DEF 14A of Gilead Sciences, Inc., Mar 20, 2026

DEF 14A of Gilead Sciences, Inc.

Filed Mar 20, 2026 · FY20250001308179-26-000106

Open on EDGAR

  1. Board Overview

    Board Overview

  2. Board Overview

    | Director Nominee | | Occupation | Qualifications/Key Experience | | | Jacqueline K. Barton, Ph.D. IND Age 73 Director Since 2018 | Professor Emerita, California Institute of Technology | ► Extensive experience in chemistry and related fields, for which she has received many awards ► Accomplished academic and inventor who has performed pioneering medical research and discovery ► Business experience as a founder and leader of a molecular diagnostics company | | | Jeffrey A. Bluestone, Ph.D. IND Age 72 Director Since 2020 | Former President and Chief Executive Officer, Sonoma Biotherapeutics | ► Internationally-recognized leader in the field of immunotherapy and related fields, with a distinguished scientific and academic career spanning four decades ► Strong leadership experience in the healthcare industry | | | Sandra J. Horning, M.D. IND Age 77 Director Since 2020 | Retired Chief Medical Officer, Roche | ► Significant leadership experience in the pharmaceutical and healthcare industry, including expertise in drug development in multiple therapeutic areas ► Physician with experience treating patients as a practicing oncologist | | | Kelly A. Kramer IND Age 58 Director Since 2016 | Retired Chief Financial Officer, Cisco Systems | ► Significant financial expertise, including serving as chief financial officer of major companies or divisions in the technology and healthcare industries ► Experience in strategic and financial planning and corporate development | | | Ted W. Love, M.D. IND Age 67 Director Since 2024 | Former Chair of Board of Directors, Biotechnology Innovation Organization | ► Significant leadership experience in the biopharma industry, including serving as a chief executive officer of a global healthcare company ► Physician with a strong scientific background, known for championing access to care | | | Harish Manwani IND Age 72 Director Since 2018 | Senior Operating Partner, Blackstone; Retired Chief Operating Officer, Unilever | ► Strong leadership skills and broad global operational, sales and marketing and human resources expertise at a complex, multi-national company ► Experience in driving growth across complex organizations on a global scale | | | Daniel P. O’Day Chairman Age 61 Director Since 2019 | Chief Executive Officer, Gilead | ► Significant leadership and international business experience in the pharmaceutical industry ► Deep understanding of the evolving global healthcare environment and demonstrated commitment to driving innovation across the business | | | Javier J. Rodriguez IND Age 55 Director Since 2020 | Chief Executive Officer, DaVita | ► Significant leadership experience in the healthcare industry, including serving as chief executive officer and in various other executive roles of a Fortune 500 public healthcare company ► Recognized for his vision and leadership in transforming how kidney care is delivered and accelerating the digital transformation to improve patients’ lives while lowering costs for the healthcare system | | | Anthony Welters IND Lead Independent Director Age 71 Director Since 2020 | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, CINQ Care; Retired Senior Adviser to the Office of the CEO, UnitedHealth Group | ► Extensive experience in the health insurance and managed care industry ► Demonstrated commitment to delivering healthcare to underserved global communities |

  3. Board Overview

    | | Audit Committee | | Compensation and Talent Committee | | Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee | | Science Committee | | Chair | IND | Independent |

  4. Board Overview

    | 16 | |

  5. Nominees

    Nominees Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has evaluated and recommended, and our full Board has considered and nominated for election at the Annual Meeting, each of the nine director nominees described below. The names of the nominees and certain information about them as of March 20, 2026 (the filing date of this Proxy Statement), as well as the relevant skills and experience of the director nominees that led our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to conclude that the nominee should serve as a director on our Board, are set forth below:

  6. Nominees

    | | | | | | | Jacqueline K. Barton, Ph.D. Independent | | | | | Age: 73 Director since: 2018 | Board Committees ► Compensation and Talent ► Science | Other Public Company Board Service: ► None |

  7. Nominees

    | CAREER HIGHLIGHTS ► California Institute of Technology ► John G. Kirkwood and Arthur A. Noyes Professor of Chemistry Emerita in the Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering; member of the faculty for more than 30 years and Norman Davidson Leadership Chair of the division from 2009 to 2019 ► GeneOhm Sciences Inc., a molecular diagnostics company (acquired by Becton, Dickinson and Company) ► Founder and board member (2001-2006) | OTHER PROFESSIONAL HIGHLIGHTS AND ITEMS OF NOTE ► Member of Gilead’s Scientific Advisory Board from 1989 to 2007 ► Former director of both Dow Inc. and The Dow Chemical Company and a former member of the board and Materials Advisory Committee of DowDupont Inc. ► Member of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Medicine and the American Philosophical Society ► Recipient of the 2010 National Medal of Science for her discovery of new chemistry of the DNA helix and the 2015 Priestley Medal, the highest award of the American Chemical Society | | RELEVANT SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE ► Extensive experience in chemistry and related fields, for which she has received many awards ► Accomplished academic and inventor who has performed pioneering medical research and discovery ► Business experience as a founder and leader of a molecular diagnostics company | |

  8. Nominees

    | 22 | |

  9. Nominees

    | | | | | | | Jeffrey A. Bluestone, Ph.D. Independent | | | | | Age: 72 Director since: 2020 | Board Committees ► Science | Other Public Company Board Service: ► None |

  10. Nominees

    | CAREER HIGHLIGHTS ► Sonoma Biotherapeutics, Inc., a clinical-stage biotechnology company developing engineered regulatory T cell therapies to treat serious autoimmune and inflammatory diseases ► President and Chief Executive Officer (2019-2025) ► University of California San Francisco – Diabetes Center ► A.W. and Mary Margaret Clausen Distinguished Professor Emeritus in the Diabetes Center at University of California San Francisco, where he has been a member of the faculty and served in various other roles since 2020, including the Director of the Diabetes Center from 2000 to 2019 ► Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy ► President and Chief Executive Officer (2015-2019) | OTHER PROFESSIONAL HIGHLIGHTS AND ITEMS OF NOTE ► Managing Director at Vie Ventures, a life sciences venture capital firm focused on autoimmune and immune-mediated diseases (since 2026) ► Published more than 500 papers focused on T-cell activation and immune tolerance in autoimmunity, organ transplantation and cancer; his research has led to the development of multiple immunotherapies, including the first medicine approved by the FDA to delay/prevent autoimmune Type 1 diabetes and the first FDA-approved checkpoint inhibitor for the treatment of metastatic melanoma and other cancers ► Founding director of the Immune Tolerance Network, the largest National Institutes of Health-funded multicenter clinical immunology research program ► Member of the Blue Ribbon Panel, appointed by then Vice President Joe Biden, as a member of the National Cancer Moonshot Task Force ► Member of the National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Medicine and American Academy of Arts and Sciences ► Recipient of a prestigious Guggenheim Fellowship ► Former Ludwig Professor and Director of the Ben May Institute at the University of Chicago ► Former director of Provention Bio, Inc. (2013-2022) | | RELEVANT SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE ► Internationally-recognized leader in the field of immunotherapy and related fields, with a distinguished scientific and academic career spanning four decades ► Strong leadership experience in the healthcare industry | |

  11. Nominees

    | 2026 Proxy Statement | 23 |

  12. Nominees

    | | | | | | | Sandra J. Horning, M.D. Independent | | | | | Age: 77 Director since: 2020 | Board Committees ► Nominating and Corporate Governance ► Science (Chair) | Other Public Company Board Service: ► Moderna, Inc. ► Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ► Revolution Medicines, Inc. |

  13. Nominees

    | CAREER HIGHLIGHTS ► Genentech/Roche Group, a pharmaceutical and biotechnology company ► Chief Medical Officer and Global Head of Product Development; helped bring 15 new medicines to patients in disease areas including cancer, multiple sclerosis, influenza and blindness (2009-2019) ► Stanford University School of Medicine ► Professor of Medicine, Emerita, following 25 years as a practicing oncologist, investigator and tenured professor | OTHER PROFESSIONAL HIGHLIGHTS AND ITEMS OF NOTE ► President of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (2005-2006) ► Recognized as Healthcare Businesswomen’s Association Woman of the Year (2020) ► Recipient of the Duane Roth Memorial Award, an honor dedicated to leaders in healthcare, whose work has overcome numerous scientific obstacles to create new paradigms in research and treatment (2017) ► Former director of EQRx, Inc. (2021 to 2023) | | RELEVANT SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE ► Significant leadership experience in the pharmaceutical and healthcare industry, including expertise in drug development in multiple therapeutic areas ► Physician with experience treating patients as a practicing oncologist | |

  14. Nominees

    | | | | | | | Kelly A. Kramer Independent | | | | | Age: 58 Director since: 2016 | Board Committees ► Audit (Chair) ► Compensation and Talent | Other Public Company Board Service: ► Coinbase, Inc. ► Figma, Inc. ► Snowflake Inc. |

  15. Nominees

    | CAREER HIGHLIGHTS ► Cisco Systems, Inc., a worldwide technology leader ► Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 2015 until her retirement in 2020 ► GE Healthcare, a global medical technology and digital solutions company ► Former Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of GE Healthcare Systems and Chief Financial Officer of GE Healthcare Biosciences | ► Also worked in GE’s Corporate Headquarters, Transportation Systems and Aerospace divisions | | RELEVANT SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE ► Significant financial expertise, including serving as a chief financial officer of major companies or divisions in the technology and healthcare industries ► Experience in strategic and financial planning and corporate development | |

  16. Nominees

    | 24 | |

  17. Nominees

    | | | | | | | Ted W. Love, M.D. Independent | | | | | Age: 67 Director since: 2024 | Board Committees ► Audit | Other Public Company Board Service: ► Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc ► Royalty Pharma plc ► Structure Therapeutics Inc. |

  18. Nominees

    | CAREER HIGHLIGHTS ► Biotechnology Innovation Organization, a trade association representing biotechnology companies, academic institutions, state biotechnology centers and related organizations across the U.S. and in more than 30 other countries ► Chair of Board of Directors (2023-2025) ► Global Blood Therapeutics, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company ► President and Chief Executive Officer from 2014 to 2022, leading the company from a pre-clinical startup through its growth to a global commercial company with a pipeline of innovative therapies focused on sickle cell disease ► Other Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Experience ► Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. - Executive Vice President, Research and Development and Technical Operations ► Nuvelo, Inc. - President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman ► Theravance Biopharma, Inc. - Senior Vice President, Development | ► Genentech, Inc. - Senior management positions in clinical science and product development, including Chair of Genentech’s Product Development Committee ► Massachusetts General Hospital ► Physician in Department of Cardiology OTHER PROFESSIONAL HIGHLIGHTS AND ITEMS OF NOTE ► Recipient of William E. Proudford Sickle Cell Fund Distinguished Service Award (2023) ► Recipient of Spirit of the Heart Health Equity Champion Award from the Association of Black Cardiologists (2023) ► Former director of Seagen Inc. (2020-2023) and Global Blood Therapeutics (2013-2022) | | RELEVANT SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE ► Significant leadership experience in the biopharma industry, including serving as a chief executive officer of a global healthcare company ► Physician with a strong scientific background, known for championing access to care | |

  19. Nominees

    | 2026 Proxy Statement | 25 |

  20. Nominees

    | | | | | | | Harish Manwani Independent | | | | | Age: 72 Director since: 2018 | Board Committees ► Compensation and Talent ► Nominating and Corporate Governance (Chair) | Other Public Company Board Service: ► Whirlpool Corporation |

  21. Nominees

    | CAREER HIGHLIGHTS ► Blackstone Inc., a global investment firm ► Senior Operating Partner, advising select Blackstone portfolio companies since 2015 ► Unilever Group, a multinational consumer packaged goods company ► Chief Operating Officer from 2011 until his retirement in 2014; joined Unilever in 1976 as a management trainee in India and held several senior management roles around the world, including overseeing Unilever’s businesses in North America, Latin America, Asia and Africa | OTHER PROFESSIONAL HIGHLIGHTS AND ITEMS OF NOTE ► Member of the board of directors of Tata Sons Private Limited ► Chairman of the Executive Board of the Indian School of Business ► Former Non-Executive Chairman of Hindustan Unilever Limited (2005-2018) and member of Singapore Economic Development Board (2013-2019) ► Former director of Nielsen Holdings plc (2015-2021) and Qualcomm Incorporated (2014-2022) | | RELEVANT SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE ► Strong leadership skills and broad global operational, sales and marketing and human resources expertise at a complex, multi-national company ► Experience in driving growth across complex organizations on a global scale | |

  22. Nominees

    | 26 | |

  23. Nominees

    | | | | | | | Daniel O’Day Chairman and Chief Executive Officer | | | | | Age: 61 Director since: 2019 | Board Committees ► None | Other Public Company Board Service: ► None |

  24. Nominees

    | CAREER HIGHLIGHTS ► Gilead Sciences, Inc. ► Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since 2019 ► Roche Pharmaceutical ► Former Chief Executive Officer; 30+ year career at Roche, during which he held a number of executive positions in the company’s pharmaceutical and diagnostics divisions in North America, Europe and Asia and served as a member of Roche’s Corporate Executive Committee | OTHER PROFESSIONAL HIGHLIGHTS AND ITEMS OF NOTE ► Current member of the board of directors of the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) organization and of Georgetown University ► Former member of several public and private boards, including Genentech, Flatiron Health and Foundation Medicine ► Bachelor’s degree in biology from Georgetown University and an MBA from Columbia University | | RELEVANT SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE ► Extensive knowledge and a deep understanding of our business and the pharmaceutical industry as our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and through various significant leadership positions and international business experience ► Deep understanding of the evolving global healthcare environment and demonstrated commitment to driving innovation across the business | |

  25. Nominees

    | | | | | | | Javier J. Rodriguez Independent | | | | | Age: 55 Director since: 2020 | Board Committees ► Audit | Other Public Company Board Service: ► DaVita, Inc. |

  26. Nominees

    | CAREER HIGHLIGHTS ► DaVita Inc., a leading kidney care provider with operations in 14 countries ► Chief Executive Officer since 2019, building on more than 20 years of increasing company leadership and commitment to transforming care delivery to improve quality of life for patients with kidney disease – from the earliest stages through transplantation | ► Chief Executive Officer of DaVita Kidney Care, the company’s business unit that treats patients with kidney failure and end-stage kidney disease from 2014 to 2019 | | RELEVANT SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE ► Significant leadership experience in the healthcare industry, including serving as chief executive officer and in various other executive roles of a Fortune 500 public company ► Recognized for his vision and leadership in transforming how kidney care is delivered and accelerating the digital transformation to improve patients’ lives while lowering costs for the health care system | |

  27. Nominees

    | 2026 Proxy Statement | 27 |

  28. Nominees

    | | | | | | | Anthony Welters Lead Independent Director | | | | | Age: 71 Director since: 2020 | Board Committees ► Compensation and Talent (Chair) ► Nominating and Corporate Governance | Other Public Company Board Service: ► Carlyle Group |

