DEF 14A of Amazon Com Inc, Apr 18, 2018

DEF 14A of Amazon Com Inc

Filed Apr 18, 2018 · FY20170001193125-18-121077

Open on EDGAR
  1. ITEM 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

    ITEM 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS In accordance with our Bylaws, the Board has fixed the number of directors constituting the Board at nine, effective as of the Annual Meeting. The Board, based on the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, proposed that the following nine nominees be elected at the Annual Meeting, each of whom will hold office until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders or until his or her successor shall have been elected and qualified:

  2. ITEM 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

    | • Jeffrey P. Bezos • Tom A. Alberg • Jamie S. Gorelick • Daniel P. Huttenlocher • Judith A. McGrath | • Jonathan J. Rubinstein • Thomas O. Ryder • Patricia Q. Stonesifer • Wendell P. Weeks |

  3. ITEM 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

    Each of the nominees is currently a director of Amazon.com, Inc. and has been elected to hold office until the 2018 Annual Meeting or until his or her successor has been elected and qualified. The nominees were most recently elected at the 2017 Annual Meeting. Biographical and related information on each nominee is set forth below. On April 12, 2018, John Seely Brown informed the Company that he would not stand for re-election at the Annual Meeting. Although the Board expects that the nine nominees will be available to serve as directors, if any of them should be unwilling or unable to serve, the Board may decrease the size of the Board or may designate substitute nominees, and the proxies will be voted in favor of any such substitute nominees. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” EACH NOMINEE.

  4. Director Nominees’ Biographical and Related Information

    Director Nominees’ Biographical and Related Information In evaluating the nominees for the Board of Directors, the Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee took into account the qualities they seek for directors, as discussed below under “Corporate Governance” and “Board Meetings and Committees,” and the directors’ individual qualifications, skills, and background that enable the directors to effectively and productively contribute to the Board’s oversight of Amazon. These individual qualifications and skills are included below in each nominee’s biography.

  5. Biographical Information

    Biographical Information Jeffrey P. Bezos, age 54, has been Chairman of the Board since founding the Company in 1994 and Chief Executive Officer since May 1996. Mr. Bezos served as President from founding until June 1999 and again from October 2000 to the present. Mr. Bezos’ individual qualifications and skills as a director include his customer-focused point of view, his willingness to encourage invention, his long-term perspective, and his on-going contributions as founder and CEO. Tom A. Alberg, age 78, has been a director since June 1996. Mr. Alberg has been a managing director of Madrona Venture Group, LLC, a venture capital firm, since September 1999, and a principal in Madrona Investment Group, LLC, a private investment firm, since January 1996. Prior to co-founding Madrona Investment Group, Mr. Alberg served as president of LIN Broadcasting Corporation, Executive Vice President of McCaw Cellular Communications, Inc., and Executive Vice President of AT&T Wireless Services. Previously, he was chair of the Executive Committee and Partner at Perkins Coie, the Northwest’s largest law firm. Mr. Alberg has served as a director of Impinj, Inc. since September 2000. Mr. Alberg’s individual qualifications and skills as a director include his experience as a venture capitalist investing in technology companies, through which he gained experience with emerging technologies, his experience as a lawyer, his knowledge of Amazon from having served as a director since 1996, as well as his customer experience skills and skills relating to financial statement and accounting matters. Jamie S. Gorelick, age 67, has been a director since February 2012. Ms. Gorelick has been a partner with the law firm Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP since July 2003. She has held numerous positions in the U.S. government, serving as Deputy Attorney General of the United States, General Counsel of the Department of Defense, Assistant to the Secretary of Energy, and a member of the bipartisan National Commission on Terrorist Threats Upon the United States. Ms. Gorelick has served as a director of VeriSign, Inc. since January 2015, a director of United Technologies Corporation from February 2000 to December 2014, and a director of Schlumberger Limited from April 2002 to June 2010. Ms. Gorelick’s individual qualifications and skills as a director include her experience as a lawyer, her leadership experience in senior governmental positions, including experience with regulatory and compliance matters, as well as her customer experience skills and skills relating to public policy and financial statement and accounting matters. Daniel P. Huttenlocher, age 59, has been a director since September 2016. Mr. Huttenlocher has been Dean and Vice Provost, Cornell Tech at Cornell University since 2012, and has worked for Cornell University since 1988 in various positions. Mr. Huttenlocher has served as a director of Corning Incorporated since February 2015. Mr. Huttenlocher’s individual qualifications and skills as a director include his experience in senior positions at Cornell University, a leading university, Cornell Tech, a research, technology commercialization, and graduate-level educational facility, and the Xerox Palo Alto Research Center, a technology research facility, through which he gained experience with emerging technologies, as well as his customer experience skills. Judith A. McGrath, age 65, has been a director since July 2014. Ms. McGrath serves as a senior advisor to Astronauts Wanted * No experience necessary, a multimedia joint venture that Ms. McGrath formed with Sony Music Entertainment, and served as President of Astronauts Wanted from June 2013 to March of 2018. The company is currently a subsidiary of Sony Pictures Television. Ms. McGrath served as Chair and Chief Executive Officer of MTV Networks Entertainment Group worldwide, a division of Viacom, Inc., including Comedy Central and Nickelodeon, from July 2004 until May 2011. Ms. McGrath’s individual qualifications and skills as a director include her leadership and multimedia operations experience as a longtime senior executive of MTV Networks Entertainment Group, through which she gained experience with content creation, advertising, and content distribution, as well as her customer experience skills. Ms. McGrath further honed her digital and entrepreneurial experience with global customers in her role at Astronauts Wanted * No experience necessary. Jonathan J. Rubinstein, age 61, has been a director since December 2010. Mr. Rubinstein was co-CEO of Bridgewater Associates, LP, a global investment management firm, from May 2016 to April 2017. Previously, Mr. Rubinstein was Senior Vice President, Product Innovation, for the Personal Systems Group at the Hewlett-Packard Company (“HP”), a multinational information technology company, from July 2011 to January 2012, and served as Senior Vice President and General Manager, Palm Global Business Unit, at HP from July 2010 to July 2011. Mr. Rubinstein was Chief Executive Officer and President of Palm, Inc., a smartphone manufacturer, from June 2009 until its acquisition by HP in July 2010, and Chairman of the Board of Palm, Inc. from October 2007 through the acquisition. Prior to joining Palm, Mr. Rubinstein was a Senior Vice President at Apple Inc., also serving as the General Manager of the iPod Division. Mr. Rubinstein served as a director of Qualcomm Incorporated from May 2013 to May 2016. Mr. Rubinstein’s individual qualifications and skills as a director include his leadership and technology experience as a senior executive at large financial and technology companies, through which he gained experience with hardware devices and emerging technologies, as well as his customer experience skills and skills relating to financial statement and accounting matters. Thomas O. Ryder, age 73, has been a director since November 2002. Mr. Ryder was Chairman of the Reader’s Digest Association, Inc. from April 1998 to December 2006, and was Chief Executive Officer from April 1998 to December 2005. From 1984 to 1998, Mr. Ryder worked in several roles at American Express, including as President of American Express Travel Related Services International. Mr. Ryder has been a director of Interval Leisure Group, Inc. since May 2016. He served as a director of RPX Corporation from December 2009 to June 2017, a director of Quad/Graphics, Inc. from July 2010 to May 2017, a director of Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. from April 2001 to September 2016, and Chairman of the Board of Directors at Virgin Mobile USA, Inc. from October 2007 to November 2009. Mr. Ryder’s individual qualifications and skills as a director include his leadership experience as a senior executive of Reader’s Digest, a large media and publishing company, and American Express, a large financial services company, through which he gained experience with intellectual property, media, enterprise sales, payments, and international operations, as well as his customer experience skills and skills relating to financial statement and accounting matters. Patricia Q. Stonesifer, age 61, has been a director since February 1997. Ms. Stonesifer has served as the President and CEO of Martha’s Table, a non-profit, since April 2013. She served as Chair of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution from January 2009 to January 2012 and as Vice Chair from January 2012 to January 2013. From September 2008 to January 2012, she served as senior advisor to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, a private philanthropic organization, where she was Chief Executive Officer from

