DEF 14A of Avis Budget Group, Inc., Apr 3, 2024

DEF 14A of Avis Budget Group, Inc.

Filed Apr 3, 2024 · FY20230001140361-24-017590

Open on EDGAR
  1. Election of Directors

    Election of Directors The Board of Directors (the “Board”) has nominated Bernardo Hees, Jagdeep Pahwa, Anu Hariharan, Lynn Krominga, Glenn Lurie and Karthik Sarma to be elected at the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Meeting”) to serve as directors for a one-year term ending at the 2025 annual meeting of shareholders and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified or until his or her earlier resignation or removal. The nominations of Mr. Pahwa and Mr. Sarma are in accordance with the terms of the Fourth Amended and Restated Cooperation Agreement (as amended through the date hereof, the “Cooperation Agreement”), dated as of December 23, 2022, between the Company and SRS and certain of its affiliates.

  2. Biographical Information for Nominees

    Biographical Information for Nominees The following material contains information concerning the Board’s nominees, including their period of service as a director, their recent employment, other directorships, including those held during the past five years with a public company or registered investment company, and age as of the Meeting.

  3. BERNARDO HEES

    BERNARDO HEES

  4. Executive Chairman of the Board

    Executive Chairman of the Board Mr. Hees, age 54, has been a director since February 2020 and Executive Chairman since July 2020. Since March 2024, Mr. Hees has served as an Operating Partner of The Cranemere Group, a diversified holding company. Previously, Mr. Hees served as Chief Executive Officer of The Kraft Heinz Company from 2015 to June 2019. He served as Chief Executive Officer of H.J. Heinz Holding Corporation from 2013 until its merger with Kraft Foods Group in 2015. From 2010 to 2013, Mr. Hees served as Chief Executive Officer of Burger King Worldwide Holdings, Inc., a global fast food restaurant chain, and Burger King Worldwide, Inc. from 2012 to 2013. From 2005 to 2010, he was Chief Executive Officer of América Latina Logística, a Brazilian logistics company. Mr. Hees was also a partner at 3G Capital, a global investment firm, from 2010 to 2019. Mr. Hees is also a director of Bunge Limited, which files reports pursuant to the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). As previously announced, subject to his re-election at the Meeting, Mr. Hees will resign as Executive Chairman of the Board but continue to serve as a member of the Board, effective immediately following the completion of the Meeting. Specific Qualifications, Attributes, Skills and Experience:

  5. Executive Chairman of the Board

    | • | Chief Executive Officer experience |

  6. Executive Chairman of the Board

    | • | Public company board experience |

  7. Executive Chairman of the Board

    | • | International experience |

  8. Executive Chairman of the Board

    | • | Diverse personal background |

  9. JAGDEEP PAHWA

    JAGDEEP PAHWA

  10. Vice Chairman of the Board

    Vice Chairman of the Board Mr. Pahwa, age 50, has been a director since April 2018 and Vice Chairman since February 2020. Mr. Pahwa has been the President of SRS Investment Management, LLC since 2017 and has led SRS’s private equity business since 2006. Previously, Mr. Pahwa worked at McKinsey & Company in the U.S. and India, where he led client engagements in the telecom, technology and real estate sectors. Prior thereto, Mr. Pahwa worked in the Mergers & Acquisitions group of Lehman Brothers in New York. Mr. Pahwa received a Bachelor of Technology from the Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, and an M.S. from Princeton University and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School. As previously announced, subject to his re-election at the Meeting, Mr. Pahwa will assume the role of Chairman of the Board, effective immediately following the completion of the Meeting. Specific Qualifications, Attributes, Skills and Experience:

  11. Vice Chairman of the Board

    | • | Financial and investment expertise |

  12. Vice Chairman of the Board

    | • | Advisory experience in business strategy and growth |

  13. Vice Chairman of the Board

    | • | Broad international experience and understanding of the technology sector |

  14. Vice Chairman of the Board

    | • | Diverse personal background |

  15. ANU HARIHARAN

    ANU HARIHARAN

  16. Board Committees: Audit

    Board Committees: Audit Ms. Hariharan, age 43, has been a director since January 2022. Ms. Hariharan is Founder and Managing Partner of Avra, a venture fund focused on empowering growth stage founders with the right foundation to scale their company. From 2016 until March 2023, Ms. Hariharan was Managing Director at Y Combinator's Continuity Fund focused on growth stage investments, where she led investments in Convoy, Brex, Gusto and Faire, among many others. Prior to joining Y Combinator, Ms. Hariharan was a Partner with the investment team at Andreessen Horowitz, from 2014 to 2016. Previously, Ms. Hariharan was a Principal with The Boston Consulting Group, from 2010 to 2014, and, prior to that, a senior software engineer with Qualcomm. Ms. Hariharan holds a B.E. from the National Institute of Technology Karnataka, an M.S. from Virginia Tech and an M.B.A. from The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. Specific Qualifications, Attributes, Skills and Experience:

  17. Board Committees: Audit, Compensation, Corporate Governance (Chair)

    Board Committees: Audit, Compensation, Corporate Governance (Chair) Ms. Krominga, age 73, has been a director since October 2006 and Lead Independent Director since February 2024. Ms. Krominga is an attorney, management consultant and former senior executive of global businesses. Ms. Krominga has served on the boards of directors of public, private and not-for-profit companies, as well as advisory boards of start-up and early stage technology and personal care businesses in the U.S. and abroad. Since 1999, she has been a consultant to private equity, venture capital, hedge funds and angel investors, in which capacity she served in a number of operating and board roles, including Chief Executive Officer of Fashion Wire Daily, Inc.; director and audit committee member of AHAVA Dead Sea Laboratories, Ltd. (a global cosmeceuticals business); advisor to London-based Apax Partners for acquisitions in Israel and the United States; director of StructuredWeb, Inc; board of advisors of Makeover Studios, Inc.; General Manager-North America of Electric Fuel, Inc. (an early stage fuel cell-based technology business); and Internet Consultant for private websites in the U.S. and Europe. From 2007 until January 2013, Ms. Krominga served as a director of publicly traded Sunrise Senior Living, Inc., one of the world’s largest assisted living companies, with operations in the U.S., Canada, the U.K. and Germany. From March through November 2008, she served as Chairman of the Board of Sunrise Senior Living and as Lead Director thereafter until January 2013 (when the company was sold). She also served as Chairman of the Compensation Committee (2008-2011), and as a member of the Audit, Compensation and Governance Committees from 2007-2013. Ms. Krominga is the former President of the Revlon and Coleman Worldwide Licensing Divisions, and previously served as General Counsel and International Counsel for Revlon’s global operations. Prior to joining Revlon, she was Senior Counsel at American Express Company and an associate at Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton. Specific Qualifications, Attributes, Skills and Experience:

