hire equity awards, please see the "Recent New Hire Information" section. 2022-2024 Performance-Based RSUs. The Compensation Committee assessed the performance awards granted in February 2022 for which vesting was based on achievement of three-year cumulative performance through December 31, 2024. In February 2025, we paid out the performance-based RSUs for the 2022-2024 performance period. The following tables set forth: (1) the threshold, target and maximum goal levels, as well as the performance level achieved during the performance period; and (2) for each NEO holding these awards, the target number of performance-based RSUs granted, the actual number of performance-based RSUs forfeited, and the actual number of performance-based RSUs earned.

  47. 2024 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION

    | Performance Metric | Weight | Threshold 40% Payout | Target 100% Payout | Maximum 200% Payout | Achievement (% of Target) | | Average Return on Net Assets (RONA)(1) | | | Actual: 26.7% | | | | | 33.3% | | | | 82% | | | | 22.3% | 28.6% | 33.4% | | | | | | Actual: $3,914M | | | | Cumulative Net Income (NI)(2) | 33.3% | | | | 106% | | | | $3,004M | $3,863M | $4,507M | | | | Actual: 21st | | | | | | Relative Total Shareholder Return (TSR)(3) | 33.3% | | | | 0% | | | | 30th | 50th | 90th | | | Total Weighted Financial Performance Payout | | | | | 63% |

  48. 2024 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION

    (1) Average RONA is tax-affected adjusted operating income divided by average net working capital plus average net property, plant and equipment for each calendar year, as adjusted for incentive plan calculation purposes. (2) For purposes of the Adjusted NI calculated results under the Long-Term Incentive Plan, the results shown in Appendix A were adjusted to neutralize the impact of a 2022 reporting change to remove amortization from Adjusted NI and to remove the impact of M&A activity not included in the original target. (3) Relative TSR is measured by comparing the average closing price per share of the Company’s ordinary shares for the specified trading days in December of the final year of the performance period to the average closing price per share of the Company’s ordinary shares for the specified trading days in December of the year prior to the beginning of the performance period, including the reinvestment of dividends, relative to the companies in the Russell 3000 Auto Parts Index. While our financial performance over the three-year performance period (including RONA and NI results together) was slightly below target, our stock price performance over the same period relative to companies in the Russell 3000 Auto Parts Index had a significant impact on the overall achievement of the performance goals. Based on the achievement of the performance goals during the period, the earned award was 63% of the target opportunity. As a result, the Compensation Committee approved the following 2022-2024 performance-based RSU award payouts.

  49. 2024 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION

    | | Performance-Based RSUs | | | | Name(1) | Target Units Granted (#) | Units Forfeited (#) | Actual Units Earned (#) | | Kevin P. Clark | 54,125 | 20,026 | 34,099 | | Joseph R. Massaro | 21,650 | 8,010 | 13,640 |

  50. 2024 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION

    (1) Messrs. Laroyia, Khan and Liotine joined Aptiv in 2024, and Mr. Louissaint joined Aptiv in 2023; none of them received a performance-based RSU award in 2022.

  51. RECENT NEW HIRE INFORMATION

    RECENT NEW HIRE INFORMATION Messrs. Liotine, Khan and Laroyia each joined Aptiv in 2024 with the target compensation opportunities discussed in the "2024 NEO Target Total Direct Compensation Opportunities" table above. The 2024 target annual incentive awards for Messrs. Laroyia and Liotine were prorated based on their respective hire dates, while the 2024 target annual incentive award for Mr. Khan was not prorated and his award was guaranteed to pay out at least at target for 2024. In addition, Messrs. Liotine, Khan and Laroyia received new hire awards, which were granted in consideration of the forfeited value of cash and equity compensation from their prior employers, and to build an equity ownership stake to align with our shareholders, as detailed below. The cash awards described below are subject to a repayment provision if the executive voluntarily terminates his employment or is terminated for "cause" within the first two years of employment. Mr. Liotine joined Aptiv on April 29, 2024. He received one-time cash and equity sign-on awards, including a cash award of $2,000,000 and a time-based RSU award with a targeted value of $3,000,000. The sign-on cash award is paid in two installments: $1,000,000 upon hire and $1,000,000 following the one-year anniversary of his hire date, subject to continued employment through such anniversary. The sign-on time-based RSU award was granted in June 2024, and vests ratably in June 2025 and 2026. Mr. Khan joined Aptiv on August 14, 2024. He received one-time cash and equity sign-on awards, including a cash award of $5,000,000 and an equity award of $6,500,000. The sign-on cash award is paid in three installments: $2,500,000 upon hire, $1,500,000 following the one-year anniversary of his hire date, and $1,000,000 following the two-year anniversary of his hire date, subject to continued employment through each such anniversary. The sign-on equity awards were granted in October 2024, and included a time-based RSU award with a targeted value of $4,000,000, which vests ratably in October 2025 and 2026, and a performance-based RSU award with a targeted value of $2,500,000, with performance and vesting terms consistent with the regular annual performance-based RSU awards described above under the “2024 Long-Term Incentive Compensation” section. Mr. Laroyia joined Aptiv on November 4, 2024. He received one-time cash and equity sign-on awards, including a cash award of $2,000,000 and a time-based RSU award with a targeted value of $3,000,000. The sign-on cash award is paid in two installments: $1,000,000 upon hire and $1,000,000 following the one-year anniversary of his hire date, subject to continued employment through such anniversary. The sign-on time-based RSU award was granted in November 2024, and vests ratably in November 2025 and 2026.