  29. Nominees

    | CAREER HIGHLIGHTS ► CINQ Care Inc., a physician-led, community-based ambulatory care delivery system that delivers whole person care in the home, whenever possible, to Black and Brown communities ► Founder, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer ► BlackIvy Group, an organization focused on building and growing commercial enterprises in Sub-Saharan Africa ► Executive Chairman ► Somatus Inc., a values-based kidney care company ► Chairman ► AmeriChoice, a company specializing in public sector health coverage (acquired by UnitedHealth Group (UHG)) ► Founder of AmeriChoice in 1986 and joined UHG in 2002 as Senior Adviser to the Office of the Chief Executive Officer, Executive Vice President and Member of the Office of the Chief Executive Officer, until retiring in 2016 | OTHER PROFESSIONAL HIGHLIGHTS AND ITEMS OF NOTE ► Numerous academic and cultural leadership roles, including Trustee Emeritus of the Morehouse School of Medicine Board of Trustees, Chairman Emeritus of the Board of New York University School of Law, Vice Chairman of the Board of New York University, a Trustee of NYU Langone Medical Center, former Vice Chair of the Kennedy Center for Performing Arts, and a founding member of the National Museum of African American History and Culture ► Former director of Loews Corporation (2013-2025) | | RELEVANT SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE ► Extensive experience in the health insurance and managed care industry ► Demonstrated commitment to delivering healthcare to underserved communities | |

  30. Majority Vote Standard for Election of Directors

    Majority Vote Standard for Election of Directors Our bylaws require directors to be elected by a majority of the votes cast with respect to such director in uncontested elections (number of shares voted “for” a director must exceed the number of shares voted “against” that director). In a contested election (a situation in which the number of director nominees exceeds the number of directors to be elected), our bylaws provide that the standard for election of directors is a plurality of the shares voting in the election of directors at any meeting of stockholders for the election of directors at which a quorum is present. Under our Board Guidelines, any incumbent director who fails to receive at least a majority of the votes cast in an uncontested election is expected to tender his or her resignation to our Board. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee would then evaluate the tendered resignation and make a recommendation to our Board to accept or reject the resignation or to take other action. Our Board will act on our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation and publicly disclose its decision and the rationale for such decision within 90 days from the date the election results are certified. The director who tenders his or her resignation will not participate in our Board’s decision with respect to his or her resignation. If a nominee who was not already serving as a director does not receive at least a majority of the votes cast for such director at the annual meeting, that nominee will not become a director.

  31. Majority Vote Standard for Election of Directors

    | 28 | |

  32. Roles and Responsibilities

    Roles and Responsibilities As set forth in the Lead Independent Director Charter, the Lead Independent Director has clearly delineated and comprehensive duties, which are described further below:

  33. Roles and Responsibilities

    | ► | Consulting with the Chairperson as to an appropriate schedule of Board meetings, seeking to ensure that the independent directors can perform their duties responsibly while not interfering with ongoing company operations; | | ► | Consulting with the Chairperson regarding and approving the information, agenda and schedules of meetings of the Board of Directors and Board committees; | | ► | Chairing meetings of the Board of Directors when the Chairperson is not present or when otherwise appropriate, including all executive sessions of independent directors; | | ► | Facilitating the effective functioning of key Board committees and providing input on functioning of the committees, when required; | | ► | Advising the Chairperson as to the information necessary or appropriate for the independent directors to effectively and responsibly perform their duties and provide feedback on the quality, quantity and timeliness of information submitted by management; | | ► | Advising the Board of Directors and its committees on the retention of advisers and consultants who report directly to the Board of Directors; | | ► | Calling meetings of the independent directors, as appropriate; | | ► | Serving as chairperson of meetings of the independent directors; | | ► | Serving as principal liaison between the independent directors and the Chairperson and between the independent directors and senior management; | | ► | Ensuring that independent directors have adequate opportunities to meet and discuss issues in meetings of the independent directors; | | ► | Encouraging director participation by fostering an environment of open dialogue and constructive feedback among independent directors; | | ► | Communicating to management, as appropriate, the results of private discussions among independent directors; | | ► | Participating on ad-hoc committees established to deal with extraordinary matters, such as investigations and mergers and acquisitions; | | ► | Providing guidance on director succession and development; | | ► | Ensuring Board agendas provide the Board with the ability to periodically review and provide input on the company’s long-term strategy and to monitor management’s execution of the long term-strategy; | | ► | Serving as the independent directors’ representative in crisis situations, unless otherwise directed by the Board; | | ► | Monitoring conflicts of interest of all directors, including the Chairperson; | | ► | Participating in succession planning for the Chief Executive Officer and in talent retention and development programs for members of senior management; |

  34. Roles and Responsibilities

    | 34 | |

  35. Roles and Responsibilities

    | ► | Responding to major stockholder and other stakeholder questions and comments that are directed to the Lead Independent Director or to the independent directors as a group, with such consultation with the Chairperson and other directors as the Lead Independent Director may deem appropriate; | | ► | Representing independent directors in communications with other stakeholders, as required; and | | ► | Performing such other duties as the Board of Directors may from time to time delegate. |

  36. Roles and Responsibilities

    The Lead Independent Director also frequently attends meetings of all our Board committees and leads our Board in conducting an annual assessment of our Board and the committees to evaluate their effectiveness. In addition, as required by our Board Guidelines, our independent directors meet without executive management on a regular basis to review, among other things, Gilead’s strategy, performance, management effectiveness and succession planning. Consistent with our commitment to robust engagement with our stockholders, the Lead Independent Director also participates in meetings with stockholders as part of our year-round stockholder engagement program. The Lead Independent Director Charter is available on our website at www.gilead.com on the Investors page under “Governance.”

  37. Roles and Responsibilities

    | | Daniel P. O’Day | | | Chairman of the Board Our Board believes that it is currently in the best interests of Gilead and its stockholders for Mr. O’Day to serve as our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board because it positions Mr. O’Day to effectively drive future strategy and decision-making for our organization. In addition to public, private and non-profit board experience, Mr. O’Day has a track record of success in highly scientific and competitive therapeutic areas, deep understanding of the evolving healthcare environment around the world and unwavering commitment to driving innovation across all aspects of the business. As the individual with primary responsibility and accountability for managing our day-to-day operations, Mr. O’Day can provide unified leadership of Gilead and help to make sure that key business and strategic issues, risks and opportunities are brought to our Board’s attention in a way that prioritizes and makes the best use of our Board’s time. |

  38. Roles and Responsibilities

    | | Anthony Welters | | | Lead Independent Director In 2024, the independent directors of our Board unanimously appointed Anthony Welters as our Lead Independent Director. Mr. Welters has served as a director since 2020 and currently serves as Chair of the Compensation and Talent Committee and a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Mr. Welters has extensive leadership experience in the health insurance and managed care industry, and he has demonstrated a commitment to delivering healthcare to underserved communities. He also has significant experience with corporate governance matters as a current and former director of other public company boards, including board leadership roles. In light of this extensive experience and his valued contributions to our Board and its committees, our Board believes Mr. Welters is well-positioned to provide strong leadership and oversight of Board matters, be an effective partner to our Chairman of the Board and foster effective collaboration among the directors. |

  39. Roles and Responsibilities

    | 2026 Proxy Statement | 35 |

  40. 2025 Director Compensation

    2025 Director Compensation The table below summarizes the compensation paid by us to non-employee Board members for the 2025 fiscal year:

  41. 2025 Director Compensation

    | Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash(1) | Stock Awards(2)(3) | Option Awards(3)(4) | All Other Compensation(5) | Total | | Jacqueline K. Barton | $115,000 | $149,932 | $149,989 | $15,000 | $429,921 | | Jeffrey A. Bluestone | $95,000(6) | $149,932 | $149,989 | $14,860 | $409,781 | | Sandra J. Horning | $132,521(6) | $149,932 | $149,989 | $1,500 | $433,942 | | Kelly A. Kramer | $137,521 | $149,932 | $149,989 | — | $437,442 | | Ted W. Love | $95,000 | $149,932 | $149,989 | $15,000 | $409,921 | | Harish M. Manwani | $132,521 | $149,932 | $149,989 | — | $432,442 | | Javier J. Rodriguez | $95,000 | $149,932 | $149,989 | $15,000 | $409,921 | | Anthony Welters | $180,041 | $149,932 | $149,989 | — | $479,962 |

  42. 2025 Director Compensation

    | (1) Represents cash retainer for serving on our Board and committees of the Board for the year ended December 31, 2025. | | (2) Represents RSU awards comprised of 1,516 shares granted in 2025 under our 2022 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2022 Plan”) to each Board member on May 7, 2025 and vested immediately on the same date. The applicable grant-date fair value of each award was calculated in accordance with Topic 718 and did not take into account any estimated forfeitures related to service vesting. Market values are calculated by multiplying the number of shares of our common stock subject to the award by the closing price per share of our common stock on the award date of $98.90. | | (3) The following table shows, for each named individual, the aggregate shares under stock awards and option awards held by that individual as of December 31, 2025 (all such awards were fully vested): |

  43. 2025 Director Compensation

    | Name | Aggregate Stock Awards Outstanding as of December 31, 2025(a) | Aggregate Option Awards Outstanding as of December 31, 2025 | | Jacqueline K. Barton | 4,553 | 91,495 | | Jeffrey A. Bluestone | 5,713 | 46,025 | | Sandra J. Horning | 7,801 | 71,869 | | Kelly A. Kramer | 19,110 | 99,752 | | Ted W. Love | — | 22,453 | | Harish M. Manwani | — | 89,376 | | Javier J. Rodriguez | — | 68,813 | | Anthony Welters | — | 67,864 |

  44. 2025 Director Compensation

    | (a) Aggregate stock awards include vested RSUs for which receipt of the underlying shares of our common stock has been deferred. RSUs accrue forfeitable dividend equivalents that are subject to the same vesting and other terms and conditions as the corresponding RSUs. Dividend equivalents are accumulated and paid in cash when the underlying shares are issued. |

  45. 2025 Director Compensation

    | (4) Represents the grant-date fair value of the stock option awards comprised of 6,809 options with an exercise price of $98.90 per share made to each Board member on May 7, 2025 under the 2022 plan and vested immediately on the same date. The applicable grant-date fair value of each award was calculated in accordance with Topic 718 and did not take into account any estimated forfeitures related to such service vesting. Assumptions used in the calculation of grant-date fair value are set forth in Note 13 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2025, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for such fiscal year filed with the SEC. | | (5) Represents matching donations made by us to a charitable organization of (i) $15,000 on behalf of each of Dr. Barton, Dr. Love, and Mr. Rodriguez, (ii) $14,860 on behalf of Dr. Bluestone and (iii) $1,500 on behalf of Dr. Horning. | | (6) Dr. Bluestone and Dr. Horning elected to defer retainer fees of $95,000 and $132,521, respectively, as a cash deferral under our Deferred Compensation Plan. |

  46. 2025 Director Compensation

    | 44 | |

  47. 2025 Business Highlights

    | ► | Reinforced long-term value creation goals, innovation and the strength of our domestic growth strategy |

  48. Compensation Philosophy

    | ► | Pay-for-Performance | ► | Short- and Long-Term Balance | ► | Value Optimization | | ► | Market Competitiveness | ► | Stockholder Alignment | | |

  49. Compensation Philosophy

    | WHAT WE DO | WHAT WE DO NOT DO | | Ongoing outreach and engagement with major stockholders on executive compensation governance Rigorous annual incentive performance metrics with financial goals weighted at 60% of the total award opportunity and pipeline, product and people goals weighted at 40%, and with an individual performance modifier applicable to all NEOs other than our Chief Executive Officer Grant long-term equity awards that are 75% performance- based, with 50% awarded in the form of performance shares, based on pre-established measures and goals set at the beginning of the three-year performance period Clawback policies that cover both time- and performance- based cash and equity awards and require clawback in the event of a financial restatement as well as allow for clawback in the event of significant misconduct Cap annual cash incentive and long-term performance share award payouts at reasonable levels Set pre-established grant dates for executive officers’ annual equity awards Compensation and Talent Committee’s independent consultant performs no other work for Gilead Conduct annual assessments to identify and mitigate risk in our compensation programs Robust executive stock ownership guidelines | No repricing of stock options without stockholder approval No single trigger change in control benefits No change in control excise tax gross-ups Employees and directors are prohibited from hedging and pledging our stock No dividend or dividend equivalent rights payable on unearned or unvested equity awards No defined benefit pension or supplemental executive retirement plan (SERP) benefits No fixed term employment agreements |

  50. Compensation Components

    | Base Salary | Long-Term Incentive (“LTI”) Compensation | | Payment Criteria Fixed annual compensation reviewed annually with any increases generally effective March 1 2025 Compensation Summary Our Named Executive Officers received modest base salary increases ranging from 1.4% to 3.0% over 2024 levels (other than Dr. Berger, who was newly hired and not eligible for a base salary increase), consistent with increases given to salaried employees company-wide | 2025 Performance Shares ► 50% delivered in performance shares earned over three years based on relative TSR and, new for 2025 in response to stockholder feedback, a multi-year adjusted EPS growth metric ► There is no payout if performance falls below a minimum threshold ► Relative TSR awards are capped at target if absolute TSR is negative, regardless of relative performance ► 25% delivered in stock options that vest over four years beginning with one-quarter vesting one year after grant, and the remainder vesting in equal quarterly installments after year one ► 25% delivered in restricted stock units that vest over four years beginning with one-quarter vesting one year after grant, and the remainder vesting in equal quarterly installments after year one 2025 Compensation Summary ► 2023 performance shares, were earned as follows: ► Relative TSR performance shares were earned at 200.00% of target based on 88.2 percentile TSR against the companies in the S&P Healthcare Sub- Index ► Absolute Revenue performance shares were earned at 149.42% of target | | Annual Cash Incentive | | | Payment Criteria ► Corporate performance assessed on: ► Financial results: 60% ► Pipeline, Product and People results: 40% ► Individual performance modifier applies for all Named Executive Officers other than the CEO ► Maximum payout = 200% of target | | | 2025 Compensation Summary ► Annual incentive earned at 180% of target for our CEO, based on corporate performance against pre-set rigorous metrics ► Annual incentive earned at 161% to 181% of target for other Named Executive Officers, based on corporate and individual performance | |

  51. Pay and Performance Alignment

    Pay and Performance Alignment Our industry’s business model is characterized by significant capital investment, long lead times for discovery and development and unpredictable outcomes due to the nature of developing medicines for human use. Our business involves multi-year development cycles, in which realization of the return on investments in our product pipeline may take up to 12 years or more. Thus, our executive compensation program focuses not only on the successful progression of research programs, clinical trials and the launch of new products, but also on performance across a range of shorter-term metrics that advance our long-term strategy and longer-term value creation for our stockholders. As a result of long development cycles, success in the early phases of development, while critical to achieving our long-term strategy and short-term goals, may not be reflected in our operating performance and share price for several years. Long-term equity incentives, awarded in the form of performance shares, stock options and restricted stock units, make up the single largest component of our executives’ annual pay opportunity. As a result, a substantial portion of the target total direct compensation (“TDC”) for each Named Executive Officer is at-risk and tied directly to Gilead’s performance with an appropriate balance between the short- and long-term, as shown below. Target TDC is comprised of annual base salary, target annual incentive, and target annual long-term equity incentives.