  18. Board Committees: Audit (Chair), Compensation

    Board Committees: Audit (Chair), Compensation Mr. Lurie, age 58, has been a director since May 2018. Since August 2021, Mr. Lurie has served as General Partner at Stormbreaker Ventures, an early-stage fund focused on capital-efficient startups. Mr. Lurie was the President and Chief Executive Officer of Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. from 2017 to 2020. Prior to joining Synchronoss, Mr. Lurie was employed by AT&T for 27+ years and was President and Chief Executive Officer of AT&T Mobility and Consumer Operations when he retired in September of 2017. Mr. Lurie helped usher in the smartphone era by leading negotiations for AT&T with Apple for the first iPhone and then for the first iPad. He built three groundbreaking businesses at AT&T: IoT (Internet of Things) business – bringing wireless connectivity to tablets, cars, connected cities and consumer electronics; Digital Life – AT&T’s home automation and security business; and the launch of Aio Wireless – now Cricket Wireless, the company’s industry-leading prepaid flanker brand. At AT&T, Mr. Lurie served in a variety of leadership roles, including as President and Chief Executive Officer of Mobility and Consumer Operations from 2016 to 2017, President and Chief Executive Officer of AT&T Mobility from 2014 to 2016, President of Emerging Enterprises and Partnerships Organization from 2011 to 2014 and President of Emerging Devices Organization (now IoT Organization) from 2008 to 2011. Mr. Lurie previously served as a director of Synchronoss, which files reports pursuant to the Exchange Act. Mr. Lurie also serves as a director of Teal Communications, a global eSIM and IoT connectivity platform provider; Blue Link Wireless, an AT&T Authorized Dealer and service provider; and Pivotal Commware, Inc., which develops 5G network platforms, services and applications. Specific Qualifications, Attributes, Skills and Experience:

  19. Board Committees: Compensation (Chair), Corporate Governance

    Board Committees: Compensation (Chair), Corporate Governance Mr. Sarma, age 49, has been a director since May 2020. Mr. Sarma is the Managing Partner at SRS, which he founded in 2006. Prior to founding SRS, Mr. Sarma was a Managing Director at Tiger Global Management, LLC, which he joined within a few months of its launch in 2001. Prior to joining Tiger Global, Mr. Sarma worked as a consultant at McKinsey & Company in its New York office. Mr. Sarma received a Bachelor of Technology from the Indian Institute of Technology, Chennai and an M.S. from Princeton University. Specific Qualifications, Attributes, Skills and Experience:

  20. Board Committees: Compensation (Chair), Corporate Governance

    | • | Experience in the technology sector |

  21. Board Committees: Compensation (Chair), Corporate Governance

    | • | Financial and investment expertise |

  22. Board Committees: Compensation (Chair), Corporate Governance

    | • | Experience providing strategic and operational advice |

  23. Board Committees: Compensation (Chair), Corporate Governance

    | • | Diverse personal background |

  24. Compensation Practices

    | • | no excise tax gross-up or single-trigger change-in-control provisions; and |

  25. Our Named Executive Officers

    | Component | Function and Objective | | Base Salary | Paid in cash, provides a fixed form of annual compensation for the performance of primary responsibilities consistent with each executive’s experience and role. | | Annual Incentive Awards | Comprised of annual cash incentive opportunities that are performance-based, compensate executives subject to achieving specific annual financial goals and individual goals, which are based primarily on quantitative financial and operational metrics with measurable targets utilizing a “scorecard” approach. | | Long-Term Incentive Awards | Designed to align a significant component of executive compensation with shareholder interests, provide an incentive for executives to stay with the Company and achieve appropriately challenging long-range performance goals, and allow executives to share in the value created for the Company’s shareholders. | | Other Compensation | We provide health, life insurance, disability and retirement benefits as part of our broad-based employee benefits program. Retirement benefits for our NEOs (other than our CEO, who is also eligible for our frozen pension plan) are limited to (i) deferrals under the executive deferred compensation plan, which the Company matches up to a maximum of 6% of base salary and annual incentive, and/or (ii) participation in our 401(k) plan. Other executive benefits and perquisites for some NEOs include auto use and financial planning services. Our CEO is also provided with agreed-upon limited personal use of Company-leased aircraft services. |

  26. Base Salaries for our Named Executive Officers

    | • | reasonable comparability with the Peer Group and Survey Data (as described under “Consideration of Peer Groups and Survey Data”); |

  27. Annual Incentive Awards

    Annual Incentive Awards 2023 AIP For 2023, the Committee approved an annual incentive program (the “2023 AIP”) in which all of our NEOs participated other than our Executive Chairman. The program design was generally consistent with the 2022 program design. Target payout opportunity as a percentage of base salary remained unchanged at 200% for our CEO, 125% for our CFO and EVP, Americas, and 120% for our CDIO, in each case subject to a maximum payout opportunity of 150% of target. 2023 AIP Performance Metrics and Goals – Adjusted EBITDA Component Consistent with prior years, the 2023 AIP included Adjusted EBITDA(1) as a performance metric with a weighting of 50%:

  28. Annual Incentive Awards

    | • | in recognition of its wide acceptance and understanding as a metric within the Company; |

  29. Annual Incentive Awards

    | • | because Adjusted EBITDA is a key measure of operational and financial performance, driven by our annual business plan; and |

  30. Annual Incentive Awards

    | • | given the fact that Adjusted EBITDA has been strongly correlated to the Company’s long-term stock price performance. |

  31. Annual Incentive Awards

    The Adjusted EBITDA goals included in the 2023 AIP (the “AIP Adjusted EBITDA Goals”) as shown below were based on the Company’s 2023 business plan approved by the Board at the end of 2022 (the “Business Plan”). At the time the Business Plan was approved, the Company’s outlook for the year was difficult to predict, given the recent variability in results during and following the global Covid health emergency and general economic uncertainties. As a result, at target, the global Adjusted EBITDA goal of $2.541 billion represented an amount greater than any of our past results other than our record 2022 results, and a significant increase (more than 50%) over the 2022 target.

  32. Annual Incentive Awards

    | | Payout Opportunity (% of Target)* | Adjusted EBITDA Goals (Dollars in millions) | | | Achievement Level | | Global** | Americas | | Maximum | 150% | $3,050 | $2,670 | | Target | 100% | $2,541 | $2,225 | | Threshold | 50% | $2,030 | $1,780 |

  33. Annual Incentive Awards

    | * Straight-line interpolation used to determine payout between specified achievement levels. |

  34. Annual Incentive Awards

    | ** Includes unallocated corporate expenses. |

  35. Annual Incentive Awards

    2023 AIP Performance Metrics and Goals – Individual Scorecard Component Consistent with 2022, to enhance the pay-for-performance nature of the 2023 AIP, an individual performance component, with a 50% weighting, was included to incorporate a broad set of goals which the Committee believed were important to our overall success and to each individual executive officer’s contributions to our business. The component is comprised of primarily quantitative financial and operational metrics, with measurable targets based on attainment of specific Business Plan goals and measured utilizing a “scorecard” approach. The achievement level of the individual scorecard goals is capped at 100% of target payout and can be further reduced based on achievement of fixed cost goals set forth in the Business Plan. Scorecard achievement is then multiplied by 0% to 150% based on achievement of AIP Adjusted EBITDA Goals (from Below-Threshold to Maximum) to further align individual performance with overall company performance. Accordingly, for an NEO to be eligible for any payout under this component, Threshold AIP Adjusted EBITDA Goals must be met. Assuming attainment of fixed cost goals, the formula for determining the payout under the Individual Scorecard Component is:

  36. Annual Incentive Awards

    | Individual Scorecard Achievement (0% - 100%)X | Adjusted EBITDA Multiplier (0%-150%) |

  37. Annual Incentive Awards

    For example, if an NEO had achieved a score of 100% of target on his or her individual scorecard but Adjusted EBITDA was below the threshold achievement level, then the NEO would not have received any payout under the 2023 AIP, including under the individual scorecard component. The Committee established individual performance metrics and goals for each NEO’s scorecard based on key objectives in support of the Business Plan and the Company’s overall strategy. Individual performance metrics for our CEO included, among others, revenue and improved customer satisfaction, with 100% being quantitative. The substantial majority of scorecard metrics and goals for our NEOs were quantitative with a limited percentage being qualitative but still based on achievement of specific objectives. Set forth below is an illustrative example of a scorecard; however it does not represent the actual scorecard of any of our NEOs.