  52. OTHER COMPENSATION

    OTHER COMPENSATION Additional compensation and benefit programs available to our NEOs are described below. Aptiv Salaried 401(k) Plan. Along with other eligible U.S. Aptiv salaried employees, our NEOs participate in our broad-based and tax-qualified defined contribution plan, the Aptiv Salaried 401(k) Plan, which is a qualified plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”). All contributions are subject to tax-qualification limits imposed by the Code. Aptiv Deferred Compensation Plan (“DCP”). Under the DCP, eligible U.S. employees, including our NEOs, receive Aptiv contributions in excess of the limits imposed upon the Aptiv Salaried 401(k) Plan by the Code. No guaranteed or above-market rates are earned; the investment options available are a subset of those available to all employees under the Aptiv Salaried 401(k) Plan. Additional details regarding benefits and payouts under this plan are provided in the “Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation” section. Financial Planning. A select group of senior executives, including the NEOs, are eligible to participate in executive financial services sponsored by Aptiv. Aptiv pays the annual service fee of the third-party financial advisory firm for the participating executives, and each participating executive pays income taxes on the imputed income associated with the benefit. Severance Plans. In 2017, we adopted the Aptiv PLC Executive Severance Plan (the “Severance Plan”) and the Aptiv PLC Executive Change in Control Severance Plan (the “Change in Control Plan”). These plans were adopted to provide severance protections to certain executives who are designated by the Compensation Committee as eligible to participate in each plan, including our NEOs. For the participating NEOs, the Severance Plan generally provides for severance benefits in the event of a “qualifying separation” (as defined in the Severance Plan to include a termination without “cause” or a resignation for “good reason”) of the NEO’s employment. Pursuant to the Severance Plan, an NEO who incurs a qualifying separation would be entitled to receive severance payments equal in the aggregate to a multiple of annual base salary (1.5 times for officers with at least two years of service, and 1 time for all other officers), unless and until the NEO is employed by another employer. The Severance Plan also provides a COBRA subsidy for a period of up to 18 months following a qualifying separation. The Change in Control Plan generally provides for “double-trigger” severance benefits in connection with a “qualifying separation” (as defined in the Change in Control Plan to include a termination without “cause” or a resignation for “good reason”) that occurs in connection with or within two years after a change in control (as defined in the Change in Control Plan). Pursuant to the Change in Control Plan, an NEO who incurs a qualifying separation would generally be entitled to receive a lump sum cash payment in an amount equal to the sum of (1) three times base salary in the case of the CEO and two times base salary in the case of an NEO other than the CEO, and (2) in the case of the CEO, three times the higher of the CEO’s target annual cash incentive award opportunity for the year in which the separation occurs or in effect immediately prior to the change in control (or in the case of an NEO other than the CEO, two times the higher of the NEO’s target annual cash incentive award opportunity for the year in which the separation occurs or in effect immediately prior to the change in control). In addition, an NEO who incurs a qualifying separation is also entitled to receive a lump sum payment representing the sum of 36 monthly COBRA premiums for the CEO and 24 monthly COBRA premiums for NEOs other than the CEO. The Change in Control Plan does not provide for any excise tax gross-up benefit. Benefits under the Severance Plan and the Change in Control Plan are generally subject to execution by the NEO of a general waiver and release of claims in favor of Aptiv. Other Benefits. We provide additional benefits, such as relocation and expatriate benefits to our NEOs, when applicable, and in general, these benefits are the same as those provided to similarly situated non-officer employees. Additional details are covered in the “2024 Summary Compensation Table”.