  6. Biographical Information

    January 2006 to September 2008 and President and Co-chair from June 1997 to January 2006. Since September 2009, she has also served as a private philanthropy advisor. From 1988 to 1997, she worked in many roles at Microsoft Corporation, including as a Senior Vice President of the Interactive Media Division, and also served as the Chairwoman of the Gates Learning Foundation from 1997 to 1999. Ms. Stonesifer’s individual qualifications and skills as a director include her leadership experience as a senior executive at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and at Microsoft, through which she gained experience with emerging technologies and consumer-focused product development and marketing issues, her knowledge of Amazon from having served as a director since 1997, as well as her customer experience skills and skills relating to public policy and financial statement and accounting matters. Wendell P. Weeks, age 58, has been a director since February 2016. Mr. Weeks has been the Chief Executive Officer of Corning Incorporated, a glass and materials science innovator, since April 2005; Chairman of the board of directors since April 2007; and President since December 2010. He has held leadership roles in financial management, business development, commercial leadership, and general management across many of Corning’s businesses and technologies since joining the company in 1983. Mr. Weeks has served as a director of Merck & Co., Inc. since February 2004. Mr. Weeks’ individual qualifications and skills as a director include his leadership and operations experience as a senior executive at a large corporation with international operations, experience with product development, as well as his customer experience skills and skills relating to financial statement and accounting matters.

  7. Board Meetings and Committees

    Board Meetings and Committees The Board meets regularly during the year, and holds special meetings and acts by unanimous written consent whenever circumstances require. During 2017, there were six meetings of the Board. All incumbent directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the meetings of the Board and committees on which they served occurring during 2017. All directors then serving attended the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The Board has established an Audit Committee, a Leadership Development and Compensation Committee, and a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, each of which is comprised entirely of directors who meet the applicable independence requirements of the Nasdaq rules. The Committees keep the Board informed of their actions and provide assistance to the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibility to shareholders. The table below provides current membership information as well as meeting information for the last fiscal year.