  38. Annual Incentive Awards

    | 1 | We define Adjusted EBITDA as income (loss) from continuing operations before non-vehicle related depreciation and amortization; any impairment charges; restructuring and other related charges; early extinguishment of debt costs; non-vehicle related interest; transaction-related costs, net; charges for legal matters, net, which includes amounts recorded in excess of $5 million related to class action lawsuits and personal injury matters; non-operational charges related to shareholder activist activity, which include third party advisory, legal and other professional fees; COVID-19 charges, net; cloud computing costs; other (income) expense, net, and income taxes. This non-GAAP measure is a performance metric in our incentive programs |

  39. Illustrative Scorecard Example

    | Weight | Metric | Key Performance Indicator | Goal | Type of Measure | | ~90% | Revenue Growth | Total Revenue | Based on Business Plan | Quantitative | | | Cost Control | Variable Costs | | | | | Customer Service | Net Promoter Score | | | | ~10% | Other | Varies | Varies (i.e. completion, roll-out, etc.) | Qualitative | | • Payout (1) is subject to attainment of Threshold AIP Adjusted EBITDA Goals and (2) can be reduced based on achievement of fixed cost goals set forth in the Business Plan. | | | | | | • Achievement of total scorecard goals is capped at 100% of target, with the result multiplied by 0%-150% based on attainment of AIP Adjusted EBITDA Goals (from Below-Threshold to Maximum). | | | | |

  40. Illustrative Scorecard Example

    2023 AIP Results and Payouts Payouts under the Adjusted EBITDA component of the 2023 AIP were 97% and 96% of target, for Global and Americas, respectively. Payouts under the Individual Component were based on scorecard results multiplied by attainment of the applicable AIP Adjusted EBITDA Goals and reflected the extent to which each NEO attained his or her fixed cost goals. For example, for our CEO, the Individual Component of the scorecard was determined based on a quantitative assessment of the scorecard factors, including revenue growth, cost control and improved net promoter scores, for a score of 91 out of 100 points. Actual payouts under the 2023 AIP were as follows:

  41. Illustrative Scorecard Example

    | NEO | Base Salary ($) | Target (% of Base Salary) | Adjusted EBITDA* Component Payout % (50% weight) | Individual Scorecard Component (50% weight) | | | Total Payout (%) | Total Payout ($) | | | | | | Score | Adjusted EBITDA Multiplier % | Payout %** | | | | CEO | 1,248,000 | 200% | 97% | 91 | 97% | 88% | 93% | 2,312,170 | | CFO | 624,000 | 125% | 97% | 92 | 97% | 89% | 93% | 726,336 | | EVP, Americas | 624,000 | 125% | 96% | 87 | 96% | 84% | 90% | 700,128 | | CDIO | 500,000 | 120% | 97% | 92 | 97% | 62% | 80% | 478,404 |

  42. Illustrative Scorecard Example

    | ** Reflects that each NEO met his or her fixed cost goal other than our CDIO for which a 30% reduction in payout percentage was applied based on his fixed cost goal attainment. |

  43. Illustrative Scorecard Example

    We believe Adjusted EBITDA is useful as a supplemental measure in evaluating the performance of our operating businesses and in comparing our results from period to period. We also believe Adjusted EBITDA is useful to investors because it allows them to assess our results of operations and financial condition on the same basis that management uses internally. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for net income or other income statement data prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Our presentation of Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies. Executive Chairman Incentive Award For our Executive Chairman, who did not participate in the 2023 AIP, the Committee approved an annual incentive award with Adjusted EBITDA as the sole metric, with goals at threshold and target consistent with the 2023 AIP. Target payout opportunity as a percentage of base salary was 100% and total payout opportunity ranged from 50% to 100% of target. The actual payout for this award was 97% based on Adjusted EBITDA results described above.

  44. Long-Term Incentive Awards

    Long-Term Incentive Awards 2023 LTIP For 2023, the Committee approved a long-term incentive program (the “2023 LTIP”) in which all NEOs participated. Grant date values for 2023 LTIP awards were determined in light of the Company’s record financial performance for 2022 and following a market review of the Peer Group, and in certain cases, Survey Data (as defined under “Consideration of Peer Groups and Survey Data”), as well as individual performance for 2022. In determining the 2023 LTIP award values, the Committee also considered that one-time incremental long-term incentive awards were granted in late 2022 to acknowledge the Company’s record performance in 2022. The Committee determined that generally retaining the target grant date value of annual awards to the NEOs in 2022 (that is, excluding the one-time incremental awards and new hire awards) for the annual grants in 2023 was appropriate. 2023 LTIP — Type of Award The Committee reviewed the following factors to determine the appropriate type of equity to be granted: perceived value to award recipients to effect retention and incentive goals, peer practices, the degree of alignment with shareholder interests and our pay-for-performance philosophy, potential dilution and projected expense balanced with the value delivered to award recipients. Based on an analysis of these factors, the Committee determined that continuing the mix of 50% PSUs and 50% RSUs would:

  45. Long-Term Incentive Awards

    | • | align incentives with shareholders’ focus on profitability and financial performance; |

  46. Long-Term Incentive Awards

    | • | reflect the relevant decision-making impact of the individual and the impact of those decisions on the Company; and |

  47. Long-Term Incentive Awards

    | • | incentivize retention of key employees over the long term. |

  48. Long-Term Incentive Awards

    2023 LTIP — Vesting Terms and Performance Metrics and Goals Under the 2023 LTIP:

  49. Long-Term Incentive Awards

    | • | RSUs are scheduled to vest, subject to continued service, in approximately equal installments on the first three anniversaries of the date of grant, except that our Executive Chairman’s RSUs vest in June 2024; |

  50. Long-Term Incentive Awards

    | • | PSUs are scheduled to vest on the three-year anniversary of the date of grant, subject to satisfaction of performance goals and continued service; |

  51. Long-Term Incentive Awards

    | • | Three-year cumulative Adjusted EBITDA was selected as a performance metric with a 75% weight for the PSUs based on several factors, including the following: |

  52. Long-Term Incentive Awards

    | ○ | the Company’s Adjusted EBITDA has been strongly correlated to the Company’s long-term stock price performance; and |

  53. Long-Term Incentive Awards

    | ○ | Adjusted EBITDA is a key measure of operational and financial performance driven by the Company’s strategy and widely understood within the Company and by the Company’s shareholders; and |

  54. Long-Term Incentive Awards

    | ○ | although also used in our AIP, the metric as used for the PSUs measures sustained performance over a three-year period; and |

  55. Long-Term Incentive Awards

    | • | To drive operational excellence and resilience over the long-term consistent with the Company’s strategy, a variable cost performance metric was also selected with a 25% weight for the PSUs. |

  56. Long-Term Incentive Awards

    The three-year cumulative Adjusted EBITDA goals are set forth below. The target goal represents attainment of three-year Adjusted EBITDA during the performance period, and an increase of 30% compared to the target goal for the 2022 LTIP.

