The FY2025 (Jan) proxy of Healthequity names 16 peer companies for pay. Among Healthequity and these peers, CEO pay was 5th highest of 6 and total shareholder return was 2nd highest of 6.
5th highest of 6in Healthequity and its pay peers, FY2025 (Jan) by CEO pay:
$6.0M$22.8M
2nd highest of 6in Healthequity and its pay peers, FY2025 (Jan) by total shareholder return:
$36$196
Pay peer group, FY2025 (Jan) proxy
| Paycom Software | ||
| Aci Worldwide | ||
| Guidewire Software | ||
| Tyler Technologies | ||
| Blackbaud | ||
| Black Knight, Inc. | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| CorVel Corporation | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Dayforce, Inc. | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Envestnet, Inc. | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Evolent Health, Inc. | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Green Dot Corporation | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Omnicell | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Paylocity Holding | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Progyny, Inc. | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Verint Systems Inc. | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| WEX | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
%20scale(0.100000,-0.100000)'%20fill='%23000000'%20stroke='none'%3e%3cpath%20d='M0%205120%20l0%20-5120%203075%200%203075%200%200%201025%200%201025%20-2050%200%20-2050%200%200%203060%200%203060%204093%202%204092%203%203%201033%202%201032%20-5120%200%20-5120%200%200%20-5120z'/%3e%3cpath%20d='M4082%205118%20l3%20-1033%202045%20-3%202045%20-2%20-3%20-2040%20-2%20-2040%201035%200%201035%200%200%203075%200%203075%20-3080%200%20-3080%200%202%20-1032z'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/svg%3e)
%20}%20.s1%20{%20fill:%20url(%23g2)%20}%20%3c/style%3e%3cg%20id='Layer_2'%3e%3cg%20id='Layer_1-2'%3e%3cpath%20id='Layer'%20fill-rule='evenodd'%20class='s0'%20d='m0.2%20861.8v-1.4c-0.1-1.2%200-2.4%200.3-3.5%200.3-1.1%200.9-2.2%201.6-3.1%200.7-0.9%201.6-1.7%202.6-2.3%201-0.5%202.1-0.9%203.3-1.1h501.6q1.3%200.1%202.5%200.6%201.2%200.6%202.2%201.4%201%200.9%201.6%202.1%200.7%201.1%200.9%202.4c96.1%20363.8%20187.2%20485.2%20266.2%20485.2%20109.8%200%20196.1-235.5%20238.6-380.4%203.1-10.5%2016.5-6.4%2014.7%204.7-90.6%20590.8-362.4%20590.8-449.7%20590.8-273.3-0.4-505-291.9-586.4-695.4zm1565.6-2.5c-79.8%20400-311.5%20696.6-585.8%20696.6q-15.5-0.1-30.9-1.3-15.4-1.3-30.7-3.7-15.2-2.4-30.3-5.9-15-3.6-29.7-8.3-0.4-0.2-0.8-0.4-0.4-0.3-0.8-0.5-0.4-0.3-0.7-0.6-0.3-0.3-0.6-0.7c-1-0.9-1.7-2-2.2-3.2-0.5-1.2-0.7-2.4-0.7-3.7%200-1.3%200.2-2.6%200.7-3.8%200.5-1.2%201.2-2.3%202.2-3.2%20136.6-125.6%20216-351.5%20247.1-662.4q0.1-1.5%200.6-2.9%200.6-1.3%201.6-2.4%201.1-1.1%202.4-1.7%201.4-0.7%202.9-0.8h447.3q1.7%200.1%203.2%200.9%201.5%200.7%202.6%201.9%201.2%201.3%201.7%202.9%200.6%201.5%200.5%203.2z'/%3e%3cpath%20id='Layer'%20fill-rule='evenodd'%20class='s1'%20d='m1565.4%20695q0%200.1%200%200.3%200%200.2%200%200.3%200%200.2%200%200.3%200%200.2%200%200.3c0.2%201.2%200.2%202.3%200%203.5-0.2%201.1-0.7%202.2-1.3%203.1-0.7%201-1.5%201.8-2.4%202.4-1%200.7-2%201.1-3.2%201.4h-502.1q-1.3-0.1-2.5-0.6-1.2-0.4-2.2-1.3-1-0.9-1.7-2-0.6-1.2-0.8-2.5c-96.1-364.1-187.2-485.5-266.2-485.5-109.8%200-196.1%20235.5-238.6%20380.5-3.1%2010.5-16.5%206.3-14.7-4.8%2090.8-590.4%20362.7-590.4%20449-590.4%20274%200%20505.7%20291.5%20586.7%20695zm-979.2-694.1q15.4%200.1%2030.8%201.3%2015.4%201.3%2030.7%203.7%2015.2%202.5%2030.2%206.1%2015%203.6%2029.7%208.3%200.4%200.2%200.8%200.4%200.4%200.3%200.8%200.5%200.3%200.3%200.7%200.6%200.3%200.3%200.6%200.7c0.9%200.9%201.7%201.9%202.2%203.1%200.5%201.2%200.7%202.5%200.7%203.7%200%201.3-0.2%202.6-0.7%203.8-0.5%201.2-1.3%202.2-2.2%203.1-136.6%20124.7-216%20351.5-247.1%20662.4q-0.1%201.5-0.7%202.9-0.6%201.4-1.7%202.5-1%201-2.4%201.7-1.3%200.6-2.8%200.7h-447.8q-1.7-0.2-3.2-0.9-1.4-0.8-2.5-2-1.1-1.3-1.7-2.9-0.5-1.6-0.4-3.3c79.7-399.8%20311.5-696.4%20586-696.4z'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/svg%3e)
16 companies
PSU comparator group
The companies that relative total shareholder return is measured against for performance stock units.
| Russell 2000 (index) | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
1 company
Changes by year
No proxy on file names a change to the peer group.
The comes from the company's proxy. CEO pay and of each company come from its own Pay versus Performance table for the same fiscal year. Each company counts TSR from its own start year, so two values compare only when the start years match.