  53. COMPENSATION GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

    | | 2024 Summary Compensation Table |

  54. COMPENSATION GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

    | Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary ($)(1) | Bonus ($)(2) | Stock Awards ($)(3) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) | All Other Compensation ($)(4) | Total ($) | | Kevin P. Clark | 2024 | 1,462,272 | — | 14,502,615 | 2,478,551 | 314,612 | 18,758,050 | | Chair and Chief Executive Officer | 2023 | 1,462,272 | — | 14,032,595 | 2,193,408 | 311,861 | 18,000,136 | | | 2022 | 1,462,272 | — | 12,358,679 | 2,193,408 | 192,262 | 16,206,621 | | Varun Laroyia | 2024 | 138,447 | 1,000,000 | 6,880,792 | 152,627 | 6,242 | 8,178,108 | | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | | | | | | | | | Joseph R. Massaro | 2024 | 1,275,000 | — | 6,714,213 | 1,945,013 | 182,112 | 10,116,338 | | Vice Chairman, Engineered Components Group and Former Chief Financial Officer | 2023 | 1,256,250 | — | 6,206,788 | 1,593,750 | 172,336 | 9,229,124 | | | 2022 | 1,150,000 | — | 4,943,446 | 1,500,000 | 103,463 | 7,696,909 | | Javed A. Khan | 2024 | 344,318 | 2,500,000 | 11,300,147 | 1,470,150 | 14,603 | 15,629,218 | | President, Software and Advanced Safety and User Experience | | | | | | | | | Joseph T. Liotine | 2024 | 606,818 | 1,000,000 | 7,633,583 | 799,366 | 472,294 | 10,512,061 | | Executive Vice President, Electrical Distribution Systems | | | | | | | | | Obed D. Louissaint | 2024 | 750,000 | — | 3,652,545 | 847,500 | 107,759 | 5,357,804 | | Executive Vice President and Chief People Officer | 2023 | 750,000 | 2,000,000 | 11,139,181 | 750,000 | 82,190 | 14,721,371 |

  55. COMPENSATION GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

    | | 2024 Grants of Plan-Based Awards |

  56. COMPENSATION GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

    | | 2024 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End |

  57. COMPENSATION GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

    | | 2024 Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table |

  58. COMPENSATION GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

    | | 2024 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation |

  59. 2024 NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION TABLE

    2024 NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION TABLE

  60. 2024 NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION TABLE

    | Name | Executive Contributions in Last FY ($)(1) | Registrant Contributions in Last FY ($)(2) | Aggregate Earnings in Last FY ($)(3) | Aggregate Withdrawals / Distributions ($)(4) | Aggregate Balance at Last FYE ($) | | Kevin P. Clark | 231,748 | 248,301 | 168,173 | 549,913 | 1,917,353 | | Varun Laroyia | — | — | — | — | — | | Joseph R. Massaro | 75,713 | 138,806 | 95,580 | 49,337 | 748,859 | | Javed A. Khan | — | — | — | — | — | | Joseph T. Liotine | 18,327 | 19,636 | (506) | — | 37,458 | | Obed D. Louissaint | 41,563 | 66,981 | 9,780 | — | 176,886 |

  61. 2024 NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION TABLE

    (1) All NEOs other than Messrs. Laroyia and Khan elected to defer a portion of their salary and annual incentive awards as permitted under the DCP. Each NEO’s total salary and annual incentive award, including these deferred amounts, are reported in the “2024 Summary Compensation Table”. (2) Company contributions to the NEOs’ DCP accounts, along with contributions to the qualified Aptiv Salaried 401(k) Plan, are disclosed in the “All Other Compensation” column in the “2024 Summary Compensation Table”. (3) Aggregate earnings represent change (including losses) in market value less any fee paid by the NEO, but none of these amounts are disclosed in the “2024 Summary Compensation Table”. The withdrawals of our NEO(s) were made in accordance with the deferral election process described in this section.