  57. Long-Term Incentive Awards

    | Achievement Level | Payout Opportunity* (as a % of target units awarded) | Adjusted EBITDA Goal (in billions) | | Maximum | 150% | $7.8 | | Target | 100% | $6.5 | | Threshold | 50% | $5.2 |

  58. Long-Term Incentive Awards

    | * Straight-line interpolation is used to determine payout between specified achievement levels. |

  59. Role of the Independent Compensation Consultant

    Role of the Independent Compensation Consultant Consistent with its charter, the Committee continued its engagement of Pay Governance LLC, a compensation consulting firm, to work with the Committee and the Company as an adviser on executive compensation matters in 2023. The compensation consultant reports to, and is directed by, the Committee, which has the authority to retain or terminate compensation advisers. In early 2023, the Committee reviewed information regarding the independence and potential conflicts of interest of Pay Governance, taking into account, among other things, the factors set forth in the Nasdaq listing standards. Based on this review, the Committee concluded that the engagement of Pay Governance did not raise any conflict of interest. Outside of services provided for the Committee, the compensation consultant did not provide additional services to the Company in 2023.

  60. Consideration of Peer Groups and Survey Data

    Consideration of Peer Groups and Survey Data The Committee developed the Company’s peer group set forth below for 2023 pay decisions (the “Peer Group”), taking into consideration that very few direct industry competitors exist, the Company’s business model, the relevant labor market for talent and other factors, including but not limited to the following:

  61. Consideration of Peer Groups and Survey Data

    | • | the industry for peer group companies, which the Committee believes should operate within hotel/resort, travel, trucking, automotive retail and rental retail industries; and |

  62. Consideration of Peer Groups and Survey Data

    | • | market capitalization and revenue for peer group companies, with primary emphasis on market capitalization. |

  63. PEER GROUP

    PEER GROUP

  64. PEER GROUP

    | Alaska Air Group, Inc. | J.B. Hunt Transportation Services, Inc. | | American Airlines Group Inc. | JetBlue Airways Corporation | | Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. | KAR Auction Services, Inc. | | AutoNation, Inc. | Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. | | Choice Hotels International, Inc. | Rent A Center, Inc. | | Group 1 Automotive, Inc. | Ryder System, Inc. | | Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. | Schneider National, Inc. | | Hyatt Hotels Corporation | Travel + Leisure Co. | | InterContinental Hotels Group PLC | United Airlines Holdings, Inc. |

  65. PEER GROUP

    The Committee reviewed pay data of the Peer Group for 2023 pay decisions to ensure reasonable comparability of the compensation of our NEOs. The Committee does not specifically target any percentile within the Peer Group when setting overall compensation, any individual element of compensation or the relative pay mix among different elements of compensation. The Committee reviews the Peer Group periodically to ensure that the component companies continue to meet the criteria for which they were selected, as well as to identify other companies that may become appropriate for inclusion. The Committee recognizes that our executives have opportunities available to them in a range of industries and that any peer group for the Company will have some inherent limitations given the absence of a large sample of public companies in the vehicle rental business. In order to compare ourselves to a broad set of general industry market data available, the Committee also reviews widely-used survey data from consulting firms such as Aon Hewitt and Willis Towers Watson for companies that have revenue comparable to ours (the “Survey Data”) as another data point. The Survey Data(2) represents data from over 1,000 companies sized according to revenue, assets and number of employees. In 2023, the Committee considered the Survey Data for each element of the 2023 compensation and benefits package as a general check and to ensure reasonable comparability. Consideration of the Peer Group and the Survey Data represented just two factors considered in setting executive compensation for 2023. Please refer to “Analysis of 2023 Pay Decisions” for the other factors considered in setting executive compensation for 2023.

  66. Policy Related to Equity Awards

    Policy Related to Equity Awards Our practice has been to grant regular long-term incentive awards at pre-established meetings of the Committee. Annual long-term incentive awards, which typically include awards granted to all NEOs, are usually approved in the first quarter. However, the Committee retains the ability to determine, and has in the past determined, to make grants at other times during

  67. Policy Related to Equity Awards

    | 2 | While the Survey Data include a general list of participating companies, each survey provides information on a “no-names” basis—i.e., for each position comparison, it does not identify by name which companies comparable in revenue size to our Company produced results for each position matched, and thus we are unable to list the comparable companies that are included in the Survey Data utilized. |

  68. Policy Related to Equity Awards

    the year, including but not limited to approvals for executives hired or promoted during the year. In connection with valuing the grants of stock-based awards, it is our policy generally to use, as the grant or strike price for any stock-based compensation vehicle, the closing price of our Common Stock on the grant date, which is often the date the Committee approves the award but may be a future specified date. The Committee typically approves a dollar amount for each RSU or PSU award, which is then divided by the closing price of our Common Stock on the date of grant to arrive at the number of RSUs or PSUs to be granted.

  69. Employment and Change of Control Agreements; Severance Arrangements

    Employment and Change of Control Agreements; Severance Arrangements To foster the retention of our key management team and in accordance with past practice, we have an agreement with our CEO under which the Company seeks to provide appropriate protections consistent with prevailing market practices. We also maintain an Executive Severance Plan, in which our other NEOs participate. Since 2021, there have been no material changes to the agreement with our CEO or the executive severance plan. A more detailed description of the Company’s current agreements and other arrangements with our NEOs is set forth below under the heading “Employment Agreements and Other Arrangements.” The benefits that would be received by our NEOs in the event of termination without cause or a change in control are set forth below under the heading “Termination, Severance and Change of Control Arrangements.”

  70. Summary Compensation Table

    Summary Compensation Table

  71. Summary Compensation Table

    | Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary ($)(a) | Bonus ($)(b) | Stock Awards ($)(c) | Option Awards ($) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(d) | Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)(e) | All Other Comp ($)(f) | Total ($) | | Ferraro, Joseph A. President and CEO | 2023 | 1,248,000 | — | 5,200,116 | — | 2,312,170 | — | 1,514,635 | 10,274,921 | | | 2022 | 1,200,000 | — | 8,199,867 | — | 3,348,000 | — | 262,876 | 13,010,743 | | | 2021 | 1,000,000 | — | 5,000,032 | — | 2,500,000 | — | 94,523 | 8,594,555 | | Choi, Brian J. EVP and CFO* | 2023 | 624,000 | — | 1,800,200 | — | 726,336 | — | 450,841 | 3,601,377 | | | 2022 | 600,000 | — | 3,300,136 | — | 1,057,500 | — | 30,396 | 4,988,032 | | | 2021 | 500,000 | — | 1,499,960 | — | 742,500 | — | 25,113 | 2,767,573 | | Bernardo Hees Executive Chairman | 2023 | 500,000 | — | 4,000,122 | — | 485,000 | — | 553,344 | 5,538,466 | | | 2022 | 500,000 | — | 3,999,960 | — | 500,000 | — | 16,711 | 5,016,671 | | | 2021 | 500,000 | 500,000 | 3,500,010 | — | 500,000 | — | 9,026 | 5,009,036 | | Martins, Izzy EVP, Americas* | 2023 | 624,000 | — | 900,100 | — | 700,128 | — | 301,631 | 2,525,859 | | | 2022 | 600,000 | — | 2,400,048 | — | 1,051,875 | — | 40,030 | 4,091,953 | | | 2021 | 500,000 | 83,333 | 800,045 | — | 737,500 | — | 39,470 | 2,160,348 | | Simhambhatla, Ravi EVP, Chief Digital & Innovation Officer | 2023 | 500,000 | — | 900,100 | — | 478,404 | — | 596,312 | 2,474,816 | | | 2022 | 252,055 | — | 5,449,927 | — | 421,940 | — | 95,642 | 6,219,564 |