  8. Board Meetings and Committees

    | Name | Audit Committee | Leadership Development and Compensation Committee | Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee | | Jeffrey P. Bezos | | | | | Tom A. Alberg | X | | | | John Seely Brown(1) | | | X | | Jamie S. Gorelick | | | X* | | Daniel P. Huttenlocher | | X | | | Judith A. McGrath | | X | | | Jonathan J. Rubinstein | | X* | | | Thomas O. Ryder | X* | | | | Patricia Q. Stonesifer | | | X | | Wendell P. Weeks | X | | | | Total Meetings in 2017 | 7 | 3 | 4 |

  9. Board Meetings and Committees

    | Committee Chair* |

  10. Board Meetings and Committees

    | Mr. Brown is not standing for re-election at the Annual Meeting.(1) |

  11. Board Meetings and Committees

    The functions performed by these Committees, which are set forth in more detail in their charters, are summarized below. Audit Committee. The Audit Committee represents and assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibility relating to our financial statements and financial reporting process, the qualifications, independence, and performance of our independent auditors, the performance of our internal audit function, legal and regulatory matters, and our compliance policies and procedures. The Board has designated each of Messrs. Alberg, Ryder, and Weeks as an Audit Committee Financial Expert, as defined by Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules. During the past year, the Audit Committee met with management and reviewed matters that included the Company’s risk assessment and compliance functions, information security, public policy expenditures, treasury and investment matters, accounting industry issues, the reappointment of our independent auditor, and pending litigation. The Audit Committee also met with the auditors to review the scope and results of the auditor’s annual audit and quarterly reviews of the Company’s financial statements. Leadership Development and Compensation Committee. The Leadership Development and Compensation Committee evaluates our programs and practices relating to leadership development, reviews and establishes compensation of the Company’s executive officers, and oversees management of risks for succession planning and our overall compensation program, including our equity-based compensation plans, all with a view toward maximizing long-term shareholder value. The Committee may engage compensation consultants but did not do so in 2017. Additional information on the Committee’s processes and procedures for considering and determining executive compensation is contained in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this Proxy Statement. During the past year, the Leadership Development and Compensation Committee met with management and reviewed matters that included the design, amounts, and effectiveness of the Company’s compensation of senior executives, management succession planning, the Company’s benefit and compensation programs, the Company’s human resources programs, including review of workplace discrimination and harassment reports, and feedback from the Company’s shareholder engagement. Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews and assesses the composition of the Board, assists in identifying potential new candidates for director, recommends candidates for election as director, and provides a leadership role with respect to our corporate governance. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also recommends to the Board compensation for newly elected directors and reviews director compensation as necessary. During the past year, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met with management and reviewed matters that included the Board’s composition, diversity, and skills in the context of identifying and evaluating new director candidates to join the Board, the Board’s recruitment and self-evaluation processes, Board Committee membership and qualifications, consideration of feedback from the Company’s shareholder engagement, and corporate governance developments. Director Nominations. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers candidates for director who are recommended by its members, by other Board members, by shareholders, and by management, as well as those identified by a third-party search firm retained to assist in identifying and evaluating possible candidates. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee annually reviews the tenure, performance, and contributions of existing Board members to the extent they are candidates for re-election, and considers all aspects of each candidate’s qualifications and skills in the context of the Company’s needs at that point in time and, as stated in the Board of Directors Guidelines on Significant Corporate Governance Issues, seeks out candidates with a diversity of experience and perspectives, including diversity with respect to race, gender, geography, and areas of expertise. When considering candidates as potential Board members, the Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluate the candidates’ ability to contribute to such diversity. The Board assesses its effectiveness in this regard as part of its annual Board and director evaluation process. Currently, one-third of our independent directors are women and one-third of our independent directors have served for fewer than five years. Our Board’s composition also represents a balanced approach to director tenure, allowing the Board to benefit from the experience of longer-serving directors combined with fresh perspectives from newer directors (with two new directors on-boarding and two directors leaving in the last three years). The current tenure range of our Board is as follows:

  12. Board Meetings and Committees

    | Tenure on Board | Number of Director Nominees | | More than 10 years | 5 | | 6-10 years | 2 | | 1-5 years | 3 |

  13. Board Meetings and Committees

    Among the qualifications and skills of a candidate considered important by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are: a commitment to representing the long-term interests of shareholders; customer experience skills; Internet savvy; an inquisitive and objective perspective; the willingness to take appropriate risks; leadership ability; personal and professional ethics, integrity, and values; practical wisdom and sound judgment; and business and professional experience in fields such as operations, technology, finance/accounting, product development, intellectual property, law, multimedia entertainment, and marketing. When evaluating re-nomination of existing directors, the Committee also considers the nominees’ past and ongoing effectiveness on the Board and, with the exception of Mr. Bezos, who is an employee, their independence. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that each of the director nominees for the Annual Meeting possesses these attributes. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates director candidates recommended by shareholders in the same way that it evaluates candidates recommended by its members, other members of the Board, or other persons. Shareholders wishing to submit recommendations for director candidates for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee must provide the following information in writing to the attention of the Secretary of Amazon.com, Inc. by certified or registered mail:

  14. Board Meetings and Committees

    | • | the name, address, and biography of the candidate, and an indication of whether the candidate has expressed a willingness to serve; |

  15. Board Meetings and Committees

    | • | the name, address, and phone number of the shareholder or group of shareholders making the recommendation; and |

  16. Board Meetings and Committees

    | • | the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by the shareholder or group of shareholders making the recommendation, the length of time held, and to the extent any shareholder is not a registered holder of such securities, proof of such ownership. |

  17. Board Meetings and Committees

    To be considered by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, a director candidate recommendation must be received by the Secretary of Amazon.com, Inc. by December 20, 2018. Our Bylaws provide a proxy access right for shareholders, pursuant to which a shareholder, or group of up to 20 shareholders, may include director nominees (representing up to 20% of the number of directors in office) in our proxy materials for annual meetings of our shareholders. To be eligible to utilize these proxy access provisions, the shareholder or group must have owned at least 3% of the aggregate of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock continuously for at least the prior three years and must satisfy the additional eligibility, procedural, and disclosure requirements set forth in our Bylaws.

