DEF 14A of Insteel Industries Inc, Jan 2, 2026

DEF 14A of Insteel Industries Inc

Filed Jan 2, 2026 · FY20250001308179-26-000001

Open on EDGAR
  1. of Contents

    | CEO Pay Ratio | | 37 | | Pay Versus Performance | | 38 | | Director Compensation | | 41 | | Equity Compensation Plan Information | | 42 | | Policies and Practices Related to the Grant of Certain Equity Awards | | 42 | | Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation | | 43 | | Item Number Three: | Ratification of the Appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | 44 | | Board Recommendation | | 44 | | Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | | 44 | | Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures | | 45 | | Report of the Audit Committee | | 45 | | Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions | | 46 | | Questions and Answers About the Annual Meeting | | 47 | | Other Information | | 51 | | Expenses of Solicitation | | 51 | | Householding | | 51 | | Shareholder Proposals for the 2027 Annual Meeting | | 52 | | Proposals for Inclusion in the Proxy Statement | | 52 | | Other Proposals | | 52 | | Delivery of Notice of a Proposal | | 52 |

  2. Election of Directors

    Election of Directors We typically elect approximately one-third of our directors each year to serve three-year terms. Our Board currently consists of nine directors. W. Allen Rogers II has informed the Board that he would not stand for re-election at the Annual Meeting, and Joseph A. Rutkowski has tendered his resignation as a director, effective immediately prior to the Annual Meeting. Accordingly, the Board has taken action to reduce the size of the Board to eight members, effective upon effectiveness of Mr. Rutkowski’s resignation, and to seven members, effective upon the conclusion of Mr. Rogers’ term of service at the Annual Meeting. Additionally, pursuant to North Carolina law, the term of a director elected to fill a vacancy expires at the next shareholders’ meeting at which directors are elected. We are seeking the election of one director nominee, Eric J. Zernikow, for a one-year term ending in 2027 and the election of two director nominees, Abney S. Boxley III and Anne H. Lloyd, for a three-year term ending in 2029.

  3. Election of Directors

    | Information about our director nominees, continuing directors and executive officers can be found on pages 17-20. |

  4. The Audit Committee

    The Audit Committee The Audit Committee is responsible for assisting the Board in fulfilling its oversight of:

  5. The Executive Compensation Committee

    The Executive Compensation Committee The Executive Compensation Committee is responsible for:

  6. The Executive Compensation Committee

    | • | reviewing and approving, for the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers, annual base salary, annual incentive opportunity, long-term incentive opportunity and corporate goals and objectives applicable to compensation; | | • | annually evaluating our Chief Executive Officer’s performance in light of applicable goals and objectives; | | • | reviewing and making recommendations to the Board with respect to the compensation of non-management directors; | | • | reviewing, approving and administering our incentive compensation plans and equity-based compensation plans; | | • | determining stock ownership guidelines for the executive officers and directors and monitoring compliance with such guidelines and administering our clawback policy; | | • | reviewing the Company’s incentive compensation arrangements to determine whether they encourage excessive risk-taking; | | • | reviewing the results of any shareholder advisory votes regarding our executive compensation and recommending to the Board how to respond to such votes; and | | • | recommending to the Board whether to have an annual, biannual or triennial shareholder advisory vote regarding executive compensation. |

  7. The Executive Compensation Committee

    The Executive Compensation Committee is also responsible for preparing a report on executive compensation that is to be included in our proxy statement relating to our Annual Meeting. This report is provided under “Executive Compensation Committee Report” on page 29.

  8. The Executive Compensation Committee

    | INSTEEL INDUSTRIES INC. | 2026 Proxy Statement | 11 |

  9. Item Number One Election of Directors

    Item Number One Election of Directors

  10. Information Regarding Nominees, Continuing Directors and Executive Officers

    Information Regarding Nominees, Continuing Directors and Executive Officers We have set forth below certain information regarding our nominees for director, our continuing directors and our executive officers. The age and committee membership shown for each such person is as of December 10, 2025, our record date.

  11. Information Regarding Nominees, Continuing Directors and Executive Officers

    | | Age | Director Since | Audit Committee | Executive Compensation Committee | Nominating and Governance Committee | Independent | | Abney S. Boxley III | 67 | 2018 | | | | Y | | Blake K. Doyle | 45 | 2024 | | | | Y | | Anne H. Lloyd | 64 | 2019 | | | | Y | | Jon M. Ruth | 70 | 2016 | | | | Y | | G. Kennedy Thompson | 75 | 2017 | | | | Y | | Eric J. Zernikow | 52 | 2025 | | | | Y | | H. O. Woltz III | 69 | 1986 | | | | N |

  12. Information Regarding Nominees, Continuing Directors and Executive Officers

    | | Chair |

  13. Age 52 Director since: February 28, 2025 INDEPENDENT

    Age 52 Director since: February 28, 2025 INDEPENDENT Mr. Zernikow served in various capacities with Nucor Corporation (“Nucor”), the nation’s largest steel producer, for 22 years, most recently as General Manager of Commercial from 2020 to 2022. Prior to that, he was the Commercial Director of the Engineered Bar Group from 2018 to 2020, the National Sales Manager of the Nucor Cold Finish Group in Darlington, South Carolina, from 2014 to 2018, and the Plant Manager of Nucor Cold Finish in Darlington, South Carolina, from 2009 to 2014. Earlier in his career, he held various positions at USS Kobe Steel Company and Norwest Financial. Presently, Mr. Zernikow is a strategic business advisor within the steel industry. Our Board determined that Mr. Zernikow should continue to serve as a director because of his extensive commercial and operational experience as a senior executive in the steel industry. Committee Memberships:

  14. Age 52 Director since: February 28, 2025 INDEPENDENT

    | • | Executive Compensation Committee | | • | Nominating and Governance Committee |

  15. Age 52 Director since: February 28, 2025 INDEPENDENT

    | 18 | INSTEEL INDUSTRIES INC. | 2026 Proxy Statement | www.insteel.com |

  16. Continuing Directors with terms expiring at the 2027 Annual Meeting

    Continuing Directors with terms expiring at the 2027 Annual Meeting

  17. Continuing Directors with terms expiring at the 2028 Annual Meeting

    Continuing Directors with terms expiring at the 2028 Annual Meeting

  18. Our Key Compensation Practices

    | | An Executive Compensation Committee comprising solely independent directors | | | An independent compensation consultant that reports to and is directed by the Committee, and that provides no other services to the Company | | | A mandatory clawback policy for performance-based incentive compensation awarded to executive officers | | | Double triggers for change in control payments | | | Significant vesting periods for equity awards | | | Robust share ownership guidelines | | | No tax gross-ups of any kind, including for any excise taxes in conjunction with change in control payments | | | No significant perquisites | | | No repricing or replacing of underwater stock options without shareholder approval | | | Mitigation of risk, in that responsible management of our assets is an integral component of the calculation of annual incentives payable under our ROCICP |