  72. Summary Compensation Table

    | * Reflects the individual’s position during all of 2023. As of January 2024, Mr. Choi is our Chief Transformation Officer, and Ms. Martins is our Chief Financial Officer. |

  73. Summary Compensation Table

    | (a) Salary includes amounts deferred under the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan or 401(k) Plan. For Mr. Simhambhatla, 2022 salary is prorated to reflect when his employment with the Company commenced in July 2022. |

  74. Summary Compensation Table

    | (b) For 2021, for Mr. Hees, represents an annual bonus paid in July 2021 based on performance during the initial 12-month period following his start date; for Ms. Martins, represents a long-term cash bonus awarded in 2019 and paid in 2021. |

  75. Summary Compensation Table

    | (c) Represents the aggregate grant date fair value computed by multiplying the number of shares (in the case of PSUs, based on target level as the probable outcome) by the closing price on the grant date, in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718, Compensation Stock—Compensation. The grant date value of the 2023 stock awards assuming achievement of the highest level of performance conditions are: for Mr. Ferraro, $6,500,145; Mr. Choi, $2,250,251; Mr. Hees, $5,000,256; Ms. Martins, $1,125,230; and Mr. Simhambhatla, $1,125,230. The 2023 stock awards are further discussed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (the “CD&A”). |

  76. Summary Compensation Table

    | (d) For 2023, amounts reflected were earned based on the terms of the 2023 AIP as further discussed in the CD&A and include amounts deferred under the Company's Deferred Compensation Plan. |

  77. Summary Compensation Table

    | (e) For 2023, while no value is shown for Mr. Ferraro, his pension value decreased by $3,220. Avis froze this qualified defined benefit pension plan to new participation and future benefit accruals as of December 31, 1998. Please see the “Pension Benefits Table” for further information regarding this plan. |

  78. Summary Compensation Table

    | (f) All Other Compensation is comprised of the compensation described in the following tables. |

  79. 2023 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

    2023 Grants of Plan-Based Awards The following table reflects information regarding our annual cash incentive plan and grants of stock awards (RSUs and PSUs) during 2023. We did not grant any stock options during 2023.

  80. 2023 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

    | Name | Award Type | Grant/ Approval Date | Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (a) | | | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards (b) | | | All Other stock Awards Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#)(c) | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards ($)(d) | | | | | Threshold ($) | Target ($) | Maximum ($) | Threshold (#) | Target (#) | Maximum (#) | | | | Mr. Ferraro | Annual Incentive | — | 1,248,000 | 2,496,000 | 3,744,000 | | | | | | | | RSU | 3/9/2023 | | | | | | | 12,450 | 2,600,058 | | | PSU | 3/9/2023 | | | | 6,225 | 12,450 | 18,675 | | 2,600,058 | | Mr. Choi | Annual Incentive | — | 390,000 | 780,000 | 1,170,000 | | | | | | | | RSU | 3/9/2023 | | | | | | | 4,310 | 900,100 | | | PSU | 3/9/2023 | | | | 2,155 | 4,310 | 6,465 | | 900,100 | | Mr. Hees | Annual Incentive | — | 250,000 | 500,000 | 500,000 | | | | | | | | RSU | 3/9/2023 | | | | | | | 9,577 | 2,000,061 | | | PSU | 3/9/2023 | | | | 4,789 | 9,577 | 14,366 | | 2,000,061 | | Ms. Martins | Annual Incentive | — | 390,000 | 780,000 | 1,170,000 | | | | | | | | RSU | 3/9/2023 | | | | | | | 2,155 | 450,050 | | | PSU | 3/9/2023 | | | | 1,078 | 2,155 | 3,233 | | 450,050 | | Mr. Simhambhatla | Annual Incentive | — | 300,000 | 600,000 | 900,000 | | | | | | | | RSU | 3/9/2023 | | | | | | | 2,155 | 450,050 | | | PSU | 3/9/2023 | | | | 1,078 | 2,155 | 3,233 | | 450,050 |

  81. 2023 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

    | (a) Reflects pay opportunity under the 2023 AIP, which is discussed in the CD&A. Amounts actually earned and paid for 2023 performance are reflected in the Summary Compensation Table. |

  82. 2023 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

    | (b) Represents awards of PSUs which are scheduled to vest in March 2026, subject to both continued service through the vesting date and attainment of performance goals as described in the CD&A under “2023 Long-Term Incentive Awards.” |

  83. 2023 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

    | (c) For Messrs. Ferraro, Choi, Simhambhatla and Ms. Martins, RSUs awarded March 9, 2023 are scheduled to vest in equal installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant, subject to continued service through each vesting date. For Mr. Hees, the RSU award of 9,577 vests on June 30, 2024, subject to continued service. |

  84. 2023 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

    | (d) Represents the aggregate grant date fair value computed by multiplying the number of shares (in the case of PSUs, based on target level as the probable outcome) by the closing price on the grant date. |

  85. Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table

    Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table The following table reflects information regarding our outstanding stock awards at December 31, 2023. There were no stock options outstanding.

  86. Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table

    | | | Stock Awards (a) | | | | | Name | Grant Date | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($) | | Mr. Ferraro | 3/9/2023 | 13,123(b) | 2,326,183 | 13,123(h) | 2,326,183 | | | 12/30/2022 | 19,290(c) | 3,419,345 | | | | | 3/9/2022 | 9,382(d) | 1,663,053 | 14,073(i) | 2,494,580 | | | 3/9/2021 | 14,107(e) | 2,500,607 | 63,480(j) | 11,252,465 | | Mr. Choi | 3/9/2023 | 4,543(b) | 805,292 | 4,543(h) | 805,292 | | | 12/30/2022 | 9,645(c) | 1,709,673 | | | | | 3/9/2022 | 3,248(d) | 575,740 | 4,872(i) | 863,611 | | | 3/9/2021 | 4,232(e) | 750,164 | 19,043(j) | 3,375,562 | | Mr. Hees | 3/9/2023 | 10,095(f) | 1,789,440 | 10,095(h) | 1,789,440 | | | 3/9/2022 | | | 10,825(i) | 1,918,840 | | | 3/9/2021 | | | 25,392(j) | 4,500,986 | | Ms. Martins | 3/9/2023 | 2,271(b) | 402,557 | 2,271(h) | 402,557 | | | 12/30/2022 | 9,645(c) | 1,709,673 | | | | | 3/9/2022 | 1,624(d) | 287,870 | 2,436(i) | 431,805 | | | 3/9/2021 | 2,257(e) | 400,076 | 10,157(j) | 1,800,430 | | Mr. Simhambhatla | 3/9/2023 | 2,271(b) | 402,557 | 2,271(h) | 402,557 | | | 7/26/2022 | 36,649(g) | 6,496,402 | 1,601(i) | 283,793 |

  87. Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table

    | (a) Stock awards reflect RSUs and PSUs, together with the dividend equivalent stock units that accrued on such awards as a result of the special one-time cash dividend paid to stockholders in December 2023 that remain subject to the same vesting conditions as the underlying stock awards. Values are based on the closing price of our Common Stock on December 29, 2023 of $177.26. For PSUs (including dividend equivalent units) where performance levels have been achieved but remained unvested as of December 31, 2023, the number of shares shown as outstanding reflect the actual achievement. Notes (b)-(I) are set forth below. |

  88. Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table

    | Award | Scheduled Vesting | | (b) RSUs | Three equal installments on March 9, 2024, 2025, and 2026. | | (c) RSUs | December 30, 2025 | | (d) RSUs | Two equal installments on March 9, 2024 and 2025. | | (e) RSUs | March 9, 2024 | | (f) RSUs | June 30, 2024 | | (g) RSUs | 18,324 on July 26, 2024, 534 on July 26, 2025, and 17,791 on July 26, 2026 | | (h) PSUs | March 9, 2026, based on three-year cumulative Adjusted EBITDA (75% weighting) and a variable cost metric (25% weighting), as discussed in the CD&A, and disclosed at target level. | | (i) PSUs | March 9, 2025 (or July 26, 2025 in the case of Mr. Simhambhatla's award), based on three-year cumulative Adjusted EBITDA (75% weighting) and a variable cost metric (25% weighting), and disclosed at target level. | | (j) PSUs | March 9, 2024, based on highest one-year Adjusted EBITDA performance during the performance period, and disclosed above at maximum value as performance goals were achieved at the maximum vesting level (150% of target for NEOs other than Mr. Hees whose award vesting was capped at 100%). |

  89. 2023 Option Exercise and Stock Vested Table

    2023 Option Exercise and Stock Vested Table The following table reflects information regarding vesting of our stock awards during fiscal 2023. There were no stock options outstanding or exercised.