  18. Compensation of Directors

    Compensation of Directors Our directors do not receive cash compensation for their services as directors or as members of committees of the Board, but we pay reasonable expenses incurred for attending meetings. At the discretion of the Board, directors are eligible to receive stock-based awards under the 1997 Plan. Based on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation, in February 2017, the Board approved a restricted stock unit award for 1,074 shares to Mr. Gordon, vesting in three equal annual installments on February 15, 2018, February 15, 2019, and February 15, 2020, which award was cancelled when Mr. Gordon resigned from the Board in March 2017. Based on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation, in September 2017 the Board approved a restricted stock unit award for 912 shares to Ms. McGrath, vesting in three equal annual installments on August 15, 2018, August 15, 2019, and August 15, 2020. The February 2017 award was designed to provide approximately $288,000 in compensation annually, and the September 2017 award was designed to provide approximately $298,000 in compensation annually, in each case based on an assumed value of the restricted stock units vesting in each year, which compensation represents the 50th percentile for annual director compensation among a group of peer companies. When determining the amount and vesting schedule for directors’ restricted stock unit awards, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Board have not varied awards based on specific committee service. The following table sets forth for the year ended December 31, 2017 all compensation reportable for directors who served during 2017, as determined by SEC rules.

  19. Director Compensation for 2017

    Director Compensation for 2017

  20. Director Compensation for 2017

    | Name | Stock Awards(1) | | Jeffrey P. Bezos(2) | $— | | Tom A. Alberg(3) | — | | John Seely Brown(4) | — | | William B. Gordon(5) | 883,209 | | Jamie Gorelick(4) | — | | Daniel P. Huttenlocher(6) | — | | Judith A. McGrath(7) | 890,632 | | Jonathan J. Rubinstein(3) | — | | Thomas O. Ryder(3) | — | | Patricia Q. Stonesifer(3) | — | | Wendell P. Weeks(8) | — |

  21. Director Compensation for 2017

    | Stock awards are reported at aggregate grant date fair value in the year granted, as determined under applicable accounting standards. Grant date fair value for restricted stock units is determined based on the number of shares granted multiplied by the average of the high and the low trading price of common stock of the Company on the grant date, without regard to the fact that the grants vest over a number of years. See Note 1, “Description of Business and Accounting Policies—Stock-Based Compensation,” in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” in our 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K.(1) |

  22. Director Compensation for 2017

    | Mr. Bezos does not receive any compensation for his services as a director in addition to his compensation as Chief Executive Officer.(2) |

  23. Director Compensation for 2017

    | Messrs. Alberg, Rubinstein, and Ryder and Ms. Stonesifer each held 718 unvested restricted stock units as of December 31, 2017.(3) |

  24. Director Compensation for 2017

    | Mr. Brown and Ms. Gorelick each held 879 unvested restricted stock units as of December 31, 2017. Mr. Brown is not standing for re-election at the Annual Meeting.(4) |

  25. Director Compensation for 2017

    | All of the unvested restricted stock units granted to Mr. Gordon for his service as a director were cancelled in March 2017 when he ceased to serve as a director.(5) |

  26. Director Compensation for 2017

    | Mr. Huttenlocher held 754 unvested restricted stock units as of December 31, 2017.(6) |

  27. Director Compensation for 2017

    | Ms. McGrath held 912 unvested restricted stock units as of December 31, 2017.(7) |

  28. Director Compensation for 2017

    | Mr. Weeks held 910 unvested restricted stock units as of December 31, 2017.(8) |