  62. 2024 NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION TABLE

    | | Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control |

  63. POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL TABLE

    POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL TABLE

  64. POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL TABLE

    | | | Termination Scenario | | | | | | Name | Component | Voluntary Resignation / Retirement (If Eligible) ($)(5)(6) | Involuntary (Not For Cause) or For Good Reason ($) | Involuntary (For Cause) ($) | Change in Control and Termination ($) | Death /Disability ($) | | Kevin P. Clark | Cash Severance(1) | — | 5,483,520 | — | 10,967,040 | — | | | Annual Incentive Plan(2) | — | — | — | 2,193,408 | 2,193,408 | | | Long-Term Incentives—Time-Based Restricted Stock Units(3)(4) | — | 1,348,281 | — | 6,677,113 | 5,517,167 | | | Long-Term Incentives—Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units(3)(4) | 5,866,016 | 5,866,016 | — | 13,533,489 | 12,119,406 | | | Benefits Continuation | — | 32,073 | — | 84,197 | — | | | Total | 5,866,016 | 12,729,890 | — | 33,455,247 | 19,829,981 | | Varun Laroyia | Cash Severance(1) | — | 850,000 | — | 3,400,000 | — | | | Annual Incentive Plan(2) | — | — | — | 850,000 | 850,000 | | | Long-Term Incentives—Time-Based Restricted Stock Units(3)(4) | — | — | — | 5,003,087 | 5,003,087 | | | Long-Term Incentives—Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units(3)(4) | — | — | — | 2,631,424 | 2,631,424 | | | Benefits Continuation | — | 17,816 | — | 25,891 | — | | | Total | — | 867,816 | — | 11,910,402 | 8,484,511 | | Joseph R. Massaro | Cash Severance(1) | — | 4,494,375 | — | 5,992,500 | — | | | Annual Incentive Plan(2) | — | — | — | 1,721,250 | 1,721,250 | | | Long-Term Incentives—Time-Based Restricted Stock Units(3)(4) | — | 570,750 | — | 3,008,699 | 2,500,788 | | | Long-Term Incentives—Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units(3)(4) | 2,456,153 | 2,456,153 | — | 5,976,694 | 5,351,270 | | | Benefits Continuation | — | 32,073 | — | 56,131 | — | | | Total | 2,456,153 | 7,553,351 | — | 16,755,274 | 9,573,308 | | Javad A. Khan | Cash Severance(1) | — | 900,000 | — | 4,230,000 | — | | | Annual Incentive Plan(2) | — | — | — | 1,215,000 | 1,215,000 | | | Long-Term Incentives—Time-Based Restricted Stock Units(3)(4) | — | — | — | 4,784,149 | 4,784,149 | | | Long-Term Incentives—Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units(3)(4) | — | — | — | 4,207,352 | 4,207,352 | | | Benefits Continuation | — | 32,073 | — | 56,131 | — | | | Total | — | 932,073 | — | 14,492,632 | 10,206,501 | | Joseph T. Liotine | Cash Severance(1) | — | 900,000 | — | 4,050,000 | — | | | Annual Incentive Plan(2) | — | — | — | 1,125,000 | 1,125,000 | | | Long-Term Incentives—Time-Based Restricted Stock Units(3)(4) | — | — | — | 3,788,044 | 3,788,044 | | | Long-Term Incentives—Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units(3)(4) | — | — | — | 2,070,593 | 2,070,593 | | | Benefits Continuation | — | 30,392 | — | 44,410 | — | | | Total | — | 930,392 | — | 11,078,047 | 6,983,637 | | Obed D. Louissaint | Cash Severance(1) | — | 750,000 | — | 3,000,000 | — | | | Annual Incentive Plan(2) | — | — | — | 750,000 | 750,000 | | | Long-Term Incentives—Time-Based Restricted Stock Units(3)(4) | — | 399,591 | — | 2,830,706 | 2,591,024 | | | Long-Term Incentives—Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units(3)(4) | — | 598,329 | — | 2,499,578 | 2,173,288 | | | Benefits Continuation | — | 30,182 | — | 48,931 | — | | | Total | — | 1,778,102 | — | 9,129,215 | 5,514,312 |