  90. 2023 Option Exercise and Stock Vested Table

    | | Stock Awards | | | Name | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) | Value Realized on Vesting ($)(a) | | Mr. Ferraro | 128,471 | 26,829,884 | | Mr. Choi | 34,872 | 7,416,061 | | Mr. Hees | 62,333 | 14,253,687 | | Ms. Martins | 15,753 | 3,289,857 | | Mr. Simhambhatla | 506 | 113,673 |

  91. 2023 Option Exercise and Stock Vested Table

    | (a) The value realized on vesting reflects the market value of the shares (before taxes) on the applicable vesting date. |

  92. Pension Benefits Table

    Pension Benefits Table

  93. Pension Benefits Table

    | Name | Plan Name (a) | Number of Years of Credited Service (#)(a) | Present Value of Accumulated Benefit ($)(a) | Payments During Last Fiscal Year ($) | | Mr. Ferraro | Avis Rent A Car System, LLC Pension Plan | 22 years, 1 month | 374,411 | — |

  94. Pension Benefits Table

    | (a) Avis froze its qualified defined benefit pension plan to new participation and future benefit accruals as of December 31, 1998. Mr. Ferraro is the only NEO who participated in this plan. Prior to December 31, 1998, Mr. Ferraro earned the right to receive certain benefits upon retirement at the retirement age of 65 or upon early retirement on or after age 55. For a discussion of the calculation of retirement benefits, please see Note 19 to our audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, included in our 2023 Form 10-K. |

  95. Pension Benefits Table

    The Avis Rent A Car System, LLC Pension Plan is a qualified, final average pay type of retirement plan that pays unreduced benefits upon attainment of age 65. The retirement benefit is calculated by multiplying years of credited service and final average pay (five highest consecutive years earnings in the ten years immediately preceding the December 31,1998 plan freeze date) and reducing that amount by a portion of estimated Social Security old age benefits payable at age 65. The normal form of payment is a 50% joint and survivor annuity (assuming the participant is married at the time benefit payments commence). Alternate forms of annuity payments and a lump-sum option may be selected, if approved by the spouse.

  96. Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Table

    Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Table

  97. Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Table

    | Name | Executive Contributions in Last FY ($)(a) | Registrant Contributions in Last FY ($)(b) | Aggregate Earnings in Last FY ($)(c) | Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($)(d) | Aggregate Balance at Last FYE ($)(e) | | Mr. Ferraro | 669,600 | 200,880 | 628,559 | — | 3,130,202 | | Mr. Choi | — | — | — | — | — | | Mr. Hees | — | — | — | — | — | | Ms. Martins | — | — | — | — | — | | Mr. Simhambhatla | — | — | — | — | — |

  98. Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Table

    | (a) Under the deferred compensation plan as in effect during 2023, participants were able to elect to defer a maximum of 80% of base salary and 98% of annual cash incentives. The agreements between participants and the Company must provide that the deferrals under the plan are (1) irrevocable; (2) agreed to before the compensation is earned; and (3) for a specified length of time. Amounts deferred by participants, as well as any matching contributions made by the Company, are typically contributed to a rabbi trust established for the purpose of holding plan assets. Participants may allocate deferrals to one or more deemed investments under the plan. Matching contributions may be subject to such distribution provisions as determined from time to time; however, all of a participant’s accounts under this plan will be distributed in the event of a change in control (as defined in the deferred compensation plan) or in the event that the participant’s service with us terminates as a result of death or disability. A participant in this plan may elect a single lump-sum payment of his or her account, or may elect installments over a period of up to 10 years; however, the participant’s entire account balance will be paid in a single lump-sum following a change in control. |

  99. Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Table

    | (b) The Company provides matching contributions for its NEOs up to a cap of 6% of base salary and annual incentive, as applicable. |

  100. Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Table

    | (c) All participant deferrals and matching contributions are immediately vested and are held in a grantor trust. Under this arrangement, the Company takes no tax deduction, and the beneficiaries pay no tax on contributions to the trust until amounts are paid. Although funds are potentially subject to the employer’s creditors, they are inaccessible to present and future management until payment is required to be made in accordance with the terms of the plan. |

  101. Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Table

    | (d) Amounts represent ordinary-course distributions pursuant to prior payment elections made by the NEOs in accordance with the terms and conditions of the applicable plan (as further discussed in note (a) above). |

  102. Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Table

    | (e) Represents total trust assets accumulated for all periods of plan participation through the end of 2023. The aggregate balance is the sum of all participant and registrant contributions and investment earnings less any withdrawals or distributions. |

  103. Potential Payments on Termination or Change of Control

    Potential Payments on Termination or Change of Control The table below provides estimated potential severance payments for each NEO, as of December 31, 2023, under the circumstances described (excluding amounts accrued under the pension plan described above or other retirement plans, as applicable).

  104. Potential Payments on Termination or Change of Control

    | Name and Triggering Event (a) | Lump-Sum Severance Payment ($)(b) | Accelerated Vesting of Stock- Based Awards ($)(c) | Continuation of Benefits and Perquisites ($)(d) | Total ($) | | Mr. Ferraro | | | | | | Resignation or Termination by Company for Cause | — | — | — | — | | Termination due to Death or Disability | 2,312,170 | 25,982,416 | — | 28,294,586 | | Termination by Company without Cause or due to Constructive Discharge | 7,488,000 | 22,880,721 | 104,533 | 30,473,253 | | Change of Control Transaction and Termination by Company without Cause or due to a Constructive Discharge | 7,488,000 | 25,982,416 | 104,533 | 33,574,949 | | Change of Control Transaction without Termination | — | — | — | — | | Mr. Choi | | | | | | Resignation or Termination by Company for Cause | — | — | — | — | | Termination due to Death or Disability | 726,336 | 8,885,246 | — | 9,611,582 | | Termination by Company without Cause or due to Constructive Discharge | 1,997,349 | 4,681,702 | 30,924 | 6,709,975 | | Change of Control Transaction and Termination by Company without Cause or due to a Constructive Discharge | 1,997,349 | 8,885,246 | 30,924 | 10,913,519 | | Change of Control Transaction without Termination | — | — | — | — | | Mr. Hees | | | | | | Resignation or Termination by Company for Cause | — | — | — | — | | Termination due to Death or Disability | 485,000 | 9,998,705 | — | 10,483,705 | | Termination by Company without Cause or due to Constructive Discharge | 1,508,013 | 6,290,426 | — | 7,798,439 | | Change of Control Transaction and Termination by Company without Cause or due to a Constructive Discharge | 1,508,013 | 9,998,705 | — | 11,506,718 | | Change of Control Transaction without Termination | — | — | — | — | | Ms. Martins | | | | | | Resignation or Termination by Company for Cause | — | — | — | — | | Termination due to Death or Disability | 700,128 | 5,434,880 | — | 6,135,008 | | Termination by Company without Cause or due to Constructive Discharge | 1,970,962 | 2,478,183 | 21,929 | 4,471,074 | | Change of Control Transaction and Termination by Company without Cause or due to a Constructive Discharge | 1,970,962 | 5,434,880 | 21,929 | 7,427,771 | | Change of Control Transaction without Termination | — | — | — | — | | Mr. Simhambhatla | | | | | | Resignation or Termination by Company for Cause | — | — | — | — | | Termination due to Death or Disability | 478,404 | 7,585,310 | — | 8,063,714 | | Termination by Company without Cause or due to Constructive Discharge | 1,484,962 | 3,382,121 | 12,616 | 4,879,698 | | Change of Control Transaction and Termination by Company without Cause or due to a Constructive Discharge | 1,484,962 | 7,585,310 | 12,616 | 9,082,887 | | Change of Control Transaction without Termination | — | — | — | — |