  52. Pay and Performance Alignment

    Our programs are structured so that the target pay opportunity is not representative of actual realized pay unless we perform. For example, our performance share awards are directly impacted by our adjusted EPS growth achievement, relative TSR performance and stock price. When actual adjusted EPS growth and relative TSR performance is below target, the number of shares earned is also below the target number granted. This realizable value is then further impacted if the stock price declines below grant value. In addition, our restricted stock units decrease in value when our stock price declines, and our stock options have no value unless and until the stock price exceeds the grant date exercise price.

  53. Annual Incentive

    Annual Incentive Our annual incentive plan is designed to reward performance that supports our corporate strategy and drives desired leadership behaviors. The annual incentive plan aligns with our corporate strategy by focusing on short-term financial, pipeline, product and people metrics that serve as building blocks for our future product development and position us to deliver longer-term value to stockholders. As in prior years, our Chief Executive Officer’s annual incentive was tied solely to our corporate performance, with our Chief Executive Officer’s individual performance factor being the same as our corporate performance factor. Our other Named Executive Officers’ annual incentives were based on the achievement of the same corporate performance metrics that applied to our Chief Executive Officer, as well as individual performance goals, with award amounts determined by the following formula:

  54. Annual Incentive

    | Base Salaryx | Target Incentivex | Corporate Performance Factor 0% – 150%x | Individual Performance Factor 0% – 150%(1) | = | Actual Incentive Award 0% – 200% |

  55. Annual Incentive

    | (1) CEO performance is tied 100% to corporate performance. For purposes of calculating the CEO award, the individual performance factor is set equal to the corporate performance factor. Commencing with the 2026 annual incentive plan, the Committee has eliminated application of the corporate performance factor as an individual modifier for the CEO’s award and funding of the CEO’s bonus will equal the corporate performance factor. |

  56. Annual Incentive

    Both the company performance factor and individual performance factor can range from 0% to 150% achievement, with the maximum cash incentive payout capped at 200% of target. If the overall corporate performance factor for the year was less than 50%, no award would have been earned.

  57. Target Annual Incentive Opportunities

    Target Annual Incentive Opportunities Consistent with past years, the Compensation and Talent Committee set the 2025 target annual incentive opportunity at 150% of salary for our CEO and 100% of salary for our other Named Executive Officers. Actual earned amounts could range from 0% to 200% of the target opportunity, based on achievement of the relevant corporate and individual performance objectives.

  58. Target Annual Incentive Opportunities

    | 2026 Proxy Statement | 57 |

  59. Corporate Performance Metrics and Achievements for 2025

    Corporate Performance Metrics and Achievements for 2025 Our Compensation and Talent Committee reviews our executive compensation program annually to ensure that it drives desired leadership behaviors, is aligned with our corporate strategy, and links our executives’ pay with the long-term interests of our stockholders. As part of this review, in February 2025, the Committee approved increasing the weighting of the financial metrics under the annual incentive plan from 50% to 60% and decreasing the weighting of the strategic metrics from 50% to 40%. The increase in the weighting of financial metrics incentivizes the company’s executives to focus on key short-term metrics that drive our ability to invest in and advance our pipeline while reinforcing our commitment to disciplined expense management. Each of our financial goals and many of our strategic goals are quantitative and tied to pre-established targets. The Committee then reviews our performance against these metrics after the end of the year. Based on our performance, the Committee calculated a corporate performance factor between 0% and 150% achievement for each of the metrics, as shown below. The Committee approved adjusted net product revenue and adjusted operating income goals as our financial goals for 2025 because they drive our ability to invest in and advance our pipeline which in turn positions us to deliver longer-term value to stockholders. For purposes of the 2025 annual incentive plan, the Committee approved adjusted net product revenue and adjusted operating income performance goals that excluded Veklury revenue, consistent with the approach used in 2021 through 2024. The 2025 approved adjusted net product revenue and adjusted operating income targets, excluding Veklury revenue, were above the 2024 actual adjusted net product revenue and adjusted operating income results. When setting the goals, the Committee determined to continue its 2022 process for separately assessing Veklury performance in incentive plan results, applying a 0.75x to 1.25x modifier to the corporate performance factor to reflect Veklury’s potential impact while maintaining focus on other parts of the business. This was done in light of the continued highly unpredictable nature of COVID-19 infection rates (and resulting Veklury revenues) and the Committee’s desire to incentivize performance around our core businesses which are vital to our longer-term performance. After considering Gilead’s 2025 financial performance within our core businesses, the Committee approved a 1.00x modifier to the corporate performance factor for Veklury, resulting in no change to otherwise earned annual incentive payouts. Based on this assessment and the achievements described below, our Compensation and Talent Committee certified an overall corporate performance factor of 134% of target for our Named Executive Officers, other than Ms. Telman, who received a pro-rated target annual bonus payout pursuant to the Gilead Sciences, Inc. Severance Plan.

  60. Corporate Performance Metrics and Achievements for 2025

    | | Financial Metrics |

  61. Corporate Performance Metrics and Achievements for 2025

    | Metric(1) | Weighting | Threshold | Target | Maximum | Performance Factor | Resulting Payout Percentage | | Adjusted Net Product Revenue | | | | | 150% | 52.5% | | Adjusted Operating Income | | | | | 150% | 37.5% | | | | | | | Financial Results 90.0% | |

  62. Corporate Performance Metrics and Achievements for 2025

    | (1) Financial metrics are reported and reconciled in Appendix A. |

  63. Corporate Performance Metrics and Achievements for 2025

    | 58 | |

  64. Corporate Performance Metrics and Achievements for 2025

    | | Strategic: Pipeline, Product and People Metrics |

  65. Corporate Performance Metrics and Achievements for 2025

    | Metric | Overall Weighting | Actual | Performance Factor | Resulting Payout Percentage | | Pipeline | | | | | | Introduce nine new molecular entities (“NMEs”) into the Development portfolio and achieve key pipeline milestones | | ► Introduced a total of 9 NMEs into the Development portfolio as of year-end ► Filed PURPOSE 1 & 2 in 8 geographies ► Completed ASCENT-03 topline progression-free survival (PFS) primary readout in May 2025 with sBLA completed in September 2025 ► Completed ASCENT-04 PFS readout in April 2025 ► Achieved ISLEND-1&2 last patient in May 2025, ahead of schedule ► Achieved Next Gen Lymphoma first site activation in Q4 ► Filed BLA for iMMagine-1 in Q4 | 110% | 22% | | Product | | | | | | Achieve commercialization launch milestones ► Achieve Len4PrEP total U.S. patients of 8,700 as of November 2025 ► Achieve Livdelzi total U.S. patients of 5,400 as of December 2025 | | ► Achieved 7,276 Len4PrEP U.S. patients as of November 2025, resulting in below target achievement ► Treated 5,852 Livdelzi total patients as of December 2025, resulting in maximum achievement | 104% | 10% | | People | | | | | | Foster employee engagement and inclusion | | ► Conducted a global employee survey which showed a 4% increase in overall employee engagement and a 5% increase in employee belonging compared to 2024 | 120% | 12% | | | | Pipeline, Product and People Results 44% | | | | | | Overall Corporate Performance Factor 134% | | |

  66. Corporate Performance Metrics and Achievements for 2025

    | 2026 Proxy Statement | 59 |

  67. Annual Incentive Decisions

    Annual Incentive Decisions The Committee approved final annual incentive awards based on our corporate performance and individual performance for our Named Executive Officers other than our Chief Executive Officer. Based on our corporate performance, the Committee recommended, and the independent members of our Board ratified, the annual incentive award for our Chief Executive Officer. As a result, the following payments were approved for 2025:

  68. Annual Incentive Decisions

    | Named Executive Officer | Base Salary | Target Incentive Opportunity (as % of Salary) | Target Incentive Opportunity | Corporate Performance Factor | Individual Performance Factor | Total Award Value | | Mr. O’Day | $1,800,000 | 150% | $2,700,000 | 134% | 134%(1) | $4,848,120 | | Mr. Dickinson | $1,123,000 | 100% | $1,123,000 | 134% | 130% | $1,956,266 | | Ms. Mercier | $1,189,000 | 100% | $1,189,000 | 134% | 135% | $2,150,901 | | Dr. Berger(2) | $997,260 | 100% | $997,260 | 134% | 120% | $1,603,594 |

  69. Annual Incentive Decisions

    | (1) CEO performance is tied 100% to corporate performance. For purposes of calculating the CEO award for 2025, the individual performance factor was set equal to the corporate performance factor. | | (2) Dr. Berger’s award was pro-rated based on his start date of January 2, 2025. |

  70. Annual Incentive Decisions

    | 2026 Proxy Statement | 61 |

  71. Long-Term Equity Compensation

    Long-Term Equity Compensation Our long-term equity compensation program is designed to link our executives’ pay with the long-term interests of our stockholders, help competitively position target compensation opportunities for our executives and provide meaningful retentive value. As part of our Compensation and Talent Committee’s annual review of our executive compensation program described above, our Committee reviews our long-term equity compensation program to ensure alignment with our executive compensation philosophy. As a result of its annual review, in March 2025, the Committee approved replacing the annual revenue metric in the performance shares with a multi-year adjusted EPS growth metric. The table below shows the components of the long-term equity compensation program approved by the Committee for 2025, which is comprised of performance shares, stock options and restricted stock units, with performance shares emphasized:

  72. 2025 Annual Long-Term Equity Decisions

    2025 Annual Long-Term Equity Decisions Our Compensation and Talent Committee approved equity awards in the amounts set forth below, which reflect approved grant-date values and not actual delivered or realized compensation. When setting target long-term equity award values, our Committee evaluated each Named Executive Officer’s performance during the prior year, his or her expected future contributions and his or her market position compared to the competitive market. The following table sets forth the value of the equity awards approved by our Committee and, for our Chief Executive Officer, ratified by the independent members of our Board. Mr. O’Day’s target long-term equity award value was increased 9% over his 2024 target award value in recognition of his expected future contributions and to further tie his compensation with Gilead’s long-term performance, and Ms. Telman’s target long-term equity award value was increased 11% over her 2024 target award value as her compensation continued to be adjusted to market levels, although her 2025 equity awards were forfeited in connection with her termination of employment in December 2025.

  73. 2025 Annual Long-Term Equity Decisions

    | | Total Target Equity Award Value Approved by the Compensation and Talent Committee | | Named Executive | 2025 | | Mr. O’Day | $18,000,000 | | Mr. Dickinson | $5,200,000 | | Ms. Mercier | $5,200,000 | | Dr. Berger | $4,000,000 | | Ms. Telman | $3,600,000 |

  74. 2025 Performance Share Awards

    2025 Performance Share Awards All measures and goals were pre-established at the beginning of the three-year performance period. As part of its annual review of our long-term equity incentive program, our Committee conducts an annual review of the performance share award design, including performance measures and associated payout levels, the rigor of the performance goals and their alignment with performance. In March 2025, the Compensation and Talent Committee reviewed and established a new program design for the 2025 performance share awards based on input from management, the Committee’s independent compensation consultant, FW Cook, and shareholder discussions. The performance share awards granted by our Compensation and Talent Committee in 2025 were divided into two equally weighted tranches: one subject to three-year relative TSR performance conditions and one subject to two-year adjusted EPS growth followed by a one-year service period. The adjusted EPS growth metric was weighted equally in each of the two years and measured against pre-established performance targets. The adjusted EPS growth

  75. 2025 Performance Share Awards

    | 62 | |

  76. 2025 Performance Share Awards

    metrics were established based on a review of the company’s internal EPS budget for the performance period. Our Committee determined that relative TSR and adjusted EPS growth were appropriate performance measures as they both drive behaviors that the Committee wants to reinforce and align pay directly with stockholder returns. The 2025 performance shares are generally subject to continued employment through certification of the TSR performance achievement. Relative TSR Portion. The performance-based vesting requirement for the relative TSR performance shares is tied to our TSR for the performance period from March 1, 2025 through December 31, 2027, relative to the companies comprising the S&P Healthcare Sub-Index. The S&P Healthcare Sub-Index was selected for comparison because it enables our Committee to assess our performance against an objective peer group of industry relevant competitors. The Committee evaluated relative TSR performance against the same comparator group in prior years.

  77. 2025 Performance Share Awards

    | TSR Percentile vs. Comparator Group | % of Target Paid | | 81st or above | 200% | | 50th | 100% | | 20th or below | 0% |

  78. 2025 Performance Share Awards

    If our absolute TSR is negative, the vesting opportunity is capped at 100% of target, regardless of our relative performance. To receive the earned performance shares, an executive officer must generally remain employed with us through the date following the end of the performance period when our Compensation and Talent Committee certifies performance achievement. 2025 Adjusted EPS Growth Portion. The adjusted EPS growth metric for the 2025 performance shares is weighted equally between the 2025 tranche and 2026 tranche and measured against targets and goals established in March 2025. To receive the earned performance shares, an executive officer must generally remain employed with us through the date following the end of the full three-year performance period when our Compensation and Talent Committee certifies TSR performance achievement.

  79. 2025 Performance Share Awards

    | Measure | Threshold (90%) | Target (100%) | Maximum (107.5%) | 2025 Performance | Actual Earned | | 2025 Adjusted EPS Growth ($) | ≤6.54 | 7.26 | ≥7.81 | 7.92 | 200% | | | | | | | | | 2025 – 2027 EPS Score | | | | | | | Measure | 2025 | 2026 | | 2025-2027 Actual Earned | | | Adjusted EPS Growth(1) | 200% | Target growth pre-established and to be disclosed following achievement | | TBD | |

  80. 2025 Performance Share Awards

    | (1) Financial metrics are reported and reconciled in Appendix A. |

  81. 2025 Stock Options

    2025 Stock Options Our Compensation and Talent Committee believes that stock options provide an appropriate incentive for our executives because they will deliver value only if our stock price appreciates from the date of grant, which benefits all stockholders. Stock options granted to our Named Executive Officers have a 10-year contractual term and vest over a four-year service period. One-quarter of these options vest one year from the grant date, and the remaining stock options vest in equal quarterly installments thereafter (assuming the continued service of the executive officer through the applicable vesting date).

  82. 2025 Restricted Stock Units

    2025 Restricted Stock Units Our Compensation and Talent Committee believes that restricted stock units promote alignment of our executives’ interests with those of our stockholders and the long-term retention of our executives. Restricted stock units granted to our Named Executive Officers vest over a four-year service period. One-quarter of these restricted stock units vest one year from the grant date, and the remaining restricted stock units vest in equal quarterly installments thereafter (assuming the continued service of the executive officer through the applicable vesting date).