  65. POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL TABLE

    (1) In the case of an involuntary not for cause termination or a termination for good reason, Messrs. Clark and Massaro are eligible to receive severance payments equal to 18 months of base salary, plus 1.5 times the value of the annual incentive plan target award, payable in installments. Messrs. Laroyia, Khan, Liotine and Louissaint are eligible for a severance payment equal to 1 times base salary, payable in installments. In the case of a qualifying change in control and termination, Mr. Clark is eligible to receive a lump sum severance payment equal to 3 times base salary, plus 3 times the value of the annual incentive plan target award. In the case of a qualifying change in control and termination, Messrs. Laroyia, Massaro, Khan, Liotine and Louissaint are eligible to receive a lump sum severance payment equal to 2 times base salary, plus 2 times the value of the annual incentive plan target award. (2) In the case of a change in control, each NEO would receive a prorated annual incentive award based on the greater of (a) actual performance or (b) target. If the NEO terminates due to death or disability, he or she would receive a prorated annual incentive award based on actual performance. In the case of any other terminations prior to the payment date, the award is forfeited in its entirety. The values shown use target performance. The value shown is based on the market value of the award using a per-share price of $60.48, the closing price of our stock on December 31, 2024 (the last trading day of fiscal 2024). In the event of a qualifying termination within two years after a change in control the NEOs’ awards will vest as described under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control—Long-Term Incentive Plan”. Also as described under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control—Long-Term Incentive Plan”, if at the time of a change in control the NEOs do not receive replacement awards, their awards will vest upon the change in control regardless of whether their employment is terminated. The performance-based RSUs included represent a 100% payout of each award. (5) In the event of a voluntary termination on December 31, 2024 (the last business day of fiscal 2024), each NEO would receive the value of their respective 2022 performance-based RSUs. Messrs. Laroyia, Khan, Liotine and Louissaint do not hold 2022 performance-based RSU awards. (6) As of December 31, 2024, Messrs. Clark and Massaro are the only NEOs eligible to retire. As required by Section 409A of the Code, all NEOs who have elected to participate in the DCP generally must wait six months to receive a payment under the plan by reason of termination of employment. Payments for departure on December 31, 2024, would generally be made within 60 days after July 1, 2025. All amounts are estimates only, and actual amounts will vary depending upon the facts and circumstances applicable at the time of the triggering event. CEO PAY RATIO 59

  66. POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL TABLE

    | | CEO Pay Ratio |

  67. POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL TABLE

    We are required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and SEC rules to disclose the ratio of the annual total compensation of Mr. Clark, our Chair and Chief Executive Officer, to that of an employee whose annual compensation is at the median of all our employees (the “Median Employee”). Due to our permitted use of reasonable estimates and assumptions in preparing this pay ratio disclosure, the disclosure may involve a degree of imprecision, and thus this ratio disclosure is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K using the data and assumptions described below. The Median Employee was identified by using “total annual base pay” as reflected in our enterprise-wide human resources information system, as of October 31, 2024, for all of our employees (including full-time, part-time, and temporary employees of Aptiv and its consolidated subsidiaries). We did not include our “contingent workforce”. We did not use any statistical sampling or cost-of-living adjustments for purposes of this pay ratio disclosure. The total annual base pay for our salaried employees reflects base salary paid on an annual basis, and for hourly employees, the annual rate is determined using their hourly rate and standard work hours. This methodology was chosen because we believe it is a compensation measure that can be applied consistently across the globe and provides an accurate depiction of total earnings. Because there was more than one Median Employee identified using this methodology, we selected an individual who we determined to be reasonably representative of our Median Employee and who did not have any unusual or nonstandard compensation items. Aptiv employs approximately 141,000 employees globally as of December 31, 2024, with approximately 31,000 salaried employees and 110,000 hourly employees. In addition, we maintain a contingent workforce of approximately 50,000 to accommodate fluctuations in customer demand. 51% of our workforce is located in North America, where our largest presence is in Mexico. 79% of our North American workforce is part of our global manufacturing workforce. Market levels of pay and wage rates are generally lower in countries in which Aptiv has manufacturing facilities, in line with our regional service model that enables us to efficiently and effectively serve our global customers from best cost countries. In these countries, Aptiv provides market competitive compensation, which, in many cases, is dictated by local union agreements. The Median Employee is a full-time hourly employee located in Mexico, where competitive wages vary greatly from standard U.S. hourly rates. After identifying the Median Employee, we calculated annual total compensation for the Median Employee using the same methodology as compensation reported in the 2024 Summary Compensation Table for the CEO. The Median Employee’s annual total compensation is $9,052. When compared to our CEO’s annual total compensation of $18,758,050, the ratio of the total annual compensation of our CEO to the total annual compensation of our Median Employee was approximately 2,072:1. We believe that there are a number of reasons why our pay ratio is not comparable to that of other companies, including that other companies may have a median employee that works in the U.S., may outsource manufacturing, may have different types of workforces, may operate in different countries, or may utilize different compensation practices. Further, in calculating their own pay ratios, other companies may utilize methodologies, exclusions, estimates, and assumptions that substantially differ from Aptiv’s calculation methodology. 60 2024 PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE TABLE

  68. POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL TABLE

    | | 2024 Pay Versus Performance Table |

  69. POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL TABLE

    In accordance with SEC rules, the following table sets forth information with respect to how the compensation of our NEOs aligns with Company performance.