  105. Potential Payments on Termination or Change of Control

    | (a) Descriptions of the terms “Cause” and “Constructive Discharge” are provided above under the sections captioned “Employment Agreements and Other Arrangements — Definition of Cause” and “Discussion of Change-in-Control Provisions.” |

  106. Potential Payments on Termination or Change of Control

    | (b) Lump sump severance payments due to death or disability, for each NEO, is based on actual annual incentives under the AIP in 2023. For Mr. Ferraro, lump sum severance payments, other than due to death or disability, is calculated as of December 31, 2023, based on base salary and target annual incentive and multiplied by 200%. For Messrs. Choi, Hees, Simhambhatla, and Ms. Martins, lump sum severance payments, other than due to death or disability, are calculated as of December 31, 2023, based on base salary multiplied by 200%, actual incentives earned under the AIP in 2023, and the annual amount of the Company's contribution towards medical and dental premiums. |

  107. Potential Payments on Termination or Change of Control

    | (c) The values of RSUs and PSUs were calculated assuming accelerated vesting as of December 31, 2023 and based on the closing price of our Common Stock of $177.26 on December 29, 2023. Additionally, values are based on maximum vesting levels for the 2021 PSUs, and target vesting for the 2022 and 2023 PSUs. Descriptions of the accelerated vesting provisions are provided under “Employment Agreements and Other Arrangements.” |

  108. Potential Payments on Termination or Change of Control

    | (d) For Mr. Ferraro, reflects 24 months of continued health and dental, car benefits and financial planning. For Messrs. Choi, Hees, Simhambhatla, and Ms. Martins, reflects 12 months of continued participation in financial planning and car benefits, as applicable based on each Executive's participation in such programs as of December 31, 2023. |

  109. CEO Pay Ratio

    CEO Pay Ratio For 2023, the Company reviewed a comparison of CEO pay to the pay of all of its employees (consisting of 14,447 U.S. employees and 9,448 non-U.S. employees). This review included all employees employed by the Company as of December 31, 2023, excluding 232, 192, 170, 154, 52, 23, 8, 6, 6 and 3 of non-U.S. based employees in Portugal, Poland, Belgium, Sweden, India, Czechia, China, Netherlands, Brazil and Monaco, respectively. We identified our median employee by (i) examining payroll records of each employee as previously described, whether on a full-time, part-time or seasonal or temporary basis, to calculate each employee’s gross earnings for the twelve-month period starting January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023; (ii) annualizing gross earnings for any employee that did not work for the full fiscal year; (iii) ranking, by total amount of gross earnings, all employees, except the CEO, from highest to lowest; and (iv) selecting the median employee (the “Median Employee”) ranked on the list. We have calculated the total annual compensation for the Median Employee applying the same methodology used for our NEOs, as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table above. Total compensation for 2023 for our CEO was $10,274,921. Our Median Employee's total compensation for 2023 was $37,795. The ratio of our CEO's pay to the pay of our Median Employee for 2023 is 272 to 1.

  110. Pay Versus Performance

    Pay Versus Performance In accordance with Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act and Item 402(v) of SEC Regulation S-K, we are required to disclose the relationship between executive compensation actually paid (“CAP”) by us and our financial performance over the applicable time period of the disclosure.

  111. Pay Versus Performance Table

    Pay Versus Performance Table

  112. Pay Versus Performance Table

    | Fiscal Year | Summary Compensation Table Total for PEO (a)(b) ($) | Compensation Actually Paid (CAP) to PEO (a)(c)(d) ($) | Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs(e)(f)($) | Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs (e)(g)($) | Total Shareholder Return (h)($) | Peer Group Total Shareholder Return (h)($) | Net income ($) | Adjusted EBITDA (i)($) | | 2023 | 10,274,921 | 17,022,638 | 3,535,130 | 5,335,554 | 578.37 | 154.31 | 1.635 billion | 2.490 billion | | 2022 | 13,010,743 | 5,274,544 | 5,079,055 | 2,547,482 | 508.47 | 127.96 | 2.756 billion | 4.133 billion | | 2021 | 8,594,555 | 64,815,057 | 3,344,194 | 21,392,900 | 643.21 | 155.22 | 1.283 billion | 2.411 billion | | 2020 | 4,915,152 | 4,087,859 | 2,876,919 | 2,321,984 | 115.69 | 116.52 | (684) million | (175) million |

  113. Pay Versus Performance Table

    | (a) The PEO for each year is Mr. Ferraro. |

  114. Pay Versus Performance Table

    | (b) Values reflect total compensation as shown in the Summary Compensation Table for each year shown. |

  115. Pay Versus Performance Table

    | (c) In accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, CAP is calculated first by subtracting the amounts shown in the Stock Awards column of the Summary Compensation Total for each applicable year. (For 2023, the Stock Award amount was $5,200,116. For prior years, the amount is set forth in the Summary Compensation Table shown elsewhere in this proxy or in the proxy statement for the applicable year.) Then the following adjustments are made to the calculation: |

  116. Pay Versus Performance Table

    | Year | Fair value at 12/31 of equity awards granted during the year and unvested at 12/31 ($) | Fair value at vesting of equity awards granted and vested in the year ($) | Change in fair value during the year of equity awards outstanding both on 1/1 and 12/31 ($) | Change in fair value during the year of equity awards outstanding on 1/1 that vested during the year ($) | Forfeitures of equity awards that had value on 1/1 that failed to vest during the year ($) | | 2023 | 5,181,398 | — | 996,802 | 5,769,633 | — | | 2022 | 8,197,914 | — | (8,584,873) | 850,627 | — | | 2021 | 20,813,727 | — | 35,195,582 | 5,211,225 | — | | 2020 | 2,608,091 | 699,225 | (770,708) | (159,758) | — |

  117. Pay Versus Performance Table

    | (d) In addition, for 2020, $81,463 of pension earnings in the Summary Compensation Total have been removed when calculating CAP, and no additional pension values have been included for any years as there are no service costs because the Avis Rent A Car System, LLC Pension Plan was frozen as of December 31, 1998. |