  83. 2023 Performance Share Awards Earned

    2023 Performance Share Awards Earned The 2023 performance share awards approved for our then-serving Named Executive Officers in 2023 were subject to an approximate three-year performance period and continued employment through certification of performance achievement:

  84. 2023 Performance Share Awards Earned

    | ► | The vesting requirement for the TSR tranche was tied to our relative TSR for the performance period from March 1, 2023 through December 31, 2025, compared to the TSR of the companies comprising the S&P Healthcare Sub-Index over such period; and | | ► | The vesting requirement for the revenue tranche was based on our level of achievement with respect to net product revenue goals established for each of 2023, 2024 and 2025 (one-third each year). |

  85. 2023 Performance Share Awards Earned

    | 2026 Proxy Statement | 63 |

  86. 2023 Performance Share Awards Earned

    In February 2025, our Committee established the net product revenue performance goal for 2025 of $28.4 billion (at target), which included Veklury revenue, with the payout level ranging from 0% to 200% of target. In contrast to the separate revenue assessments established under the annual incentive plan, and consistent with prior years, the Committee included revenue from Veklury in setting the performance share program revenue target resulting in a higher revenue target than the 2025 revenue target under our annual incentive plan. The 2025 net product revenue goal aligned with our forecast for 2025. In February 2026, our Compensation and Talent Committee certified final performance achievements for the 2023 performance share awards. Our three-year relative TSR was at the 88.2 percentile, resulting in a payout of 200% of target for the TSR-based awards. Our net product revenue exceeded the target revenue goal in 2023, 2024 and 2025, resulting in a payout of 149.42% of target for the revenue-based awards.

  87. 2023 Performance Share Awards Earned

    | Performance Share Awards | Weighting | Threshold | Target | Maximum | Percentage Earned | | Relative TSR Tranche | | | | | 200.00% | | Net Product Revenue Tranche: 2023 Net Product Revenue | | | | | 136.36% | | 2024 Net Product Revenue(1) | | | | | 176.42% | | 2025 Net Product Revenue(1) | | | | | 135.47% |

  88. 2023 Performance Share Awards Earned

    | (1) Also included as a sub-tranche of the 2024 performance share awards. |

  89. 2023 Performance Share Awards

    2023 Performance Share Awards

  90. 2023 Performance Share Awards

    | Named Executive Officer | Target Number of TSR Shares | Earned TSR Shares | Target Number of Revenue Shares | Earned Revenue Shares | | Mr. O’Day | 42,790 | 85,580 | 47,170 | 70,480 | | Mr. Dickinson | 14,835 | 29,670 | 16,350 | 24,430 | | Ms. Mercier | 14,835 | 29,670 | 16,350 | 24,430 |

  91. Dr. Berger - New Hire Arrangements

    | ► | An award of restricted stock units with a grant date value of $4,500,000 to compensate Mr. Berger for the value of certain equity awards granted by his former employers that he forfeited as a result of accepting employment with Gilead. The one-time make-whole award, which was informed by the form, value and timing of equity awards granted by his former employer, vests in three annual installments from the date of grant, subject to Dr. Berger’s continued service through the applicable vesting dates. |

  92. Dr. Berger - New Hire Arrangements

    | ► | A $3,000,000 sign-on bonus, to offset the value of his annual bonus and certain unvested equity awards forfeited from his prior employer, which were scheduled to become payable or vest, as applicable, shortly after starting his employment with Gilead, and to offset other economic costs to Dr. Berger as a result of joining Gilead. The full sign-on bonus is subject to repayment should Dr. Berger terminate his employment prior to completing two years of service with the company. |

  93. Role of Compensation Consultant

    Role of Compensation Consultant Our Compensation and Talent Committee has retained FW Cook, a national compensation consulting firm, as its independent compensation consultant. FW Cook reports directly to our Compensation and Talent Committee, which has the direct authority to appoint, compensate, oversee the work of and dismiss its compensation consultant. FW Cook attends meetings of our Compensation and Talent Committee, as requested. FW Cook provides various executive compensation services to our Compensation and Talent Committee, including advising our Compensation and Talent Committee on the principal aspects of our Chief Executive Officer’s compensation and evolving industry practices, and providing market information and analyses regarding the competitiveness of our program design for both our executive officers and the non-employee members of our Board. During 2025, FW Cook served solely as a consultant to our Compensation and Talent Committee and did not provide any other services to Gilead. Our Compensation and Talent Committee has determined that FW Cook is independent, and the work of FW Cook on behalf of our Compensation and Talent Committee did not raise any conflict of interest based on the six factors for assessing independence and identifying potential conflicts of interest set forth in Exchange Act Rule 10C-1(b)(4), the listing standards of Nasdaq and such other factors as were deemed relevant under the circumstances.

  94. Use of Market Data

    Use of Market Data Individual compensation levels and opportunities for our Named Executive Officers are compared to a peer group of biopharmaceutical and pharmaceutical companies headquartered in the U.S. that are similar to us in terms of business strategy, labor market competition, market capitalization, revenue and number of employees. Our compensation peer group for 2025, which was identified based on these objective selection criteria and remained unchanged from the compensation peer group for 2024, comprised these 10 companies:

  95. Use of Market Data

    | Compensation Peer Group | | | | | AbbVie Inc. | Bristol Myers Squibb Company | Merck & Co., Inc. | Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated | | Amgen Inc. | Eli Lilly and Company | Pfizer Inc. | | | Biogen Inc. | Johnson & Johnson | Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | |

  96. Use of Market Data

    | 2026 Proxy Statement | 65 |

  97. Use of Market Data

    The following chart represents our position relative to our compensation peer group on two key selection criteria at the time the 2025 compensation peer group was approved in July 2024 (based on publicly available information as of June 2024).

  98. Use of Market Data

    | | Revenue(1) in $ Millions | Market Capitalization(2) in $ Millions | | Peer Group Median | $40,733 | $158,597 | | Gilead Sciences, Inc. | $27,450 | $82,094 |

  99. Use of Market Data

    | (1) Revenues represent amounts reported during the four most recent quarters (from April 1, 2023 to March 31, 2024). | | (2) Market capitalization represents a 30-day average capitalization as of June 3, 2024. |

  100. Use of Market Data

    Our compensation peer group includes industry competitors we believe are most like us in terms of business complexity and product life cycle. We also include companies that fall within specified revenue and market capitalization ranges. These ranges are broad enough to ensure we can maintain a sufficient number of peer companies. This is especially important as our industry experiences a number of mergers and acquisitions each year, thereby reducing the number of relevant peer company choices. Our Compensation and Talent Committee reviews the companies in our compensation peer group annually and makes adjustments as necessary so that the comparator companies properly reflect the market in which we compete for executive talent. We also review the executive pay practices of similarly situated companies as reported in industry surveys and reports. In practice, our Compensation and Talent Committee has not targeted a specific percentile relative to our compensation peer group for individual components of our total compensation. Instead, we take a holistic perspective in establishing total compensation for our executive officers, considering internal pay equity that recognizes officers’ relative experience, responsibilities and individual capabilities in addition to external market compensation practices.

  101. Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

    Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Eligible employees (including our executive officers) can enroll in our Deferred Compensation Plan and defer a portion of their base salaries and part or all of their annual incentives and commissions. Gilead generally does not provide any matching contributions to the Deferred Compensation Plan. Each participant may direct the investment of his or her deferred compensation account balance into investment choices that mirror substantially all the investment funds available under our 401(k) savings plan. None of these investment alternatives result in “above-market” interest for disclosure purposes. For further information on the deferred compensation arrangements of our Named Executive Officers, see the 2025 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation table on page 81.

  102. Clawback Policies

    Under our Compensation Reconciliation and Recoupment Policy, our second clawback policy, which has been in place for several years, the Compensation and Talent Committee has authority to recoup cash incentive payments and equity awards (which includes time-based and performance-based equity compensation) and certain realized proceeds, as applicable, from an executive officer whose misconduct contributed to Gilead’s obligation to file a financial restatement. The Committee also has authority to recoup all or any portion of the amounts or shares of stock (including proceeds realized on a sale of such shares) attributable to cash or equity-based incentive compensation from any executive officer whose significant misconduct results in a violation of significant company policy, law or regulation that caused material financial, operational or reputational harm to Gilead, including the failure to appropriately supervise a subordinate employee who engaged in misconduct. This policy requires Gilead to publicly disclose actions taken to recoup compensation from an executive so long as the underlying facts have been previously disclosed, subject to certain legal and privacy rights considerations. In addition, as discussed below, forfeiture provisions in our equity award agreements apply in the event of a termination for cause.

  103. Severance Benefits

    Severance Benefits We maintain the Gilead Sciences, Inc. Severance Plan, which was most recently amended and restated effective as of July 29, 2025 (the “Severance Plan”) and offers severance payments and benefits to all our employees, including our executive officers, upon certain involuntary terminations of employment. The intent of our Severance Plan is to:

  104. Severance Benefits

    | ► | Enable us to provide a standard set of payments and benefits to new and current executive officers and employees. | | ► | Align the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders by enabling our executive officers to consider corporate transactions that are in the best interests of our stockholders and other stakeholders without undue concern over whether a transaction may jeopardize their employment. | | ► | Assure our executive officers of fair treatment in connection with a change in control of Gilead by providing for payments and benefits under the Severance Plan subject to a “double trigger,” which means that an executive officer will be eligible to receive payments and benefits under the Severance Plan in connection with a change in control of Gilead only if he or she incurs a qualifying termination of employment. |

  105. Severance Benefits

    In addition, the Severance Plan does not provide “gross-up” payments on any excise tax imposed on payments or benefits received in connection with a change in control. Gilead and Ms. Telman entered into a severance agreement in connection with her not-for-cause termination of employment, pursuant to which Ms. Telman is entitled to severance benefits as set forth in the Severance Plan. The severance benefits provided to Ms. Telman aligned with our standard benefits under the Severance Plan; no enhancements to severance were provided. These benefits include (i) cash severance payments equal to $2,505,000 (i.e., the sum of 18 months’ base salary and one year’s target annual bonus under Gilead’s annual cash incentive plan), payable in 18 equal monthly installments; (ii) a pro-rata target annual bonus for 2025; (iii) a lump-sum payment to cover the estimated cost of COBRA premiums for 18 months; and (iv) outplacement services for six months. The severance agreement also includes a customary release of claims and confidentiality, non-disparagement, non-solicitation and cooperation covenants.

  106. Severance Benefits

    | 68 | |

  107. Compensation-Related Risk

    | ► | Our overall compensation structure is applied uniformly throughout the organization, with the only major exception relating to the form in which equity compensation is awarded. | | ► | For our broad-based employee population with a title of Senior Director or higher, a significant component of compensation is in the form of equity awards tied to the value of our common stock. | | ► | The vesting of performance share awards is tied to our relative TSR achievement and revenue (for awards granted before 2025) or adjusted EPS growth (for awards granted in 2025) achievement over prescribed performance periods. | | ► | Our overall compensation structure is not excessively oriented toward short-term incentives. | | ► | The performance goals for our 2025 annual incentive program were based on achievement with respect to both financial and non-financial corporate performance measures as well as individual performance (except with respect to our Chief Executive Officer, whose performance is evaluated solely on corporate performance measures). | | ► | Our stock ownership guidelines require our executive officers to maintain a substantial ownership interest in Gilead. | | ► | Our clawback policies permit us to recoup cash incentives and equity awards paid to our executive officers if financial results have to be subsequently restated, including the full amount of such awards if the restatement is a result of their misconduct, or our executive officers otherwise engage in significant misconduct resulting in a violation of significant company policy, law or regulation that caused material financial, operational or reputational harm to Gilead, including the failure to appropriately supervise a subordinate employee who engaged in misconduct. | | ► | Hedging transactions in our common stock, such as put and call options or pre-paid forward sale contracts by executive officers, employees and directors, as well as pledging of our securities, are not allowed under our insider trading policy. |

  108. Severance and Change in Control Arrangements with Named Executive Officers

    Severance and Change in Control Arrangements with Named Executive Officers Although the employment of our executive officers is “at will,” they may be eligible to receive certain severance payments and benefits upon a qualifying termination of employment under certain defined circumstances. There are four general categories of termination:

  109. Severance and Change in Control Arrangements with Named Executive Officers

    | ► | Voluntary Termination/For Cause Termination: includes a voluntary termination of employment by the Named Executive Officer (other than in connection with a resignation for Good Reason) prior to reaching applicable retirement age and a termination of the Named Executive Officer’s employment by us for Cause. | | ► | Retirement: includes a termination of employment by us or by the Named Executive Officer after the Named Executive Officer has reached the applicable retirement age, other than a termination of the Named Executive Officer’s employment by us for Cause. | | ► | Involuntary Termination Without Cause/Good Reason Resignation: includes a termination of the Named Executive Officer’s employment by us for reasons not constituting Cause and the resignation of the Named Executive Officer for reasons constituting Good Reason, including a resignation as a result of a change in the executive’s work location by more than a specified distance. | | ► | Change in Control Termination: includes a termination of the Named Executive Officer’s employment by us without Cause, or the resignation of the Named Executive Officer for Good Reason, within the applicable change in control protection period following a change in control of Gilead (i.e., “double trigger”). |

  110. Severance and Change in Control Arrangements with Named Executive Officers

    In addition, certain benefits are payable upon the Named Executive Officer’s death or disability. For purposes of determining a Named Executive Officer’s eligibility for the various severance payments and benefits available under the Severance Plan, Mr. O’Day’s individual offer letters, and our equity plan, the following definitions are relevant: A “change in control of Gilead” will be deemed to occur upon:

  111. Severance and Change in Control Arrangements with Named Executive Officers

    | ► | a merger, consolidation or other reorganization approved by our stockholders, unless our stockholders continue to own more than 50% of the total combined voting power of the voting securities of the successor corporation; | | ► | a sale of all or substantially all our assets; or | | ► | the acquisition by any person or related group of persons of more than 50% of the total combined voting power of our outstanding securities, or a change in the majority of the members of our Board over a 12-month or shorter period by reason of one or more contested elections for Board membership. |

  112. Severance and Change in Control Arrangements with Named Executive Officers

    Under the Severance Plan and our equity plan, a resignation for Good Reason is referred to as “Constructive Termination” and generally will be deemed to occur should a Named Executive Officer resign from his or her employment with us for any of the following reasons during the applicable change in control protection period:

  113. Severance and Change in Control Arrangements with Named Executive Officers

    | ► | an adverse change in his or her status, title, position or responsibilities (including reporting responsibilities) or the assignment to him or her of any duties or responsibilities which are inconsistent with his or her status, title, position or responsibilities; | | ► | a material reduction in his or her annual base compensation; | | ► | his or her required permanent relocation to any place outside a 50-mile radius of the location serving as his or her existing principal work site; | | ► | the failure by the new company to continue in effect any material compensation or employee benefit plan in which he or she was participating or to provide him or her with an aggregate level of compensation and benefits comparable to that in effect for him or her prior to the change in control; or | | ► | any material breach by the new company of any provision of any agreement we have with the Named Executive Officer. |

  114. Severance and Change in Control Arrangements with Named Executive Officers

    In addition, a resignation following a required relocation, without consent, to a new work location that is more than 50 miles from the executive’s previous work location is also a Good Reason trigger under our Severance Plan outside the context of a change in control. Mr. O’Day also has a definition of “Good Reason” under his individual offer letter with us, which generally allows for a “Good Reason” resignation, after a notice and cure period, upon:

  115. Severance and Change in Control Arrangements with Named Executive Officers

    | ► | an adverse change in employment status, title, position or responsibilities (including reporting responsibilities); | | ► | a reduction in annual base compensation; | | ► | a required relocation to any place outside a specified radius of the greater Foster City, California area; or | | ► | a material breach by the company or any subsidiary of the terms of his offer letter or of any written equity award agreement between him and the company. |

  116. Severance and Change in Control Arrangements with Named Executive Officers

    A Named Executive Officer’s employment will be deemed to have been terminated “for Cause” if such termination occurs by reason of:

  117. Severance and Change in Control Arrangements with Named Executive Officers

    | ► | any act or omission in bad faith and to our detriment; | | ► | dishonesty, fraud, misconduct, material violation of any company policy or material breach of any agreement with us; | | ► | conviction or plea of nolo contendere to any crime involving dishonesty, breach of trust or physical or emotional harm to any person; or | | ► | poor performance, nonperformance or neglect of duties owed to us or insubordination. |

  118. Severance and Change in Control Arrangements with Named Executive Officers

    | 70 | |

  119. Severance and Change in Control Arrangements with Named Executive Officers

    The following table summarizes the payments and benefits that each Named Executive Officer other than Ms. Telman (who became entitled to the payments and benefits described with respect to a termination without Cause in connection with her termination of employment) would have been eligible to receive upon various termination of employment scenarios, assuming such scenarios occurred on December 31, 2025.