  19. II. Overall Objectives

    | • | Attract, motivate and retain key executives by providing total compensation opportunities competitive with those provided to executives employed by companies of a similar size and/or operating in similar industries. | | | In formulating our approach to total compensation, the Committee utilizes peer group data to assess our executive officers’ compensation opportunities against those of similarly situated executives at other companies in similar industries, as well as comparably-sized companies in other industries (as described in “How We Make Executive Compensation Decisions” on page 25). We generally aim to provide total compensation opportunities to our executive officers that are near the median of our peer group. In keeping with our pay for performance culture, we expect our executive officers to deliver overall results that exceed the target level of performance in order to receive above median market compensation. Performance below the target level of performance is expected to result in below median market compensation. |

  20. II. Overall Objectives

    | • | Align executives’ interests with those of our shareholders by providing annual incentives which are designed to reward the attainment of short-term goals, and long-term incentives which are designed to reward increases in our shareholder value over time. |

  21. II. Overall Objectives

    | • | Annual Incentive. Our primary objective is to create shareholder value. The annual incentive for our executive officers is based entirely on the Company’s return on capital, which is a measure that incorporates both the generation of earnings and the management of the Company’s balance sheet and is closely correlated with long-term shareholder returns. | | • | Long-Term Incentives. Our long-term incentives are entirely equity-based, composed of 50% RSUs and 50% stock options. Use of these equity-based incentives ensures that their value is directly linked to changes in the price of our common stock and inherently performance-based. In addition, these awards build ownership among our executives and help to promote commonality of interest between our executives and our shareholders. |

  22. II. Overall Objectives

    | • | Encourage long-term commitment to the Company. | | | We believe that the value provided by our executives increases over time as they become increasingly knowledgeable about our industry, customers and competitors, as well as our business processes, people and culture. We believe that providing incentives for executive officers to remain with the Company will enhance its long-term value. Accordingly, we include elements such as our Supplemental Retirement Plan (“SRP”) and Change in Control Severance (“CIC”) Agreements as components of our executive compensation program to provide such incentives. The full benefit under our SRP is not earned until an executive officer is employed by us for 30 years, and the minimum benefit under these agreements requires ten years of service. We believe that our long-term equity incentives, which fully vest over a three-year period, are also a key element of our effort to ensure retention of our key executives. | | • | Administrative simplicity and direct line of sight to performance. | | | Each component of the Company’s compensation program is formulaic and focused on creating short-term and long-term shareholder value. The absence of subjective and behavioral criteria in the plan simplifies administration and promotes clear line of sight for executives between performance and their compensation. |

  23. III. How We Make Executive Compensation Decisions

    III. How We Make Executive Compensation Decisions The Committee, advised by its independent compensation consultant, is responsible for overseeing and approving the compensation program for our executive officers. Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC (“Pearl Meyer”) serves as the Committee’s executive compensation consultant. Pearl Meyer was engaged by, and reports directly to the Committee, and the Committee has the sole authority to terminate or replace Pearl Meyer at any time. Pearl Meyer assists in the development of compensation programs for our executive officers and our non-employee directors by providing compensation information from our peer group companies, relevant market trend data, information on current issues in the regulatory environment, recommendations for program design and best practices and corporate governance guidance. The Committee realizes that it is extremely valuable to receive objective advice from its compensation advisors. Prior to the retention of a compensation consultant or any other external advisor, and from time to time as the Committee deems appropriate (but at least annually), the Compensation Committee assesses the independence of the advisor from management, taking into consideration all factors relevant to the advisor’s independence, including the factors specified in NYSE listing standards. The Committee has assessed the independence of Pearl Meyer based on these criteria and concluded that Pearl Meyer’s work for the Committee does not raise any conflict of interest. Pearl Meyer provides the Committee and our Chief Executive Officer with information about the compensation competitiveness of our executive officers. Our Chief Executive Officer uses this information to make recommendations to the Committee regarding compensation of these officers, other than himself, and Pearl Meyer provides guidance to the Committee about those recommendations. Pearl Meyer also makes independent recommendations to the Committee regarding the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer without the involvement of management. The Committee uses this information and considers these recommendations in making decisions about executive compensation for all our executive officers. All decisions regarding compensation of our executive officers are made solely by the Committee. The Committee does not generally make regular annual adjustments in pay. Instead, the Committee uses judgment when making compensation decisions and reviews executive pay from a holistic perspective, including reference to compensation peer group pay practices and norms, general industry pay levels as gathered from publicly-available survey sources, individual performance, experience, strategic importance of the position to Insteel and internal equity considerations. The Committee last approved adjustments to the total compensation for our NEOs in July 2024. To determine what constitutes a “competitive” compensation package, the Committee generally considers the total compensation opportunities for executives at our peer group companies. Because of significant differences in the pay practices of our peer group companies, the Committee does not view this market data as a prescriptive determinant of individual compensation. Rather, it is used by the Committee as a general guide in its decisions on the amount and mix of total target direct compensation. Ultimately, executive officer compensation is based on the Committee’s judgment, considering factors described elsewhere in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis that are particular to Insteel and our executive officers, including, most importantly, actual performance.

  24. Base Salaries

    | • | the executive’s performance; | | • | the executive’s responsibilities; | | • | the strategic importance of the position; | | • | competitive market compensation information; | | • | skills, experience and the amount of time the executive has served in the position; and | | • | the Company’s recent performance and current business outlook. |

  25. Annual Incentives

    Annual Incentives The annual incentive opportunity for our executive officers is based on our financial performance pursuant to the terms of our ROCICP. Substantially all of our sales and administrative employees also participate in this plan, with target annual incentive payments ranging from 10% to 100% of base salary and payments capped at twice the target incentive level. Based on peer group information, the Committee believes our annual incentive opportunity for executive officers at targeted award levels, when added to base salary levels, brings potential total cash compensation near the median total cash compensation for our peer group. When the annual incentive is at maximum levels, reflecting excellent Company performance, the potential total cash compensation would be above the median for our peer group. The Committee believes this balance between base salaries and annual cash incentives is appropriate, in that our executive officers’ cash compensation will be near the median for our peer group only if our short-term goals are achieved, and will exceed the median in the event of superior performance during the fiscal year. For fiscal 2025, the Committee established our weighted average cost of capital (“WACC”), for purposes of calculating incentive awards under the ROCICP, to be 8.5% based on a weighted average of (i) our after-tax interest rate for debt and (ii) the after-tax return that we believe would be expected by a prudent investor in our stock. Attaining a return equal to our WACC would have resulted in the payout of incentive compensation at the target bonus level. The performance level at which the maximum incentive payment would be earned was set at 13.5% of the beginning of the year invested capital (WACC + 5%) while the minimum threshold at which an incentive payment would be earned was set at 3.5% of the beginning of year invested capital (WACC - 5%). The actual return on capital as calculated under our ROCICP for fiscal 2025 was 14.1% resulting in incentive payments to our NEOs at 200.0% of the targeted amounts. The target, maximum and actual payout levels for each NEO under the ROCICP for fiscal 2025 are set forth below:

  26. Annual Incentives

    | Executive Officer | Target (% of base salary) | Target | Maximum | Actual | | H. O. Woltz III | 100% | $750,000 | $1,500,000 | $1,500,000 | | Scot R. Jafroodi | 60% | $201,000 | $402,000 | $402,000 | | Richard T. Wagner | 60% | $237,000 | $474,000 | $474,000 | | Elizabeth C. Southern | 60% | $174,000 | $348,000 | $348,000 | | James R. York | 60% | $171,000 | $342,000 | $342,000 |

  27. Annual Incentives

    For fiscal 2026, the Committee determined that the WACC, for purposes of the ROCICP, will be 9.0% based on current estimates of the Company’s cost of debt and equity and its anticipated capital structure. The Committee believes that return on capital is the most appropriate metric for our executives’ annual incentive opportunity in that it is driven off both the generation of earnings and responsible management of our balance sheet, and it is closely correlated with the creation of shareholder value. Since responsible management of our assets is an integral component of the annual incentive calculation, the Committee believes that the program inherently restrains excessive risk-taking on the part of management. The amounts earned annually under the ROCICP are established strictly by formula. The ROCICP does not provide for adjustments to the annual incentive based on subjective factors. Under our Executive Officer Clawback Policy, if we must file an accounting restatement with the SEC, we will recover from current and former executive officers any incentive-based compensation received in the past three fiscal years that exceeds what they would have earned based on the restated results, calculated before taxes.

  28. Long-Term Incentives

    Long-Term Incentives Our executives’ long-term incentive opportunity is entirely equity-based, consisting of 50% RSUs and 50% stock options. The targeted value of the long-term incentives for each NEO during fiscal 2025 is set forth below:

  29. Long-Term Incentives

    | Executive Officer | Target Value | | H. O. Woltz III | $1,125,000 | | Scot R. Jafroodi | $250,000 | | Richard T. Wagner | $275,000 | | Elizabeth C. Southern | $150,000 | | James R. York | $150,000 |

  30. Long-Term Incentives

    The RSUs and stock options are awarded in two equal tranches, with the first tranche granted on the date of our annual meeting of shareholders each February and the second tranche granted on the date that is six months after the date of such meeting. These dates are typically about three weeks after the announcement of our quarterly financial results. The Committee believes that providing these awards on predetermined dates that closely follow the reporting of our quarterly financial results is the most appropriate approach. RSUs vest on the third anniversary of the grant date and stock options vest one-third each year on the anniversary of the grant date. Stock options and RSUs are subject to forfeiture if an executive officer leaves our employ for reasons other than death, disability or retirement prior to vesting. The number of RSUs to be awarded to our executive officers on each grant date is calculated based on the closing stock price on such date. The strike price of the stock options to be awarded to

  31. Long-Term Incentives

    | INSTEEL INDUSTRIES INC. | 2026 Proxy Statement | 27 |

  32. Long-Term Incentives

    our executive officers on each grant date is based on the closing price on such date and the number of options to be granted is calculated based on their aggregate fair value on that date. Since the value of each grant of options and RSUs is pre-determined by the Committee, and the awards occur on pre-established dates, management does not participate in the process of granting these options and RSUs.

  33. Change in Control Severance (“CIC”) Agreements

    Change in Control Severance (“CIC”) Agreements We have entered into CIC Agreements with each of our executive officers. These agreements provide for certain compensation if terminations of employment occur following a change in control. These agreements are considered “double-trigger” since no benefits are payable under them unless both a change in control and loss of employment occur. The initial term of each agreement is two years, and the agreements automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless we or the executive officer provides notice of termination. The agreements do not provide assurances of continued employment, nor do they specify the terms of an executive officer’s termination should the termination occur in the absence of a change in control. These agreements are consistent with the Committee’s overall objective of aligning the interests of executive officers and shareholders in that they provide protection to the executive officers in the event of job loss following a transaction. Absent this protection, the executive may be distracted by personal uncertainties and risks in the event of a proposed transaction or may not vigorously pursue certain transactions that would benefit shareholders due to potential negative personal consequences. Under the terms of these agreements, in the event of termination within two years of a change in control, Mr. Woltz would receive severance benefits equal to two times base salary, plus two times the average bonus for the prior three years and the continuation of health and welfare benefits (including payment of premiums for “COBRA” coverage) for two years following termination. Messrs. Jafroodi, Wagner and York and Ms. Southern would receive severance benefits equal to one times base salary, plus one times the average bonus for the prior three years and the continuation of health and welfare benefits (including payment of premiums for “COBRA” coverage) for one year following termination. In addition, all stock options and RSUs outstanding immediately prior to termination would vest and, in the case of options, become exercisable for the remainder of the term provided for in the original agreement relating to each grant of options. Finally, we would pay up to $15,000 for outplacement services for each of our executive officers. Any termination benefits payable under a CIC Agreement are subject to reduction, if necessary, to avoid the application of the “golden parachute” rules of Section 280G and the excise tax imposed under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”). The agreements do not provide for a “gross up” of any payments to cover any tax liability that may be imposed on our executive officers.

  34. Change in Control Severance (“CIC”) Agreements

    | 28 | INSTEEL INDUSTRIES INC. | 2026 Proxy Statement | www.insteel.com |

  35. Change in Control Severance (“CIC”) Agreements

    The Committee periodically reviews the payments that could be received by executive officers pursuant to their respective Severance CIC Agreements but does not consider the amount of the potential benefits under these agreements when it establishes the elements of each executive officer’s ongoing compensation.

  36. Severance Agreement

    Severance Agreement We have a Severance Agreement with Mr. Woltz. The Severance Agreement provides certain termination benefits if we terminate the employment of Mr. Woltz without cause (as defined in the Severance Agreement). The Severance Agreement provides for automatic one-year renewal terms unless we or Mr. Woltz provide prior notice of termination. Mr. Woltz would not be entitled to termination benefits under a severance agreement (i) if his employment with us is terminated for cause, or (ii) if he is entitled to receive benefits under his CIC Agreement described above. Under the terms of the Severance Agreement, if Mr. Woltz was terminated without cause, he would receive a lump sum severance payment equal to one and one-half times his annual base salary and the continuation of health and welfare benefits (including payments of premiums for “COBRA” coverage) for 18 months following termination. In addition, all stock options and RSUs outstanding immediately prior to termination would vest and, in the case of options, become exercisable for the remainder of the term provided for in the original agreement relating to each grant of options. Finally, we would pay up to $15,000 for outplacement services for Mr. Woltz. Any termination benefits payable under Mr. Woltz’s Severance Agreement are subject to reduction, if necessary, to avoid the application of the “golden parachute” rules of Section 280G and the excise tax imposed under Section 4999 of the Code.

  37. Summary Compensation Table

    Summary Compensation Table The following table and accompanying footnotes provide information regarding compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer and our three other most highly compensated executive officers for the fiscal year ended September 27, 2025.