  118. Pay Versus Performance Table

    | (e) The non-PEO NEOs for 2023 and 2022 are Messrs. Choi, Hees and Simhambhatla and Ms. Martins; for 2021 are Messrs. Choi, Hees, Sita, and Rankin; and for 2020 are Messrs. Choi, Hees, Rankin, North and Tucker and Ms. Martins. |

  119. Pay Versus Performance Table

    | (f) Values reflect the average total compensation as shown in the Summary Compensation Table for the non-PEO NEOs for each year shown. |

  120. Pay Versus Performance Table

    | (g) In accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, CAP is calculated first by subtracting the average of the amounts shown in the Stock Awards column of the Summary Compensation Total for each applicable year. (For 2023, the individual Stock Award amounts were $1,800,200, $4,000,122, $900,100 and $900,100, respectively. For prior years, the amount is set forth in the Summary Compensation Table shown elsewhere in this proxy or in the proxy statement for the applicable year.) Then the following adjustments are made to the calculation: |

  121. Pay Versus Performance Table

    | Year | Fair value at 12/31 of equity awards granted during the year and unvested at 12/31 ($) | Fair value at vesting of equity awards granted and vested in the year ($) | Change in fair value during the year of equity awards outstanding both on 1/1 and 12/31 ($) | Change in fair value during the year of equity awards outstanding on 1/1 that vested during the year ($) | Forfeitures of equity awards that had value on 1/1 that failed to vest during the year ($) | | 2023 | 1,818,532 | — | 263,742 | 1,618,281 | — | | 2022 | 3,955,662 | — | (1,719,420) | (980,296) | — | | 2021 | 6,595,092 | — | 11,794,300 | 1,534,325 | — | | 2020 | 1,481,115 | 27,969 | (172,866) | (91,304) | (89,236) |

  122. Pay Versus Performance Table

    | (h) Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) is determined based on the value of an initial fixed investment of $100 on December 31, 2019. The peer group TSR reflects the Dow Jones US Transportation Average Index. |

  123. Pay Versus Performance Table

    | (i) The Company-selected measure is Adjusted EBITDA, which is a non-GAAP financial metric. See the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section above for a description and reconciliation of this metric. |

  124. Analysis of the Information Presented in the Pay Versus Performance Table

    Analysis of the Information Presented in the Pay Versus Performance Table As required by Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, the Company is providing the following descriptions of the relationships between CAP and the metrics presented in the Pay Versus Performance table. For the four-year period shown in the table above, the amount of CAP is aligned with the Company’s TSR. For this same four-year period, our TSR has exceeded that of the peer group TSR presented in the table. The alignment of CAP with the Company’s TSR (and its relative TSR to the peer group) over the period presented is because a significant portion of the CAP is in the form of equity awards the value of which varies year to year for purposes of this table depending on the stock price (including for unvested awards). For example, given the significant change in the Company’s 2020 TSR of $115.69 compared to the Company’s 2021 TSR of $643.21, the amount of 2021 CAP significantly exceeds 2020. Since the Company’s 2022 TSR of $508.47 was lower than the Company’s 2021 TSR of $643.21, the amount of 2022 CAP declined, and since the Company’s 2023 TSR of $578.37 was higher than the Company’s 2022 TSR of $508.47, the amount of 2023 CAP increased. While the Company does not use net income as a performance measure in its executive compensation program, the measure of net income is correlated with the measure of Adjusted EBITDA, which is a performance goal under both the annual and long-term incentive compensation programs. As shown in the table above, the amount of CAP does not necessarily align with the Company’s net income and adjusted EBITDA over the four years presented in the table, primarily as a result of the impact of stock price on the calculation of CAP (including for awards that remain unvested and unearned) as described above.

  125. Director Compensation

    Director Compensation For 2023, our non-employee directors were eligible to receive an annual director retainer of $250,000. To reflect their additional responsibilities, the chairs and members of the Audit, Compensation and Corporate Governance Committees were also eligible to receive additional annual retainers in 2023 at the rates set forth below.

  126. Director Compensation

    | | Annual Retainers ($) | | Audit Committee Chair | 35,000 | | Audit Committee Member | 15,000 | | Compensation Committee Chair | 30,000 | | Compensation Committee Member | 15,000 | | Corporate Governance Committee Chair | 30,000 | | Corporate Governance Committee Member | 12,000 |

  127. Director Compensation

    Annual retainers described above (collectively, “Director Fees”) are paid (i) 50% in cash on a quarterly basis and (ii) 50% in the form of an annual RSU award with vesting scheduled on the one-year anniversary of the grant date, subject to an annual cap of 30,000 units. Under the Company’s deferred compensation plan applicable to non-employee directors (the “NED Plan”), directors may elect to defer all or a portion of their Director Fees. Directors who elect to defer cash fees may choose from various investment choices similar to those available to the NEOs under our executive deferred compensation plan or may elect to receive an increased RSU award in lieu of some or all of such cash fees. Under the NED Plan, settlement of RSUs is automatically deferred. Such units convert on a one-on-one basis into the Company’s Common Stock upon termination of service, a change in control, or at a different time based on a director’s election. Directors can also elect settlement to occur on the scheduled vesting date. Directors do not receive any meeting fees or any benefits such as life or medical insurance. Any member of the Board who is also an officer or employee of our Company does not receive compensation for serving as a director. Directors are eligible for limited matching of charitable contributions through the Avis Budget Group Charitable Foundation, and are also eligible to purchase vehicles through the auto lease program we make available to our employees; however, such purchases do not result in an associated incremental cost to the Company.

  128. 2023 Director Compensation Table

    2023 Director Compensation Table The following table sets forth compensation paid to our directors during 2023, except for our Executive Chairman, who did not receive separate compensation for his service as a director during 2023 and whose compensation is set forth above in the Summary Compensation Table.

  129. 2023 Director Compensation Table

    | Name of Director | Fees Earned or Paid In Cash ($)(a) | Stock Awards ($)(b) | Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) | All Other Compensation ($)(c) | Total ($) | | Pahwa, Jagdeep (d) | — | — | — | — | — | | Hariharan, Anu | 132,500 | 132,419 | — | 17,935 | 282,854 | | Krominga, Lynn | 155,000 | 154,859 | — | 279,214 | 589,073 | | Lurie, Glenn | 150,000 | 149,927 | — | 128,433 | 428,360 | | Sarma, Karthik (d) | — | — | — | — | — |

  130. 2023 Director Compensation Table

    | (a) Represents the cash portion of the Director Fees described above. |

  131. 2023 Director Compensation Table

    | (b) Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of RSU awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The number of stock units are determined by dividing the applicable portion of the Director Fees by the Company’s closing stock price on the date of grant (rounded to the nearest whole number of shares). |

  132. 2023 Director Compensation Table

    Outstanding stock awards (including both unvested RSU awards and deferred stock units under the NED Plan) for the Company’s non-employee directors at fiscal year-end (together with the dividend equivalent stock units described below), are as follows: for Ms. Hariharan, 1,365; for Ms. Krominga, 29,065; and for Mr. Lurie, 13,083.

  133. 2023 Director Compensation Table

    | (c) Includes discretionary matching contributions in the amount of $5,000 per person available through The Avis Budget Group Charitable Foundation. The remaining amounts represent the grant date fair value of the dividend equivalent stock units credited to outstanding RSU awards and to deferred stock units under the NED Plan in connection with the special one-time cash dividend paid to stockholders in December 2023. The dividend equivalent stock units on unvested stock awards remain subject to the same vesting conditions as the underlying stock awards. |

  134. 2023 Director Compensation Table

    | (d) Mr. Pahwa and Mr. Sarma have waived compensation for Board service. |