The FY2025 (Dec) proxy of Array Technologies names 17 peer companies for pay. Among Array Technologies and these peers, CEO pay was 3rd highest of 10 and total shareholder return was 9th highest of 10.
3rd highest of 10in Array Technologies and its pay peers, FY2025 (Dec) by CEO pay:
$2.5M$15.0M
9th highest of 10in Array Technologies and its pay peers, FY2025 (Dec) by total shareholder return:
$18$266
Pay peer group, FY2025 (Dec) proxy
| Timken | ||
| Enphase Energy | ||
| Power Integrations | ||
| Shoals Technologies Group | ||
| Esco Technologies | ||
| Lindsay | ||
| Franklin Electric Co | ||
| Gibraltar Industries | ||
| Rogers | ||
| American Superconductor Corporation | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| FTC Solar, Inc | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Fluence Energy, Inc | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Helios Technologies | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Littelfuse, Inc | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Nextpower Inc. (formerly Nextracker, Inc.) | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Solaredge Technologies | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Sunrun Inc.; and | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
'%3e%3cg%20id='Header_x2F_Desktop_x2F_Black_x5F_v2'%20transform='translate(0%20300)'%3e%3cg%20id='Logo_x2F_Gibraltar_x2F_Wordmark_x5F_Only_x2F_White'%20transform='translate(398%2070)'%3e%3cg%20id='Gilbraltar_Wordmark_White'%20transform='translate(1.368%205.268)'%3e%3cpath%20id='Path'%20class='st0'%20d='M11.4%2010.6h8.1v.6c0%201.3-.2%202.6-.5%203.9-.4%201.1-.9%202.1-1.7%202.9-1.7%202-4.3%203.1-6.9%203.1-2.7%200-5.2-1-7-3C1.5%2016.2.4%2013.6.5%2011c-.1-2.7%201-5.3%203-7.2%201.9-1.9%204.5-3%207.3-3%201.5%200%203%20.3%204.3.9%201.4.8%202.7%201.8%203.7%203l-2.1%202c-1.7-2-3.7-3.1-6-3.1-2-.1-3.9.7-5.2%202.1C4.1%207.2%203.3%209.1%203.4%2011c-.1%202.1.8%204%202.3%205.4%201.3%201.2%203%201.9%204.8%202%201.4%200%202.8-.5%203.9-1.5%201.1-.9%201.8-2.2%202-3.5h-4.9v-2.8z'/%3e%3cpath%20id='Path_1_'%20class='st0'%20d='M31.1%201.2v19.6h-2.9V1.2z'/%3e%3cpath%20id='Shape'%20class='st0'%20d='M40.8%2020.8V1.2h2.9c1.1%200%202.1.1%203.1.3.7.2%201.4.5%202%201%20.6.5%201%201.2%201.3%201.9.3.7.5%201.5.5%202.3%200%201.4-.6%202.7-1.6%203.6%201%20.3%201.9%201%202.5%201.9.6.9.9%202%20.9%203.1%200%201.5-.6%202.9-1.6%203.9-.6.6-1.4%201.1-2.2%201.4-1.1.3-2.2.4-3.3.4h-4.5zm2.9-11.2h.9c1.1%200%201.9-.2%202.4-.7.6-.6.8-1.4.8-2.1.1-.8-.2-1.5-.8-2.1-.6-.5-1.5-.8-2.3-.7h-1v5.6zm0%208.4h1.8c1.3%200%202.3-.3%202.9-.8.6-.5%201-1.3%201-2.2%200-.8-.3-1.6-1-2.1-.6-.6-1.7-.9-3.3-.9h-1.5v6z'/%3e%3cpath%20id='Shape_1_'%20class='st0'%20d='M66.8%2012.4l6.1%208.3h-3.6l-5.6-8h-.5v8h-2.9V1.2h3.5c2.6%200%204.5.5%205.6%201.5%201.3%201.1%202%202.6%201.9%204.3%200%201.3-.4%202.5-1.2%203.6-.9.9-2%201.6-3.3%201.8zm-3.7-2.2h.9c2.8%200%204.2-1.1%204.2-3.2%200-2-1.4-3-4.1-3H63v6.2z'/%3e%3cpath%20id='Shape_2_'%20class='st0'%20d='M90.7%2016h-8.4l-2.2%204.7H77L86.7%200%2096%2020.8h-3.2L90.7%2016zm-1.2-2.7l-2.9-6.6-3%206.6h5.9z'/%3e%3cpath%20id='Path_2_'%20class='st0'%20d='M106.3%201.2V18h5.8v2.8h-8.7V1.2z'/%3e%3cpath%20id='Path_3_'%20class='st0'%20d='M124.2%204v16.8h-2.9V4h-4.6V1.2h12V4z'/%3e%3cpath%20id='Shape_3_'%20class='st0'%20d='M145.7%2016h-8.4l-2.2%204.7H132L141.6%200l9.4%2020.8h-3.2l-2.1-4.8zm-1.2-2.7l-2.9-6.6-3%206.6h5.9z'/%3e%3cpath%20id='Shape_4_'%20class='st0'%20d='M163.2%2012.4l6.1%208.3h-3.6l-5.6-8h-.5v8h-3V1.2h3.5c2.6%200%204.5.5%205.6%201.5%201.3%201.1%202%202.6%201.9%204.3%200%201.3-.4%202.6-1.2%203.6-.8.9-1.9%201.6-3.2%201.8zm-3.7-2.2h.9c2.8%200%204.2-1.1%204.2-3.2%200-2-1.4-3-4.1-3h-1.1v6.2z'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/svg%3e)
17 companies
PSU comparator group
The companies that relative total shareholder return is measured against for performance stock units.
| Russell 2000 Index (index) | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
1 company
Changes by year
FY2025 (Dec) proxy
- AddedAmerican Superconductor Corporationpay peer group
- AddedHelios Technologiespay peer group
- AddedRogerspay peer group
- RemovedFirst Solarpay peer group
- RemovedGenerac Holdingspay peer group
- RemovedSunPower Corporationpay peer group
The comes from the company's proxy. CEO pay and of each company come from its own Pay versus Performance table for the same fiscal year. Each company counts TSR from its own start year, so two values compare only when the start years match.