  38. SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

    SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

  39. SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

    | Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary ($) | Stock Awards(1) ($) | Option Awards(1) ($) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation(2) ($) | Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings(3) ($) | All Other Compensation(4) ($) | Total ($) | | H. O. Woltz III | 2025 | 750,000 | 562,506 | 562,489 | 1,500,000 | 6,564 | 65,700 | 3,447,259 | | President and CEO | 2024 | 705,769 | 456,265 | 456,251 | 204,673 | 177,548 | 103,510 | 2,104,016 | | | 2023 | 700,000 | 349,992 | 350,009 | 654,500 | — | 92,011 | 2,146,512 | | Scot R. Jafroodi | 2025 | 335,000 | 125,007 | 125,006 | 402,000 | 66,322 | 23,333 | 1,076,668 | | Vice President, CFO and Treasurer | 2024 | 312,885 | 125,022 | 125,005 | 54,442 | 118,702 | 30,981 | 767,037 | | | 2023 | 293,750 | 125,015 | 125,009 | 153,341 | 24,112 | 24,503 | 745,730 | | Richard T. Wagner | 2025 | 395,000 | 137,489 | 137,501 | 474,000 | 8,275 | 28,796 | 1,181,061 | | Senior Vice President and COO | 2024 | 372,885 | 137,471 | 137,499 | 64,882 | 189,669 | 46,680 | 949,086 | | | 2023 | 370,000 | 137,479 | 137,493 | 207,570 | 24,701 | 42,764 | 920,007 | | Elizabeth C. Southern(5) | 2025 | 290,000 | 75,005 | 74,998 | 348,000 | 15,253 | 13,537 | 816,793 | | Vice President Administration, Secretary and CLO | 2024 | 276,731 | 74,993 | 75,003 | 48,151 | 18,794 | 18,464 | 512,136 | | James R. York | 2025 | 285,000 | 75,005 | 74,998 | 342,000 | 50,820 | 24,379 | 852,202 | | Senior Vice President Sourcing and Logistics | 2024 | 271,731 | 74,993 | 75,003 | 47,281 | 60,585 | 32,358 | 561,951 | | | 2023 | 270,000 | 75,003 | 75,001 | 151,470 | 31,181 | 27,106 | 629,761 |

  40. SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

    | (1) The amounts reported in these columns reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of stock and option awards granted during each fiscal year and do not reflect the actual value, if any, that may be received by executive officers for their awards. Our assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts for fiscal 2025 are set forth in Note 9 of our consolidated financial statements as reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 27, 2025. Dividend equivalents paid on RSUs are currently paid in cash and are reported in the “All Other Compensation” column. | | (2) The amounts reported in this column are the annual cash incentive amounts earned for such fiscal years under our ROCICP. | | (3) Amounts reported for each fiscal year represent the increase in the actuarial present value during such fiscal year of the accumulated benefits accrued under our SRP determined using interest rate assumptions consistent with those set forth in Note 11 of our consolidated financial statements as reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 27, 2025. The amounts in this column were calculated based on the following discount rate assumptions as of the end of each fiscal year: 2023, 5.25%, 2024, 5.0% and 2025, 5.5%. Executive officers may not be fully vested in the amounts reflected herein. We do not offer any program for deferring compensation and therefore there were no above-market earnings on deferrals that were required to be reported in this column. |

  41. SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

    | 30 | INSTEEL INDUSTRIES INC. | 2026 Proxy Statement | www.insteel.com |

  42. SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

    | (4) Amounts shown for fiscal 2025 include (i) dividend equivalents paid on RSUs; (ii) the current dollar value attributed by the IRS to the death benefit program we provide to our executive officers; and (iii) the amount of matching funds paid into our 401(k) retirement savings plan on behalf of the NEOs. The following table shows the amount of each component described above and included in the All Other Compensation column: |

  43. SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

    | Name | Dividend Equivalents Paid on RSUs ($) | Death Benefit Value ($) | 401(k) Matching Payments ($) | | H. O. Woltz III | 39,171 | 6,858 | 19,671 | | Scot R. Jafroodi | 10,992 | 2,322 | 10,019 | | Richard T. Wagner | 14,032 | 6,858 | 7,906 | | Elizabeth C. Southern | 5,372 | 675 | 7,490 | | James R. York | 7,654 | 6,858 | 9,867 |

  44. SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

    | (5) Ms. Southern joined the Company on June 5, 2023 and was not an NEO during fiscal 2023. |

  45. Fiscal 2025 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

    Fiscal 2025 Grants of Plan-Based Awards The following table provides information regarding (1) annual incentive compensation payments to our NEOs under our ROCICP and (2) the value of stock options and RSUs awarded to our NEOs during fiscal 2025. Our practice is to grant equity awards on two dates each fiscal year: the date of our annual meeting of shareholders and the date that is six months after such meeting. Stock options have a ten-year term and vest in equal annual increments of one-third of the amount of each grant on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date. Options are priced at the closing price of our stock on the date of grant, as reported on NYSE. RSUs are settled in shares of our common stock at the end of three years. Our executive officers do not have the right to vote the shares represented by RSUs and may not sell or transfer RSUs or use them as collateral. Our executive officers receive dividend equivalents in cash on outstanding RSUs. Stock options and RSUs are subject to forfeiture if an executive officer leaves our employ for reasons other than death, disability or retirement prior to vesting. For purposes of our equity award agreements, “retirement” means the executive’s voluntary termination of employment on or after age 55 and completing ten years of service. Pursuant to the Severance Agreement we have with Mr. Woltz, vesting of his stock options and RSUs will accelerate in connection with a termination without cause. For all our NEOs, if employment with us terminates due to death, disability or retirement, or without cause in connection with a change in control pursuant to the terms of our CIC Agreements, the vesting of their stock options and RSUs will accelerate. See “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”

  46. Fiscal 2025 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

    | INSTEEL INDUSTRIES INC. | 2026 Proxy Statement | 31 |

  47. FISCAL 2025 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

    FISCAL 2025 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

  48. FISCAL 2025 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

    | | | Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2) | | | All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#) | All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#) | Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Share)(3) | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($)(4) | | Name | Grant Date(1) | Threshold ($) | Target ($) | Maximum ($) | | | | | | H. O. Woltz III | N/A | | 750,000 | 1,500,000 | | | | | | | 2/11/2025 | | | | 8,943 | | | 281,257 | | | 2/11/2025 | | | | | 22,940 | 31.45 | 281,244 | | | 8/11/2025 | | | | 7,819 | | | 281,249 | | | 8/11/2025 | | | | | 21,355 | 35.97 | 281,245 | | Scot R. Jafroodi | N/A | | 201,000 | 402,000 | | | | | | | 2/11/2025 | | | | 1,987 | | | 62,491 | | | 2/11/2025 | | | | | 5,098 | 31.45 | 62,501 | | | 8/11/2025 | | | | 1,738 | | | 62,516 | | | 8/11/2025 | | | | | 4,746 | 35.97 | 62,505 | | Richard T. Wagner | N/A | | 237,000 | 474,000 | | | | | | | 2/11/2025 | | | | 2,186 | | | 68,750 | | | 2/11/2025 | | | | | 5,608 | 31.45 | 68,754 | | | 8/11/2025 | | | | 1,911 | | | 68,739 | | | 8/11/2025 | | | | | 5,220 | 35.97 | 68,747 | | Elizabeth C. Southern | N/A | | 174,000 | 348,000 | | | | | | | 2/11/2025 | | | | 1,192 | | | 37,488 | | | 2/11/2025 | | | | | 3,059 | 31.45 | 37,503 | | | 8/11/2025 | | | | 1,043 | | | 37,517 | | | 8/11/2025 | | | | | 2,847 | 35.97 | 37,495 | | James R. York | N/A | | 171,000 | 342,000 | | | | | | | 2/11/2025 | | | | 1,192 | | | 37,488 | | | 2/11/2025 | | | | | 3,059 | 31.45 | 37,503 | | | 8/11/2025 | | | | 1,043 | | | 37,517 | | | 8/11/2025 | | | | | 2,847 | 35.97 | 37,495 |