  120. Severance and Change in Control Arrangements with Named Executive Officers

    | Type of Termination | | | Voluntary or “For Cause” Termination | ► No severance payments. ► Accrued base salary and vacation pay. ► Vested but unpaid benefits. | | Retirement(1) | ► To the extent retirement occurs at least 12 months after grant date, continued vesting of and five-year post-retirement exercise period (subject to existing expiration date) for stock options granted in or after 2019. Three-year post-retirement exercise period (subject to existing expiration date) for vested stock options granted in or prior to 2018. ► Continued vesting of 100% of performance shares for which performance goals are attained, provided retirement occurs at least 12 months after grant date. ► Continued vesting of 100% of restricted stock units granted in 2022 and 2023 in accordance with the standard vesting schedule, provided retirement occurs at least 12 months after grant date. ► 100% acceleration of restricted stock units granted in or after 2024, provided retirement occurs at least 12 months after grant date. | | Death or Disability | ► Accelerated vesting of equity awards (based on actual performance for completed performance periods and target performance for open performance periods for performance shares). | | Involuntary Termination without “Cause” or for “Good Reason”(2) | ► Cash severance equal to 1.5 times (2.0 times for Mr. O’Day) base salary + 1.0 times (2.0 times for Mr. O’Day) target annual cash incentive. ► Pro-rata target annual cash incentive for year of termination. ► Lump-sum payment to cover the estimated cost of COBRA premiums for 18 months (24 months for Mr. O’Day). ► Outplacement services for 6 months (12 months for Mr. O’Day). | | Change in Control Termination (Involuntary Termination without “Cause” or Resignation for “Good Reason” within Change in Control Protection Period(3)) | ► Cash severance equal to 2.5 times (3.0 times for Mr. O’Day) base salary + 2.5 times (3.0 times for Mr. O’Day) target annual cash incentive. ► Pro-rata target annual cash incentive for year of termination. ► Lump-sum payment to cover the estimated cost of COBRA premiums for 30 months (36 months for Mr. O’Day). ► Outplacement services for 6 months (12 months for Mr. O’Day). ► 100% acceleration of stock option and restricted stock unit awards. ► Acceleration of unvested performance shares as follows: ► Accelerates at target if change in control occurs within first 12 months of performance period. ► If the change in control occurs following that 12-month period, then accelerates at greater of (i) target or (ii) actual performance through the end of the fiscal quarter prior to the change in control date. |

  121. Severance and Change in Control Arrangements with Named Executive Officers

    | (1) For equity awards granted in 2018 and prior years, retirement is defined as the termination of a Named Executive Officer’s employment with a combined age and years of service of not less than 70 years. For awards granted in and after 2019, retirement is defined as termination of employment after the Named Executive Officer (i) attains age 55 and has completed at least ten (10) years of continuous service or (ii) attains age 65. As of December 31, 2025, no Named Executive Officers were retirement eligible. | | (2) Other than a required relocation, the Good Reason trigger outside of the context of a change in control is only applicable to Mr. O’Day. | | (3) The change in control protection period would begin six months prior to the consummation of a change in control transaction and continue for a specified period following the effective date of the change in control transaction (24 months for Mr. O’Day and 18 months for the other Named Executive Officers). |

  122. Severance and Change in Control Arrangements with Named Executive Officers

    A Named Executive Officer must execute and deliver a general release of claims against Gilead as a condition of his or her receipt of severance payments and benefits. The cash severance component of those arrangements will be paid in a series of equal periodic installments in accordance with our normal payroll practices over a period of years corresponding to the applicable multiple of base salary indicated above for the Named Executive Officer. However, a portion of those installments may be subject to a six-month holdback to the extent required under applicable tax laws.

  123. Severance and Change in Control Arrangements with Named Executive Officers

    | 2026 Proxy Statement | 71 |

  124. Severance and Change in Control Arrangements with Named Executive Officers

    The estimated severance payments and benefits for which a Named Executive Officer would have become eligible if his or her employment terminated under these various scenarios, and the actual severance payments and benefits that Ms. Telman became entitled to receive in connection with the termination of her employment, are set forth in the table on page 82. The estimated amounts assume:

  125. Severance and Change in Control Arrangements with Named Executive Officers

    | ► | that the covered termination of employment occurred on December 31, 2025; and | | ► | the value of any equity vesting is based on the closing market price of our common stock on December 31, 2025. |

  126. Severance and Change in Control Arrangements with Named Executive Officers

    The table on page 82 does not include accrued wages, vacation accrual, vested deferred compensation or the intrinsic value (as of December 31, 2025) of any outstanding stock options or other stock awards held by the Named Executive Officer that were vested on that date. Due to the number of different factors that affect the nature and amount of any benefits provided in connection with these events, actual amounts payable to any of the Named Executive Officers should a separation from service or change in control occur during the year will likely differ, perhaps significantly, from the amounts reported below. Factors that could affect such amounts include the timing during the year of the event, our stock price, target amounts payable under annual and long-term incentive arrangements that are in place at the time of the event, and the Named Executive Officer’s age and prevailing tax rates.

  127. CEO Pay Ratio

    CEO Pay Ratio We present below the ratio of annual total compensation of our median compensated employee to the annual total compensation of Mr. O’Day. The ratio presented below is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K. The SEC’s rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their employee populations and compensation practices. As a result, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported below, as other companies have different employee populations and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios. For 2025, we used the same median employee identified for purposes of calculating our 2023 and 2024 pay ratios because we believe there has been no change in our employee population or employee compensation arrangements that would significantly impact the pay ratio disclosure. In identifying such median compensated employee, we applied the following steps:

  128. CEO Pay Ratio

    | ► | We identified our median compensated employee from the 18,157 full-time and part-time workers who were included as employees on our payroll records as of October 1, 2023 based on year-to-date base salary, incentive compensation, commissions and vested equity values, with conforming adjustments for employees who were hired during that period but did not work the full nine months. | | ► | We then disregarded employees at the median who had anomalous compensation characteristics to select the median compensated employee. |

  129. CEO Pay Ratio

    We then calculated annual total compensation for the median compensation employee using the same methodology we use for our Named Executive Officers as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table. The 2025 annual total compensation for Mr. O’Day was $28,437,198 as reported in the Summary Compensation Table. The 2025 annual total compensation for our median compensated employee was $238,979. The ratio of Mr. O’Day’s total compensation to our median compensated employee’s annual total compensation for fiscal year 2025 is 119 to 1.

  130. CEO Pay Ratio

    | 72 | |

  131. Equity Grant Practices

    Equity Grant Practices The Compensation and Talent Committee generally approves the target value of annual equity awards for the company’s executive officers, including each of the Named Executive Officers, at its regularly scheduled meeting in late January or early February of each year, with a grant date to be effective on March 10th, which is generally following the filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the prior year. Annual equity awards to other company employees are typically approved by our CEO with a grant date of March 10th as well. Additionally, employees may enroll to purchase shares of the company’s common stock under the terms of the Gilead Sciences, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, with purchase dates generally in February and August of each year. In special circumstances, including the hiring or promotion of an individual or where the Committee or its authorized delegate determines it is in the best interest of the company, the Committee or its delegate may approve grants throughout the year, with such grants effective on the 10th day of the applicable calendar month or at other times determined to be appropriate. The company may change these practices in the future. The company does not time the disclosure of material nonpublic information for the purpose of affecting the value of executive compensation. Consistent with the above-described practice, on March 10, 2025, the Committee granted our Named Executive Officers annual equity awards including stock options, restricted stock units and performance shares. This pre-approved grant was made two days before Gilead filed a Form 8-K disclosing that Sandra Patterson, the company’s then Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer and principal accounting officer, had decided to leave the company, and that the Board had appointed Diane E. Wilfong as the company’s interim Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer, and designated her as the interim principal accounting officer, effective immediately. Due to this Form 8-K event, as required by SEC rules, the table below sets forth certain information about the annual stock option grants made to our Named Executive Officers.

  132. Equity Grant Practices

    | Name | Grant Date | Number of Securities Underlying the Award | Exercise Price of the Award ($/Sh) | Grant Date Fair Value of the Award | Percentage Change in the Closing Market Price of the Securities Underlying the Award Between the Trading Day Ending Immediately Prior to the Disclosure of Material Nonpublic Information and the Trading Day Beginning Immediately Following the Disclosure of Material Nonpublic Information(1) | | Daniel P. O’Day | March 10, 2025 | 169,690 | $117.21 | $4,500,060 | (0.94)% | | Andrew D. Dickinson | March 10, 2025 | 49,020 | $117.21 | $1,299,976 | (0.94)% | | Johanna Mercier | March 10, 2025 | 49,020 | $117.21 | $1,299,976 | (0.94)% | | Dietmar Berger, M.D., Ph.D. | March 10, 2025 | 37,710 | $117.21 | $1,000,043 | (0.94)% | | Deborah H. Telman | March 10, 2025 | 33,940 | $117.21 | $900,065 | (0.94)% |

  133. Equity Grant Practices

    | (1) Reflects the percentage change in the closing market price of our common stock between the trading day ending immediately prior to the Form 8-K filing ($114.43 on March 11, 2025) and the trading day beginning immediately following the disclosure of material nonpublic information ($113.35 on March 13, 2025). |

  134. Equity Grant Practices

    | 2026 Proxy Statement | 73 |

  135. Summary Compensation Table

    Summary Compensation Table The following table shows, for the fiscal years 2025, 2024 and 2023, compensation awarded to, paid to, or earned by, our NEOs. Dr. Berger commenced employment with us in 2025 and was not a NEO prior to 2025.

  136. Summary Compensation Table

    | Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary(1) | Bonus | Stock Awards(2) | Option Awards(2) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation(1)(3) | All Other Compensation(1)(4) | Total | | Daniel P. O’Day Chairman and Chief Executive Officer | 2025 | $1,795,192 | — | $15,238,402(5) | $4,500,060 | $4,848,120 | $2,055,424 | $28,437,198 | | | 2024 | $1,771,201 | — | $12,426,816 | $4,125,011 | $4,028,096 | $1,338,268 | $23,689,392 | | | 2023 | $1,740,962 | — | $11,865,090 | $3,749,966 | $4,036,200 | $1,215,472 | $22,607,690 | | Andrew D. Dickinson Chief Financial Officer | 2025 | $1,116,654 | — | $4,321,741(5) | $1,299,976 | $1,956,266 | $70,979 | $8,765,616 | | | 2024 | $1,083,969 | — | $4,080,024 | $1,300,029 | $1,608,840 | $36,896 | $8,109,758 | | | 2023 | $1,052,396 | — | $4,143,271 | $1,299,966 | $1,574,304 | $37,886 | $8,107,823 | | Johanna Mercier Chief Commercial and Corporate Affairs Officer | 2025 | $1,182,269 | — | $4,564,517(5) | $1,299,976 | $2,150,901 | $102,980 | $9,300,643 | | | 2024 | $1,148,038 | — | $4,139,594 | $1,300,029 | $1,845,246 | $176,158 | $8,609,065 | | | 2023 | $1,114,035 | — | $4,190,733 | $1,299,966 | $1,805,440 | $176,580 | $8,586,754 | | Dietmar Berger, M.D., Ph.D. Chief Medical Officer | 2025 | $969,231 | $3,000,000(6) | $6,999,758(5) | $1,000,043 | $1,603,594 | $350,252 | $13,922,878 | | Deborah H. Telman(7) Former Executive Vice President, Corporate Affairs and General Counsel | 2025 | $977,334 | — | $3,071,792(5) | $900,065 | — | $55,478 | $5,004,669 | | | 2024 | $967,723 | — | $2,151,425 | $812,500 | $1,436,148 | $704,083 | $6,071,879 | | | 2023 | $936,865 | — | $1,895,703 | $812,512 | $1,288,980 | $337,168 | $5,271,228 |

  137. Summary Compensation Table

    | (1) Includes amounts earned but deferred at the election of the NEO pursuant to our 401(k) savings plan and our non-qualified deferred compensation plan. | | (2) Represents the aggregate grant-date fair value of the equity-based awards, including restricted stock units (“RSUs”), performance shares and stock options granted to the NEOs for the applicable year under our 2022 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2022 Plan”), calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 (“Topic 718”), and does not take into account estimated forfeitures. Assumptions used in the calculation of such grant-date fair values are set forth in Note 13 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2025, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for such fiscal year. Also, see the 2025 Grants of Plan-Based Awards table on page 76 for additional information. | | (3) For 2025, represents amounts paid in March 2026 based on our Compensation & Talent Committee’s review and certification of corporate performance for Mr. O’Day and certification of corporate performance and individual achievements for all other NEOs other than Ms. Telman in 2025 pursuant to our annual incentive plan. | | (4) Includes the 2025 value of perquisites and other personal benefits, company contributions to our Section 401(k) plan, and term life insurance premiums. |

  138. Summary Compensation Table

    | 74 | |

  139. Summary Compensation Table

    | Name | Perquisite and Other Personal Benefits | Contributions to 401(k) plan | Insurance Premiums | Total | | Daniel O’Day | $2,028,940 | $15,000 | $11,484 | $2,055,424 | | Andrew Dickinson | $48,497 | $15,000 | $7,482 | $70,979 | | Johanna Mercier | $80,498 | $15,000 | $7,482 | $102,980 | | Dietmar Berger, MD, PhD | $314,176 | $15,000 | $21,076 | $350,252 | | Deborah Telman | $28,994 | $15,000 | $11,484 | $55,478 |