  29. Compensation Discussion and Analysis

    Compensation Discussion and Analysis Compensation Philosophy. As stated in the Company’s 1997 letter to shareholders, we believe that a fundamental measure of our success will be the shareholder value we create over the long term. As a result, we may make decisions and weigh tradeoffs differently than some companies. For example, under our compensation philosophy, we have prioritized stock-based compensation that vests over an extended period of time. In addition, we believe granting stock-based compensation to employees at all levels across the Company results in motivated, customer-centric people who think and act like owners because they are owners. Our compensation philosophy for our “named executive officers” identified in the “Summary Compensation Table” below is the same as for all of our employees and is governed by the following principles. First, our compensation program is designed to attract and retain the highest caliber employees by providing above industry-average compensation assuming stock price performance. Second, our compensation program provides strong long-term incentives to align our employees’ interests with our shareholders’ interests. Third, our compensation program emphasizes performance and potential to contribute to our long-term success as a basis for compensation increases, as opposed to rewarding solely for length of service. Finally, our compensation program reinforces and reflects our core values, including customer obsession, innovation, bias for action, acting like owners and thinking long term, a high hiring bar, and frugality. For our named executive officers, who are employed on an at-will basis, we provide few perquisites and generally do not provide cash bonuses other than in a new-hire context. We do not maintain nonqualified deferred compensation plans, supplemental executive retirement plan benefits, cash severance programs, or change-in-control benefits for our executive officers. Additionally, except as noted below in certain circumstances, we do not provide cash or equity incentives tied to performance criteria, which could cause employees to focus solely on short-term returns at the expense of long-term growth and innovation. We believe that investing in the creation of long-term value, without the use of performance measures or specific indices, is optimal for Amazon employees, particularly at the executive level, and for shareholders. We believe that the best measure of our performance is how we are valued over the long term. To help align our employees with long-term value creation, we compensate our employees with restricted stock unit awards that have long vesting periods. Over time, employees will have multiple restricted stock unit awards that vest over many years, and thus provide a greater amount of potential compensation in later years than the current year. This encourages employees, including executives, to seek out, develop, and pursue initiatives that focus on serving our customers and reflect a long-term view for thinking about our operations holistically and contributing to initiatives across the Company. As a company that relentlessly pursues invention across a wide range of opportunities, we believe it would be inappropriate to utilize a few discrete or short term financial or operational performance measures that may narrowly focus our executives on the success of only isolated initiatives, instead of on the long-term success of the Company as a whole. For example, in 1997, we could have adopted performance measures appropriate for an Internet bookseller, but those performance measures may have discouraged our employees from investing their time and energy into initiatives that later became AWS, Kindle, and Alexa. Other examples of long-term focus include the development of our third-party seller business, which was aided by the lessons learned from our unsuccessful efforts to build an auctions marketplace, and when we experimented with adding services other than fast shipping to our Prime membership program. A performance goal assumes some level of success by a prescribed measure, but to have a culture that relentlessly pursues invention, we have to encourage experimentation and long-term thinking, which, by definition, means we do not know in advance whether it will work. In addition, given the unique nature of Amazon and our many initiatives, standardized industry indices are either too broad or too narrow to serve as relevant comparisons for benchmarking performance. For example, if we had tied compensation to our performance relative to a retail index, we might never have pursued our AWS business since executives would have been penalized for making the early investments in cloud technology and infrastructure that AWS required. Similarly, if we tied compensation to our performance relative to a technology index, we might not have built our own devices, developed our own movies and TV shows, or innovated shipping and delivery methods. A customized index locks in a business profile at a point in time and may deter employees from considering or pursuing initiatives that do not fit into that mold. Thus, we think the best stock market comparison we can make is measuring our own success: can we continue to grow our share value over the long term? As a result, we believe the best performance measure for our company is stock price performance over the long term. Therefore, when we set our executives’ target compensation, we assume a fixed annual increase in the stock price so that our executives’ compensation will be negatively impacted if our stock price is flat or declines, and is favorably impacted if the stock performs beyond the initial stock price assumption. This approach has served our employees and shareholders well over the past three years, as our stock price has increased approximately 280% between January 2015 and December 2017. Base Salaries. Consistent with our philosophy that total compensation should be tied to long-term shareholder value, base salaries for named executive officers are designed to provide a minimum level of cash compensation and to be significantly less than those paid to senior leadership at similarly situated companies. Base salaries ranged from $81,840 for Mr. Bezos to $175,000 for Messrs. Blackburn, Jassy, and Wilke. Due to Mr. Bezos’ substantial ownership in Amazon, Mr. Bezos again requested not to receive additional compensation in 2017 and has never received annual cash compensation in excess of his current amount. Stock-Based Compensation. The primary component of a named executive officer’s total compensation is stock-based compensation in order to closely tie total compensation to long-term shareholder value. Accordingly, named executive officers receive sizeable stock-based awards at the time of hire and are also eligible for stock-based awards on a periodic basis. Because our compensation program is designed to reward long-term performance and operate over a period of years, named executive officers may not necessarily receive stock-based awards every year. For example, because annual total compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table below includes the entire fair value as of the grant date of a stock award granted in that year, without regard to the fact that the grant vests over a number of years, a named executive officer’s total compensation as reported will be higher in years in which he or she receives a grant compared to years in which he or she does not receive a grant. Due to Mr. Bezos’ substantial stock ownership, he believes he is appropriately incentivized and his interests are appropriately aligned with shareholders’ interests. Mr. Bezos has never received any stock-based compensation from Amazon.