  49. FISCAL 2025 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

    | (1) The awards with “N/A” in the Grant Date column represent awards under our Return on Capital Incentive Compensation Plan or ROCICP. | | (2) Our ROCICP is considered a non-equity incentive plan and is discussed above under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Elements of Compensation.” There is no threshold amount payable under the program. The amounts shown in the “Target” column reflect each executive officer’s target bonus percentage of base salary set by the Committee for fiscal 2025. The amounts shown in the “Maximum” column reflect the maximum amount payable to each executive officer under the program based on his or her target bonus percentage. | | (3) For each option, the exercise price per share is the closing price of our common stock on NYSE on the grant date. | | (4) These amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. The actual value an executive officer may receive depends on the market price of our stock, and there can therefore be no assurance that amounts reflected in this column will actually be realized. |

  50. Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End 2025

    Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End 2025 The following table provides information regarding unexercised stock options and unvested RSUs held by our executive officers as of September 27, 2025, the last day of fiscal 2025. All values in the table are based on a market value of our common stock of $38.49, the closing price reported on NYSE on September 26, 2025 (the last trading day of our fiscal year).

  51. Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End 2025

    | 32 | INSTEEL INDUSTRIES INC. | 2026 Proxy Statement | www.insteel.com |

  52. OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR END 2025

    OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR END 2025

  53. OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR END 2025

    | | Option Awards | | | | Stock Awards | | | | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Option (#) Exercisable(1) | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable(1) | Option Exercise Price ($) | Option Expiration Date | Number of Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)(2) | Market Value of Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) | | H. O. Woltz III | 8,643 | — | 34.49 | 8/11/2026 | 42,032 | 1,617,812 | | | 10,981 | — | 37.06 | 2/7/2027 | | | | | 14,340 | — | 29.69 | 2/13/2028 | | | | | 10,534 | — | 41.85 | 8/13/2028 | | | | | 6,281 | — | 21.57 | 2/12/2029 | | | | | 15,408 | — | 18.25 | 8/12/2029 | | | | | 13,532 | — | 22.09 | 2/11/2030 | | | | | 16,949 | — | 19.86 | 8/11/2030 | | | | | 12,165 | — | 29.43 | 2/16/2031 | | | | | 8,656 | — | 41.87 | 8/16/2031 | | | | | 9,709 | — | 38.54 | 2/15/2032 | | | | | 12,456 | — | 32.77 | 8/15/2032 | | | | | 8,825 | 4,413 | 30.27 | 2/14/2033 | | | | | 8,765 | 4,383 | 30.99 | 8/14/2033 | | | | | 4,456 | 8,913 | 34.75 | 2/13/2034 | | | | | 7,245 | 14,490 | 31.94 | 8/13/2034 | | | | | — | 22,940 | 31.45 | 2/11/2035 | | | | | — | 21,355 | 35.97 | 8/11/2035 | | | | Scot R. Jafroodi | 2,013 | — | 37.06 | 2/7/2027 | 11,563 | 445,060 | | | 1,931 | — | 41.85 | 8/13/2028 | | | | | 3,721 | — | 22.09 | 2/11/2030 | | | | | 3,107 | — | 19.86 | 8/11/2030 | | | | | 2,230 | — | 29.43 | 2/16/2031 | | | | | 1,587 | — | 41.87 | 8/16/2031 | | | | | 1,780 | — | 38.54 | 2/15/2032 | | | | | 2,669 | — | 32.77 | 8/15/2032 | | | | | 3,152 | 1,576 | 30.27 | 2/14/2033 | | | | | 3,130 | 1,566 | 30.99 | 8/14/2033 | | | | | 1,591 | 3,184 | 34.75 | 2/13/2034 | | | | | 1,610 | 3,220 | 31.94 | 8/13/2034 | | | | | — | 5,098 | 31.45 | 2/11/2035 | | | | | — | 4,746 | 35.97 | 8/11/2035 | | | | Richard T. Wagner | 4,828 | — | 41.85 | 8/13/2028 | 12,716 | 489,439 | | | 2,589 | — | 19.86 | 8/11/2030 | | | | | 1,859 | — | 29.43 | 2/16/2031 | | | | | 3,967 | — | 41.87 | 8/16/2031 | | | | | 4,450 | — | 38.54 | 2/15/2032 | | | | | 4,893 | — | 32.77 | 8/15/2032 | | | | | 3,466 | 1,734 | 30.27 | 2/14/2033 | | | | | 3,443 | 1,722 | 30.99 | 8/14/2033 | | | | | 1,750 | 3,502 | 34.75 | 2/13/2034 | | | | | 1,771 | 3,542 | 31.94 | 8/13/2034 | | | | | — | 5,608 | 31.45 | 2/11/2035 | | | | | — | 5,220 | 35.97 | 8/11/2035 | | | | Elizabeth C. Southern | 3,756 | 1,879 | 30.99 | 8/14/2033 | 6,908 | 265,889 | | | 955 | 1,910 | 34.75 | 2/13/2034 | | | | | 966 | 1,932 | 31.94 | 8/13/2034 | | | | | — | 3,059 | 31.45 | 2/11/2035 | | | | | — | 2,847 | 35.97 | 8/11/2035 | | | | James R. York | 1,931 | — | 41.85 | 8/13/2028 | 6,937 | 267,005 | | | 3,721 | — | 22.09 | 2/11/2030 | | | | | 1,587 | — | 41.87 | 8/16/2031 | | | | | 2,427 | — | 38.54 | 2/15/2032 | | | | | 890 | — | 32.77 | 8/15/2032 | | | | | — | 946 | 30.27 | 2/14/2033 | | | | | 939 | 939 | 30.99 | 8/14/2033 | | | | | 955 | 1,910 | 34.75 | 2/13/2034 | | | | | 966 | 1,932 | 31.94 | 8/13/2034 | | | | | — | 3,059 | 31.45 | 2/11/2035 | | | | | — | 2,847 | 35.97 | 8/11/2035 | | |

  54. OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR END 2025

    | (1) All of these options have become exercisable or will become exercisable as to one-third of the total number of shares covered by such option on each of the first, second and third anniversary of the grant date. The grant date in each case is ten years prior to the option expiration date. |