  140. Summary Compensation Table

    | Mr. O’Day: $2,028,940, which includes (i) $1,708,354 reflecting the aggregate incremental cost incurred by us for security and driving services provided to Mr. O’Day and (ii) $320,586 reflecting the aggregate incremental cost incurred by us for Mr. O’Day’s personal use of our corporate aircraft. | | After considering the recommendation of an independent, third-party security study and in response to specific threats and incidents, our Board of Directors requires the use of company-provided personal security, aircraft and a driver for most of our CEO’s travel, including personal travel. The incremental costs incurred by the company for these items have been determined to be necessary to promote our CEO’s personal safety and security. | | Mr. Dickinson: $48,497, which includes (i) $11,726 reflecting the aggregate incremental cost incurred by us for the personal use of our corporate automobiles; (ii) $35,871 reflecting the aggregate incremental cost incurred by us for the personal use of our corporate aircraft; and (iii) $900 mobile telephone benefit. | | Ms. Mercier: $80,498, which includes (i) $8,266 reflecting the aggregate incremental cost incurred by us for the personal use of our corporate automobiles; (ii) $7,852 reflecting the aggregate incremental cost incurred by us for the personal use of our corporate aircraft; (iii) $63,380 of relocation subsidy reimbursement to Ms. Mercier, which includes tax reimbursements of $2,122; and (iv) $1,000 wellness reimbursement. The relocation support given to Ms. Mercier is consistent with Gilead’s standard practice for all employees eligible under Gilead’s mobility program. | | Dr. Berger: $314,176, which includes (i) $6,031 reflecting the aggregate incremental cost incurred by us for the personal use of our corporate aircraft; (ii) $307,591 of relocation subsidy reimbursement to Dr. Berger, which includes tax reimbursements of $165,637; and (iii) $554 reflecting the aggregate incremental cost incurred by us for the personal use of our corporate automobiles. The relocation support given to Dr. Berger is consistent with Gilead’s standard practice for all employees eligible under Gilead’s mobility program. | | Ms. Telman: $28,994, which includes (i) $13,743 reflecting the aggregate incremental cost incurred by us for the personal use of our corporate automobiles; (ii) $6,979 reflecting the aggregate incremental cost incurred by us for the personal use of our corporate aircraft; (iii) $7,372 of relocation subsidy reimbursement to Ms. Telman, which includes tax reimbursements of $3,695; and (iv) $900 mobile telephone benefit. The relocation support given to Ms. Telman is consistent with Gilead’s standard practice for all employees eligible under Gilead’s mobility program. | | (5) Includes the aggregate grant-date fair value of the performance shares determined in accordance with Topic 718. Performance objectives have been set or are otherwise determinable for only certain tranches of the awards granted in each year and the associated grant-date fair values of those tranches have been incorporated in the table above. Tranches for which performance objectives have not been set (or were not determinable at December 31, 2025) do not have a reportable grant-date fair value under Topic 718 and therefore, are not included in the table above. Accordingly, amounts reported for 2025 reflect the grant-date fair value of awards granted in 2025 that are subject to a three-year Relative TSR performance condition; the portions of the 2023 and 2024 awards that are subject to the 2025 revenue goal; and the portions of the 2025 awards that are subject to the 2025 adjusted EPS growth goal. The aggregate grant-date fair values of the awards reported for 2025 (the Relative TSR tranche of the 2025 performance shares; the 2025 revenue subtranches of the 2023 and 2024 performance shares, as applicable; and the 2025 adjusted EPS growth subtranche of the 2025 performance shares), assuming maximum attainment of the applicable performance goals in effect for those tranches and subtranches, are as follows: $18,514,257 for Mr. O’Day, $5,188,117 for Mr. Dickinson, $5,673,667 for Ms. Mercier, $2,341,856 for Dr. Berger, and $3,750,954 for Ms. Telman. The revenue subtrances under the 2024 performance shares and the 2026 adjusted EPS growth subtranche under the 2025 performance shares for which performance objectives were not set or otherwise determinable at December 31, 2025, and this did not have a reportable grant-date fair value in 2025 under Topic 718. The grant-date fair values assume maximum goal attainment only as to those tranches or subtranches that at present have a reportable grant-date fair value. Assumptions used in the calculation of such grant-date fair values are set forth in Note 13 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2025, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for such fiscal year. | | See footnotes 4, 5, 6, and 7 to the 2025 Grants of Plan-Based Awards table on pages 76-77 for a detailed description of the terms of the 2025 performance shares. | | (6) Dr. Berger began his employment with us on January 2, 2025. The “Bonus” column amount includes Dr. Berger’s $3,000,000 sign-on bonus, which was intended to offset the value of his annual bonus and certain unvested equity awards forfeited from his prior employer, which were scheduled to become payable or vest, as applicable, shortly after starting his employment with Gilead, and to offset other economic implications of Dr. Berger’s accepting our offer. The sign-on bonus is subject to repayment should Dr. Berger terminate his employment without good reason or be terminated for cause (as such terms are defined in the 2022 Plan) on or prior to January 2, 2027. | | (7) Ms. Telman, our former Executive Vice President, Corporate Affairs and General Counsel entered into a severance agreement in connection with her not-for-cause termination of employment as of December 5, 2025 the “Separation Agreement”. Pursuant to the Separation Agreement, Ms. Telman will receive cash severance payments totaling $2,505,000 (payable in eighteen monthly installments) which started in January 2026, a target pro-rata 2025 bonus payment of $947,096, a lump sum cash payment intended to offset costs of her health care continuation coverage for 18 months and reasonable professional outplacement services for a period of six consecutive months. These separation payments were excluded from the table above since the amounts had not been paid as of December 31, 2025 and remained subject to Ms. Telman’s compliance with various covenants under the Separation Agreement as of such date. |

  141. Summary Compensation Table

    | 2026 Proxy Statement | 75 |

  142. 2025 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

    2025 Grants of Plan-Based Awards The following table sets forth certain additional information regarding grants of plan-based awards to our NEOs for the 2025 fiscal year:

  143. 2025 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

    | | | | | Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) | | | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2) | | | All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units | All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options | Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards | Grant-Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards(3) | | Name | Award Type | Grant Date | Approval Date | Threshold | Target | Maximum | Threshold | Target | Maximum | | | | | | Daniel P. O’Day | 2023 performance shares | 3/10/2025 | 2/4/2025 | — | — | — | 3,145 | 15,723(4)(5) | 31,446 | — | — | — | $1,842,893 | | | 2024 performance shares | 3/10/2025 | 2/4/2025 | — | — | — | 3,661 | 18,303(4)(6) | 36,606 | — | — | — | $2,145,295 | | | 2025 performance shares | 3/10/2025 | 2/4/2025 | — | — | — | 9,605 | 44,953(4)(7) | 89,906 | — | — | — | $6,749,937 | | | 2025 option awards | 3/10/2025 | 2/4/2025 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 169,690(8) | $117.21 | $4,500,060 | | | 2025 restricted stock unit awards | 3/10/2025 | 2/4/2025 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 38,395(9) | — | — | $4,500,278 | | | Corporate bonus | N/A | NA | — | $2,700,000 | $5,400,000 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | | Andrew D. Dickinson | 2023 performance shares | 3/10/2025 | 2/4/2025 | — | — | — | 1,090 | 5,450(4)(5) | 10,900 | — | — | — | $638,795 | | | 2024 performance shares | 3/10/2025 | 2/4/2025 | — | — | — | 1,154 | 5,768(4)(6) | 11,536 | — | — | — | $433,292 | | | 2025 performance shares | 3/10/2025 | 2/4/2025 | — | — | — | 2,774 | 12,985(4)(7) | 25,970 | — | — | — | $1,949,796 | | | 2025 option awards | 3/10/2025 | 2/4/2025 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 49,020(8) | $117.21 | $1,299,976 | | | 2025 restricted stock unit awards | 3/10/2025 | 2/4/2025 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 11,090(9) | — | — | $1,299,859 | | | Corporate bonus | N/A | NA | — | $1,123,000 | $2,246,000 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | | Johanna Mercier | 2023 performance shares | 3/10/2025 | 2/4/2025 | — | — | — | 1,090 | 5,450(4)(5) | 10,900 | — | — | — | $638,795 | | | 2024 performance shares | 3/10/2025 | 2/4/2025 | — | — | — | 1,154 | 5,768(4)(6) | 11,536 | — | — | — | $676,067 | | | 2025 performance shares | 3/10/2025 | 2/4/2025 | — | — | — | 2,774 | 12,985(4)(7) | 25,970 | — | — | — | $1,949,796 | | | 2025 option awards | 3/10/2025 | 2/4/2025 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 49,020(8) | $117.21 | $1,299,976 | | | 2025 restricted stock unit awards | 3/10/2025 | 2/4/2025 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 11,090(9) | — | — | $1,299,859 | | | Corporate bonus | N/A | NA | — | $1,189,000 | $2,378,000 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | | Dietmar Berger, M.D., Ph.D. | 2025 performance shares | 3/10/2025 | 2/4/2025 | — | — | — | 2,134 | 9,990(4)(7) | 19,980 | — | — | — | $1,500,134 | | | 2025 option awards | 3/10/2025 | 2/4/2025 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 37,710(8) | $117.21 | $1,000,043 | | | 2025 restricted stock unit awards | 1/2/2025 | 1/2/2025 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 48,975(10) | — | — | $4,499,823 | | | 2025 restricted stock unit awards | 3/10/2025 | 2/4/2025 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8,530(9) | — | — | $999,801 | | | Corporate bonus | N/A | NA | — | $997,260 | $1,994,520 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | | Deborah H. Telman | 2023 performance shares | 3/10/2025 | 2/4/2025 | — | — | — | 681 | 3,406(4)(5) | 6,812 | — | — | — | $399,217 | | | 2024 performance shares | 3/10/2025 | 2/4/2025 | — | — | — | 721 | 3,605(4)(6) | 7,210 | — | — | — | $422,542 | | | 2025 performance shares | 3/10/2025 | 2/4/2025 | — | — | — | 1,921 | 8,990(4)(7) | 17,980 | — | — | — | $1,349,860 | | | 2025 option awards | 3/10/2025 | 2/4/2025 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33,940(8) | $117.21 | $900,065 | | | 2025 restricted stock unit awards | 3/10/2025 | 2/4/2025 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7,680(9) | — | — | $900,173 | | | Corporate bonus | N/A | NA | — | $1,002,000 | $2,004,000 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |

  144. 2025 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

    | (1) Actual amounts paid in early 2026 were based on our Compensation & Talent Committee’s review and certification of corporate performance and individual achievements in 2025 under our annual bonus program and are included in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table on page 74. Ms. Telman earned a pro-rata target bonus pursuant to the Separation Agreement, and did not earn an annual incentive for 2025 in light of her termination of employment. | | (2) Performance shares and RSU awards accrue forfeitable dividend equivalents that are subject to the same vesting and other terms and conditions as the corresponding performance shares and RSU awards. Dividend equivalents are accumulated and paid in cash when and to the extent the underlying shares are issued. Amounts in the “Threshold” column represent the number of shares of our common stock issuable (e.g., 20% of the target number of performance shares allotted to the revenue subtranche, 50% of the target number of performance shares allotted to the adjusted EPS growth subtranche, and 0.025% of the target number of performance shares allotted to the Total Shareholder Return (Relative TSR) tranche) upon threshold-level achievement of the performance goals described in footnotes 5, 6 and 7 below. If threshold level performance is not achieved, no shares are issuable. | | (3) Represents the grant-date fair value of each equity award, calculated in accordance with Topic 718, and does not take into account estimated forfeitures. The grant-date fair value of the performance shares awarded is based on the probable outcome of the pre-established performance objectives and the assumptions used in the calculation of |

  145. 2025 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

    | 76 | |

  146. 2025 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

    | the grant-date fair value of the award are set forth in Note 13 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2025, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for such fiscal year. | | (4) Performance objectives were set for certain tranches of performance shares which were approved in prior years by our Compensation & Talent Committee and the associated grant-date fair value of those tranches has been incorporated in the table above (i.e., the performance objectives for the third subtranche of the 2023 revenue-based performance shares for Mr. O’Day, Mr. Dickinson, Ms. Mercier and Ms. Telman, and the second subtranche of the 2024 revenue-based performance shares for Mr. O’Day, Mr. Dickinson, Ms. Mercier and Ms. Telman). Performance shares that had no grant date for accounting purposes as the performance objectives were not yet determinable as of the close of the 2025 fiscal year, and therefore, do not have a reportable 2025 grant-date fair value under Topic 718 are excluded from the Summary Compensation Table and the table above (i.e., the performance objectives for the third subtranche of the 2024 revenue-based performance shares and the second subtranche of the 2025 adjusted EPS growth-based performance shares). | | Because of changes in our stock price between the date of the approval by our Compensation & Talent Committee and the time when the performance objectives are established or otherwise become determinable, the reported grant-date fair value of the performance shares differs from the award value approved by our Compensation & Talent Committee. In addition, because the second subtranche of the 2025 adjusted EPS growth-based performance shares are excluded from the Summary Compensation Table and the table above, only a portion of the value of performance shares awarded in 2025 is included in the two tables. The value of the relevant performance shares awarded to our NEOs in 2025 is as set forth below: |

  147. 2025 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

    | | Performance Share Award Value Approved By Our | Performance shares at Target based on Compensation & Talent Committee Approval (# of Shares) | | | Executive Officer | Compensation & Talent Committee | Relative TSR | Adjusted EPS Growth | | Mr. O’Day | $9,000,000 | 25,755 | 38,395 | | Mr. Dickinson | $2,600,000 | 7,440 | 11,090 | | Ms. Mercier | $2,600,000 | 7,440 | 11,090 | | Dr. Berger | $2,000,000 | 5,725 | 8,530 | | Ms. Telman | $1,800,000 | 5,150 | 7,680 |