  70. POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL TABLE

    | | | | | | Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based On: | | | | | Year(1) (a) | Summary Compensation Table Total for PEO ($) (b) | Compensation Actually Paid to PEO ($)(2)(3)(4) (c) | Average Summary Compensation Table Total for non-PEO NEOs ($) (d) | Average Compensation Actually Paid to non-PEO NEOs ($)(2)(3)(4) (e) | Total Shareholder Return ($)(5) (f) | Peer Group Total Shareholder Return ($)(5) (g) | Net Income ($ millions)(6) (h) | Adjusted Net Income ($ millions)(7) (i) | | 2024 | 18,758,050 | 9,584,557 | 9,959,438 | 7,957,099 | 63.84 | 434.04 | 1,787 | 1,607 | | 2023 | 18,000,136 | 16,072,614 | 9,691,458 | 8,388,279 | 94.70 | 296.83 | 2,938 | 1,376 | | 2022 | 16,206,621 | (3,338,551) | 5,880,152 | 3,091,630 | 98.30 | 183.92 | 594 | 967 | | 2021 | 14,744,780 | 20,823,184 | 4,899,559 | 6,122,511 | 174.11 | 433.35 | 590 | 868 | | 2020 | 31,267,329 | 32,047,839 | 6,747,057 | 6,881,294 | 137.52 | 291.17 | 1,804 | 646 |

  71. POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL TABLE

    (1) NEOs included in the above compensation columns reflect the following:

  72. POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL TABLE

    | Year | Principal Executive Officer (“PEO”) | Non-PEO NEOs | | 2024 | Kevin P. Clark | Varun Laroyia, Joseph R. Massaro, Javed A. Khan, Joseph T. Liotine, Obed D. Louissaint | | 2023 | Kevin P. Clark | Joseph R. Massaro, William T. Presley, Obed D. Louissaint, Benjamin Lyon, Katherine H. Ramundo | | 2022 | Kevin P. Clark | Joseph R. Massaro, Benjamin Lyon, William T. Presley, Sophia M. Velastegui | | 2021 | Kevin P. Clark | Joseph R. Massaro, William T. Presley, Katherine H. Ramundo, Mariya K. Trickett | | 2020 | Kevin P. Clark | Joseph R. Massaro, David Paja, David M. Sherbin, Mariya K. Trickett |

  73. POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL TABLE

    (2) Fair value or change in fair value, as applicable, of equity awards in the “Actually Paid” columns was determined by reference to (1) for RSU awards (excluding TSR awards and other performance-based awards), the closing price on each applicable year-end date or, in the case of vesting dates, the actual vesting date closing price, (2) for performance-based RSU awards (excluding TSR awards), the same valuation methodology as RSU awards above except that year-end award values are adjusted by the projected probability of achievement of each award as of each such date, and (3) for TSR-based awards, the fair value calculated by a Monte Carlo simulation as of the applicable year-end date. (3) For the portion of “Actually Paid” compensation that is based on year-end stock prices, the following prices were used: 2024: $60.48 (33% decrease from prior year), 2023: $89.72 (4% reduction from prior year), 2022: $93.13 (44% reduction from prior year), 2021: $164.95 (27% increase from prior year), 2020: $130.29 (38% increase from prior year). (4) “Compensation Actually Paid” to our PEO and the average “Compensation Actually Paid” to non-PEO NEOs reflects adjustments from total compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table (see reconciliation below).