  30. Compensation Discussion and Analysis

    Since late 2002, we have used restricted stock units as our primary stock-based compensation vehicle. We believe that restricted stock units align the long-term interests of named executive officers and shareholders and help efficiently manage overall shareholder dilution from stock awards. Restricted stock unit grant amounts and vesting for named executive officers, whether for new hire or subsequent grants, are established by the Leadership Development and Compensation Committee after receiving recommendations from the Senior Vice President of Human Resources and the Chief Executive Officer. These restricted stock unit grants generally vest over a period of five or six years. Vesting does not accelerate as a result of termination of employment or upon a change-in-control (unless the Leadership Development and Compensation Committee determines that the acquiring company will not be assuming or substituting the awards). For new hire grants and grants made in connection with internal promotions, the Senior Vice President of Human Resources, the Chief Executive Officer, and the Leadership Development and Compensation Committee consider a variety of factors, including past compensation from the named executive officer’s former employer, future compensation from such former employer that will be forfeited upon joining the Company, the compensation of similarly situated senior executives at Amazon, the named executive officer’s expected level of responsibility and expected contributions to our future success, and the compensation of similarly situated executives at other retail, Internet, and technology companies. For periodic grants, the Senior Vice President of Human Resources, the Chief Executive Officer, and the Leadership Development and Compensation Committee consider a variety of factors, including the named executive officer’s level of responsibility, past contributions to our performance, including our core values, and expected contributions to our future success, as well as the compensation of similarly situated executives at other retail, Internet, and technology companies. Generally, the Leadership Development and Compensation Committee considers whether to make periodic grants to executive officers in connection with our annual performance and compensation review process, which normally occurs between January and April. For both new hire and periodic restricted stock unit grants, the Senior Vice President of Human Resources and Chief Executive Officer develop grant recommendations by subjectively evaluating the factors above to set a total compensation target for each named executive officer and then designing restricted stock unit grants to help meet those total compensation targets based on stock price appreciation assumptions, taking into account the named executive officer’s cash compensation and the estimated value of pre-existing stock-based compensation vesting in subsequent years, if any. In this process, the Senior Vice President of Human Resources and Chief Executive Officer view projected total compensation for a given year as cash compensation expected to be earned in that year plus an assumed value of stock-based compensation vesting in that year. Because we focus on total compensation over time and take into account existing compensation, periodic grants for a smaller number of shares do not necessarily reflect lower total compensation. In 2017, the named executive officers did not receive any new equity awards. In evaluating the compensation of our named executive officers in 2017, the Leadership Development and Compensation Committee considered the vesting schedule of existing equity awards as well as aggregated information from third-party surveys, including compensation data for retail, Internet, technology, and media companies including Alphabet, Apple, AT&T, Best Buy, Cisco, eBay, Facebook, General Electric, Honeywell, IBM, Intel, Microsoft, Oracle, Starbucks, Target, Wal-Mart, and The Walt Disney Company. The Leadership Development and Compensation Committee exercises discretion in determining executive officers’ compensation and does not require that compensation be set at a specific level relative to what is reflected in the survey data. The total number of restricted stock units granted to our named executive officers during the three-year period from 2015 to 2017 represented only (i) 0.64% of the total number of restricted stock units granted to all employees during the same three-year period and (ii) 0.01% of the weighted-average number of shares outstanding for the same three-year period. We impose additional vesting conditions on certain stock-based awards issued to named executive officers. For equity awards granted prior to recent tax law changes, these conditions were intended to qualify the stock-based awards as tax-deductible compensation under Section 162(m)(4)(c) of the Internal Revenue Code. However, there is no guarantee that these awards will ultimately be viewed as so qualifying by the Internal Revenue Service. As a result of changes to the tax laws, we expect that equity awards granted or other compensation provided under arrangements entered into or materially modified on or after November 2, 2017 generally will not be deductible to the extent they result in compensation to certain of our named executive officers for or after 2017 that exceeds $1 million in any one year for any such officer. New Hire Cash Bonuses. None of the named executive officers received a new hire cash bonus in 2017. Other Compensation and Benefits. Named executive officers receive additional compensation in the form of vacation, medical, 401(k), relocation, and other benefits generally available to all of our employees. At times, we may provide security for Mr. Bezos and certain other executive officers, including security in addition to that provided at business facilities and during business-related travel. We believe that all Company-incurred security costs are reasonable and necessary and for the Company’s benefit. The Leadership Development and Compensation Committee periodically reviews the amount and nature of executive officers’ security expenses. Reportable security expenses are included in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table. We do not provide any other perquisites or other personal benefits to our named executive officers. Shareholder Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation. At our 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, our shareholders overwhelmingly approved the compensation of our named executive officers, with more than 97% of the votes cast for approval of our executive compensation on an advisory basis. The Leadership Development and Compensation Committee evaluated the results of the 2017 advisory vote approving the compensation of our named executive officers as well as discussions we have had in recent years with our shareholders and the other factors discussed in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis when evaluating our executive compensation and compensation policies and practices. While each of these factors informed the Leadership Development and Compensation Committee’s decisions regarding our executive compensation program, the Leadership Development and Compensation Committee did not implement changes to our executive compensation program as a result of the shareholder advisory vote. After consideration of our shareholders’ vote in favor of conducting an annual advisory vote to approve our executive compensation, the Board adopted an annual shareholder advisory vote on executive compensation.

  31. 2017 Summary Compensation Table

    2017 Summary Compensation Table

  32. 2017 Summary Compensation Table

    | Name And Principal Position | Year | Salary | Stock Awards(1) | All Other Compensation | Total | | Jeffrey P. Bezos | 2017 | $81,840 | $— | $1,600,000(2) | $1,681,840 | | Chief Executive Officer | 2016 | 81,840 | — | 1,600,000 | 1,681,840 | | | 2015 | 81,840 | — | 1,600,000 | 1,681,840 | | Brian T. Olsavsky | 2017 | 160,000 | — | 3,200(3) | 163,200 | | SVP and Chief Financial Officer | 2016 | 160,000 | 4,395,447 | 3,200 | 4,558,647 | | | 2015 | 160,000 | 7,623,373 | 3,200 | 7,786,573 | | Jeffrey M. Blackburn | 2017 | 175,000 | — | 3,500(3) | 178,500 | | SVP, Business Development(4) | 2016 | 171,250 | 22,019,668 | 3,425 | 22,194,343 | | Andrew R. Jassy | 2017 | 175,000 | — | 19,447(5) | 194,447 | | CEO Amazon Web Services | 2016 | 175,000 | 35,431,144 | 3,500 | 35,609,644 | | | 2015 | 171,250 | — | 3,425 | 174,675 | | Jeffrey A. Wilke | 2017 | 175,000 | — | 9,781(5) | 184,781 | | CEO Worldwide Consumer | 2016 | 175,000 | 32,779,614 | 3,500 | 32,958,114 | | | 2015 | 172,509 | — | 3,450 | 175,959 |

  33. 2017 Summary Compensation Table

    | Stock awards are reported at aggregate grant date fair value in the year granted, as determined under applicable accounting standards. Grant date fair value for restricted stock units is determined based on the number of shares granted multiplied by the average of the high and the low trading price of common stock of the Company on the grant date, without regard to the fact that the grants vest over a number of years. See Note 1, “Description of Business and Accounting Policies—Stock-Based Compensation,” in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” in our 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K.(1) |