  148. 2025 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

    | (5) Represents the 2025 revenue subtranche of performance shares awarded in 2023 under the 2022 Plan, as that value was measured on March 10, 2025, the date on which the revenue target for that particular subtranche was first communicated to the NEOs (following approval by our Compensation & Talent Committee). Although such subtranche was part of the performance share awards originally granted on March 10, 2023, no grant-date fair value could be determined for that subtranche under Topic 718 until March 10, 2025. | | The 2023 performance shares were divided into two equally-weighted Relative TSR and revenue tranches based on award value approved by the Compensation & Talent Committee. Based on the terms of the awards, any shares accrued on the basis of the applicable level of Relative TSR goal attainment are also subject to a service-vesting condition that generally requires continued service with us through the date following the completion of the performance period on which our Compensation & Talent Committee certifies the Relative TSR level attained (the “Relative TSR-based Awards Certification Date”). The Relative TSR three-year performance period was from March 1, 2023 through December 31, 2025. Based on the terms of the awards, any shares accrued on the basis of the applicable level of revenue goal attainment are also subject to a service-vesting condition that requires continued service with us through the date following the completion of the third subtranche performance period on which our Compensation & Talent Committee certifies the attained level of the consolidated net product revenue goal applicable to the third subtranche (the “Revenue-based Awards Certification Date”), subject to certain special vesting in the event of death, disability or retirement before that date. | | (6) Represents the 2025 revenue subtranche of performance shares awarded in 2024 under the 2022 Plan, as that value was measured on March 10, 2025, the date on which the revenue target for that particular subtranche was first communicated to the NEOs (following approval by our Compensation & Talent Committee). Although such subtranche was part of the performance share awards originally made on March 10, 2024, no grant-date fair value could be determined for that subtranche under Topic 718 until March 10, 2025. | | The 2024 performance shares were divided into two equally-weighted Relative TSR and revenue tranches based on award value approved by the Compensation & Talent Committee. Based on the terms of the awards, any shares accrued on the basis of the applicable level of Relative TSR goal attainment are also subject to a service-vesting condition that generally requires continued service with us through the Relative TSR-based Awards Certification Date. The Relative TSR three-year performance period is from March 1, 2024 through December 31, 2026. Based on the terms of the awards, any shares accrued on the basis of the applicable level of revenue goal attainment are also subject to a service-vesting condition that requires continued service with us through the Revenue-based Awards Certification Date, subject to certain special vesting in the event of death, disability or retirement before that date. | | Since the revenue goal for the third subtranche of the 2024 performance share award had not been set by our Compensation & Talent Committee as of the close of the 2025 fiscal year, that subtranche does not have a determinable grant-date fair value under Topic 718 for the 2025 fiscal year. | | (7) Represents the 2025 performance shares awarded on March 10, 2025 under the 2022 Plan. | | The 2025 performance shares were divided into two equally-weighted Relative TSR and adjusted EPS growth tranches based on award value approved by the Compensation & Talent Committee. The performance-based vesting requirement for the Relative TSR tranche was set by our Compensation & Talent Committee on March 7, 2025 and is tied to the percentile level of our TSR for the three-year performance period from March 1, 2025 through December 31, 2027 relative to the TSR realized for that same period by the companies comprising three subsets of the S&P Healthcare Sub-Index. Based on the terms of the awards, to receive any shares of our common stock accrued pursuant to this Relative TSR tranche, an executive officer must remain employed with us through the Relative TSR-based Awards Certification Date, subject to certain special vesting in the event of death, disability or retirement before that date. | | The performance-based vesting requirement for the adjusted EPS growth tranche of each performance award is divided into two equal subtranches, each with its own one-year performance period and applicable service period, as follows: | | The performance-based vesting requirement for the first subtranche was the achievement of the adjusted EPS growth for the 2025 fiscal year as set by our Compensation & Talent Committee. The grant-date fair value of that particular subtranche was measured on March 10, 2025, in accordance with Topic 718 and does not take into account estimated forfeitures. Based on the terms of the awards, any shares accrued on the basis of adjusted EPS growth goal attainment for this subtranche are also subject to a service-vesting condition that requires continued service through the award certification date. | | The adjusted EPS growth goal for the second subtranche of the 2025 performance shares was set by our Compensation & Talent Committee on March 10, 2025, as a specified percentage of growth in adjusted EPS over 2025 actual adjusted EPS, and thus the actual numeric adjusted EPS goal was not determinable as of the close of the 2025 fiscal year. Accordingly, the second subtranche does not have a determinable grant-date fair value under Topic 718 for the 2025 fiscal year. | | (8) Reflects option awards granted under our 2022 Plan that vest at the rate of 25% on the first anniversary of the grant date and 6.25% each quarter thereafter during the optionee’s employment over the next 36 months. Subject to earlier forfeiture, the maximum term of such options is 10 years. The exercise price per share of each option granted was equal to the closing market price of our common stock on the grant date or the closing market price on the trading day before the grant date if the grant date is not on a trading day. | | (9) Represents time-based RSU awards under the 2022 Plan that vest at the rate of 25% on the first anniversary of the grant date and 6.25% each quarter thereafter during the awardee’s employment over the next 36 months. | | (10) Represents time-based RSU awards under the 2022 Plan that were granted to Dr. Berger to compensate him for the value of certain equity awards granted by his former employer that he forfeited as a result of accepting employment with Gilead. These one-time make-whole RSUs, which parallel the form, value and timing of equity awards granted by his former employer, vest in three annual installments from the date of grant during Dr. Berger’s employment over the next 3 years. |

  149. 2025 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

    | 2026 Proxy Statement | 77 |

  150. 2025 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

    2025 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End The following table sets forth information regarding each unexercised option award and unvested stock award held by each of our NEOs as of December 31, 2025. Market values are based on our closing stock price on December 31, 2025, the last trading day of 2025, of $122.74:

  151. 2025 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

    | | Option Awards(1) | | | | Stock Awards(3) | | | | | Name | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable | Option Exercise Price(2) | Option Expiration Date | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested | | Daniel P. O’Day | 231,280 | — | $66.01 | 3/1/2029 | — | — | — | — | | | 256,620 | — | $72.34 | 3/10/2030 | — | — | — | — | | | 307,355 | — | $63.91 | 3/10/2031 | — | — | — | — | | | 374,282 | 24,953 | $57.92 | 3/10/2032 | — | — | — | — | | | 147,877 | 67,218 | $79.50 | 3/10/2033 | — | — | — | — | | | 122,119 | 157,011 | $75.12 | 3/10/2034 | — | — | — | — | | | — | 169,690 | $117.21 | 3/10/2035 | — | — | — | — | | | — | — | — | — | 21,441(4) | $2,631,699 | — | — | | | — | — | — | — | 85,580(5) | $10,504,089 | — | — | | | — | — | — | — | 27,739(6) | $3,404,626 | — | — | | | — | — | — | — | 21,226(7) | $2,605,285 | — | — | | | — | — | — | — | 32,292(8) | $3,963,510 | 58,550(9) | $7,186,427 | | | — | — | — | — | 24,709(10) | $3,032,789 | — | — | | | — | — | — | — | 38,396(11) | $4,712,725 | 25,755(12) | $3,161,169 | | | — | — | — | — | 4,047(13) | $496,729 | — | — | | | — | — | — | — | 14,741(14) | $1,809,310 | — | — | | | — | — | — | — | 30,887(14) | $3,791,070 | — | — | | | — | — | — | — | 38,395(14) | $4,712,602 | — | — | | Andrew D. Dickinson | 68,700 | 9,815 | $57.92 | 3/10/2032 | — | — | — | — | | | 51,263 | 23,302 | $79.50 | 3/10/2033 | — | — | — | — | | | 38,487 | 49,483 | $75.12 | 3/10/2034 | — | — | — | — | | | — | 49,020 | $117.21 | 3/10/2035 | — | — | — | — | | | — | — | — | — | 7,432(4) | $912,157 | — | — | | | — | — | — | — | 29,670(5) | $3,641,696 | — | — | | | — | — | — | — | 9,615(6) | $1,180,132 | — | — | | | — | — | — | — | 7,358(7) | $903,060 | — | — | | | — | — | — | — | 10,176(8) | $1,248,991 | 18,450(9) | $2,264,553 | | | — | — | — | — | 7,787(10) | $955,752 | — | — | | | — | — | — | — | 11,090(11) | $1,361,187 | 7,440(12) | $913,186 | | | — | — | — | — | 1,592(13) | $195,402 | — | — | | | — | — | — | — | 5,110(14) | $627,201 | — | — | | | — | — | — | — | 9,734(14) | $1,194,751 | — | — | | | — | — | — | — | 11,090(14) | $1,361,187 | — | — |

  152. 2025 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

    | 78 | |

  153. 2025 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

    | | Option Awards(1) | | | | Stock Awards(3) | | | | | Name | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable | Option Exercise Price(2) | Option Expiration Date | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested | | Johanna Mercier | 73,110 | — | $66.64 | 7/24/2029 | — | — | — | — | | | 71,850 | — | $72.34 | 3/10/2030 | — | — | — | — | | | 92,205 | — | $63.91 | 3/10/2031 | — | — | — | — | | | 160,940 | 10,730 | $57.92 | 3/10/2032 | — | — | — | — | | | 51,263 | 23,302 | $79.50 | 3/10/2033 | — | — | — | — | | | 38,487 | 49,483 | $75.12 | 3/10/2034 | — | — | — | — | | | — | 49,020 | $117.21 | 3/10/2035 | — | — | — | — | | | — | — | — | — | 7,432(4) | $912,157 | — | — | | | — | — | — | — | 29,670(5) | $3,641,696 | — | — | | | — | — | — | — | 9,615(6) | $1,180,132 | — | — | | | — | — | — | — | 7,358(7) | $903,060 | — | — | | | — | — | — | — | 10,178(8) | $1,249,207 | 18,450(9) | $2,264,553 | | | — | — | — | — | 7,787(10) | $955,752 | — | — | | | — | — | — | — | 11,090(11) | $1,361,187 | 7,440(12) | $913,186 | | | — | — | — | — | 1,740(13) | $213,568 | — | — | | | — | — | — | — | 5,110(14) | $627,201 | — | — | | | — | — | — | — | 9,734(14) | $1,194,751 | — | — | | | — | — | — | — | 11,090(14) | $1,361,187 | — | — | | Dietmar Berger, M.D., Ph.D. | — | 37,710 | $117.21 | 3/10/2035 | — | — | — | — | | | — | — | — | — | 8,530(11) | $1,046,972 | 5,725(12) | $702,687 | | | — | — | — | — | 8,530(14) | $1,046,972 | — | — | | | — | — | — | — | 48,975(15) | $6,011,192 | — | — | | Deborah H. Telman | 3,038 | — | $60.75 | 3/12/2026(16) | — | — | — | — | | | 32,041 | — | $79.50 | 3/12/2026(16) | — | — | — | — | | | 6,872 | — | $75.12 | 3/12/2026(16) | — | — | — | — |

  154. 2025 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

    | (1) The options vest over a four-year period at the rate of 25% on the first anniversary of the grant date and 6.25% each quarter thereafter during the optionee’s employment. Each option is exercisable over a period not to exceed the contractual term of ten years from the grant date. | | (2) The exercise price per share of each option granted was equal to the closing market price of our common stock on the grant date or the closing market price on the day before the grant date if the grant date was not a trading day. | | (3) Stock awards granted under the Equity Incentive Plans accrue forfeitable dividend equivalents that are subject to the same vesting and other terms and conditions as the corresponding stock awards. Dividend equivalents are accumulated and paid in cash when and to the extent that the underlying shares vest. | | (4) Represents the number of shares of our common stock that have accrued under the first revenue subtranche of the 2023 performance shares, as described in footnote 5 to the 2025 Grants of Plan-Based Awards table on page 76. based on attainment of the applicable revenue goal at 136% of the target level. The shares are now subject only to a service-vesting condition that requires continued service through certification by our Compensation & Talent Committee, subject to certain accelerated vesting provisions in the event of death, disability or a qualifying retirement before that date. The shares were released on February 3, 2026. | | (5) Represents the number of shares of our common stock that will vest and become issuable pursuant to the Relative TSR tranche of the 2023 performance shares, as described in footnote 5 to the 2025 Grants of Plan-Based Awards table on page 76, based on attainment of the relative TSR goal at 200% of the target level. The shares were released on February 3, 2026. | | (6) Represents the number of shares of our common stock that have accrued under the second revenue subtranche of the 2023 performance shares, as described in footnote 5 to the 2025 Grants of Plan-Based Awards table on page 76, based on attainment of the applicable revenue goal at 176% of the target level. The shares are now subject only to a service-vesting condition that requires continued service through certification by our Compensation & Talent Committee, subject to certain accelerated vesting provisions in the event of death, disability or a qualifying retirement before that date. The shares were released on February 3, 2026. | | (7) Represents the number of shares of our common stock that have accrued under the third revenue subtranche of the 2023 performance shares, as described in footnote 5 to the 2025 Grants of Plan-Based Awards table on page 76, based on attainment of the applicable revenue goal at 135% of the target level. The shares are now subject only to a service-vesting condition that requires continued service through certification by our Compensation & Talent Committee, subject to certain accelerated vesting provisions in the event of death, disability or a qualifying retirement before that date. The shares were released on February 3, 2026. | | (8) Represents the number of shares of our common stock that have accrued under the first revenue subtranche of the 2024 performance shares, as described in footnote 6 to the 2025 Grants of Plan-Based Awards table on page 76, based on attainment of the applicable revenue goal at 176% of the target level. The shares are now subject only to a service-vesting condition that requires continued service through certification by our Compensation & Talent Committee, subject to certain accelerated vesting provisions in the event of death, disability or a qualifying retirement before that date. | | (9) Represents the number of shares of our common stock that will vest and become issuable pursuant to the Relative TSR tranche of the 2024 performance shares, as described in footnote 6 to the 2025 Grants of Plan-Based Awards table on page 76, assuming the established performance goal is attained at the target level. |

  155. 2025 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

    | 2026 Proxy Statement | 79 |

  156. 2025 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

    | (10) Represents the number of shares of our common stock that have accrued under the second revenue subtranche of the 2024 performance shares, as described in footnote 6 to the 2025 Grants of Plan-Based Awards table on page 76, based on attainment of the applicable revenue goal at 135% of the target level. The shares are now subject only to a service-vesting condition that requires continued service through certification by our Compensation & Talent Committee, subject to certain accelerated vesting provisions in the event of death, disability or a qualifying retirement before that date. | | (11) Represents the number of shares of our common stock that have accrued under the first adjusted EPS growth subtranche of the 2025 performance shares, as described in footnote 7 to the 2025 Grants of Plan-Based Awards table on page 76, based on attainment of the applicable adjusted EPS growth goal at 200% of the target level. The shares are now subject only to a service-vesting condition that requires continued service through certification by our Compensation & Talent Committee, subject to certain accelerated vesting provisions in the event of death, disability or a qualifying retirement before that date. | | (12) Represents the number of shares of our common stock that will vest and become issuable pursuant to the Relative TSR tranche of the 2025 performance shares, as described in footnote 7 to the 2025 Grants of Plan-Based Awards table on page 76, assuming the established performance goal is attained at the target level. | | (13) Represents time-based RSU awards under the 2004 Plan that vest at the rate of 25% on the first anniversary of the grant date and 6.25% each quarter thereafter during the awardee’s employment over the next 36 months. | | (14) Represents time-based RSU awards under the 2022 Plan that vest at the rate of 25% on the first anniversary of the grant date and 6.25% each quarter thereafter during the awardee’s employment over the next 36 months. | | (15) Represents time-based RSU awards under the 2022 Plan that vest at the rate of 33% on the first anniversary of the grant date and 33% on each subsequent anniversary during the awardee’s employment over the next two years. | | (16) As a result of Ms. Telman’s termination on December 12, 2025, outstanding vested options will expire three-months following her termination date. |

  157. 2025 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

    | 80 | |

  158. 2025 Option Exercises and Stock Vested

    2025 Option Exercises and Stock Vested The following table shows the number of shares acquired upon exercise of stock options and vesting of RSUs and/or performance shares for each of our NEOs during the year ended December 31, 2025.