  55. OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR END 2025

    | INSTEEL INDUSTRIES INC. | 2026 Proxy Statement | 33 |

  56. OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR END 2025

    | (2) These RSUs will vest on the third anniversary of the date of grant. The number of shares that will vest on dates subsequent to the end of fiscal 2025 is shown in the following chart. |

  57. OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR END 2025

    | | 2/14/2026 | 8/14/2026 | 2/13/2027 | 8/13/2027 | 2/11/2028 | 8/11/2028 | | H.O. Woltz III | 5,781 | 5,647 | 5,036 | 8,806 | 8,943 | 7,819 | | Scot R. Jafroodi | 2,065 | 2,017 | 1,799 | 1,957 | 1,987 | 1,738 | | Richard T. Wagner | 2,271 | 2,218 | 1,978 | 2,152 | 2,186 | 1,911 | | Elizabeth C. Southern | — | 2,420 | 1,079 | 1,174 | 1,192 | 1,043 | | James R. York | 1,239 | 1,210 | 1,079 | 1,174 | 1,192 | 1,043 |

  58. Options Exercised and Stock Vested During Fiscal Year 2025

    Options Exercised and Stock Vested During Fiscal Year 2025 The following table provides information regarding compensation earned by our executive officers as a result of vesting of RSUs and exercise of stock options during fiscal 2025.

  59. Options Exercised and Stock Vested During Fiscal Year 2025

    | | Option Awards | | Stock Awards | | | Name | No. of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) | Value Realized on Exercise ($) | No. of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) | Value Realized on Vesting ($) | | H. O. Woltz III | — | — | 9,232 | 319,894 | | Scot R. Jafroodi | 15,649 | 190,617 | 1,858 | 64,796 | | Richard T. Wagner | — | — | 3,882 | 133,629 | | Elizabeth C. Southern | — | — | — | — | | James R. York | 17,638 | 237,585 | 2,117 | 72,872 |

  60. Pension Benefits

    Pension Benefits Under our SRP, which is implemented through individual agreements, we provide supplemental retirement benefits to our executive officers which provide for payments to them for a 15-year period beginning on the later of their (i) retirement or (ii) reaching age 65. The maximum annual benefit payable under the SRP is equal to 50% of the executive officer’s average annual base salary for the five consecutive years in which he received the highest salary during the ten years prior to retirement. Only base salary is included in the calculation of the benefit under the SRP. To receive the maximum benefit under the SRP, the executive officer must be employed by us for at least 30 years. An executive officer will receive reduced benefits under the SRP if he is employed by us for at least ten years and retires at or after reaching age 55. Since Mr. Woltz and Mr. Wagner have been employed by us for 30 years and have reached 55 years of age, their benefits under the SRP have fully vested. For more information regarding the SRP, see the discussion above under the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Elements of Compensation” section of this proxy statement. Assumptions used in the calculation of the amounts shown in the following chart are set forth in Note 11 of our consolidated financial statement as reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2025. The following table shows the actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit as of September 27, 2025 payable at, following or in connection with retirement to each of our executive officers, including the number of years of service credited to each.

  61. FISCAL 2025 PENSION BENEFITS

    FISCAL 2025 PENSION BENEFITS

  62. FISCAL 2025 PENSION BENEFITS

    | Name | Plan Name | Number of Years Credited Service (#) | Present Value of Accumulated Benefit ($) | Payments During Last Fiscal Year ($) | | H. O. Woltz III | SRP | 47 | 3,695,204 | — | | Scot R. Jafroodi | SRP | 20 | 626,689 | — | | Richard T. Wagner | SRP | 32 | 1,943,212 | — | | Elizabeth C. Southern | SRP | 2 | 39,079 | — | | James R. York | SRP | 7 | 288,491 | — |

  63. FISCAL 2025 PENSION BENEFITS

    | 34 | INSTEEL INDUSTRIES INC. | 2026 Proxy Statement | www.insteel.com |

  64. Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

    Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control The discussion and tables below describe the potential payments that could be received by each of the NEOs if the executive’s employment was terminated on September 27, 2025, the last day of our fiscal year. The amounts in the tables for stock options and RSUs represent the value of the awards that vest as a result of the termination of the executive’s employment. For purposes of valuing the stock options and RSUs, the amounts below are based on a per share price of $38.49, which was the closing price of our stock as reported on NYSE on September 26, 2025 (the last trading day of our fiscal year).

  65. BENEFITS AND PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION

    BENEFITS AND PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION

  66. BENEFITS AND PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION

    | | Voluntary Termination | Termination Without Cause | Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason after Change in Control | Retirement | Death | Disability | | H. O. Woltz III | | | | | | | | Salary Continuation(1) | — | — | — | — | — | 215,750 | | Severance Payment(2) | — | 1,125,000 | 3,072,782 | — | — | — | | Stock Options(3) | 412,704 | 412,704 | 412,704 | 412,704 | 412,704 | 412,704 | | RSUs(4) | 1,617,812 | 1,617,812 | 1,617,812 | 1,617,812 | 1,617,812 | 1,617,812 | | Benefits(5) | — | 33,213 | 44,284 | — | — | — | | Outplacement | — | 15,000 | 15,000 | — | — | — | | Supplemental Retirement Plan(6) | 3,695,204 | 3,695,204 | 3,695,204 | 3,695,204 | 2,747,647 | 3,695,204 | | Death Benefit(7) | — | — | — | — | 500,000 | — | | TOTAL | 5,725,720 | 6,898,933 | 8,857,786 | 5,725,720 | 5,278,163 | 5,941,470 |

  67. BENEFITS AND PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION

    | (1) This amount represents the lump-sum present value of bi-weekly payments which Mr. Woltz would be entitled to receive pursuant to our disability insurance program. | | (2) These amounts would be paid to Mr. Woltz in a lump sum following termination without cause, pursuant to his Severance Agreement, or in the event of a termination following a change in control, pursuant to his CIC Agreement. | | (3) These amounts represent the difference between the market value of our stock on September 27, 2025 and the option strike prices for unvested options that would vest (i) pursuant to the terms of the option grant agreements in the event of death, disability or voluntary termination of employment on or after attaining age 55 and completing ten years of service; (ii) pursuant to the terms of his Severance Agreement in the event of termination without cause; and (iii) pursuant to the terms of his CIC Agreement in the event of termination following a change in control. | | (4) These amounts represent the market value of RSUs on September 27, 2025 that would vest (i) pursuant to the terms of the RSU agreements in the event of death, disability or voluntary termination of employment on or after attaining age 55 and completing ten years of service; (ii) pursuant to the terms of his Severance Agreement in the event of termination without cause; and (iii) pursuant to the terms of his CIC Agreement in the event of termination following a change in control. | | (5) These amounts represent premiums for continued participation in employee welfare benefit plans which would be paid by us for 18 months following termination without cause and 24 months following termination after a change in control. | | (6) The amounts under the “Voluntary Termination,” “Termination without Cause,” “Termination without Cause or for Good Reason after Change in Control,” “Retirement” and “Disability” columns for Mr. Woltz represent the lump-sum present value of his benefits under the SRP, on September 27, 2025, which have vested. The amounts under the “Death” column represents the estimated lump-sum present value of bi-weekly payments which the heirs of Mr. Woltz would have been entitled to receive for a ten-year period pursuant to the SRP in the event of death on September 27, 2025. | | (7) This amount would be payable in a lump sum to the heirs of Mr. Woltz in the event of his death, pursuant to our death benefit program. |