  74. POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL TABLE

    | | | PEO ($) | Average Non-PEO NEOs ($) | | Total Reported in 2024 Summary Compensation Table (SCT) | | 18,758,050 | 9,959,438 | | + | Fair value of equity awards granted during the fiscal year 2024 | (14,502,615) | (7,236,256) | | + | Year-end fair value of equity awards granted during the fiscal year 2024 | 12,005,572 | 6,313,579 | | + | Change in fair value from end of prior fiscal year 2023 to end of current fiscal year 2024 for awards made in prior fiscal years that were unvested at end of current fiscal year 2024 | (5,852,978) | (958,608) | | + | Change in fair value from end of fiscal year 2023 to vesting date, for awards made in prior fiscal years that vested during current fiscal year 2024 | (823,472) | (121,054) | | Total Adjustments | | (9,173,493) | (2,002,339) | | Compensation Actually Paid for Fiscal Year 2024 | | 9,584,557 | 7,957,099 |

  75. POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL TABLE

    2024 PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE TABLE 61 Peer group TSR reflects the Company’s 2024 Automotive Peer Group ("Russell 3000 Automobiles and Parts Sector") as reflected in our 2024 Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Item 201(e) of Regulation S-K. Each year reflects what the cumulative value of a $100 investment would be, including reinvestment of dividends. (6) The year ended December 31, 2023 includes a $2.1 billion deferred tax benefit recognized from the Company’s initiation of changes to its corporate entity structure, including intercompany transfers of intellectual property and other related transactions, as further discussed in Note 14 of our 2024 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The year ended December 31, 2020 includes a pre-tax gain of $1.4 billion for the completion of the Motional autonomous driving joint venture, as further discussed in Note 20 of our 2022 Annual Report on Form 10-K. (7) Adjusted Net Income was selected by the Compensation Committee as the Company-Selected Measure (“CSM”). It is a non-GAAP measure which represents net income attributable to Aptiv before restructuring and other special items, including the tax impact thereon. Appendix A contains a reconciliation of Adjusted Net Income to U.S. GAAP Net Income.

  76. ANALYSIS OF THE INFORMATION PRESENTED IN THE PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE TABLE

    ANALYSIS OF THE INFORMATION PRESENTED IN THE PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE TABLE In accordance with SEC rules, the following charts describe the relationship between the “Compensation Actually Paid” to our NEOs and the Company’s financial performance as measured by our cumulative TSR, GAAP NI and our CSM, Adjusted NI. As more fully described under “Compensation Governance and Alignment with Shareholders” in our “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section, our focus on pay-for-performance and corporate governance aims to help ensure alignment with the interests of our shareholders, as highlighted below. Aligning executive compensation to Company financial and stock price performance is one of the key design principles of our executive compensation program. This is evidenced by the program design elements, including: • 91% of 2024 total target annual compensation for the CEO is at risk and 78% is granted in equity, while, on average, 86% of 2024 total target annual compensation for the other NEOs is at risk and 68% is granted in equity. • We use a structured goal-setting process for performance incentives, with multiple levels of review including the Compensation Committee and its consultant, and senior management. • NEOs’ annual incentives are typically based on achievement of multi-faceted financial and strategic annual performance goals. • 60% of the NEOs’ annual long-term incentive compensation consists of performance-based RSUs, which deliver value based on achievement of multi-year financial and relative TSR goals. We review and analyze our pay-for-performance alignment on an annual basis, both in absolute terms and relative to our peer group. 62 2024 PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE TABLE

  77. Compensation Actually Paid Versus Total Shareholder Return (1)

    Compensation Actually Paid Versus Total Shareholder Return (1) (1) TSR in the above chart, in the case of both the Company and our Automotive Peer Group as noted in footnote 5 of the above Pay for Performance Table, reflects the cumulative return of $100 as if invested on December 31, 2019, including reinvestment of any dividends.

  78. Compensation Actually Paid Versus Net Income(1)

    Compensation Actually Paid Versus Net Income(1) The year ended December 31, 2023 includes a $2.1 billion deferred tax benefit recognized from the Company’s initiation of changes to its corporate entity structure, including intercompany transfers of intellectual property and other related transactions, as further discussed in Note 14 of our 2024 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The year ended December 31, 2020 includes a pre-tax gain of $1.4 billion for the completion of the Motional autonomous driving joint venture, as further discussed in Note 20 of our 2022 Annual Report on Form 10-K. 2024 PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE TABLE 63

  79. Compensation Actually Paid versus Adjusted Net Income(1)

    Compensation Actually Paid versus Adjusted Net Income(1) (1) Adjusted Net Income was selected by the Compensation Committee as the Company-Selected Measure. It is a non-GAAP measure which represents net income attributable to Aptiv before restructuring and other special items, including the tax impact thereon. Appendix A contains a reconciliation of Adjusted Net Income to U.S. GAAP Net Income.