  159. 2025 Option Exercises and Stock Vested

    | | Option Awards | | Stock Awards | | | Name | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise | Value Realized on Exercise(1) | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting | Value Realized on Vesting(2) | | Daniel P. O’Day | — | — | 292,368 | $29,660,441 | | Andrew D. Dickinson | 297,785 | $10,007,385 | 112,298 | $11,351,948 | | Johanna Mercier | 75,000 | $3,799,988 | 121,535 | $12,267,071 | | Dietmar Berger, M.D., Ph.D. | — | — | — | — | | Deborah H. Telman | 53,646 | $3,084,600 | 17,573 | $2,026,678 |

  160. 2025 Option Exercises and Stock Vested

    | (1) Option awards value realized is determined by multiplying (i) the amount by which the market price of our common stock at the time of exercise exceeded the exercise price by (ii) the number of shares of common stock for which the options were exercised. | | (2) Stock awards value realized is determined by multiplying (i) the closing market price of our common stock on the vesting date by (ii) the number of shares of common stock that vested on that date. |

  161. 2025 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

    2025 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation The following table shows the contributions, earnings and account balances as of 2025 fiscal year end for our NEOs under our Deferred Compensation Plan:

  162. 2025 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

    | Name | Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year | Company Contributions in Last Fiscal Year | Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year(1) | Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions | Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year-End(2) | | Daniel P. O’Day | — | — | $934,589 | — | $6,611,338 | | Andrew D. Dickinson | $408,498(3) | — | $254,260 | — | $1,313,097 | | Johanna Mercier | — | — | — | — | — | | Dietmar Berger | — | — | — | — | — | | Deborah H. Telman | $1,652,915(4) | — | $560,996 | — | $3,895,497 |

  163. 2025 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

    | (1) The reported amounts corresponds to a composite of the actual market earnings on a group of investment funds selected by the applicable NEOs for purposes of tracking the notional investment return on his or her balance for the 2025 fiscal year. | | (2) Includes the following amounts reported as compensation to the NEOs in prior year Summary Compensation Tables: $4,611,548 for Mr. O’Day, $576,408 for Mr. Dickinson and $1,489,362 for Ms. Telman. | | (3) Includes $408,498 reported as “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” in the 2024 Summary Compensation table for Mr. Dickinson. | | (4) Includes deferred salary of $336,000 reported in the 2025 Summary Compensation Table and $1,316,915 reported for as “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” in the 2024 Summary Compensation table for Ms. Telman. |

  164. 2025 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

    | 2026 Proxy Statement | 81 |

  165. 2025 Potential Payments Upon Involuntary Termination or Change in Control Termination

    2025 Potential Payments Upon Involuntary Termination or Change in Control Termination

  166. 2025 Potential Payments Upon Involuntary Termination or Change in Control Termination

    | Executive Benefits and Payments Upon Separation | Involuntary Termination Without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason(1) Without a Change in Control | Involuntary Termination Without Cause or Resignation For Good Reason Within Change in Control Protection Period | Death/Disability | | Daniel P. O’Day | | | | | Cash severance | $9,000,000 | $13,500,000 | — | | Pro-rata bonus | $2,700,000(2) | $2,700,000(2) | — | | Equity award vesting acceleration | — | $69,553,989(3) | $69,553,989(3) | | Benefits and perquisites: | | | | | Lump sum to cover COBRA costs | $46,482 | $69,722 | — | | Outplacement services | $10,950 | $10,950 | — | | Total | $11,757,432 | $85,834,661 | $69,553,989 | | Andrew D. Dickinson | | | | | Cash severance | $2,807,500 | $5,615,000 | — | | Pro-rata bonus | $1,123,000(2) | $1,123,000(2) | — | | Equity award vesting acceleration | — | $22,419,181(3) | $22,419,181(3) | | Benefits and perquisites: | | | | | Lump sum to cover COBRA costs | $63,027 | $105,045 | — | | Outplacement services | $7,950 | $7,950 | — | | Total | $4,001,477 | $29,270,176 | $22,419,181 | | Johanna Mercier | | | | | Cash severance | $2,972,500 | $5,945,000 | — | | Pro-rata bonus | $1,189,000(2) | $1,189,000(2) | — | | Equity award vesting acceleration | — | $22,496,751(3) | $22,496,751(3) | | Benefits and perquisites: | | | | | Lump sum to cover COBRA costs | $52,241 | $87,069 | — | | Outplacement services | $7,950 | $7,950 | — | | Total | $4,221,691 | $29,725,770 | $22,496,751 | | Dietmar Berger, M.D., Ph.D. | | | | | Cash severance | $2,500,000 | $5,000,000 | — | | Pro-rata bonus | $997,260(2) | $997,260(2) | — | | Equity award vesting acceleration | — | $9,539,845(3) | $9,539,845(3) | | Benefits and perquisites: | | | | | Lump sum to cover COBRA costs | $63,027 | $105,045 | — | | Outplacement services | $7,950 | $7,950 | — | | Total | $3,568,237 | $15,650,100 | $9,539,845 |

  167. 2025 Potential Payments Upon Involuntary Termination or Change in Control Termination

    | (1) Per the terms of his offer letter, all such amounts are also payable to Mr. O’Day in the event of his resignation for Good Reason. The other NEOs are also entitled to all listed amounts other than the equity award vesting acceleration on a resignation following a required relocation, without consent, to a new work location that is more than 50 miles from the executive’s previous work location under the Severance Plan. | | (2) Amount reflects the pro-rated target bonus for the year of termination pursuant to the Severance Plan. | | (3) Amount reflects $122.74 (our closing stock price on December 31, 2025) multiplied by the number of shares covered by each accelerating award and for stock options, less the applicable exercise price. The 2023 relative TSR performance shares reflect payout at 200% of target. The 2023 revenue-based performance shares reflect payout at 149% of target (136% for the first subtranche, 176% for the second subtranche, 135% for the third subtranche). The 2024 relative TSR performance shares assume payout at 100% of target. The 2024 revenue-based performance shares assumes payout at 137% of target (176% for the first subtranche, 135% for the second subtranche, 100% for the third subtranche). The 2025 relative TSR performance shares assume payout at 100% of target. The 2025 adjusted EPS growth-based performance shares assume payout at 150% of target (200% for the first subtranche and 100% for the second subtranche). |

  168. 2025 Potential Payments Upon Involuntary Termination or Change in Control Termination

    The payments provided to Ms. Telman in connection with her not-for-cause termination of employment in December 2025 are set forth above under “Severance Benefits.”

  169. 2025 Potential Payments Upon Involuntary Termination or Change in Control Termination

    | 82 | |

  170. Pay Versus Performance

    Pay Versus Performance As required by Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship between executive “compensation actually paid” and certain financial performance of the company. For further information regarding our pay for performance philosophy and how we align executive compensation with the company’s performance, refer to the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” on page 51.

  171. Pay Versus Performance

    | | | | | | Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based on | | | | | Year | Summary Compensation Table Total for Mr. O’Day(1) | Compensation Actually Paid to Mr. O’Day(2) | Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Other NEOs(3) | Average Compensation Actually Paid to Other NEOs(4) | Total Shareholder Return(5) | Peer Group Total Shareholder Return(6) | Net Income (in millions)(7) | Net Product Sales (in millions)(8) | | 2025 | $28,437,198 | $63,256,337 | $9,248,452 | $13,244,193 | $255 | $125 | $8,510 | $28,915 | | 2024 | $23,689,392 | $44,785,379 | $7,725,458 | $14,186,970 | $187 | $93 | $480 | $28,610 | | 2023 | $22,607,690 | $15,483,783 | $7,588,163 | $5,469,137 | $157 | $94 | $5,613 | $26,934 | | 2022 | $21,621,253 | $54,965,255 | $7,874,828 | $18,182,586 | $161 | $90 | $4,566 | $26,982 | | 2021 | $19,229,466 | $31,485,348 | $6,279,776 | $9,693,178 | $130 | $100 | $6,201 | $27,008 |

  172. Pay Versus Performance

    | (1) The dollar amounts reported are the amounts reported in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table for our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. O’Day. |

  173. Pay Versus Performance

    | (2) The dollar amounts reported represent the amount of “compensation actually paid”, as computed in accordance with SEC rules, for Mr. O’Day. The dollar amounts do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid during the applicable year. In accordance with SEC rules, the following adjustments were made to total compensation to determine the compensation actually paid: |

  174. Pay Versus Performance

    | Year | Summary Compensation Table Total for Mr. O’Day | Less: Summary Compensation Table Reported Value of Equity Awards(a) | Plus: Equity Award Adjustments(b) | Equals: Compensation Actually Paid to Mr. O’Day | | 2025 | $28,437,198 | $19,738,462 | $54,557,601 | $63,256,337 | | 2024 | $23,689,392 | $16,551,827 | $37,647,814 | $44,785,379 | | 2023 | $22,607,690 | $15,615,056 | $8,491,149 | $15,483,783 | | 2022 | $21,621,253 | $14,353,915 | $47,697,917 | $54,965,255 | | 2021 | $19,229,466 | $13,139,064 | $25,394,946 | $31,485,348 |

  175. Pay Versus Performance

    | (a) Represents the aggregate grant-date fair value of equity awards as reported in the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year. |

  176. Pay Versus Performance

    | (b) The equity award adjustments for each applicable year were as set forth in the table below. The valuation assumptions used to calculate fair values did not materially differ from those disclosed at the time of grant. The amounts deducted or added in calculating the equity award adjustments are as follows: |

  177. Pay Versus Performance

    | Year | Year End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted during the Year | Year over Year Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years | Year over Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years that Vested during the Year | Value of Dividend Equivalents Accrued or Other Earnings Paid on Stock Awards Not Otherwise Reflected in Fair Value | Total Equity Award Adjustments | | 2025 | $20,065,232 | $25,071,648 | $8,247,479 | $1,173,242 | $54,557,601 | | 2024 | $23,956,270 | $13,333,936 | $(1,033,888) | $1,391,496 | $37,647,814 | | 2023 | $12,525,814 | $(2,481,113) | $(2,859,625) | $1,306,073 | $8,491,149 | | 2022 | $34,153,918 | $14,183,571 | $(1,966,582) | $1,327,010 | $47,697,917 | | 2021 | $17,162,219 | $6,011,125 | $707,262 | $1,514,340 | $25,394,946 |

  178. Pay Versus Performance

    | (3) The dollar amounts reported represent the average of the amounts reported for our NEOs as a group (excluding our CEO) in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table in each applicable year. The NEOs included for purposes of calculating the average amounts in each applicable year are as follows: (i) for 2025, Andrew D. Dickinson, Johanna Mercier, Deborah H. Telman, and Dietmar Berger; (ii) for 2024, 2023 and 2022, Andrew D. Dickinson, Johanna Mercier, Merdad V. Parsey and Deborah H. Telman; and (iii) for 2021, Andrew D. Dickinson, Johanna Mercier, Merdad V. Parsey and Brett A. Pletcher. |

  179. Pay Versus Performance

    | (4) The dollar amounts reported represent the average amount of “compensation actually paid” to the NEOs identified in footnote 3, as computed in accordance with SEC rules. The dollar amounts do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid to any NEO during the applicable year. In accordance with SEC rules, the following adjustments were made to average total compensation for the NEOs for each year to determine the compensation actually paid: |

  180. Pay Versus Performance

    | Year | Average Reported Summary Compensation Table Total for Other NEOs | Less: Summary Compensation Table Average Reported Value of Equity Awards | Plus: Average Equity Award Adjustments(a) | Equals: Average Compensation Actually Paid to Other NEOs | | 2025 | $9,248,452 | $5,864,467 | $9,860,208 | $13,244,193 | | 2024 | $7,725,458 | $4,828,738 | $11,290,250 | $14,186,970 | | 2023 | $7,588,163 | $4,809,225 | $2,690,199 | $5,469,137 | | 2022 | $7,874,828 | $4,961,052 | $15,268,810 | $18,182,586 | | 2021 | $6,279,776 | $3,625,534 | $7,038,936 | $9,693,178 |

  181. Pay Versus Performance

    | (a) The amounts deducted or added in calculating the total average equity award adjustments are as follows: |

  182. Pay Versus Performance

    | 2026 Proxy Statement | 83 |

  183. Pay Versus Performance

    | Year | Average Year End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted During the Year | Year over Year Average Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years | Year over Year Average Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years that Vested in the Year | Average Prior Year End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years that Failed to Meet Vesting Conditions in the Year | Average Value of Dividend Equivalents Accrued or Other Earnings Paid on Stock Awards Not Otherwise Reflected in Fair Value | Total Average Equity Award Adjustments | | 2025 | $5,515,483 | $4,158,939 | $1,800,982 | $(1,748,917) | $133,721 | $9,860,208 | | 2024 | $6,878,321 | $4,260,282 | $(282,467) | — | $434,114 | $11,290,250 | | 2023 | $3,955,902 | $(789,322) | $(879,498) | — | $403,117 | $2,690,199 | | 2022 | $11,751,514 | $3,365,229 | $(289,102) | — | $441,169 | $15,268,810 | | 2021 | $4,989,853 | $1,461,574 | $271,571 | — | $315,938 | $7,038,936 |

  184. Pay Versus Performance

    | (5) Cumulative TSR is calculated by dividing the sum of the cumulative amount of dividends for the measurement period, assuming dividend reinvestment, and the difference between our share price at the end of each year shown and the beginning of the measurement period by our share price at the beginning of the measurement period. The beginning of the measurement period for each year in the table is December 31, 2020. |

  185. Pay Versus Performance

    | (6) The peer group used for this purpose is Nasdaq Biotechnology Index. |

  186. Pay Versus Performance

    | (7) The dollar amounts reported represent the amount of net income reflected in our Consolidated Statements of Operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the applicable year. Our 2022 net income included a $2.7 billion partial impairment charge related to certain IPR&D assets acquired from Immunomedics, Inc. Our 2024 net income included $4.2 billion partial impairment charges related to certain IPR&D assets acquired from Immunomedics, Inc. Our 2025 net income included $0.6 billion partial impairment charges related to certain IPR&D assets related to bulevirtide. |

  187. Pay Versus Performance

    | (8) The dollar amounts reported represent the amount of net product sales reflected in our Consolidated Statements of Operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the applicable year. Total full year 2025 product sales of $28,915 million increased by 1% compared to the same period in 2024, with higher HIV and Liver Disease sales. |

  188. Analysis of the Information Presented in the Pay versus Performance Table

    Analysis of the Information Presented in the Pay versus Performance Table While Gilead utilizes several performance measures to align executive compensation with company performance, all of those company measures are not presented in the Pay versus Performance table on page 83. Moreover, Gilead generally seeks to incentivize long-term performance, and therefore does not specifically align the company’s performance measures with compensation actually paid (as computed in accordance with SEC rules) for a particular year. In accordance with SEC rules, Gilead is providing the following descriptions of the relationships between information presented in the Pay versus Performance table.

  189. Analysis of the Information Presented in the Pay versus Performance Table

    | 84 | |

  190. Analysis of the Information Presented in the Pay versus Performance Table

    Compensation Actually Paid Versus TSR 2021 – 2025 Compensation Actually Paid Versus Net Income 2021 – 2025 Compensation Actually Paid Versus Net Revenue 2021 – 2025

  191. Analysis of the Information Presented in the Pay versus Performance Table

    | 2026 Proxy Statement | 85 |