  68. BENEFITS AND PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION

    | INSTEEL INDUSTRIES INC. | 2026 Proxy Statement | 35 |

  69. BENEFITS AND PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION

    | | Voluntary Termination | Termination Without Cause | Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason after Change in Control | Retirement | Death | Disability | | Scot R. Jafroodi | | | | | | | | Salary Continuation(1) | — | — | 335,000 | — | — | 1,211,462 | | Severance Payment(2) | — | — | 203,261 | — | — | — | | Stock Options(3) | 105,549 | 105,549 | 105,549 | 105,549 | 105,549 | 105,549 | | RSUs(4) | 445,060 | 445,060 | 445,060 | 445,060 | 445,060 | 445,060 | | Benefits(5) | — | — | 19,840 | — | — | — | | Outplacement | — | — | 15,000 | — | — | — | | Supplemental Retirement Plan(6) | 626,689 | 626,689 | 626,689 | 626,689 | 1,118,273 | 751,728 | | Death Benefit(7) | — | — | — | — | 500,000 | — | | TOTAL | 1,177,298 | 1,177,298 | 1,750,399 | 1,177,298 | 2,168,882 | 2,513,799 | | | Voluntary Termination | Termination Without Cause | Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason after Change in Control | Retirement | Death | Disability | | Richard T. Wagner | | | | | | | | Salary Continuation(1) | — | — | 395,000 | — | — | 350,016 | | Severance Payment(2) | — | — | 248,817 | — | — | — | | Stock Options(3) | 116,101 | 116,101 | 116,101 | 116,101 | 116,101 | 116,101 | | RSUs(4) | 489,439 | 489,439 | 489,439 | 489,439 | 489,439 | 489,439 | | Benefits(5) | — | — | 27,100 | — | — | — | | Outplacement | — | — | 15,000 | — | — | — | | Supplemental Retirement Plan(6) | 1,943,212 | 1,943,212 | 1,943,212 | 1,943,212 | 1,444,917 | 1,943,212 | | Death Benefit(7) | — | — | — | — | 500,000 | — | | TOTAL | 2,548,752 | 2,548,752 | 3,234,669 | 2,548,752 | 2,550,457 | 2,898,768 | | | Voluntary Termination | Termination Without Cause | Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason after Change in Control | Retirement | Death | Disability | | Elizabeth C. Southern | | | | | | | | Salary Continuation(1) | — | — | 290,000 | — | — | 1,927,745 | | Severance Payment(2) | — | — | 148,862 | — | — | — | | Stock Options(3) | — | — | 62,600 | — | 62,600 | 62,600 | | RSUs(4) | — | — | 265,889 | — | 265,889 | 265,889 | | Benefits(5) | — | — | 17,382 | — | — | — | | Outplacement | — | — | 15,000 | — | — | — | | Supplemental Retirement Plan(6) | — | — | 39,079 | — | 1,095,216 | — | | Death Benefit(7) | — | — | — | — | 500,000 | — | | TOTAL | — | — | 838,812 | — | 1,923,705 | 2,256,234 |

  70. BENEFITS AND PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION

    | 36 | INSTEEL INDUSTRIES INC. | 2026 Proxy Statement | www.insteel.com |

  71. BENEFITS AND PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION

    | | Voluntary Termination | Termination Without Cause | Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason after Change in Control | Retirement | Death | Disability | | James R. York | | | | | | | | Salary Continuation(1) | — | — | 285,000 | — | — | 283,805 | | Severance Payment(2) | — | — | 180,250 | — | — | — | | Stock Options(3) | — | — | 63,326 | — | 63,326 | 63,326 | | RSUs(4) | — | — | 267,005 | — | 267,005 | 267,005 | | Benefits(5) | — | — | 22,314 | — | — | — | | Outplacement | — | — | 15,000 | — | — | — | | Supplemental Retirement Plan(6) | — | — | 288,491 | — | 1,045,259 | — | | Death Benefit(7) | — | — | — | — | 500,000 | — | | TOTAL | — | — | 1,121,386 | — | 1,875,590 | 614,136 |

  72. BENEFITS AND PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION

    | (1) The amounts under the “Termination without Cause or for Good Reason after Change in Control” column would be paid to Mr. Jafroodi, Mr. Wagner, Ms. Southern and Mr. York on a bi-weekly basis for a period of one year pursuant to their respective CIC Agreements. The amounts under the “Disability” column for Mr. Jafroodi, Mr. Wagner, Ms. Southern and Mr. York represent the lump-sum present value of bi-weekly payments which they would be entitled to receive pursuant to our disability insurance program. | | (2) These amounts would be paid in a lump sum to Mr. Jafroodi, Mr. Wagner, Ms. Southern and Mr. York in the event of a termination following a change in control pursuant to their CIC Agreements. | | (3) These amounts represent the difference between the market value of our common stock on September 27, 2025 and the option strike prices for unvested options that would vest (i) pursuant to the terms of the option grant agreements in the event of death, disability or voluntary termination of employment on or after attaining age 55 and completing ten years of service; and (ii) pursuant to the executives’ CIC Agreements in the event of termination following a change in control. | | (4) These amounts represent the market value of RSUs on September 27, 2025, that would vest (i) pursuant to the terms of the RSU agreements in the event of death, disability or voluntary termination of employment on or after attaining age 55 and completing ten years of service; and (ii) pursuant to the terms of the executives’ CIC Agreements in the event of termination following a change in control. | | (5) These amounts represent premiums for continued participation in employee welfare benefit plans which would be paid by us for 12 months following termination after a change in control. | | (6) The amounts under the “Voluntary Termination,” “Termination without Cause,” “Termination without Cause or for Good Reason after Change in Control” and “Retirement” columns for Mr. Jafroodi, Mr. Wagner, Ms. Southern and Mr. York represent the lump-sum present value of the benefits they would be entitled to receive under the SRP in each scenario as of September 27, 2025. The amounts under the “Death” and “Disability” columns represent the estimated lump-sum present value of bi-weekly payments which Mr. Jafroodi, Mr. Wagner, Ms. Southern and Mr. York (or their heirs) would have been entitled to receive for a ten-year period pursuant to the SRP in the event of death or disability on September 27, 2025. | | (7) These amounts would be payable in a lump sum to the heirs of Mr. Jafroodi, Mr. Wagner, Ms. Southern and Mr. York in the event of his or her death, pursuant to our death benefit program. |

  73. CEO Pay Ratio

    CEO Pay Ratio Pursuant to Item 402(u) of SEC Regulation S-K, we are required to disclose the ratio of the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer to the compensation of our median employee. The annual total compensation of our CEO for fiscal 2025 was $3,447,259, as shown in the Summary Compensation Table on page 30, and the annual total compensation for our median employee, calculated in accordance with the requirements of the Summary Compensation Table, was $75,515, resulting in a pay ratio of 46 to 1. As of September 27, 2025, we collected data for all employees and used the annual base rate of pay for fiscal 2025 as the consistently applied compensation measure to identify the median employee. We chose September 27, 2025, which is within the last three months of our fiscal year as required by applicable SEC regulations, because it aligned with our fiscal year payroll procedures. We believe this pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules and the methodology described above.