  34. 2017 Summary Compensation Table

    | Represents the approximate aggregate incremental cost to Amazon of security arrangements for Mr. Bezos in addition to security arrangements provided at business facilities and for business travel. We believe that all Company-incurred security costs are reasonable and necessary and for the Company’s benefit, and that the amount of the reported security expenses for Mr. Bezos is especially reasonable in light of his low salary and the fact that he has never received any stock-based compensation.(2) |

  35. 2017 Summary Compensation Table

    | Represents the value of cash and/or shares of common stock we contributed to the named executive officer’s account in our 401(k) plan.(3) |

  36. 2017 Summary Compensation Table

    | Mr. Blackburn became a named executive officer in 2016.(4) |

  37. 2017 Summary Compensation Table

    | Reflects the value of cash and/or shares of common stock we contributed to the named executive officer’s account in our 401(k) plan and the approximate aggregate incremental cost to Amazon of security arrangements in addition to security arrangements provided at business facilities and for business travel. We believe that all Company-incurred security costs are reasonable and necessary and for the Company’s benefit.(5) |

  38. Grants of Plan-Based Awards

    Grants of Plan-Based Awards The Company did not grant stock or other plan-based awards to the named executive officers in 2017.

  39. Outstanding Equity Awards at 2017 Fiscal Year-End and Stock Vested in 2017

    Outstanding Equity Awards at 2017 Fiscal Year-End and Stock Vested in 2017 The following table sets forth information concerning the outstanding stock awards held at December 31, 2017 by the named executive officers.

  40. Outstanding Equity Awards at 2017 Fiscal Year-End

    Outstanding Equity Awards at 2017 Fiscal Year-End

  41. Outstanding Equity Awards at 2017 Fiscal Year-End

    | Name | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested(1) | | Jeffrey P. Bezos | — | $— | | Brian T. Olsavsky | | | | Restricted stock units | 27,254(2) | 31,872,735 | | Jeffrey M. Blackburn | | | | Restricted stock units | 55,227(3) | 64,586,320 | | Andrew R. Jassy | | | | Restricted stock units | 85,227(4) | 99,670,420 | | Jeffrey A. Wilke | | | | Restricted stock units | 85,814(5) | 100,356,899 |

  42. Outstanding Equity Awards at 2017 Fiscal Year-End

    | Reflects the closing market price of our common stock on December 29, 2017, $1,169.47, multiplied by the number of restricted stock units that were not vested as of December 31, 2017.(1) |

  43. Outstanding Equity Awards at 2017 Fiscal Year-End

    | Reflects shares of our common stock subject to: (a) a restricted stock unit award that vested as to 748 shares on February 15, 2018; and vesting as follows, assuming continued employment: 781 shares on each of May 15, 2018 and August 15, 2018; 782 shares on each of November 15, 2018 and February 15, 2019; 1,479 shares on May 15, 2019; 1,480 shares on each of August 15, 2019, November 15, 2019, and February 15, 2020; 1,137 shares on May 15, 2020; and 1,138 shares on each of August 15, 2020, November 15, 2020, and February 15, 2021; (b) a restricted stock unit award that vested as to 73 shares on February 15, 2018; and vesting as follows, assuming continued employment: 1,117 shares on each of May 15, 2018, August 15, 2018, November 15, 2018, and February 15, 2019; (c) a restricted stock unit award that vested as to 1,361 shares on February 15, 2018; and (d) a restricted stock unit award that vested as to 151 shares on February 15, 2018; and vesting as follows, assuming continued employment: 130 shares on each of May 15, 2018 and August 15, 2018; 131 shares on each of November 15, 2018 and February 15, 2019; 284 shares on May 15, 2019; 285 shares on each of August 15, 2019, November 15, 2019, and February 15, 2020; 239 shares on each of May 15, 2020, August 15, 2020, November 15, 2020, and February 15, 2021; and 1,060 shares on each of May 15, 2021, August 15, 2021, November 15, 2021, and February 15, 2022.(2) |

  44. Outstanding Equity Awards at 2017 Fiscal Year-End

    | Reflects shares of our common stock subject to: (a) a restricted stock unit award that vested as to 3,688 shares on February 15, 2018; (b) a restricted stock unit award vesting as follows, assuming continued employment: 2,441 shares on each of May 15, 2018, August 15, 2018, November 15, 2018, and February 15, 2019; 1,880 shares on each of May 15, 2019 and August 15, 2019; and 1,881 shares on each of November 15, 2019 and February 15, 2020; and (c) a restricted stock unit award that vested as to 1,037 shares on February 15, 2018; and vesting as follows, assuming continued employment: 1,667 shares on each of May 15, 2018 and August 15, 2018; 1,668 shares on each of November 15, 2018 and February 15, 2019; 1,692 shares on each of May 15, 2019, August 15, 2019, November 15, 2019, and February 15, 2020; 2,791 shares on each of May 15, 2020, August 15, 2020, and November 15, 2020; 2,792 shares on February 15, 2021; 2,153 shares on each of May 15, 2021, August 15, 2021, and November 15, 2021; and 2,154 shares on February 15, 2022.(3) |

  45. Outstanding Equity Awards at 2017 Fiscal Year-End

    | Reflects shares of our common stock subject to: (a) a restricted stock unit award vesting as follows, assuming continued employment: 3,156 shares on each of May 15, 2018 and August 15, 2018; 3,157 shares on each of November 15, 2018 and February 15, 2019; 2,433 shares on May 15, 2019; and 2,434 shares on August 15, 2019 and quarterly thereafter through February 15, 2020; (b) a restricted stock unit award that(4) |