  74. CEO Pay Ratio

    | INSTEEL INDUSTRIES INC. | 2026 Proxy Statement | 37 |

  75. Pay Versus Performance

    Pay Versus Performance Pursuant to Item 402(v) of SEC Regulation S-K, we are providing the following disclosure regarding executive compensation for our principal executive officer (“PEO”), Mr. Woltz, and our other NEOs (“Non-PEO NEOs”) and Company performance for the fiscal years listed below.

  76. Pay Versus Performance

    | Year | Summary Compensation Table Total for H.O. Woltz III ($) | Compensation Actually Paid to H.O. Woltz III(1)(2) ($) | Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs(3) ($) | Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs(1)(2)(3) ($) | Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based on: | | Net income ($ Thousands) | Return on Invested Capital(5) (%) | | | | | | | Total Shareholder Return ($) | Peer Group Total Shareholder Return(4) ($) | | | | 2025 | 3,447,259 | 3,798,936 | 981,681 | 1,069,473 | 274.64 | 231.94 | 41,020 | 14.1 | | 2024 | 2,104,016 | 1,717,527 | 697,553 | 587,848 | 212.31 | 231.87 | 19,305 | 6.3 | | 2023 | 2,146,512 | 2,297,925 | 594,499 | 553,469 | 207.28 | 146.15 | 32,415 | 9.1 | | 2022 | 2,503,834 | 1,508,180 | 924,155 | 672,291 | 157.60 | 109.34 | 125,011 | 47.6 | | 2021 | 2,475,749 | 4,043,446 | 972,237 | 1,368,777 | 219.98 | 144.86 | 66,610 | 36.9 |

  77. Pay Versus Performance

    | (1) The amounts shown for Compensation Actually Paid have been calculated in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, and therefore use hypothetical values and points in time when pay may not actually have been earned or delivered to the NEOs. These amounts reflect total compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table with certain adjustments as described in footnote 2 below. |

  78. Pay Versus Performance

    | (2) Compensation Actually Paid reflects the exclusions and inclusions of certain amounts for the PEO and the Non-PEO NEOs as set forth below. Equity values are calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Amounts in Exclusion of Stock Awards and Option Awards column are the totals from the Stock Awards and Option Awards columns set forth in the Summary Compensation Table. Amounts in the Exclusion of Change in Pension Value column reflect the amounts attributable to the Change in Pension Value reported in the Summary Compensation Table. Amounts in the Inclusion of Pension Service Cost are based on the service cost for services rendered during the listed year. |

  79. Non-PEO NEOs (Average)

    | (5) We determined return on capital to be the most important financial performance measure used to link our performance to Compensation Actually Paid to Mr. Woltz and our non-PEO NEOs in fiscal 2025. For purposes of this disclosure, return on capital was calculated by dividing the Company’s Net Operating Profit After Tax for each fiscal period by its total Invested Capital for such fiscal period, each as defined in the Company’s Return on Capital Incentive Compensation Plan. |

  80. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PEO AND OTHER NEO COMPENSATION ACTUALLY PAID AND INSTEEL TOTAL SHAREHOLDER RETURN (“TSR”)

    DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PEO AND OTHER NEO COMPENSATION ACTUALLY PAID AND INSTEEL TOTAL SHAREHOLDER RETURN (“TSR”) The following chart sets forth the relationship between Compensation Actually Paid to Mr. Woltz, the average of Compensation Actually Paid to our other NEOs, and our cumulative TSR over the three most recently completed fiscal years.

  81. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PEO AND OTHER NEO COMPENSATION ACTUALLY PAID AND NET INCOME

    DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PEO AND OTHER NEO COMPENSATION ACTUALLY PAID AND NET INCOME The following chart sets forth the relationship between Compensation Actually Paid to Mr. Woltz, the average of Compensation Actually Paid to our other NEOs, and our net income over the three most recently completed fiscal years.

  82. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PEO AND OTHER NEO COMPENSATION ACTUALLY PAID AND RETURN ON INVESTED CAPITAL

    DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PEO AND OTHER NEO COMPENSATION ACTUALLY PAID AND RETURN ON INVESTED CAPITAL The following chart sets forth the relationship between Compensation Actually Paid to Mr. Woltz, the average of Compensation Actually Paid to our other NEOs, and our return on invested capital over the three most recently completed fiscal years.

  83. Director Compensation

    Director Compensation Our non-employee directors receive an annual cash retainer and an annual grant of RSUs. The RSUs are granted on the date of our annual meeting of shareholders and have a one-year vesting period. The cash retainers are paid to our non-employee directors quarterly. During fiscal 2025, we paid annual cash retainers to non-employee directors in the amount of $60,000 (except for Mr. Zernikow, who was appointed as a director during fiscal 2025 and paid an annual cash retainer of $50,000) and we provided annual grants of RSUs valued at $85,000. In addition, we pay an annual cash retainer to (i) the independent Lead Director and the Chair of the Audit Committee in the amount of $20,000 each and (ii) the Chairs of the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Executive Compensation Committee in the amount of $15,000 each. We do not pay additional “meeting fees” to directors for attendance at Board and committee meetings. Mr. Woltz, our CEO, receives no additional compensation for serving on our Board. The following table shows the compensation we provided to our non-employee directors during fiscal 2025.

  84. Director Compensation

    | Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) | Stock Awards ($)(2) | All Other Compensation ($)(3) | Total ($) | | Abney S. Boxley III | 75,000 | 85,009 | 2,466 | 162,475 | | Blake K. Doyle | 65,000 | 85,009 | 243 | 150,252 | | Anne H. Lloyd | 60,000 | 85,009 | 2,466 | 147,475 | | W. Allen Rogers II | 80,000 | 85,009 | 2,466 | 167,475 | | Jon M. Ruth | 75,000 | 85,009 | 2,466 | 162,475 | | Joseph A. Rutkowski | 60,000 | 85,009 | 2,466 | 147,475 | | G. Kennedy Thompson | 80,000 | 85,009 | 2,466 | 167,475 | | Eric J. Zernikow(1) | 50,000 | — | — | 50,000 |

  85. Director Compensation

    | (1) Mr. Zernikow was appointed as a director on February 28, 2025. | | (2) This amount reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock units awarded to each non-employee director computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures, and does not reflect the actual value, if any, that may be received by our non-employee directors for their awards. The fair value of 2,703 RSUs issued to each non-employee director on February 11, 2025 was $85,009. As of September 27, 2025, each then-current non-employee director, other than Mr. Zernikow, held 2,703 RSUs. Mr. Zernikow did not hold any RSUs as of September 27, 2025. | | (3) This amount reflects dividend equivalents paid in cash on RSUs held by our non-employee directors. |