  46. Outstanding Equity Awards at 2017 Fiscal Year-End

    | vested as to 4,230 shares on February 15, 2018; (c) a restricted stock unit award that vested as to 495 shares on February 15, 2018; and vesting as follows, assuming continued employment: 952 shares on each of May 15, 2018, August 15, 2018, November 15, 2018, and February 15, 2019; 1,138 shares on May 15, 2019; 1,139 shares on each of August 15, 2019, November 15, 2019, and February 15, 2020; 2,791 shares on each of May 15, 2020, August 15, 2020, and November 15, 2020; 2,792 shares on February 15, 2021; 2,153 shares on each of May 15, 2021, August 15, 2021, and November 15, 2021; and 2,154 shares on February 15, 2022; and (d) a restricted stock unit award vesting as follows, assuming continued employment: 4,500 shares on each of May 15, 2019, August 15, 2019, November 15, 2019, and February 15, 2020; and 3,000 shares on each of May 15, 2022, August 15, 2022, November 15, 2022, and February 15, 2023. |

  47. Outstanding Equity Awards at 2017 Fiscal Year-End

    | Reflects shares of our common stock subject to: (a) a restricted stock unit award vesting as follows, assuming continued employment: 3,512 shares on May 15, 2018 and quarterly thereafter through November 15, 2018; 3,513 shares on February 15, 2019; 2,708 shares on each of May 15, 2019 and August 15, 2019; and 2,709 shares on each of November 15, 2019 and February 15, 2020; (b) a restricted stock unit award that vested as to 5,312 shares on February 15, 2018; (c) a restricted stock unit award vesting as follows, assuming continued employment: 596 shares on each of May 15, 2018, August 15, 2018, and November 15, 2018; 597 shares on February 15, 2019; 864 shares on each of May 15, 2019, August 15, 2019, November 15, 2019, and February 15, 2020; 2,791 shares on each of May 15, 2020, August 15, 2020, and November 15, 2020; 2,792 shares on February 15, 2021; 2,153 shares on each of May 15, 2021, August 15, 2021, and November 15, 2021; and 2,154 shares on February 15, 2022; and (d) a restricted stock unit award vesting as follows, assuming continued employment: 4,500 shares on each of May 15, 2019, August 15, 2019, November 15, 2019, and February 15, 2020; and 3,000 shares on each of May 15, 2022, August 15, 2022, November 15, 2022, and February 15, 2023.(5) |

  48. Stock Vested in 2017

    Stock Vested in 2017 The following table sets forth information concerning stock awards that vested during the last fiscal year with respect to the named executive officers.

  49. Stock Vested in 2017

    | | Stock Awards | | | | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting | Value Realized on Vesting(1) | | Jeffrey P. Bezos | — | $— | | Brian T. Olsavsky | 8,513 | 8,432,516 | | Jeffrey M. Blackburn | 18,961 | 18,526,487 | | Andrew R. Jassy | 19,663 | 19,117,919 | | Jeffrey A. Wilke | 22,824 | 22,098,546 |

  50. Stock Vested in 2017

    | Amount is the number of shares of stock acquired upon vesting multiplied by the closing market price of our common stock on the vesting date (or the preceding trading day if the vesting date was not a trading day).(1) |

  51. Potential Payments Upon Termination of Employment or Change-in-Control

    Potential Payments Upon Termination of Employment or Change-in-Control Termination and Change-in-Control Agreements or Arrangements. We do not have any contracts, agreements, or arrangements with any of our named executive officers providing for additional benefits or payments in connection with a termination of employment, change in job responsibility, or change-in-control. Upon termination of employment for any reason, all unvested restricted stock units expire. Change-in-Control Provisions of 1997 Plan. In the event of (i) the merger or consolidation in which we are not the surviving corporation pursuant to which shares of common stock are converted into cash, securities, or other property (other than a merger in which holders of common stock immediately before the merger have the same proportionate ownership of the capital stock of the surviving corporation immediately after the merger), (ii) the sale, lease, exchange, or other transfer of all or substantially all of our assets (other than a transfer to a majority-owned subsidiary), or (iii) the approval by the holders of common stock of any plan or proposal for our liquidation or dissolution (each a “Corporate Transaction”), the Leadership Development and Compensation Committee will determine whether provision will be made in connection with the Corporate Transaction for the assumption of stock-based awards under the 1997 Plan or the substitution of appropriate new awards covering the stock of the successor corporation or an affiliate of the successor corporation. If the Leadership Development and Compensation Committee determines that no such assumption or substitution will be made, vesting of outstanding awards under the 1997 Plan will automatically accelerate so that such awards become 100% vested immediately before the Corporate Transaction. On a hypothetical basis, assuming the Leadership Development and Compensation Committee had made such a determination in a Corporate Transaction that closed on December 31, 2017, the dollar value of the unvested stock-based awards held by named executive officers that would have vested based on the closing price of our common stock of $1,169.47 on December 29, 2017 is set forth in the “Outstanding Equity Awards at 2017 Fiscal Year-End” table.

  52. PAY RATIO DISCLOSURE

    PAY RATIO DISCLOSURE The 2017 annual total compensation of our median compensated employee other than Mr. Bezos was $28,446; Mr. Bezos’ 2017 annual total compensation was $1,681,840, and the ratio of those amounts is 1-to-59. For purposes of identifying the median compensated employee, we took into account salary, bonus, and grant date fair value of RSUs granted during the year for all our employees as of December 31, 2017. We annualized this compensation for employees who did not work the entire year, except for employees designated as seasonal or temporary.